Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3
Karlis

Marine Sgt. Gary Stein faces discharge

70 posts in this topic

What are your opinions regarding the case of Marine Sgt. Gary Stein?

Please discuss:

-=-=-

Marine Sgt. Gary Stein faces dismissal for his Facebook page criticizing Obama administration.

The nine-year member of the Marine Corps says he started a Facebook page called Armed Forces Tea Party to encourage fellow service members to exercise their free speech rights. The Marine Corps has said that it decided to take administrative action after Stein declared on Facebook that he would not follow unlawful orders from Obama.

Stein said his statement about Obama was part of an online debate about NATO allowing U.S. troops to be tried for the Quran burnings in Afghanistan. In that context, he said, he was stating that he would not follow orders from the president if those orders included detaining U.S. citizens, disarming them or doing anything else that he believes would violate their constitutional rights.

The military has had a policy since the Civil War limiting the free speech of service members, including criticizing the commander in chief. Military law experts have said he may have crossed the line.

According to Pentagon directives, military personnel in uniform cannot sponsor a political club; participate in any TV or radio program or group discussion that advocates for or against a political party, candidate or cause; or speak at any event promoting a political movement. Commissioned officers also may not use contemptuous words against senior officials, including the defense secretary or the president.

Source

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I'm retired military, and yes, he has crossed the line. He has the right to cast a vote, if he doesn't like the current administration.

He has the right to disobey unlawful orders, however he cannot determine what is unlawful based on just what he believes is unlawful.

The UCMJ, while constitution based, overrides constitutional authority while in the military.

Article 88 of the UCMJ

“Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

Or NCO

ART. 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION

Any person subject to this chapter who--

(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;

(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or

(3) is derelict in the performance of his duties;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

Edited by Realm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When soldiers start believing they should be immune from prosecution for doing something a civilian would be prosecuted for*, then those soldiers stop defending the people - and their rights - and start becoming despots.

Furthermore, Sgt. Stein appears to have determined his allegiance lies with a political party, in violation of the oath(s) he took when joining the military. I expect the Marine Corps. will not look kindly on his statements.

*Normal military duties excepted, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So is this only Obama he would refuse to obey, or any president? Is this just yet further paranoia about Mr. O?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I think he has the right to fight for what he thinks is right or what he thinks is his rights but he should expect the same thing any normal citizen would get when he refuses to do something to fight for his rights. And getting fired from your job is at the low end of retaliation for that. And I agree with the above 3 posts completely.

Edited by conspiracybeliever

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He expressed his views about the current administration while OUT of uniform... there was even a disclaimer on his page stating that his views were not representative of the Marines and fell solely on his shoulders. He stated that he would not follow an UNlawful order... and he called Obama a Jackass. And for this, they want to completely destroy his life... an "other than honorable" or "dishonorable" discharge will dog you forever... people see that on your 214 and you arent likely to get a job. What he did is not illegal in the civilian world. I would hand him an article 15, say... 3 months reduced pay... and be on my way instead of blowing it up to the level it is now. Let us not forget that this man has been a Marine for 9 years, has risen to the rank of SGT and wants to re-enlist...

We in the military do not serve the president... we serve our country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He expressed his views about the current administration while OUT of uniform... there was even a disclaimer on his page stating that his views were not representative of the Marines and fell solely on his shoulders. He stated that he would not follow an UNlawful order... and he called Obama a Jackass. And for this, they want to completely destroy his life... an "other than honorable" or "dishonorable" discharge will dog you forever... people see that on your 214 and you arent likely to get a job. What he did is not illegal in the civilian world. I would hand him an article 15, say... 3 months reduced pay... and be on my way instead of blowing it up to the level it is now. Let us not forget that this man has been a Marine for 9 years, has risen to the rank of SGT and wants to re-enlist...

We in the military do not serve the president... we serve our country.

As long as he identifies himself as member of the Armed Forces while making a political statement he has violated at least a dozen articles of the UCMJ, whether in uniform or naked.

Now, I find a dishonorable discharge a little harsh too, reduction to E-1 and six month of pay forfeiture would do it too.

The JAG can't ignore this one because it can end in a general discipline problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as he identifies himself as member of the Armed Forces while making a political statement he has violated at least a dozen articles of the UCMJ, whether in uniform or naked.

Now, I find a dishonorable discharge a little harsh too, reduction to E-1 and six month of pay forfeiture would do it too.

The JAG can't ignore this one because it can end in a general discipline problem.

I know the code, and I know it well... Article 88 was taken from the British Articles of War of 1765. There are also DoD regulations that deal with the same issue...

In order to secure an Article 88 conviction, the government must

prove that the accused was a *commissioned officer; that he or she used certain

words against the official or legislature specified in the article; that a third

party became aware of these words because of an act attributed to the accused;

and that thewords were contemptuous in themselves or by virtue of the

circumstances in which they were used.(16) The government may not charge expressions

of opinion made during the course of a private conversation or adverse

criticism of a protected official or legislature if it was not personally

contemptuous and was done during the course of a political discussion.

*note that the marine was a Non Commissioned Officer)

Now, im not a big fan of the Marines... its engrained in me to poke fun at them at every opportunity... however... if we are going to prosecute this one... they need to go after a majority of soldiers, sailors, marines and flyboys because we have these discussions on a daily basis and there are hundreds of Military blogs out there that offer up the same type of opinion of our current leader. As a soldier and as a civilian, I dont agree with any action taken against anyone who speaks out for or against any administration they happen to be serving under. If the guy had made some sort of threat, I could understand such a harsh consequence... but being dishonorably discharged is an insane price to pay for letting your opinions be known. A letter of reprimand should suffice and if you really wanted to push it, dont allow him to re-enlist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know the code, and I know it well... Article 88 was taken from the British Articles of War of 1765. There are also DoD regulations that deal with the same issue...

*note that the marine was a Non Commissioned Officer)

Now, im not a big fan of the Marines... its engrained in me to poke fun at them at every opportunity... however... if we are going to prosecute this one... they need to go after a majority of soldiers, sailors, marines and flyboys because we have these discussions on a daily basis and there are hundreds of Military blogs out there that offer up the same type of opinion of our current leader. As a soldier and as a civilian, I dont agree with any action taken against anyone who speaks out for or against any administration they happen to be serving under. If the guy had made some sort of threat, I could understand such a harsh consequence... but being dishonorably discharged is an insane price to pay for letting your opinions be known. A letter of reprimand should suffice and if you really wanted to push it, dont allow him to re-enlist.

Which means that there is already a discipline problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know the code, and I know it well... Article 88 was taken from the British Articles of War of 1765. There are also DoD regulations that deal with the same issue...

*note that the marine was a Non Commissioned Officer)

Now, im not a big fan of the Marines... its engrained in me to poke fun at them at every opportunity... however... if we are going to prosecute this one... they need to go after a majority of soldiers, sailors, marines and flyboys because we have these discussions on a daily basis and there are hundreds of Military blogs out there that offer up the same type of opinion of our current leader. As a soldier and as a civilian, I dont agree with any action taken against anyone who speaks out for or against any administration they happen to be serving under. If the guy had made some sort of threat, I could understand such a harsh consequence... but being dishonorably discharged is an insane price to pay for letting your opinions be known. A letter of reprimand should suffice and if you really wanted to push it, dont allow him to re-enlist.

That's the thing, surely. If this was to be applied literally, no one in the military would ever discuss anything related to politics or current affairs, which would hardly be realistic to expect.

perhaps it might be time to think about updating that, like, dare i suggest, a lot of parts of the Constitution could be as well ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the thing, surely. If this was to be applied literally, no one in the military would ever discuss anything related to politics or current affairs, which would hardly be realistic to expect.

perhaps it might be time to think about updating that, like, dare i suggest, a lot of parts of the Constitution could be as well ...

Nobody expects a military man not to have an opinion, but there is a slight difference between Mr. John Doe expressing his opinion and Sgt. John Doe doing the same. No matter if overtly or not, that face calling himself Sargent always represents the military, and the military is supposed to be politically neutral.

Naturally, if Sgt. Stein would have posted a video saying I am Mr. Gary Stein and Obama is a ... (fill in as needed) it would have fallen under the category: Anti-Obama and similar cranks and after his family and friends had seen it nobody would pay any attention anymore, saying that he was Sgt. Stein made the difference, both in attention he received as legally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saying you hate your boss in public gets you fired!

And?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does not surprise me at all. Say what you want, but don't post the crap on facebook. I quit facebook for that very reason, i didnt want to worry about what I was saying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saying you hate your boss in public gets you fired!

And?

That if you are not a member of the Marine Corps you have enough brain to know that :devil:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you join the military you are the property of the military and all civilian rights go out the window. In fact if you were to kill a member of the military as a civilian you would charged with damaging military property as well. So this guy knows this, he's an idiot and deserves to be discharged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you join the military you are the property of the military and all civilian rights go out the window. In fact if you were to kill a member of the military as a civilian you would charged with damaging military property as well. So this guy knows this, he's an idiot and deserves to be discharged.

So you are saying this guy deserves to have his entire life ruined over this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are saying this guy deserves to have his entire life ruined over this?

From what I can see, he kind of pushed the envelope, and went beyond just being a guy on facebook, that happened to be in the military, that was interested in politics and expressed an opinion. There is a difference between stating he wouldn't obey an un-lawful order from a president, and basically calling out Obama, as well as his affiliation with political parties not just as a citizen, but as a military member.

Slippery slope kind of stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I can see, he kind of pushed the envelope, and went beyond just being a guy on facebook, that happened to be in the military, that was interested in politics and expressed an opinion. There is a difference between stating he wouldn't obey an un-lawful order from a president, and basically calling out Obama, as well as his affiliation with political parties not just as a citizen, but as a military member.

Slippery slope kind of stuff.

Never mind that he is still a citizen of the united states... that has fought for the united states... we can leave that aside... but you think he should have his whole life destroyed over his expressed opinions? A Dishonorable Discharge is no joke... he will never be able to work in a field that requires a security clearance... and most employers see that on your DD-214 and its an automatic No Hire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't agree to his punishment, but if he had brains he wouldn't be in this predicament. The President, whether he like its or not, is the highest

Military authority. He is the Commander in Chief.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We in the military do not serve the president... we serve our country.

Oh, so your country didn't vote him into office? Interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saying you hate your boss in public gets you fired!

And?

I actually know someone who got fired for saying bad things about the university they worked at on facebook. I agreed with some of what they were saying, but come on, you have a PhD and don't know enough to not post crap like that on facebook.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never mind that he is still a citizen of the united states... that has fought for the united states... we can leave that aside... but you think he should have his whole life destroyed over his expressed opinions? A Dishonorable Discharge is no joke... he will never be able to work in a field that requires a security clearance... and most employers see that on your DD-214 and its an automatic No Hire.

Sometimes being an idiot costs more than you think. The civilian I know that had a similar thing happen to her used to have a tenured position at a decent university and now teaches adjunct at community college.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

especially in today's navy where they are booting people left and right, its extremely important to know who you can trust if you want to discuss politics. Its easier just to go about it in a more....incognito way. This is my background on my work desk for instance.

http://brianjnoggle.com/bsgfx/cthulhu2.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are saying this guy deserves to have his entire life ruined over this?

When it comes to blatant stupidity I have no problem with someone's life being ruined. What did he think was going to happen? All in the news there have been stories of people getting called on what they posted on their facebook page. The military oath is

§ 502. Enlistment oath: who may administer

(a) Enlistment Oath.— Each person enlisting in an armed force shall take the following oath:

"I, XXXXXXXXXX, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."

(B) Who May Administer.— The oath may be taken before the President, the Vice-President, the Secretary of Defense, any commissioned officer, or any other person designated under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great story! Kinda like Oath Keepers. :yes:

It's good to see the citizen stand up to the govt. As a soldier he did not have to accept an illegal order, as it were.

But it goes to show the Obama Unitary Executive prowess!

He serves the same people Bush did, is my bet. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.