Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3
Karlis

UN-Sponsored Scientists for Global Governance

28 posts in this topic

The website promoting the film indicates it was set up by “researchers and communicators from some of the leading scientific research institutions on global sustainability.” The solution to these disastrous elements, according to the film, is global government. arrow3.gifRead more...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

frankly, i agree with them. frankly, i think "Democracy" is absolutely hopeless at getting anything done. i note it seems to be American Patriots that seem to be most paranoid about a "One World Government"; possibly because they see such a thing as a potential threat to America's Manifest Destiny to rule the world. Who can say. :unsure2:

"the true agenda behind the climate change propaganda was one-world government and the redistribution of wealth from rich countries like the United States to poorer nations"

I love how they see it as a bad thing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

frankly, i agree with them. frankly, i think "Democracy" is absolutely hopeless at getting anything done. i note it seems to be American Patriots that seem to be most paranoid about a "One World Government"; possibly because they see such a thing as a potential threat to America's Manifest Destiny to rule the world. Who can say. :unsure2:

"the true agenda behind the climate change propaganda was one-world government and the redistribution of wealth from rich countries like the United States to poorer nations"

I love how they see it as a bad thing!

reductionism is a bad thing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

~~~ ...

... the redistribution of wealth from rich countries like the United States to poorer nations"

I love how they see it as a bad thing!

It may be something like the olden-time parable of you having a mattress of feathers, re-distributed to people without a feather mattress.

:hmm:Everybody gets one feather.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there are people with way over 1.000.000 mattrasses, who still need only one to sleep on. I guess it would be up to them to share.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there are people with way over 1.000.000 mattrasses, who still need only one to sleep on. I guess it would be up to them to share.

Maybe you got that spot on ... if that's what the UN Think-Tank agenda is all about. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But there are people with way over 1.000.000 mattrasses, who still need only one to sleep on. I guess it would be up to them to share.

During the Greek era, people lived in City States and life was difficult but without insurmontable difficulties (except assaults from other city states) Today each country has difficulties that are unsurmontable what make you think that a UN world wide government who can't tie its own shoes alone could solve all the ills of the world?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

During the Greek era, people lived in City States and life was difficult but without insurmontable difficulties (except assaults from other city states) Today each country has difficulties that are unsurmontable what make you think that a UN world wide government who can't tie its own shoes alone could solve all the ills of the world?

Oh, the UN is useless, certainly. The reason it's useless is that it has no authority at all; any nation can either Veto it or decide to simply ignore it. And the only thing it can do, if everyone does manage to agree, is issue Resolutions and strongly worded protests. The UN is hardly a basis for any effective Global government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

During the Greek era, people lived in City States and life was difficult but without insurmontable difficulties (except assaults from other city states) Today each country has difficulties that are unsurmontable what make you think that a UN world wide government who can't tie its own shoes alone could solve all the ills of the world?

I never stated I believe the UN could fix world's problems. I certainly do not see a world government at this time. But I do see people who stack everything they can get there hands on, this includes money, houses, cars and really everything, way beyond there personal needs. I was just pointing that out.

I think a little redistribution of wealth could be quite helpful, especially for those at the bottom and top of the pyramid of wealth. And it's just an idea and utopia, I am aware of that. I do not have a "master plan" how this could actually be achieved, and I indeed do not see the UN doing this, nor would I want them too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today each country has difficulties that are unsurmontable

Rubbish. There is no problem that man cannot or will not in the future come to a solution for. Sometimes that problem requires a sacrifice that the people who hold the reins of power don't want to make that's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whenever the concentration of power is reduced to a minority of hands abuse is sure to occur. This is the ultimate threat of a one world government.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish. There is no problem that man cannot or will not in the future come to a solution for. Sometimes that problem requires a sacrifice that the people who hold the reins of power don't want to make that's all.

This is absolutely true .... but first Man has to have power over corporation and from the look of it, the most dangerous corporations wont relinquish their power soon.

http://thestoryoflibertyblog.com/2012/02/01/monsanto-now-owns-blackwater/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some issues with the UN's Agenda 21...

"Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole."

This seems just too ripe for abuse. Think of the UN writing the zoning codes for cities...that's what's basically implied here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

frankly, i agree with them. frankly, i think "Democracy" is absolutely hopeless at getting anything done. i note it seems to be American Patriots that seem to be most paranoid about a "One World Government"; possibly because they see such a thing as a potential threat to America's Manifest Destiny to rule the world. Who can say. :unsure2:

"the true agenda behind the climate change propaganda was one-world government and the redistribution of wealth from rich countries like the United States to poorer nations"

I love how they see it as a bad thing!

You may be correct about the whole manifest destiny thing, but do you really believe there could ever be a one world government that is not at least initially brought to fuition by force? Who would be the nation most capable of bringing that about? I put it to you that the one world government, should it ever be brought into existence, will mainly be the product of an imperialistic United States, probably partnered with China.

Edited by OverSword

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

During the Greek era, people lived in City States and life was difficult but without insurmontable difficulties (except assaults from other city states) Today each country has difficulties that are unsurmontable what make you think that a UN world wide government who can't tie its own shoes alone could solve all the ills of the world?

The slaves of those city states would disagree. As would the people who died in the constant wars between the cities. Then there's the issue of complete lack of education, no medical care, and next to no political power. It just seemed like they had no real problems because as long as people weren't dying off by the thousands and weren't harshly treated they were happy. The same could be said of the well run empires of the era. Doesn't mean a city state is better than a national state.

On the topic of world government I just don't get why it automatically has to be evil and wanting to kill/enslave everyone. I think a properly run world government would be great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the topic of world government I just don't get why it automatically has to be evil and wanting to kill/enslave everyone. I think a properly run world government would be great.

Well first, we know already that banks would run it. Second it would be the greatest consolidation of power, well, ever. Absolute power corupts, absolutly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well first, we know already that banks would run it. Second it would be the greatest consolidation of power, well, ever. Absolute power corupts, absolutly.

No it's assumed the banks would run it because the banks go hand in hand with NWO conspiracy theories. Besides maybe the corporations would run it. Or the military. Or some other vague shadowy organization that always comes up in these conversations. As for the second point the same could be said of every level of government. Would there be problems and corruption? Of course. Will they be sucking the marrow from our bones? No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No it's assumed the banks would run it because the banks go hand in hand with NWO conspiracy theories. Besides maybe the corporations would run it. Or the military. Or some other vague shadowy organization that always comes up in these conversations. As for the second point the same could be said of every level of government. Would there be problems and corruption? Of course. Will they be sucking the marrow from our bones? No.

It isnt assumed. Its documented fact. Directly from thier own pen. There are those who believe them, then there are folks like yourself who call us who believe them "conspiracy theorists". And those same bankers own this government, have control over corperations, and own the military industrial complex. If the last 11 years havent proven that to you, then you havent been paying attention. Willfully ignorant.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you're willfully paranoid. Agree to disagree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isnt assumed. Its documented fact. Directly from thier own pen. There are those who believe them, then there are folks like yourself who call us who believe them "conspiracy theorists". And those same bankers own this government, have control over corperations, and own the military industrial complex. If the last 11 years havent proven that to you, then you havent been paying attention. Willfully ignorant.

Agreed, America is and has been ran for a long time by those who control the Federal Reserve as in the UK we have the Bank of England, but they are no where near as powerful as the Federal Reserve.

China will run everything!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is, the Federal reserve is not run by American government and the board members can/could do whatever they darn want to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is, the Federal reserve is not run by American government and the board members can/could do whatever they darn want to

Which makes voting pointless???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you really believe this drivel then I have a question for you; what are YOU going to do about it?

Aside from arguing on the internet about it of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.