Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
Karlis

Former NASA Scientists, Astronauts Criticize

103 posts in this topic

Do you not see why it is of some importance that, "nearly 50 former astronauts and scientists--including the ex-boss of the Johnson Space Center--claim the agency is on the wrong side of science and must change course or ruin the reputation of the world’s top space agency"?

Well, if everybody working at NASA knows ewhat it is all about we should put the janitors into mission control. Would be a lot cheaper. And while at the subject: The opinion of 50 people who have worked in an unrelated field might be an opinion, but scientifically as relevant as the ranting of the pastor about evolution.

I don't know why you keep harping on this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, if everybody working at NASA knows ewhat it is all about we should put the janitors into mission control. Would be a lot cheaper. And while at the subject: The opinion of 50 people who have worked in an unrelated field might be an opinion, but scientifically as relevant as the ranting of the pastor about evolution.

I don't know why you keep harping on this.

Questionmark -- the opinion of the 50-or-so NASA people who signed the letter ... Their opinion was the purpose of this OP.

That said -- it is not I who "keeps harping on this" ... it's posters who keep on harping about the comments made by the NASA people who are "harping".

Karlis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The opinion of those 49 scientists is just irrelevant. Period. They have been paid to lie and spead the usual bull like so many others already. They all have their own little funny fairy tales. Some are quite hillarious. These guys are saying we shouldn't worry about atmospheric carbon dioxide as long as we don't reach 8,000 ppm. Until then, it's only going to be benefical for the whole humanity because... plants need carbon dioxide! Do I need to explain why it dosen't make sense? They are also saying (with data included) that carbon dioxide concentration and solar irradiance are all globally decreasing thus, the earth is cooling.

If you go around the "Plants Need CO2" website and read about what they have to say, you'll see that it dosen't make any sense. They are simply and miserably playing with facts in order to suit their own agenda. They also misslead people in wrong paths, create some their own data and allegedly omit to point out very important facts.

By analogy, tobacco industries have already demonstrated a correlation between red meat consumption and lung cancer in order to defend their position (that cigarettes are safe). They simply "forgot" to ask those who filled the surver if they were smokers. Ooops!

If you look at a solar irradiance vs. temperature graph, you'll see both trends rising in early 1900's. That's all you need to demonstrate to many people that global warming is caused by the sun alone and that we are poor innocents.

This is the sort of behavior that is a true insult to science and that should be condemned.

Peace. Thanks for the added link.

Edited by JayMark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.