Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Flibbertigibbet

Dogheads (Cynocephali)

21 posts in this topic

Ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Medieval Europeans and Chinese, to name just a few, all had legends and stories of races of humans with the heads of dogs, the dogheads (cynocephali). These always lived slightly further away than it was praticable to travel, just beyond the fringes of the civilised world. Why were these stories so consistent across Europe and Asia? Not to be confused with werewovles, who were shapeshifters, dogheads were exactly what their name suggests. They wore clothes, had their own settlements and villages, and their own society. Sometimes they even came to live in the civilised world. There are legends that St Christopher was one of them, as some Byzantine icons show him.

Saint_christopher_cynocephalus.gif

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynocephaly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Some of the legend surrounding cynocephali could be based on misreported, exaggerated and/or poorly described, instances of microcephaly and/or hypertrichosis. Even conditions such as maxilliary or mandibular prognathism could contribute to reports of "dog-headed people" if those reports were sufficiently distorted through multiple re-tellings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the legend surrounding cynocephali could be based on misreported, exaggerated and/or poorly described, instances of microcephaly and/or hypertrichosis. Even conditions such as maxilliary or mandibular prognathism could contribute to reports of "dog-headed people" if those reports were sufficiently distorted through multiple re-tellings.

It seems to be something more than that though. These dogheads lived in their own societies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be a case of misleading language interpretation. Dog headed could mean that they were uncivilized people that appeared to live and think like dogs. They may have been bands of people that lived in the wilds with their own language and fought each other to establish a pecking order. They may also have had few taboos and so had sex where ever and when ever they liked. They would never have been taught things like cooking and cloth making so ate food raw, drank from rivers and rain puddles and did not wear clothes. If they kept a few dogs for security and hunting and lived with the dogs like family members then that would add to the myth. Even in these times there are a remote tribes that have strange rituals and ways of living that may seem very odd to us. As for the sex thing, I've seen couples having sex in busy nightclubs, benches in the middle of the street in city centers late on weekend nights and the beach etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be a case of misleading language interpretation. Dog headed could mean that they were uncivilized people that appeared to live and think like dogs. They may have been bands of people that lived in the wilds with their own language and fought each other to establish a pecking order. They may also have had few taboos and so had sex where ever and when ever they liked. They would never have been taught things like cooking and cloth making so ate food raw, drank from rivers and rain puddles and did not wear clothes. If they kept a few dogs for security and hunting and lived with the dogs like family members then that would add to the myth. Even in these times there are a remote tribes that have strange rituals and ways of living that may seem very odd to us. As for the sex thing, I've seen couples having sex in busy nightclubs, benches in the middle of the street in city centers late on weekend nights and the beach etc.

Could well be, yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to be something more than that though. These dogheads lived in their own societies.

And many people who are marginalised by society today live in their "own societies". This is not uncommon but simply reflects the prejudice we hold against those who are different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And many people who are marginalised by society today live in their "own societies". This is not uncommon but simply reflects the prejudice we hold against those who are different.

The dogheads seem to be thought of as a different race of humans. There were debates about whether they were human at all, and had souls, but the consensus seems to be that they were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Misidentification of common animals of the Mid-East and Africa may have also grown the rumor of tribes of dog-headed men.

The tribe probably originated in ancient travellers' accounts of the African baboon which were mistaken for men. Indeed, the name Kynokephalos was later used by the Greeks for this animal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Misidentification of common animals of the Mid-East and Africa may have also grown the rumor of tribes of dog-headed men.

The tribe probably originated in ancient travellers' accounts of the African baboon which were mistaken for men. Indeed, the name Kynokephalos was later used by the Greeks for this animal.

Some of them were apparently in Scandinavia too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The dogheads seem to be thought of as a different race of humans. There were debates about whether they were human at all, and had souls, but the consensus seems to be that they were.

This view is from the religious wise men of the time. A modern atheist/humanist is more likely to conclude that the 'dogheaded' men are a clever species of animal able to remain undetected by man. They presumably are highly skilled at remaining hidden in their secret lives and are mostly active at night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This view is from the religious wise men of the time. A modern atheist/humanist is more likely to conclude that the 'dogheaded' men are a clever species of animal able to remain undetected by man. They presumably are highly skilled at remaining hidden in their secret lives and are mostly active at night.

The modern atheist/humanist view would presumably draw no distinction between humans and animals either, seeing it as perfectly possible for a non-human animal species to develop human-like intelligence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This view is from the religious wise men of the time. A modern atheist/humanist is more likely to conclude that the 'dogheaded' men are a clever species of animal able to remain undetected by man. They presumably are highly skilled at remaining hidden in their secret lives and are mostly active at night.

Something tells me that you are going to bring hyraxes into this..... :blink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't overlook the possibility that there was some tribe called, in one language, something which in another language meant 'dog-headed' and the name took on a life of its own. Stuff like that happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't overlook the possibility that there was some tribe called, in one language, something which in another language meant 'dog-headed' and the name took on a life of its own. Stuff like that happens.

Yeah, king of like what happened to Mongoloids.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the same societies reported cyclops populations and populations of people with their faces in their chest, I'm very skeptical.

I read that Christopher Columbus, when he first tried speaking with the natives he encountered was told by translators (Where they came from I'm not sure.) that dog headed people lived on some of the other islands and ate people. They were the Canibis. What I find interesting is that these Caribean peoples did not have dogs, so had no idea what one looked like.

http://www.ancientworlds.net/aw/Article/726763

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This view is from the religious wise men of the time. A modern atheist/humanist is more likely to conclude that the 'dogheaded' men are a clever species of animal able to remain undetected by man. They presumably are highly skilled at remaining hidden in their secret lives and are mostly active at night.

you used "modern" here but Im sure you meant to use delusional

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

In 500 years, there will likely be people gullible and impressionable enough to believe that certain elements of our pop culture like zombies and beautiful were-wolf fighting vampires were real. I think this is nothing more than that. A few stories that have may or even may not have had roots in some natural phenomenon or animal that have been embellished over the course of many retellings and now adopted by the cryptid community.

I think its reasonable to assume that back in the day there were just as many people who were *Snip* as there are now, and that they loved to tell a good tale around the campfire or dinner table.

There were never people with dog-heads. Just fun stories. Fairy tales.

Edited by Karlis
UM FORUM RULES: 3c. Profanity: Do not use profanity, crude, vulgar language or attempt to intentionally bypass the profanity filter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Medieval Europeans and Chinese, to name just a few, all had legends and stories of races of humans with the heads of dogs, the dogheads (cynocephali). These always lived slightly further away than it was praticable to travel, just beyond the fringes of the civilised world. Why were these stories so consistent across Europe and Asia? Not to be confused with werewovles, who were shapeshifters, dogheads were exactly what their name suggests. They wore clothes, had their own settlements and villages, and their own society. Sometimes they even came to live in the civilised world. There are legends that St Christopher was one of them, as some Byzantine icons show him.

Saint_christopher_cynocephalus.gif

http://en.wikipedia....iki/Cynocephaly

I see no reason to believe this as anything but myth.

Unless, of course, they were super evolved intelligent were-hyrax-men.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see no reason to believe this as anything but myth.

Unless, of course, they were super evolved intelligent were-hyrax-men.

lol! (and 'women' of course)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol! (and 'women' of course)

Right? We don't want to leave out the ladies! ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we see a lot of this in egyptian murals etc, i don't think it's something meant to be interpreted as literal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.