Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3
Big Bad Voodoo

Sphinx and GP dates from 10 500 BC?

1,651 posts in this topic

Aus, do you remember the actual Wiki page on which you found this photo? I tried tracking it down and couldn't find it.

You're not the first person to be misdirected by the photo. It's popped up before at UM in discussions about Göbekli Tepe. I get tired of honest people getting bad information on the internet. Isn't there some way on Wiki pages to note or comment on such errors?

You can look at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stele_of_Vultures_detail_02.jpg

there it seez it is used in

Art of Mesopotamia

Stele of the Vultures

Sumer

Have fun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oniomancer, thanks of the link. Let me ask you though, do you consider that science?

Somebody working for the Discovery Channel being dropped off in the wilderness may approach his survival from a point of view as described by Marshall Sahlins, from a logical perspective, and make smart choices. But he was probably a highly trained Navy Seal before. People in normal situations have been brought up with customs and beliefs that the parents had learned from their parents.

A 'new paradigm' sounds enticing. But Zen and 'roads to affluence' is about channeling of motivation, not science. Which one do you want to talk about?

The wording and framing of the theory and the research and reasoning that went into the theory are two different things. Note that this was based in part on actual observation of the !Kung tribe for one.

You're applying a rather limited set of means for how gobekli tepe could've been accomplished. Your earlier description assumes an all-out, all at once approach, that they dropped everything and put all their effort into it. We have no evidence for a timeframe over which it must've been constructed and there's no good reason to apply one arbitrarily. It could just as well have been carved and assembled gradually over a long period as time allowed.

Let's look at what we know about these "primitive" groups. When we watch them on that self-same discovery channel, they seem to be spending a lot of time sitting around doing nothing, or engaged in elaborate ceremonies. When we look at prehistoric relics, we see Venus figures, fine bone carvings and caves full of paintings. If they had time to do all that, surely they had time to carve a few monuments.

The definition of a hunter-gather is by no means cut and dried. To add to the previous link: http://www.mesacc.edu/dept/d10/asb/lifeways/hg_myth.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

double post, never mind

Edited by lliqerty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would not go as far as saying horse domestication, as we can only point to two events, one in the Asian steppe and one in Spain that could have been performed independently.

Much more important is the concept of the Beast of Burden that appeared all over the world between 4000 and 3000 BC and they were not all horses.

In central Asia we have horses

In Africa and the middle East donkeys

In Southern Asia we have water buffalo

In central Europe we have the cow.

Which means that it didn't just happen once and so is not limited to the claim of horse domestication happening in the Eurasian Steppes.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which means that it didn't just happen once and so is not limited to the claim of horse domestication happening in the Eurasian Steppes.

cormac

Well, you know that I am not a fan of the "historical uniqueness" so I would certainly never claim that a social advance happened "only" within a certain confine or within a certain group but more according to the social needs of multiple groups and on occasion with thousands of years of span in between.

So yes, domestication is certainly not a unique phenomena.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you know that I am not a fan of the "historical uniqueness" so I would certainly never claim that a social advance happened "only" within a certain confine or within a certain group but more according to the social needs of multiple groups and on occasion with thousands of years of span in between.

So yes, domestication is certainly not a unique phenomena.

True, but as we both know it has been presented that way in a number of places. Something of which should be set straight for those who don't know.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The wording and framing of the theory and the research and reasoning that went into the theory are two different things. Note that this was based in part on actual observation of the !Kung tribe for one.

You're applying a rather limited set of means for how gobekli tepe could've been accomplished. Your earlier description assumes an all-out, all at once approach, that they dropped everything and put all their effort into it. We have no evidence for a timeframe over which it must've been constructed and there's no good reason to apply one arbitrarily. It could just as well have been carved and assembled gradually over a long period as time allowed.

Let's look at what we know about these "primitive" groups. When we watch them on that self-same discovery channel, they seem to be spending a lot of time sitting around doing nothing, or engaged in elaborate ceremonies. When we look at prehistoric relics, we see Venus figures, fine bone carvings and caves full of paintings. If they had time to do all that, surely they had time to carve a few monuments.

The definition of a hunter-gather is by no means cut and dried. To add to the previous link: http://www.mesacc.ed...ys/hg_myth.html

I agree with everything you are saying (btw, I very much enjoyed the original Gods Must Be Crazy not only for its humor but also for its insight and the portrayal of this wonderful culture). I was implying in an earlier post that they would have had to build one circle in a season, and go on to the next one maybe a few years later.

But a single person can make a Venus figure and a cave painting, and another one next week. That is hardly comparable with cutting 16 ton blocks (and doing this with stone tools, and a 50 ton incompleted one). How did they lift the weight of 200 men out of the quarry? I have asked specific questions like this before and never gotten a concrete answer. So I surmise that it has not been experimentally confirmed. Maybe you think this is a minor detail. I do not think so. Why is it so difficult to round up enough, say, college students for a shcool project? Once it has been done, then we have an idea about the effort required, in terms of manpower, organization etc. But the fact that it has NOT been done indicates to me that it is a substantial effort, maybe more than you imagine.

Only then can we determine if this is even possible. Then we can talk about what qualities or culture the people must have had to manage that accomplishment. Without experiment or observation of the challenge that this represents, what do you expect to learn from talking about the !Kung tribe? I am sorry to repeat myself, but science is observation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you are saying (btw, I very much enjoyed the original Gods Must Be Crazy not only for its humor but also for its insight and the portrayal of this wonderful culture). I was implying in an earlier post that they would have had to build one circle in a season, and go on to the next one maybe a few years later.

But a single person can make a Venus figure and a cave painting, and another one next week. That is hardly comparable with cutting 16 ton blocks (and doing this with stone tools, and a 50 ton incompleted one). How did they lift the weight of 200 men out of the quarry? I have asked specific questions like this before and never gotten a concrete answer. So I surmise that it has not been experimentally confirmed. Maybe you think this is a minor detail. I do not think so. Why is it so difficult to round up enough, say, college students for a shcool project? Once it has been done, then we have an idea about the effort required, in terms of manpower, organization etc. But the fact that it has NOT been done indicates to me that it is a substantial effort, maybe more than you imagine.

Only then can we determine if this is even possible. Then we can talk about what qualities or culture the people must have had to manage that accomplishment. Without experiment or observation of the challenge that this represents, what do you expect to learn from talking about the !Kung tribe? I am sorry to repeat myself, but science is observation.

Hi;

A previous thread started by the L showed 2 men running while dragging a 2 tonne stone. This was achieved by short woods arranged like railway sleepers and lubed with animal fat. The clip is well worth a watch and while no one is saying that the method shown is the method used by the ancients it is a possibility;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is okay, no loss to me. But it is enlightening that the definition of science has been changed to "possibilities"! Endless, whatever-your-imagination-can-come-up-with Possibilities!

Sorry everybody, I was not aware that facts do not matter anymore! But now I understand.

Ah, but they do. A number of your misconceptions (such as those related to lithic technology and draft domestication) have already been addressed. Now, let us address other matters. Please remember some of your earlier pronouncments.

The way Schmidt sees it, Gobekli Tepe's sloping, rocky ground is a stonecutter's dream. Even without metal chisels or hammers, prehistoric masons wielding flint tools could have chipped away at softer limestone outcrops, shaping them into pillars on the spot before carrying them a few hundred yards to the summit and lifting them upright. Then, Schmidt says, once the stone rings were finished, the ancient builders covered them over with dirt. Eventually, they placed another ring nearby or on top of the old one. Over centuries, these layers created the hilltop.

http://environment-e...rst-temple.html

Will attempt to provide further and more technical information upon return to base.

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Aus, do you remember the actual Wiki page on which you found this photo? I tried tracking it down and couldn't find it.

You're not the first person to be misdirected by the photo. It's popped up before at UM in discussions about Göbekli Tepe. I get tired of honest people getting bad information on the internet. Isn't there some way on Wiki pages to note or comment on such errors?

I couldn't tell you which site this came from. Unfortunately. I was trailing from site to site trying to find just pure archaeological report data on items unearthed and when I noticed on one list there was the picture with cuneiform writing I got excited clicked the photo gave a direct source link from the photo... posted it... found the reference to Stele of vultures and continued to follow down those happy little data trails. Only to find almost immediately that this stepwise was found in Mesopotamia and was acquainted with a dig thought to be directly Sumerian. What a let down. So I posted immediately that I had been duped so as not to spread this artifact as GT. And now you know the rest of the story as a man once said... LOL. If anyone has any links to reputable archaeological artifact lists that would be of great service to me. The more boring and mundane the better as I said in an earlier post.

Edited by Aus Der Box Skeptisch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi;

A previous thread started by the L showed 2 men running while dragging a 2 tonne stone. This was achieved by short woods arranged like railway sleepers and lubed with animal fat. The clip is well worth a watch and while no one is saying that the method shown is the method used by the ancients it is a possibility;

*SNIP*

Im not sure possibilities are his thing... LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi;

A previous thread started by the L showed 2 men running while dragging a 2 tonne stone. This was achieved by short woods arranged like railway sleepers and lubed with animal fat. The clip is well worth a watch and while no one is saying that the method shown is the method used by the ancients it is a possibility;

[media=]

[/media]

Of course the problem with such a contrived idea is that it doesn't fit the cultural evidence.

There isn't even any evidence that they had the word "ramp" in the entire culture.

This is fantasy concocted by those who believe the builders were backward and couldn't

come up with something easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course the problem with such a contrived idea is that it doesn't fit the cultural evidence.

There isn't even any evidence that they had the word "ramp" in the entire culture.

This is fantasy concocted by those who believe the builders were backward and couldn't

come up with something easy.

In all of the posts regarding the builders you are the only person who references them as backward or not backward... the rest of us know better.

And if I recall correctly you adamantly deny anything of importance prior to dynasty 4 or 5. So what is it you actually know of culture? Impress me and instead of commenting on the lack of cultural knowledge instead show me in your words or whatever means you can how culturally we should be looking at this. As I recall dragging stones was something they were good at especially when they used sledges which is shown in ancient Egyptian reliefs so I'm curious as to your response. I would love to learn from you cladking as I feel most have a valid insight into at least one dimension of history.

BTW, I've honestly missed you and am glad to see you around again. (No sarcasm!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And if I recall correctly you adamantly deny anything of importance prior to dynasty 4 or 5. So what is it you actually know of culture? Impress me and instead of commenting on the lack of cultural knowledge instead show me in your words or whatever means you can how culturally we should be looking at this. As I recall dragging stones was something they were good at especially when they used sledges which is shown in ancient Egyptian reliefs so I'm curious as to your response. I would love to learn from you cladking as I feel most have a valid insight into at least one dimension of history.

This is all I've been trying to do for six years.

There are no ramps whatsoever in the cultural context as regards lifting stones to build

pyramids. The word simply doesn't exist at the time of great pyramid building and this is

a simple fact. It's not only the word that doesn't exist though it's any evidence of any na-

ture that they used ramps to lift these stones.

I'm surprised you ask what does exist because most people simply don't care.

What exists everywhere is boats. The only title in the lower workmens' cemetery is "Over-

seer of the Boats of Neit". Everywhere you look in the culture are boats. The builders said

that the king flew in a boat and was cremated on top of the pyramid. There are "Overseers

of Boat crews" and "Overseers of Canals". There's nothing at all about moving fill or building

ramps. Zilch!!!

When you put pyramid building in its cultural context there's no such thing as ramps.

Everyone will scream bloody murder because this doesn't fit in with the "skeptics" beliefs but

the facts are all on my side. It's not even logical to believe they had to have used ramps. It's

a non-sequitur dreamed up long before many of the facts were even known. The concept does

not stand up to scrutiny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ramp...

M S-TWT S-RHR PHWY

:w00t:

Unfortunately I think only sesh will get the joke... and sesh pardon me for using English grammer style...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

This is all I've been trying to do for six years.

There are no ramps whatsoever in the cultural context as regards lifting stones to build

pyramids. The word simply doesn't exist at the time of great pyramid building and this is

a simple fact. It's not only the word that doesn't exist though it's any evidence of any na-

ture that they used ramps to lift these stones.

I'm surprised you ask what does exist because most people simply don't care.

What exists everywhere is boats. The only title in the lower workmens' cemetery is "Over-

seer of the Boats of Neit". Everywhere you look in the culture are boats. The builders said

that the king flew in a boat and was cremated on top of the pyramid. There are "Overseers

of Boat crews" and "Overseers of Canals". There's nothing at all about moving fill or building

ramps. Zilch!!!

When you put pyramid building in its cultural context there's no such thing as ramps.

Everyone will scream bloody murder because this doesn't fit in with the "skeptics" beliefs but

the facts are all on my side. It's not even logical to believe they had to have used ramps. It's

a non-sequitur dreamed up long before many of the facts were even known. The concept does

not stand up to scrutiny.

one could also say obelisk doesn't exist because it was Greek. Obelisks exist we can see them touch them but the word is not Egyptian. We also have evidence of ramps on the GP and ramps on lesser pyramids we can see them touch them yet we don't have a name for them... it doesn't really matter because Egyptians were very familiar with an inclined plane and used them. They obviously didn't need a word for it.

Edited by Aus Der Box Skeptisch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...

There isn't even any evidence that they had the word "ramp" in the entire culture.

...

r-stA

Ramp...

M S-TWT S-RHR PHWY

:w00t:

Unfortunately I think only sesh will get the joke... and sesh pardon me for using English grammer style...

LOL Damn, you got me. I'm sitting here trying to make sense of it and am not getting anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

r-stA

Great!

Now all you have to do is find this word used in the 4th dynasty.

"Cultural context" applies to the Great Pyramid builders not later times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all I've been trying to do for six years.

There are no ramps whatsoever in the cultural context as regards lifting stones to build

pyramids. The word simply doesn't exist at the time of great pyramid building and this is

a simple fact. It's not only the word that doesn't exist though it's any evidence of any na-

ture that they used ramps to lift these stones.

I'm surprised you ask what does exist because most people simply don't care.

What exists everywhere is boats. The only title in the lower workmens' cemetery is "Over-

seer of the Boats of Neit". Everywhere you look in the culture are boats. The builders said

that the king flew in a boat and was cremated on top of the pyramid. There are "Overseers

of Boat crews" and "Overseers of Canals". There's nothing at all about moving fill or building

ramps. Zilch!!!

When you put pyramid building in its cultural context there's no such thing as ramps.

Everyone will scream bloody murder because this doesn't fit in with the "skeptics" beliefs but

the facts are all on my side. It's not even logical to believe they had to have used ramps. It's

a non-sequitur dreamed up long before many of the facts were even known. The concept does

not stand up to scrutiny.

was there an overseer of knot tier's or over seer of water proofers or over seer of leak fixers? Or how about over seer of blisters or over seer of water flow.... I'm not mocking you I am asking if there would be a need for a micro managed list of overseers. The pyramid and canal and builders had overseers... yes? Then you would not need over seer of ramps its redundant... know what I mean or is this just one of those conversations where what I would like to discuss further is moot in your eyes. If so that's totally cool with me. I just wanted to pose the plausibility of this as a reason that maybe we could discuss further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't tell you which site this came from. Unfortunately. I was trailing from site to site trying to find just pure archaeological report data on items unearthed and when I noticed on one list there was the picture with cuneiform writing I got excited clicked the photo gave a direct source link from the photo... posted it... found the reference to Stele of vultures and continued to follow down those happy little data trails. Only to find almost immediately that this stepwise was found in Mesopotamia and was acquainted with a dig thought to be directly Sumerian. What a let down. So I posted immediately that I had been duped so as not to spread this artifact as GT. And now you know the rest of the story as a man once said... LOL. If anyone has any links to reputable archaeological artifact lists that would be of great service to me. The more boring and mundane the better as I said in an earlier post.

I did spend awhile trying to find the Wiki page to which the image belongs but had no success. It's not on the standard Wiki page for Göbekli Tepe, but there are so many variations and permutations of Wiki at this point that it's hard to keep track. I just hate to see information presented in such a sloppy manner—but as we all know, Wiki pages are not created by professional scholars.

You were quick to post the correction and I saw it, too. That was the proper thing to do, so hat's off to you. It also allowed you to avoid the required whipping for posting errors. Just kidding. If that happened every time someone at UM posted something incorrect, probably half or more of all the posters here would be nothing now but puddles of red goo.

Take heart. Cuneiform was used in Anatolia. It was brought to the Hittites around the time of the Middle Assyrian Period, and was widespread in Hatti by the Late Bronze Age. Of course, that was just a wee bit later than Göbekli Tepe. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great!

Now all you have to do is find this word used in the 4th dynasty.

"Cultural context" applies to the Great Pyramid builders not later times.

It's tattooed on Zahi Hawass's butt, and as it happens Zahi was one of the foremen of ramps in Dynasty 4. So there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

r-stA

LOL Damn, you got me. I'm sitting here trying to make sense of it and am not getting anywhere.

LOL. (M) behold (S-TWT) resemble (S-RHR) raise up (PHWY) rear parts

OK maybe I used a dated dictionary lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall J P Houdin and Bob Brier mentioned a internal ramp at Abu Ghorab.

I think sledges and boats were used.

While videos speculating on what exactly occured may make one wonder if it was done that way or dismiss it.

here's another theory, a series of videos regarding boats and locks , fun to watch such speculation.

its also at his website

http://www.thepump.org/Joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=69&Itemid=18

I think some people may think of people back then as backwards.

But judging by their work in structures like the Great Pyramid it proves they were not stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

was there an overseer of knot tier's or over seer of water proofers or over seer of leak fixers? Or how about over seer of blisters or over seer of water flow.... I'm not mocking you I am asking if there would be a need for a micro managed list of overseers. The pyramid and canal and builders had overseers... yes? Then you would not need over seer of ramps its redundant... know what I mean or is this just one of those conversations where what I would like to discuss further is moot in your eyes. If so that's totally cool with me. I just wanted to pose the plausibility of this as a reason that maybe we could discuss further.

I did not come to this thread to discuss my theory. It's pretty plain no one wants

to hear about my theory but in the last several months I've gotten a lot more meaning

from the PT so can shoot down all of the orthodox assumptions without even mention-

ing how the pyramid was built.

Suffice to say that no orthodox ideas or beliefs have undermined my theory in any way

and it still stands.

If there's any interest I can start a new thread but I'm trying to hold off on it since it might

become "dated" pretty rapidly. There's quite a bit of information coming out of the PT now.

I've also learned to use photobucket and might like to include some drawings in the first

post since so many have trouble visualizing it.

All the necessary pieces are there in the evidence. All the evidence appears pretty much

as it should to support the theory. There are a few major obstacles to most peoples' und-

erstanding but anyone can follow it who tries.

Right now the subject is ramps. I have a fairly good debunkment for ramps if anyone would

like to see it. It's still a work in progress but it absolutely destroys ramps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not come to this thread to discuss my theory. It's pretty plain no one wants

to hear about my theory but in the last several months I've gotten a lot more meaning

from the PT so can shoot down all of the orthodox assumptions without even mention-

ing how the pyramid was built.

Suffice to say that no orthodox ideas or beliefs have undermined my theory in any way

and it still stands.

If there's any interest I can start a new thread but I'm trying to hold off on it since it might

become "dated" pretty rapidly. There's quite a bit of information coming out of the PT now.

I've also learned to use photobucket and might like to include some drawings in the first

post since so many have trouble visualizing it.

All the necessary pieces are there in the evidence. All the evidence appears pretty much

as it should to support the theory. There are a few major obstacles to most peoples' und-

erstanding but anyone can follow it who tries.

Right now the subject is ramps. I have a fairly good debunkment for ramps if anyone would

like to see it. It's still a work in progress but it absolutely destroys ramps.

You ignored my entire post. All of my discussion peices were ignored. I never even came close to talking about your theme. I was talking about entirely different items for discussion. Same old. We don't need to discuss it if you don't really want to. Also kmt made a post about the word ramp. Ignore that too though. Doesn't really fly with what you want to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.