Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
zoser

Tantalising Testimony

5,543 posts in this topic

Is anybody really watching all these youtube videos,...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is anybody really watching all these youtube videos,...?

Only the UFO enthusiasts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no skeptic here trying to "explain away" the UFO phenomenon. Most people here agrees that it needs to be examined and investigated..... but so does the other stuff (not so exotic" terrrestrial phenomenon) that is tied in with the UFO sightings... agreed???

O'm not arguing about that; I'm just saying that Plasma doesn't sound all that rational as an off-the-cuff Rational explanation, it sounds as if a lot more questions could be asked about it than there are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no skeptic here trying to "explain away" the UFO phenomenon. Most people here agrees that it needs to be examined and investigated..... but so does the other stuff (not so exotic" terrrestrial phenomenon) that is tied in with the UFO sightings... agreed???

I do not get to involved in the UFO thing. ( posting anyway ).When I do, I like to look at each " UFO " as it is....unidentified flying object.

Whether it be a bug, a rc plane, a hoax, a lie, a plane, etc. depends on each individual case.

" UFO phenomenon ", I do not think that is what it is.When you take the entire basic " UFO " cases as a whole, to me it is a " interest ", and to some a " addiction ", as in ghost hunting.

I think there is a answer for every case out there, I do not think it is a mass alien / government space travel, hide and seek program.

There is nothing to explain away, some people are fascinated by the TV shows, stories on the internet, books, movies, etc. and they group it all into one big bowl and call it a " phenomenon ", when as I said, it is a " interest ".

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only the UFO enthusiasts.

And there's the giveaway, UFO enthusiasts, not investigators/researchers.

You claim to run a group (although one which has never had any credibility in the UK), so how about posting case files for discussion - instead of endless videos of anecdotal accounts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there's the giveaway, UFO enthusiasts, not investigators/researchers.

You claim to run a group (although one which has never had any credibility in the UK), so how about posting case files for discussion - instead of endless videos of anecdotal accounts?

Take a look at the cases posted on this thread. Most of them have a lot of written detail accompanying them. We try to cater for all tastes on this thread.

:alien:

Also see post 3120 which answers your question most succinctly.

Edited by zoser
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not get to involved in the UFO thing. ( posting anyway ).When I do, I like to look at each " UFO " as it is....unidentified flying

I think there is a answer for every case out there, I do not think it is a mass alien / government space travel, hide and seek program.

Which is doomed to failure. The reports of sightings and close encounters have a marked consistency to them. The skeptics answers all vary usually in ridiculous ways that don't fit the facts. Then if all else fails, the witnesses are deemed liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And there's the giveaway, UFO enthusiasts, not investigators/researchers.

I'm not an enthusiast; I don't even like them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop messing about Haz. What did you think of the Winchester clip?

I have stopped watching your videos a long time ago. The reason is simple, the ones I did click on was among the silliest I have ever seen, and I have seen A LOT. Im thinking of the guy in the UK with the sheeps and the likes,...

In the matter of the ETH, people flapping their lips isnt what Im looking for. Sorry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is doomed to failure. The reports of sightings and close encounters have a marked consistency to them. The skeptics answers all vary usually in ridiculous ways that don't fit the facts. Then if all else fails, the witnesses are deemed liars.

Zoser, I don't have the time now, but I would love to take say, 100 sightings , and chart them..There is no consistency to them. Some are shaped like cigars, some triangles, some balls, some saucers, some squares......Some wobble, some go slow, some go fast, some disappear.....

Now, most end up identified as hoax's, planes, bugs, rc craft, balloons, Army skydivers, etc...Some have a ton of evidence to support a answer with over whelming evidence ( man made or natural ). And some can not be answered 100%, but would fall into a natural or man made thing, depending whom you talk to.There are numerous videos you had posted that have clearly been debunked.

My point is, there is nothing consistent at all when all put together.

I would think if other species were coming here, they would be more consistent, and same for secret air craft. This is a strong piece of evidence that these " sightings " are not one certain thing, but are " wishful thinking ".

Don't get me wrong, I think it would be great if a ship came here and did away with us, or " fixed " us. I used to be just like you when it comes to this. After opening my mind to answers, and not just faith, I do not think anyone is coming to this place. There is nothing to make me think that way at all, none of the " evidence " adds up at all.

Funny, last night I laughed pretty hard, a old ancient aliens was on about crop circles. It had " scientists " and " experts " explaining how a vortex from space was causing this, and how they could not be made by man. I would love to see these people today answer the circle makers in a interview. I used to believe that crap myself, until I studied and researched more on it. It really made me laugh, and laugh that I actually thought the same thing.

Anyone can be fooled Zoser...And, anyone can learn not to be fooled also.

Edited by Sakari

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have stopped watching your videos a long time ago. The reason is simple, the ones I did click on was among the silliest I have ever seen, and I have seen A LOT. Im thinking of the guy in the UK with the sheeps and the likes,...

In the matter of the ETH, people flapping their lips isnt what Im looking for. Sorry.

He also said he stopped reading everything I posted a long time ago, so I just stopped conversing with him.

Frankly, there's just no there, there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have stopped watching your videos a long time ago. The reason is simple, the ones I did click on was among the silliest I have ever seen, and I have seen A LOT. Im thinking of the guy in the UK with the sheeps and the likes,...

In the matter of the ETH, people flapping their lips isnt what Im looking for. Sorry.

denial1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the "skeptics", every time there is a radar report of UFOs the equipment is malfunctioning and every time there is a radar visual report, like Stephenville, the witnesses are all lying or mistaken.

They always have this standard list of "explanations" that they trot out for every single UFO report, although their real purpose is not to explain anything at all, but just muddy up the waters.

Quit whining and check data by yourself. Ever heard of CFAR (Constant False Alarm Rate)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoser, I don't have the time now, but I would love to take say, 100 sightings , and chart them..There is no consistency to them. Some are shaped like cigars, some triangles, some balls, some saucers, some squares......Some wobble, some go slow, some go fast, some disappear.....

Now, most end up identified as hoax's, planes, bugs, rc craft, balloons, Army skydivers, etc...Some have a ton of evidence to support a answer with over whelming evidence ( man made or natural ). And some can not be answered 100%, but would fall into a natural or man made thing, depending whom you talk to.There are numerous videos you had posted that have clearly been debunked.

My point is, there is nothing consistent at all when all put together.

I would think if other species were coming here, they would be more consistent, and same for secret air craft. This is a strong piece of evidence that these " sightings " are not one certain thing, but are " wishful thinking ".

Don't get me wrong, I think it would be great if a ship came here and did away with us, or " fixed " us. I used to be just like you when it comes to this. After opening my mind to answers, and not just faith, I do not think anyone is coming to this place. There is nothing to make me think that way at all, none of the " evidence " adds up at all.

Funny, last night I laughed pretty hard, a old ancient aliens was on about crop circles. It had " scientists " and " experts " explaining how a vortex from space was causing this, and how they could not be made by man. I would love to see these people today answer the circle makers in a interview. I used to believe that crap myself, until I studied and researched more on it. It really made me laugh, and laugh that I actually thought the same thing.

Anyone can be fooled Zoser...And, anyone can learn not to be fooled also.

How were the couple from Winchester fooled when an alien came out from a cigar shaped craft and put his arm on the car? Doesn't make sense.

Just like your comment about the Tindade incident. A group of geologists turned UFO hoaxers. Really? Yes hoaxing is possible we all realise that but I really don't think that you are seriously looking at each case on it's own merits.

You need to think how likely is it that a team of scientists would do that. To what end? Why risk their scientific careers? This is what you are not doing and this is why your attempts at debunking are not succeeding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

denial1.jpg

In case you don't know what overly open-mindedness is...

om_enl.jpg

Anyway, I agree with Hazz's no willingness to watch YT "masterpieces": how many times I watched bogus videos, and then smacked myself for being idiot for falling (once again) on that bs clap trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In case you don't know what overly open-mindedness is...

om_enl.jpg

Anyway, I agree with Hazz's no willingness to watch YT "masterpieces": how many times I watched bogus videos, and then smacked myself for being idiot for falling (once again) on that bs clap trap.

They can't all be telling lies Mr B. You know it, I know it and everyone knows it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In case you don't know what overly open-mindedness is...

Anyway, I agree with Hazz's no willingness to watch YT "masterpieces": how many times I watched bogus videos, and then smacked myself for being idiot for falling (once again) on that bs clap trap.

Hazz is not really a participant since he posts nothing but one-liners, but with no real evidence of his own or even any serious commentary on those who post evidence. He's not quite on the level of DONTEATUS, but pretty close.

Edited by TheMacGuffin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quit whining and check data by yourself. Ever heard of CFAR (Constant False Alarm Rate)?

Once again, I don't believe the Septic Skeptics when they always dismiss all radar UFO reports as ghosts, echoes and temperature inversions. The radar operators knew the difference back in the 1940s and 1950s just as they do now.

One of the biggest lies that was ever told in history was when the Washington DC UFOs of 1952 were dismissed in this way, although it was not just a lie but a deliberate cover up, pure and simple. That was also the case with the Bentwaters UFO case in 1956 and the Milton Torres case in 1957--lies and cover ups.

That's why I never believe any of this fake explanations about how radar isn't detecting real UFOs because I know the history and have read many of the original cases.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hazz is not really a participant since he posts nothing but one-liners anyone, but with no real evidence of his own or even any serious commentary on those who post evidence. He's not quite on the level of DONTEATUS, but pretty close.

I think your right MacG. The fierce denial is starting to crumble in the face of all of this testimony and the skeptics are rapidly running out of room. It's not just this thread but all the others too where inescapable evidence is being put forward.

That is the nature of the truth; it is inescapable. It happened to the Luddites in Britain, it happened to the Catholics at the time of Galileo and it happened to the flat earth society.

Listen to this:

Lance Corporal John Waygandt describes a UFO crash and retrieval in Peru. Utterly amazing testimony. Let the skeptics listen to this and maintain their attitude of denial. Is this a challenge? yes.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How were the couple from Winchester fooled when an alien came out from a cigar shaped craft and put his arm on the car? Doesn't make sense.

Just like your comment about the Tindade incident. A group of geologists turned UFO hoaxers. Really? Yes hoaxing is possible we all realise that but I really don't think that you are seriously looking at each case on it's own merits.

You need to think how likely is it that a team of scientists would do that. To what end? Why risk their scientific careers? This is what you are not doing and this is why your attempts at debunking are not succeeding.

I am not trying to debunk anything, you do not have the answers to debunk.

I do the same as you, I look for answers, we just go about it in different ways.

I all ready explained why people Hoax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not trying to debunk anything, you do not have the answers to debunk.

I do the same as you, I look for answers, we just go about it in different ways.

I all ready explained why people Hoax.

So can I challenge you on this? What's your verdict on the Winchester case?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't all be telling lies Mr B. You know it, I know it and everyone knows it.

Lies? Not exactly: human beings are susceptible to what they see, and visual perception often fails. Want examples?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hazz is not really a participant since he posts nothing but one-liners, but with no real evidence of his own or even any serious commentary on those who post evidence. He's not quite on the level of DONTEATUS, but pretty close.

Quality of theirs overcomes quantity of yours. Simple.

Once again, I don't believe the Septic Skeptics when they always dismiss all radar UFO reports as ghosts, echoes and temperature inversions. The radar operators knew the difference back in the 1940s and 1950s just as they do now.

One of the biggest lies that was ever told in history was when the Washington DC UFOs of 1952 were dismissed in this way, although it was not just a lie but a deliberate cover up, pure and simple. That was also the case with the Bentwaters UFO case in 1956 and the Milton Torres case in 1957--lies and cover ups.

That's why I never believe any of this fake explanations about how radar isn't detecting real UFOs because I know the history and have read many of the original cases.

Check data by yourself, once again (for **** sake).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.