911 Pentagon Video Footage

[DONTEATUS]

I see ? Its all photoshopped,and audio edited! And the Hundreds of eyewitnesses and actual Aircraft parts of the AA 757 smeared into the building that day were all a Hoax. Whata World,What a World ! I think thererfor I must bee crazy to believe that It was an inside job?

Who in here really believes that American Airlines 757 didnt really crash into the Pentagon?

I want a real Head count,lay your heads on a Fax machine a send us a copy of ,well Of what ever you want to call yourselfs.

[bee]

.

I might have found him...!

tim timmermans - seven bridges

[media=]

[/media]

sorry false alarm

.

[bee]

I want a real Head count,lay your heads on a Fax machine a send us a copy of ,well Of what ever you want to call yourselfs.

.

[Kludge808]

Me too Mid ! As for the orig,topic 911 Pentagon Video. Theres really no need to cont,this The Airliner hit it !

No, no, no! As part of the conspiracy, the Russians launched a highly modified anti-shipping missile from off shore. It had new cloaking equipment (including visual) created using alien technology to allow it to pass over the Pentagon unseen then drop down and replace AAL77 which was cloaked with its own suite of added electronics and flown to pax River. In the meantime, the missile, now using its ECM suite to appear like a 757 on radar approached the Pentagon along the already established path, performed the Hani maneuver complete with irregularities then head in, releasing props, as it were, to make it appear as a 757 as well as add to the damage to the building. (I did say "highly modified", right?) The C-130 was there to drop pieces parts of a 757 to provide the wreckage, something all the witnesses were made to forget using mind control techniques.

There's more but I'm in deep enough doodoo for even saying this much.

[MID]

Of course it did in some weird fantasy world of yours, can you please link or show me an original footage from that day that says a AIRPLANE hit pentagon, there was never a airplane who hit pentagon, there was talk about a helicopter and a bomb in live news i've never heard of an airplane until 5 months or something like that after the events so show a concrete information that says airplane hit, and military reports don't count... I watched entire thing live, and i know what i saw... there was no airplanes seen around pentagon except military ones than suddenly an explosion happened from nowhere... it just exploded like a bomb... no phsyical airplane hitting the object was seen, the first information that came in was something about a helicopter and a bomb... no airplane... so i don't know what you've been told but i watched it live and i know what the offical story was and from that day on i knew that whole thing was a setup.. but i explained this over and over and over again so people like you burning supporters of wrong cause ( government ) might get that there is one too many flaw in the offical story but hey if it makes sense to you fine, confirms many other things about your way of thinking..

You watched the whole thing live, did you?

How's that, when no one saw it happen live on TV?

Indeed, the media started covering the site around 09:45 that morning.After the impact happened.

That confirms something about your way of thinking!

Concrete information that shows an airplane hit??? You're embarrasing. How about the 136 witnesses who saw an airplane come into the Pentagon...the 26 who caught the AA design on that plane, the photos of the debris, the identification of the passenger and crew complement of AA77, mingled in with the aircraft debris inside that building prove that an AA jet (and, a 757) crashed into the Pentagon. It a well known fact.

I hate to ask, but is it possible that a less moronic, more astute (even if ever-so-slightly more astute) statement could be made by you here other than the one you made above??

I'm hoping that it might be something other than a maudelin imitation of full blown CTs, who say dumb stuff like "No plane hit the Pentagon", offer nothing discussable as substance, and do so in spite of the fact that it's been proven beyond any doubt that the crew remains of AA77 ware in the Pentagon, along with the pieces of the passengers of that flight, and the sirplane itself, definitively identified as AA77, a Boeing 757.

There is no argument about it. Don't be posting mindless CT dribble here...Use a little mind in your posts.

[Kludge808]

Bu-but someone's wrong on the Internet!

Someone is always wrong on the Internet. Makes it more of a challenge. :tu:

[MID]

No, no, no! As part of the conspiracy, the Russians launched a highly modified anti-shipping missile from off shore. It had new cloaking equipment (including visual) created using alien technology to allow it to pass over the Pentagon unseen then drop down and replace AAL77 which was cloaked with its own suite of added electronics and flown to pax River. In the meantime, the missile, now using its ECM suite to appear like a 757 on radar approached the Pentagon along the already established path, performed the Hani maneuver complete with irregularities then head in, releasing props, as it were, to make it appear as a 757 as well as add to the damage to the building. (I did say "highly modified", right?) The C-130 was there to drop pieces parts of a 757 to provide the wreckage, something all the witnesses were made to forget using mind control techniques.

There's more but I'm in deep enough doodoo for even saying this much.

Yep.

The MIBs who came to discuss this man named Kludge from this forum with me this evening didn't seem too keen on drinkin'! Normally, they just come and slug down something smooth and irish. Today, they called me a NASA hack, and reminded me of my status as a U.S. Disinformation Specialist, Level 17, but. despite being curious about your knowledge of this stuff, they got one hell of a kick out of the Hani maneuver.

I explained where it came from in a comical manner, and they howled,,,

"Who the hell coined that " Hani Maneuver"?

They read BR's many " technical" dissertations on the maneuver, and then they had a couple drinks! They laughed so hard, they cried.

They think you might know too much for your own good, but they think BR is a howl! They want to come back and read more of him.

I told them about his contention that only a supersonic airplane can make a crater in the ground.

They just gulped, and stared at me with an inquisitive look. I nodded in the affirmative, and showed them his statements to that effect.

They didn't look happy, saying, "This Kludge fellow knows better than that, doesn't he?"

I said, "Of course you mental pygmie. Kludge is cool!"

"OK, OK! But what's up with this Ruth guy?"

"Dunno! But maybe a couple drinks will help you figure it out?!"

Well, they both passed out on my couch at 21:00 EDFT. Ah, the Guibmint. Hic !

Think you're safe K. BR isn't even in trouble with them! They want to go (hic!) and read all he's put on line (once they wake up, that is!).

"We'll git a kick out of it, MID...(hic), some time we need to laugh, ya know!?"

Yea...I do.

[synchronomy]

Here's we go again...

beating a dead horse.

[Iron_Lotus]

and im done, you guys enjoy trying to beat this into the heads of these people im done, personally for me anyways i can only go in so many circles so many times before i come to the point of wanting nothing more than to use very harsh words for these people. best of luck to you guys and you all know who you are, this is where i walk away from this 9/11 bull****.

[booNyzarC]

and im done, you guys enjoy trying to beat this into the heads of these people im done, personally for me anyways i can only go in so many circles so many times before i come to the point of wanting nothing more than to use very harsh words for these people. best of luck to you guys and you all know who you are, this is where i walk away from this 9/11 bull****.

I completely understand your reasons, believe me I do, but I'm still sad to see you go.

Having been through this very same crossroads myself many times before, I can speak from experience that it isn't easy to walk away from this mindbogglingly ridiculous discussion. So I wish you more willpower than I apparently have. May we never see your rational mug around these parts again!!!!

[Iron_Lotus]

I completely understand your reasons, believe me I do, but I'm still sad to see you go.

Having been through this very same crossroads myself many times before, I can speak from experience that it isn't easy to walk away from this mindbogglingly ridiculous discussion. So I wish you more willpower than I apparently have. May we never see your rational mug around these parts again!!!!

thank you boon and best of luck to you, i enjoy posting on UM and i dont feel like getting banned even if everything i would have to say to a few certain people is nothing but the truth, i'll abide by the rules like a good boy, dust my hands off, and actually enjoy my time here instead of pulling my hair out.

[skyeagle409]

and im done, you guys enjoy trying to beat this into the heads of these people im done, personally for me anyways i can only go in so many circles so many times before i come to the point of wanting nothing more than to use very harsh words for these people. best of luck to you guys and you all know who you are, this is where i walk away from this 9/11 bull****.

Hate to see you go! Good luck to you!

[Kludge808]

Yep.

The MIBs who came to discuss this man named Kludge from this forum with me this evening didn't seem too keen on drinkin'! Normally, they just come and slug down something smooth and irish. Today, they called me a NASA hack, and reminded me of my status as a U.S. Disinformation Specialist, Level 17, but. despite being curious about your knowledge of this stuff, they got one hell of a kick out of the Hani maneuver.

I wonder if they read that I'd be more than happy to perform it in any airplane I can get my paws on. Including a jet.

Anyway, anyone who likes something smooth and Irish can't be all bad. I tend to favor Jameson's but whatever tickles their fancy is fine with me. There's an Irish pub in Waikiki so maybe if they show up here, we can adjourn to there.

"Who the hell coined that " Hani Maneuver"?

They read BR's many " technical" dissertations on the maneuver, and then they had a couple drinks! They laughed so hard, they cried.

Kind of like us. Only officially. It's nice to know that they support our side.

They think you might know too much for your own good,

Always the case. They did with Roswell and a few other ... ummm ... "situations" as well. As long as I don't tell all I know, they seem thus far quite willing to tolerate it, especially since I have paperwork from the VA that says I really am certified nuts. I guess I'll push them over the line someday but so far it ain't happened.

The last group I had here was equal opportunity including a rather pleasant brunette I couldn't talk into staying for ... ummm ... further discussion. Or something. Probably something. Odd, though. They wore tank tops, board shorts, shades and flip flops (what we call slippers), all of which were black, of course, trying to fit into the local scene but it was the Stetsons that blew their cover. They looked like the Hawaiian version of the Blues Brothers. And sister.

Anyway, thanks for having my back. Gotta stick together, y'know.

Here's we go again...

beating a dead horse.

Nah, now we're just having fun.

[Kludge808]

and im done, you guys enjoy trying to beat this into the heads of these people im done,

I think the topic is dead but that doesn't mean we can't have a little fun now. However, I understand and respect your reasoning. I hope to run into you again on another thread.

Edited September 25, 2012 by Kludge808

[Kludge808]

Having been through this very same crossroads myself many times before, I can speak from experience that it isn't easy to walk away from this mindbogglingly ridiculous discussion. So I wish you more willpower than I apparently have. May we never see your rational mug around these parts again!!!!

I think the topic is dead and about all we can do now is have some fun with it but ... well, got any suggestions for somewhere else to be brutally honest?

[booNyzarC]

I think the topic is dead and about all we can do now is have some fun with it but ... well, got any suggestions for somewhere else to be brutally honest?

This topic has been dead for years, but make no mistake that someone will try to revive it in this thread or another one. Ignorance is rampant in the world, and people are pumping out babies every day. This will never end.

[bee]

and im done, you guys enjoy trying to beat this into the heads of these people im done, personally for me anyways i can only go in so many circles so many times before i come to the point of wanting nothing more than to use very harsh words for these people. best of luck to you guys and you all know who you are, this is where i walk away from this 9/11 bull****.

was it Tim Timmerman.......?.... ....was he the straw that broke the camel's back.....?

never mind, I'm teasing you now....

a wise man knows his limits.....ciao

[Space Commander Travis]

Of course it did in some weird fantasy world of yours, can you please link or show me an original footage from that day that says a AIRPLANE hit pentagon, there was never a airplane who hit pentagon, there was talk about a helicopter and a bomb in live news i've never heard of an airplane until 5 months or something like that after the events so show a concrete information that says airplane hit, and military reports don't count... I watched entire thing live, and i know what i saw... there was no airplanes seen around pentagon except military ones than suddenly an explosion happened from nowhere... it just exploded like a bomb... no phsyical airplane hitting the object was seen, the first information that came in was something about a helicopter and a bomb... no airplane... so i don't know what you've been told but i watched it live and i know what the offical story was and from that day on i knew that whole thing was a setup.. but i explained this over and over and over again so people like you burning supporters of wrong cause ( government ) might get that there is one too many flaw in the offical story but hey if it makes sense to you fine, confirms many other things about your way of thinking..

I think all I can reasonably say is good heavens. You mean that you didn't find out that a plane was "supposed" to have hit the Pentagon until five months afterwards? I think it said on the news to that effect pretty much the same day, unless of course that was military reports, so they don't count...

[Space Commander Travis]

No, no, no! As part of the conspiracy, the Russians launched a highly modified anti-shipping missile from off shore. It had new cloaking equipment (including visual) created using alien technology to allow it to pass over the Pentagon unseen then drop down and replace AAL77 which was cloaked with its own suite of added electronics and flown to pax River. In the meantime, the missile, now using its ECM suite to appear like a 757 on radar approached the Pentagon along the already established path, performed the Hani maneuver complete with irregularities then head in, releasing props, as it were, to make it appear as a 757 as well as add to the damage to the building. (I did say "highly modified", right?) The C-130 was there to drop pieces parts of a 757 to provide the wreckage, something all the witnesses were made to forget using mind control techniques.

There's more but I'm in deep enough doodoo for even saying this much.

I'd heard (this is, in fact, true*) that actually the missile in question was salvaged from the Kursk and (presumably) dried out and fired from just offshore. I'm not sure whether the Kursk was in fact sunk by the CIA so that they could obtain the missile, or whether someone just saw the opportunity and dived in (as it were) while they had the chance under the disguise of the salvage operation.

Or alternatively, perhaps, someone may have been reading too much Tom Clancy. You decide.

* true as in I heard it, that is

[Babe Ruth]

and im done, you guys enjoy trying to beat this into the heads of these people im done, personally for me anyways i can only go in so many circles so many times before i come to the point of wanting nothing more than to use very harsh words for these people. best of luck to you guys and you all know who you are, this is where i walk away from this 9/11 bull****.

In truth Lotus, unlike some of the other posters who favor the OCT, all you've ever really contributed here is a sort of cheerleading effort.

But your leaving, even if just temporarily, demonstrates the cumulative frustration that builds from having to defend a tale that requires magic to be true.

As Bee has pointed out, if the Pentagon Video Footage were meaningful, if the story were actually true, the Pentagon would have released more footage, and made OPEN TO THE PUBLIC the wreckage and debris, complete with serial numbers on the parts. If the Pentagon were to do that, this discussion would be put to bed. It is within their power and ability to do so, but they do not.

Read between the lines sir, connect the dots. Best of luck to you.

[skyeagle409]

I think the topic is dead and about all we can do now is have some fun with it but ... well, got any suggestions for somewhere else to be brutally honest?

I heard that!!

[skyeagle409]

This topic has been dead for years, but make no mistake that someone will try to revive it in this thread or another one. Ignorance is rampant in the world, and people are pumping out babies every day. This will never end.

Yepper!!

Someone once said: "There's a sucker born every minute."

[Q24]

... and made OPEN TO THE PUBLIC the wreckage and debris, complete with serial numbers on the parts. If the Pentagon were to do that, this discussion would be put to bed.

It is true that physical identification of the 9/11 aircraft would limit discussion.

Without this, we are all left open to an Operation Northwoods styled deception.

The official story, with its 'false flag shaped' information gaps and other peculiarities, is not sufficient for the true skeptic to accept.

And we cheered the Neocons to war on this unproven pretext.

[Kludge808]

This topic has been dead for years, but make no mistake that someone will try to revive it in this thread or another one. Ignorance is rampant in the world, and people are pumping out babies every day. This will never end.

Yes. Yes, it is. But sometimes I get a perverse pleasure in clubbing them with reality. I am sooo evil.

[skyeagle409]

It is true that physical identification of the 9/11 aircraft would limit discussion.

Without this, we are all left open to an Operation Northwoods styled deception.

The official story, with its 'false flag shaped' information gaps and other peculiarities, is not sufficient for the true skeptic to accept.

And we cheered the Neocons to war on this unproven pretext.

Apparently, there is not a shred of evidence pointing to a "false flag" operation. After all, nations around the globe were warning the United States that Muslim terrorist were in the stages of carrying out their terrorist operation using aircraft. In fact, the Philippine government warned the United States of terrorist intentions to use aircraft as weapons years earlier, and nothing even remotely pointing to a 'false flag' operation.

Just goes to show just how vulnerable 9/11 conspiracist are to misinformation and disinformation.