Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
MaKaElectric

The United Nations Wants Your Guns America

278 posts in this topic

A dog must sleep. A dog costs money and is another animal reliant on me. i have a small dog that can travel with us. But he's inside at night. The animals get my chickens at night.

It's OK to own guns. There are uses for them. More people die from cars than guns. it doesn't matter what they are used for. It matters how they are misused.

No matter how hard you try, Zarakitty, you cannot see the future. You do not no when a gun may be needed for personal protection. Mostly i speak of a collaps of the power in the USA.

Guns are given away for free now in the States? I didn't know about that...

You can get other things for protection. You don't really need a gun. Things like pepper spray might actually be much more effective in a lot of scenarios.

@psychoticmike:

If you argue like that, private households should be able to obtain nukes. You don't get the point. We do ont want to stop people from killing each other (you are right, that's impossible), but we want to minimise gun related accidents, gun crime, and the possibility for a criminal to obtain a gun, and most important gun safety, and strict regulations for private gun ownership.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gosh America is not very good

Australian stats

2.23 Selected Underlying Causes, Assault (X85-Y09, Y87.1) - 2006

Assault by rifle, shotgun and larger firearm discharge (X94) males 5 females 6

Assault by sharp object (X99) males 44 females 17

2.19 Selected Underlying Causes, External Causes (V01-Y98) - 2006

Transport accidents (V01-V99, Y85)(a) males 1262 females 406

Massive difference in our country between car and gun deaths

Toadie, There's a massive difference in population.

Australian population 22,620,600 in 2011

US population 311,591,917 in 2011

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that I'm making a point of how close your car / gun deaths are compare to how close are gun / car deaths are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that I'm making a point of how close your car / gun deaths are compare to how close are gun / car deaths are.

Actually...I'm Canadian.

And my apologies, I misunderstood your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guns are given away for free now in the States? I didn't know about that...

You can get other things for protection. You don't really need a gun. Things like pepper spray might actually be much more effective in a lot of scenarios.

@psychoticmike:

If you argue like that, private households should be able to obtain nukes. You don't get the point. We do ont want to stop people from killing each other (you are right, that's impossible), but we want to minimise gun related accidents, gun crime, and the possibility for a criminal to obtain a gun, and most important gun safety, and strict regulations for private gun ownership.

Doesnt your country already have those things? Why do you think its your responcibility to make sure we follow the same rules as you? Why would you burdon yourself with a subject you have no say over?

According to our constitution, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Not even by our government. It certainly wont be infringed by a foreign influance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Again, I am not here to change your laws, I might have spelled that out wrong in your quote. I am discussing if a constitutional right to bear arms is good or bad for a society. I meant to show what postive outcome a strict gun control might have. And I don't have to live in the States to be interested in that topic.

Edited by FLOMBIE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a crying shame you can't go out and hunt wild innocent animals for fun. Maybe you want to stick their head up in your house and use their fur for mat in your house. Its disgusting killing animals for sport

Not if you eat them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, I am not here to change your laws, I might have spelled that out wrong in your quote. I am discussing if a constitutional right to bear arms is good or bad for a society. I meant to show what postive outcome a strict gun control might have. And I don't have to live in the States to be interested in that topic.

Freedom will always have consequences. Lack of freedom will always have worse consequences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Please explain. I don't see it. Your statement sounds nice, but is not always true.

Edited by FLOMBIE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please explain. I don't see it. Your statement sounds nice, but is not always true.

But it is always true. Especialy when it comes to the second amendment. Sure you will have situations where people prove themselfs not responcible enough to handle such freedoms. And for such people those freedoms are removed. But we dont have to look to far back to see how a lack of such freedoms could be far worse. Just take Americans from Japan during WW2 who were hauled off to consentration camps, right here on American soil. Elect the wrong leader, and homosexuals might find them selfs in the same situation. Or Christians, or muslims, ect ect ect. To have a means to protect yourself from a potencialy tyrannical government is the very foundation to a trully free and open society. Especialy today. We have a government who has litteraly created a war on terror. Told us we were all in danger cause of men on the other side of the world in caves that want us all dead cause we are free. Then over the course of 11 years, we watched as it went from men in caves on the other side of the world, to them telling us to watch our neighbors. If we see something say something. We are all now subjected to molestation just to get on a plane. Somehow, suddenly WE became the terrorists. In thier own documents every single person in this country is a potencial terrorist. So much so that our government, directly against the constitution, is somehow allowed to kidnap a American, on American soil, lock them up and throw away the key, with no due process at all.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guns are given away for free now in the States? I didn't know about that...

You can get other things for protection. You don't really need a gun. Things like pepper spray might actually be much more effective in a lot of scenarios.

That's a dumb thing to say. A .22 is much cheaper than a dog. A dog takes much more time and effort as well. I have a small dog. I don't want another dog. A gun is a much more effective tool for keeping raccoons and ground hogs under control. It's either shoot them in the trap or drop the trap in a barrel full of water. Shooting them is much more humane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a dumb thing to say. A .22 is much cheaper than a dog. A dog takes much more time and effort as well. I have a small dog. I don't want another dog. A gun is a much more effective tool for keeping raccoons and ground hogs under control. It's either shoot them in the trap or drop the trap in a barrel full of water. Shooting them is much more humane.

The only "dumb" thing to say was you arguing against a dog with it costing money. Guns do cost money as well, and time. You spend money on the ammo, you need to clean and reassamble it regularly, and if you want to be a good schooter, you need to practice shooting targets in several distances as well. Both take time and effort.

But hey, I never told you to get a dog. And now you just keep it for shooting raccoons? I actually do not see the humanity in shooting anything. But I understand if it has to be done, and you prefer it over smacking the head or drowning them: It's messy and takes longer. But you could use a sling shot, those designed to kill rats. They'd do the work just fine.

You can put it any way you want. Nobody really needs a gun, and if he does, he is able to acquire a permit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

But it is always true. Especialy when it comes to the second amendment. Sure you will have situations where people prove themselfs not responcible enough to handle such freedoms. And for such people those freedoms are removed. But we dont have to look to far back to see how a lack of such freedoms could be far worse. Just take Americans from Japan during WW2 who were hauled off to consentration camps, right here on American soil. Elect the wrong leader, and homosexuals might find them selfs in the same situation. Or Christians, or muslims, ect ect ect. To have a means to protect yourself from a potencialy tyrannical government is the very foundation to a trully free and open society. Especialy today. We have a government who has litteraly created a war on terror. Told us we were all in danger cause of men on the other side of the world in caves that want us all dead cause we are free. Then over the course of 11 years, we watched as it went from men in caves on the other side of the world, to them telling us to watch our neighbors. If we see something say something. We are all now subjected to molestation just to get on a plane. Somehow, suddenly WE became the terrorists. In thier own documents every single person in this country is a potencial terrorist. So much so that our government, directly against the constitution, is somehow allowed to kidnap a American, on American soil, lock them up and throw away the key, with no due process at all.

Was the 2nd ammendment not affective for the Japanese Americans during WWII?

Keeping a gun because you might have to overcome your government really is paranoid, sorry. Do you think you would stand any chance against today's military? They are not using muskets like 250 years ago. They whip their carbines, tanks and choppers out, and a few armed civilians with a .22, a shotgun, and a MAC10 will be dealt with in minutes. It sounds very romantic, yes, but the military is simply too advanced, sorry.

And what makes you so special now anyways? You government always acted like this. Remember the communists, the hippies? Those were rough times, too. Yet nobody thought that would be reason enough to "fight back".

If you are not happy with how it is in the States right now, I advise you to become politically active and try to change something. You live in a democracy, after all. Or do you prefer waiting for a fight that will never happen? Don't be paranoid, if it really bugs you, form a movement and fight will be possible.

Edited by FLOMBIE
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only "dumb" thing to say was you arguing against a dog with it costing money. Guns do cost money as well, and time. You spend money on the ammo, you need to clean and reassamble it regularly, and if you want to be a good schooter, you need to practice shooting targets in several distances as well. Both take time and effort.

But hey, I never told you to get a dog. And now you just keep it for shooting raccoons? I actually do not see the humanity in shooting anything. But I understand if it has to be done, and you prefer it over smacking the head or drowning them: It's messy and takes longer. But you could use a sling shot, those designed to kill rats. They'd do the work just fine.

You can put it any way you want. Nobody really needs a gun, and if he does, he is able to acquire a permit.

A slingshot for killing raccoons? Now you are just being silly.

Also, a gun and ammo is not nearly the cost of the type of dog that would be needed to protect my chickens.

I have no problem with having to get a permit for certain types of guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

A slingshot for killing raccoons? Now you are just being silly.

zwillegelb.jpg

This will kill any raccoon you want.

Also, a gun and ammo is not nearly the cost of the type of dog that would be needed to protect my chickens.

It really depends on the gun, the dog, where you get the dog from, and how you feed your dog. You could feed it with raccoons. :P

I have no problem with having to get a permit for certain types of guns.

You see, that is what I am talking about (EDIT: But for all guns, actually. Why differentiate? They all make holes). Guns are not forbidden here, they are just harder to get!

Edited by FLOMBIE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zwillegelb.jpg

This will kill any raccoon you want.

It really depends on the gun, the dog, where you get the dog from, and how you feed your dog. You could feed it with raccoons. :P

You see, that is what I am talking about (EDIT: But for all guns, actually. Why differentiate? They all make holes). Guns are not forbidden here, they are just harder to get!

Yup, Dad uses them things to kill feral cats around the house. Pretty damn effective.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zwillegelb.jpg

This will kill any raccoon you want.

It really depends on the gun, the dog, where you get the dog from, and how you feed your dog. You could feed it with raccoons. :P

You see, that is what I am talking about (EDIT: But for all guns, actually. Why differentiate? They all make holes). Guns are not forbidden here, they are just harder to get!

That slingshot would take many shots to finally kill a coon. It would be a very cuel way to kill an animal. When a coon is in a cage, they do not stay still. To kill them instantly, you need to shoot them just right. The first couple I did, I shot them between the eyes. It then took me 3-5 shots to kill them. I don't like them to suffer. I then learned that you have to shoot them right in the back of the head at an upward angle. That kills them instantly. You also need to shoot throught the cage "trap".

That's funny, feeding the raccoons to the dog. :clap: I like the idea of using it for all you can.

Unfortunately raccoons carry disease. That's why I cannot just trap them and drop them off in some woods somewhere else. It's not right to spread the disease around or to just make them someone else's problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume Zara's dad's feral cats stay perfectly still? From one or two meters away they are lethal.

But anyway, A raccoon plague might be reason enough to obtain a small bolt action rifle over here. But if you shoot them, smack their heads hard enough, use poison or a slingshot does not make any difference to me. Farmers are able to deal with predators here, too. And most of them are not armed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Feral cats are bigger and meanier then coons. But dad is a mean man, if they don't die via the slingshot.. well. Awful things happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where he hunts anyway, biggest feral was the size of a punching bag. took three arrows to the skull to take it down, and even then he had to lop of it's head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sound like he gets the job done!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Much easier to just shoot them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is, yes, but are you really claiming a constitutional right to own a gun because you want to shoot raccoons? Come on, that doesn't make any sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[

Where he hunts anyway, biggest feral was the size of a punching bag. took three arrows to the skull to take it down, and even then he had to lop of it's head.

How cruel!

Do you mean to tell me that a slingshot can kill a cat when three arrows to the skull wouldn't take one down?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Myles, I've no experience with racoons, but if you are dispatching vermin at very close range then have you considered an air rifle? I would think that a .22 pellet would do the job up close with no risk of a ricochet from a bullet.I know a few pest control people who use them. Maybe a coons skull is too hard though idk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.