Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 5
F3SS

"You didn't build that"

495 posts in this topic

Why do you insist that people that do not support Obama are all republicans or biased. Some of us just do not like his resume.

Where, exactly, do you believe that I've done that?

- The only people not offended are those that watch the mainstream media and are told that it is not offensive.

- The people watching the speech were, of course, not ofended as they are leftists like yourself and fully agree with the premise that big daddy government is the single most improtant thing in a person's life.

- Thankfully there is a Fox news that brings these momentary glimpses of the real Obama to light instead of hiding the ugliness from the bright light of public scrutiny.

I rest my case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pro-Republican? Why can't someone feel a certain way without being labled? I won't vote for Obama or Romney. That doesn't mean I belong to the same party as the 3rd choice I vote for.

If you consistently support a single party's positions - then for all intents and purposes you are pro that party.

Obama said something stupid and offensive. Get over it.

Obama said something that's offensive only if you willfully take it out of context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if I change "Screamingly Republican" to "People that are obviously biased against Obama" - how about that?

So your plan is to take another one of his quotes out of context in order to justify why you took his first quote out of context?

Don't try and put me into one of your little boxes. I don't live in a black and white world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't try and put me into one of your little boxes. I don't live in a black and white world.

So now you're claiming not to be biased against Obama?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now you're claiming not to be biased against Obama?

So because I don't support Obama I'm a "screaming Republican"? You are obviously a Democrat, who is always going to vote the party line, instead of voting for who you think would be the best person for the job. If that wasn't the case, you could acknowledge there are other people that can actually think for themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So because I don't support Obama I'm a "screaming Republican"?

No. That's not what I said, at all.

I modified my original claim of "Screamingly Republican" to "People that are obviously biased against Obama", thus broadening the category.

You are obviously a Democrat, who is always going to vote the party line, instead of voting for who you think would be the best person for the job. If that wasn't the case, you could acknowledge there are other people that can actually think for themselves.

I'm neither a Democrat, nor am I even eligible to vote in the Presidential election.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. That's not what I said, at all.

I modified my original claim of "Screamingly Republican" to "People that are obviously biased against Obama", thus broadening the category.

I'm neither a Democrat, nor am I even eligible to vote in the Presidential election.

I know you aren't eligible to vote yet, but you've made it abundantly clear which side you are on because you support Obama,

I can't be a Republican because I'm a pro choice, pro gay marriage, tree hugger...and as we all know Republicans can be none of those things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rest my case.

You do? Good, I like beating you so easily and quickly. Most arguments with you become endless boring slogs through syntax, nuance, strawman arguments and just plain dopey, libreal doggerel that only a zealot could believe in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know you aren't eligible to vote yet, but you've made it abundantly clear which side you are on because you support Obama,

Would you like a little box with that?

I made it abundantly clear here which side I'm on.

I can't be a Republican because I'm a pro choice, pro gay marriage, tree hugger...and as we all know Republicans can be none of those things.

Sure they can. They're just not electable Republicans.

You do? Good, I like beating you so easily and quickly.

Your post single-handedly proved my position. As does your continuing attitude towards me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you like a little box with that?

Good, you did catch that.

I happen to be a right leaning Libertarian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your post single-handedly proved my position. As does your continuing attitude towards me.

Yawn. No I proved how empty your arguments are, how meaningless your hyperbole is and if you had a lick of sense you'd know that without my having to explain it to you.

BTW, I argue with you only to dissaude people on the fence from falling into the hypnotic trance of liberalism. I have no illusions of ever changing what you think because, as I said, you are a zealot.

So, what is your plan for November 7th after the disaster that is going to hit the democrats on November 6th? Will you cry "They cheated!!" or something else? Better start planning because armageddon is only 60 days away, I gauarantee that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yawn. No I proved how empty your arguments are, how meaningless your hyperbole is and if you had a lick of sense you'd know that without my having to explain it to you.

BTW, I argue with you only to dissaude people on the fence from falling into the hypnotic trance of liberalism. I have no illusions of ever changing what you think because, as I said, you are a zealot.

So, what is your plan for November 7th after the disaster that is going to hit the democrats on November 6th? Will you cry "They cheated!!" or something else? Better start planning because armageddon is only 60 days away, I gauarantee that.

Again. I rest my case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I happen to be a right leaning Libertarian.

Presumably you'll be voting for Gary Johnson, then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again. I rest my case.

Weak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably you'll be voting for Gary Johnson, then?

I'm leaning heavily in that direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weak.

Strong. Since we're obviously playing the childish game of just repeating the opposite of what the other person says to form a polarized partisan argument.

And you'd have got away with it, too, if it wasn't for all those pesky neutral fact checkers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strong. Since we're obviously playing the childish game of just repeating the opposite of what the other person says to form a polarized partisan argument.

And you'd have got away with it, too, if it wasn't for all those pesky neutral fact checkers.

Neutral fact checkers? LMAO. You want to make a little bet on the outcome of the election? I'll bet the republicans take the senate, kep the house and win the Presidency. If they don't, I won't post here for two months after taaking my deserved whipping the 7th. If I am right you leave for two months after taking the same whipping the 7th.

Come on, you are so sure of yourself, put it on the line. I'm the one out on a limb here so man-up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral fact checkers? LMAO. You want to make a little bet on the outcome of the election?

What makes you think that I think the Democrats are going to win? And what do neutral fact checkers have to do with the outcome of an election?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you think that I think the Democrats are going to win? And what do neutral fact checkers have to do with the outcome of an election?

Directly nothing, but if the vice candidate and the candidate keep on spurting boolcrappy then indirectly a lot.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Directly nothing, but if the vice candidate and the candidate keep on spurting boolcrappy then indirectly a lot.

Well, that I can see, but it's not as if Facts will change dependent on whichever candidate wins. They just are.

For example - If the Democrats win, it's not as if Romney actually meant "I like being able to fire people" in the context that the Democrats are claiming he did.

If the Republicans win - it doesn't make "You didn't build that" any more contextual, either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you think that I think the Democrats are going to win? And what do neutral fact checkers have to do with the outcome of an election?

You're the one that mentioned neutral fact checkers, not me. I have no idea what you were talking about but you referring to any info you use as neutral is laugahable.

So you think I am right then and the dems lose the exec and senate. Good, glad you agree.

Edited by Merc14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you'd have got away with it, too, if it wasn't for all those pesky neutral fact checkers.

Who are these nuetral fact checkers you speak of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dang is this thread still active????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that I can see, but it's not as if Facts will change dependent on whichever candidate wins. They just are.

For example - If the Democrats win, it's not as if Romney actually meant "I like being able to fire people" in the context that the Democrats are claiming he did.

If the Republicans win - it doesn't make "You didn't build that" any more contextual, either.

Absolutely. For about 82% of those who are going to go to vote the arguments are of very little influence, they will make their cross (or whatever method is used in that state) where they always did or where their "cool friends" put it.

The restant 18% is what matters. And they actually have the fate of the country in their hand.

This year it is in fashion to be libertarian so most are "libertarian". and many of those who are could hardly explain what a "libertarian" is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that I can see, but it's not as if Facts will change dependent on whichever candidate wins. They just are.

For example - If the Democrats win, it's not as if Romney actually meant "I like being able to fire people" in the context that the Democrats are claiming he did.

If the Republicans win - it doesn't make "You didn't build that" any more contextual, either.

It's called Doublethink. You should know that....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 5

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.