Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
Pulsar_J

911

994 posts in this topic

I have read some wacky 9/11 theories also.....it is insane really what some of them come up with. I totally agree that there are conspiracy nuts out there and they do watch too many Hollywood productions! lol....BUT that doesn't mean 9/11 happened the way we were told........it's complicated for sure and it saddens me......saddens me quite deeply. I was at the WTC memorial a few weekends ago......it just is still such a shock. Such an act of cruelty.........

Did you know that countries around the world sent out warnings that Muslim terrorist were going to attack the United States, some with warnings that aircraft were to be used? Nothing there about a U.S. government conspiracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you know that countries around the world sent out warnings that Muslim terrorist were going to attack the United States, some with warnings that aircraft were to be used? Nothing there about a U.S. government conspiracy.

I don't think it was a US govt conspiracy.......lol And yes I know there were warnings sent out. Like I said it is complicated;) So many layers of bs.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will leave you all with the words of Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during the Reagan Administration. Dr. Roberts till this day is a firm believer in Reaganomics, mind you he's a true blue Republican Libertarian.

Dr. Roberts during his government service has personally worked along side many of the neo-cons stragetists who developed the PNAC policies that have driven our nation to the brink of disaster. But being the true American patriot that he is, today he write to exposes the truth about how the American nation was hijacked.

In his article entitled "The 11th Anniversary of 9/11", he writes:

It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation.

The 11th Anniversary of 9/11 ~ Paul Craig Roberts

Unfortunately many here just might make him out to be just another conspiracy nutjob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it was a US govt conspiracy.......lol And yes I know there were warnings sent out. Like I said it is complicated;) So many layers of bs.....

Evidence allows a person to know when the 'hold 'em, and when to throw 'em.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence allows a person to know when the 'hold 'em, and when to throw 'em.

"evidence" has also placed many an innocent man in prison..............

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"evidence" has also placed many an innocent man in prison..............

That is not real evidence because there have been cases where lies have have placed people in prison. In fact, real evidence has been used to free innocent people from prison.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not real evidence because there have been cases where lies have have placed people in prison. In fact, real evidence has been used to free innocent people from prison.

I don't think many could handle the evidence..the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the TRUTH.....and not just of 9/11..........but of much of what happens in our country, and around the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think many could handle the evidence..the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the TRUTH.....and not just of 9/11..........but of much of what happens in our country, and around the world.

And I don't think you have any of what you claim. No truth. No evidence. Not about 9/11 or anything else. Nothing but a flapping pair of gums like every conspiracy theorist before you, and each who will follow.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think many could handle the evidence..the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the TRUTH.....and not just of 9/11\

And what in your opinion, is that "whole truth"?

Edited by MID

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I don't think you have any of what you claim. No truth. No evidence. Not about 9/11 or anything else. Nothing but a flapping pair of gums like every conspiracy theorist before you, and each who will follow.

It doesn't matter what you think really.......and in the end it doesn't matter what i think/know. Some things are just too big, too deep, too complex and there are forces more powerful and brutal than you would be capable of believing anyways.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And I don't think you have any of what you claim. No truth. No evidence. Not about 9/11 or anything else. Nothing but a flapping pair of gums like every conspiracy theorist before you, and each who will follow.

It might surprise you how many reputable people, some even in the intelligence community who do NOT believe the 'official' story.............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And what in your opinion, is that "whole truth"?

We don't know yet, the whole truth, but many many intelligent, professional credible people do not believe the official story. And these are not conspiracy nuts. They are thinking people who are not easily led. Who think independently of media, or popular opinion. There are pilots, engineers, firefighters, doctors, intelligence community members, and on and on......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter what you think really.......and in the end it doesn't matter what i think/know. Some things are just too big, too deep, too complex and there are forces more powerful and brutal than you would be capable of believing anyways.

In the end what matters is sound reasoning which is supported by evidence.

It might surprise you how many reputable people, some even in the intelligence community who do NOT believe the 'official' story.............

If you or anyone else can bring some actual evidence to the table for examination, there are plenty who are more than willing to take a look.

We don't know yet, the whole truth, but many many intelligent, professional credible people do not believe the official story. And these are not conspiracy nuts. They are thinking people who are not easily led. Who think independently of media, or popular opinion. There are pilots, engineers, firefighters, doctors, intelligence community members, and on and on......

Disbelief is not evidence. If you want to make any headway at all in this, you'll need to bring some of that to the table.

So far just about every question that the 9/11 truth movement has raised, has been explained in depth. The only questions that haven't been explained in depth remain unanswered solely because there isn't any data available to answer them. So yes, there are areas of ambiguity. There are things which we probably will never be able to answer at this point. The vast majority of major historical events have these areas of ambiguity, but that does not mean the correct answers to those unanswered questions point to anything conspiratorial.

To legitimately reach a conspiratorial conclusion you need evidence, not a lack of evidence.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boo

Neither is belief evidence of anything. Mencken talked about that as I've mentioned here before. Faith, belief as you use it here, is often just an illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable, and if there was ever an improbable story, it is the Official Conspiracy Theory.

All this time here, I never realized you were attempting to educate other posters. I find that a noble goal, but on this particular question, a bit vain, considering that some of us have been studying the evidence for quite a few years.

On this particular subject matters, yours is not so much education as it is repetition of a story that cannot withstand even the most superficial scrutiny.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boo

Neither is belief evidence of anything. Mencken talked about that as I've mentioned here before. Faith, belief as you use it here, is often just an illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable, and if there was ever an improbable story, it is the Official Conspiracy Theory.

All this time here, I never realized you were attempting to educate other posters. I find that a noble goal, but on this particular question, a bit vain, considering that some of us have been studying the evidence for quite a few years.

On this particular subject matters, yours is not so much education as it is repetition of a story that cannot withstand even the most superficial scrutiny.

BR, my request for evidence goes doubly so for you. All you've ever done here is run off your weaselly little mouth like the true propagandist you are.

I've provided considerable evidence and references in support of my position, including research, calculations, models, and graphics which I have personally developed; to help educate and answer questions which I consider valid and worthy of explanation. Where these materials and answers have been provided by others, certainly I have referred people, including yourself, to those answers and that information.

You, and several like you, blindly go on about your merry way without even considering such information and answers. Instead you merely shirk them off and continue to spout your nonsensical and long ago debunked drivel over and over again.

So it goes.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BR, my request for evidence goes doubly so for you. All you've ever done here is run off your weaselly little mouth like the true propagandist you are.

I've provided considerable evidence and references in support of my position, including research, calculations, models, and graphics which I have personally developed; to help educate and answer questions which I consider valid and worthy of explanation. Where these materials and answers have been provided by others, certainly I have referred people, including yourself, to those answers and that information.

You, and several like you, blindly go on about your merry way without even considering such information and answers. Instead you merely shirk them off and continue to spout your nonsensical and long ago debunked drivel over and over again.

So it goes.

BR, must think that people were born yesterday.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BR, my request for evidence goes doubly so for you. All you've ever done here is run off your weaselly little mouth like the true propagandist you are.

I've provided considerable evidence and references in support of my position, including research, calculations, models, and graphics which I have personally developed; to help educate and answer questions which I consider valid and worthy of explanation. Where these materials and answers have been provided by others, certainly I have referred people, including yourself, to those answers and that information.

You, and several like you, blindly go on about your merry way without even considering such information and answers. Instead you merely shirk them off and continue to spout your nonsensical and long ago debunked drivel over and over again.

So it goes.

Yes Boo, you have provided many links and pictures. What you seem to forget is that I basically was on your side for several years. So I thank you for your effort to educate me, but I've fairly well educated myself, thanks in large part to this internet and its wealth of information.

Simply put, the links, pictures and statements you've offered are not persuasive. You are unable to address serious concerns and questions. Mere repetition of the government story really doesn't prove anything to a curious mind.

Nobody can explain the heat source at WTC. Nobody can explain how a minimally skilled rookie pilot could do what he did except by saying "Well, he did it, get over it."

Sorry Charlie, that answer might be good enough for you, but it's not good enough for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply put, the links, pictures and statements you've offered are not persuasive.

Evidence, is evidence! You dismissed viable evidence and yet, you threw in a P700 anti-ship cruise missile for which there was no evidence.

Nobody can explain the heat source at WTC.

Very simple! Fires within the WTC buildings fed by the contents within the WTC buildings.

Sorry Charlie, that answer might be good enough for you, but it's not good enough for me.

Since you have shown a serious lack of knowledge on facts and evidence, it is not surprising.

Edited by skyeagle409

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence, is evidence! You dismissed viable evidence and yet, you threw in a P700 anti-ship cruise missile for which there was no evidence.

Very simple! Fires within the WTC buildings fed by the contents within the WTC buildings.

Since you have shown a serious lack of knowledge on facts and evidence, it is not surprising.

How rude and derogatory would you be to a say...FBI agent with extensive knowledge and understanding of evidence who tells you there are many many problems, inconsistencies, omissions and cover ups with the official 'story? Do you think they are all wacky conspiracy nuts too?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How rude and derogatory would you be to a say...FBI agent with extensive knowledge and understanding of evidence who tells you there are many many problems, inconsistencies, omissions and cover ups with the official 'story? Do you think they are all wacky conspiracy nuts too?

I guess it would depend upon what evidence he / she was able to produce, or are you saying that we should just take their word on it "on faith" with no need for any kind of evidentiary support...?

Cz

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How rude and derogatory would you be to a say...FBI agent with extensive knowledge and understanding of evidence who tells you there are many many problems, inconsistencies, omissions and cover ups with the official 'story? Do you think they are all wacky conspiracy nuts too?

I have posted details on intelligence failures leading up to the 9/11 attacks, which included the FBI, and there was nothing in the details implicating the U.S. government in the 9/11 attacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess it would depend upon what evidence he / she was able to produce, or are you saying that we should just take their word on it "on faith" with no need for any kind of evidentiary support...?

Cz

Of course you would want evidence......memos, phone calls, meetings, physical, whatever type. My point is this. There are some really good people who tried to protect this country and its citizens and they were thwarted and lied to and sometimes plain ignored.....the EVIDENCE they had was ignored many times.... Does that bother you...at all? Does that not raise any flags to you? or is the official story good enough because well...they said so? Even members of the 9/11 Commission were thwarted and lied too, and they didn't like it one bit.

As I have said before, any thinking rational open minded person who has investigated and researched the events prior to and the day of 9/11 knows that we have not been told the real truths of that awful awful day. Obviously we cannot get all of the evidence we need. The masterminds will never allow that. There are so many layers of bs it is overwhelming. But many reputable intelligent good people KNOW we have been deceived. Just because some conspiracy theorists are nutty doesn't mean every alternative theory/explanation is wrong or crazy........

I just wish all Americans could be united in wanting to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth. as brutal as it may be. THEY depend upon the obedient masses who are too scared to be labeled crazy and labeled a conspiracy nut.......

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you would want evidence......memos, phone calls, meetings, physical, whatever type. My point is this. There are some really good people who tried to protect this country and its citizens and they were thwarted and lied to and sometimes plain ignored.....the EVIDENCE they had was ignored many times.... Does that bother you...at all? Does that not raise any flags to you? or is the official story good enough because well...they said so? Even members of the 9/11 Commission were thwarted and lied too, and they didn't like it one bit.

As I have said before, any thinking rational open minded person who has investigated and researched the events prior to and the day of 9/11 knows that we have not been told the real truths of that awful awful day. Obviously we cannot get all of the evidence we need. The masterminds will never allow that. There are so many layers of bs it is overwhelming. But many reputable intelligent good people KNOW we have been deceived. Just because some conspiracy theorists are nutty doesn't mean every alternative theory/explanation is wrong or crazy........

I just wish all Americans could be united in wanting to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth. as brutal as it may be. THEY depend upon the obedient masses who are too scared to be labeled crazy and labeled a conspiracy nut.......

The problem is, too many people have been mislead by 9/11 conspiracy website, which are notorious for spreading disinformation, misinformation, and lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is, too many people have been mislead by 9/11 conspiracy website, which are notorious for spreading disinformation, misinformation, and lies.

Well I definitely agree with that.....

But that does not mean any alternative theory/explanation to the 'official' story is false, or wacky. Quite frankly some of the garbage the officials have spewed is just as bad. Probably worse, seeing as how many lives were lost due to complete and total incompetence/participation or a combo of the two.

One day i hope those with the evidence will be able to speak and then.....then you will KNOW the official story is BULL&*****.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course you would want evidence......memos, phone calls, meetings, physical, whatever type.

Ok, stopping here for a moment...

What would you say then to someone who claims that the "official story" is a lie, claims that there is evidence to support his claims yet goes to extreme lengths to avoid producing any of that alleged evidence, even going so far as to openly lie about his ability to use a computer as an excuse for not producing links to the evidence he maintains is available and has seen, and continually handwaves away any and all evidence that proves his wrong as part of the Government's "official lie" since the government "has lied before and therefore nothing they say can be looked at as accurate of believable.

Would you want this person arguing on your side of the proverbial fence?

Would you consider it "rude and derogatory" to point out to others that this person has lied in the past, continues to do so, purposely misinterprets or disregards evidence for no other reason than to avoid having to answer tough questions that reveal the falsehood and folly of his position, produces strawman arguments and red herrings to try and avoid having to address the issues presented to him, claims experience and knowledge of the topics under discussion yet when pressed for details, when giving answers to some questions and when giving descriptions of how he thinks events happened or should have happened makes such egregious errors in logic and basic knowledge that it becomes clear that the person really has nothing more (and in some instances, substantially less) than a layman's level of knowledge of the topics he claims personal professional experience in...?

My point is this. There are some really good people who tried to protect this country and its citizens and they were thwarted and lied to and sometimes plain ignored.....the EVIDENCE they had was ignored many times.... Does that bother you...at all? Does that not raise any flags to you? or is the official story good enough because well...they said so? Even members of the 9/11 Commission were thwarted and lied too, and they didn't like it one bit.

As I have said before, any thinking rational open minded person who has investigated and researched the events prior to and the day of 9/11 knows that we have not been told the real truths of that awful awful day. Obviously we cannot get all of the evidence we need. The masterminds will never allow that. There are so many layers of bs it is overwhelming. But many reputable intelligent good people KNOW we have been deceived. Just because some conspiracy theorists are nutty doesn't mean every alternative theory/explanation is wrong or crazy........

I just wish all Americans could be united in wanting to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth. as brutal as it may be. THEY depend upon the obedient masses who are too scared to be labeled crazy and labeled a conspiracy nut.......

The problem that I see is that there are so many varied and different "conspiracy theories" out there. Some flatly contradict each other. Some require leaps of faith or logic so vast that Evel Knievel himself would balk at making that jump.

More importantly, there isn't one complete theory, imo, that addresses ALL the evidence, that accounts for everything as well as or as completely as what people call the "Official Narrative" or more derogatorily the "Official Lie" or "Official Conspiracy Theory".

Its the same thing with the Moon Landing hoax. There are a few theories that focus on one or two individual oddities or inconsistencies (none of which have ever stood up to any amount of serious scrutiny), but there is nothing that addresses the event in its massively complex entirety, all the facts and figures and mountains of evidence that prove Man went to the Moon.

Sure there are a few oddities and even a few holes (maybe more than a few) in the Official Story, and yeah, there's a good chance we're not being told every single thing about what happened or who knew what exactly when, but until someone can come up with something that addresses all the facts of the day more completely and logically, the "Official Narrative"remains the accepted fact(s) of the day regardless of what you or anyone else thinks or believes.

Cz

Edited by Czero 101
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.