Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4
tyrant lizard

Why do some people need conspiricies?

79 posts in this topic

It seems to be that there are certain types of people who thrive on the conspiracy thing, and who sometimes, just because it's a conspiracy, tend to believe it?

Im talking about the guys who think America crashed planes into their own sky scrapers, Princess Diana was killed by the MI5, the world is run by a secret society of Devil worshippers, JFK was killed by the CIA the KGB or the Mafia, the Moon landings were faked... etc etc.

Is it because life is too mundane and they (or you, as the case may be) get bored easily and would like to spice things up?

My brother is one of these types of people, and when I say "Bin Laden planned 9/11" or "Diana was killed becasue her driver was drunk and was being chased by the paps" he goes mental saying I'm a fool and I believe in everything I hear. To which I reply, "Who told you all these amazing facts then, and how come you beleive them?"

I suppose this kind of goes with a lot of the other sub forums on here. I was watching Finding Bigfoot the other day and, after being told by an eye witness the figure that he saw was seven foot tall, the expert said "what's the chances of a seven guy being around here? no. That was a bigfoot." But I was thinking, "the chances of it being a seven foot man are higher than it being a creature that has never been proven to exsist. I get some folk are like Moulder - they want to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good points except for the last part about bigfoot, of course its more likly that a seven foot tall guy is walking around but the odds are low so it makes you wonder hmm well wtf would a seven foot tall guy be doing and maybe it wasnt a human its all just speculating. and to answer your op i think people want there to be a mystery or at least "solve" it but hey maybe some of them are real who knows i just let people have fun :P (kinda like those group murder mystery games people pay for)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure some of them might be real.

What worries me is the vehemence that some of these guys defend the conspiracies, as if there can be no doubt whatsoever and anyone who can't see that is a total dullard. I'm open to all possibilities on most things - but I'm 100% on almost nothing regarding the issues on UM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole idea of conspiracies has been so clogged with noise that real conspiracies go pretty much unnoticed, lost in the noise. They may not be as spectacular as 9/11 etc, but they are real.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure there are people who actually need conspiracies. Everyone is different, thank goodness, and I for one think it's a good thing that some people delve into conspiracy theories and really root around for the facts.

To take your first example of 9/11, there are still a lot of unanswered questions surrounding that. I haven't heard the one about the world being run by a secret society of Devil worshippers.

Sometimes, I think conspiracy theorists have a sort of sixth sense about their pet theory. They know that the official line doesn't ring true, they just can't prove why ........ yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some things which are beyond us and our perception. And until I know the real truth as it is, I'm open to every possible explanation. Which automatically doesn't mean that I believe in it too... I just take them into account.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...what can you say to someone who questions the existance of bigfoot but believes in magic bullets?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why you perceive that some people need conspiracies is that we are lied to so often. As far as your brother being a truther or whatever, although I don't hold with alot of the 911 conpiracies it's tough to deny that the BBC in London reported WTC 7 collapsed a full half hour before the event occured, and it's hard to deny the cell phone recording of the owner, who had just taken out a new more comprehensive insurance policy on the building, order it to be "taken down" which begs the question, why were there explosives already in the building to take it down? Compound all of this with the near total lack of reporting of these facts by the so called reliable news agencies and what choice does a reasonable person have but to scream "CONSPIRACY!!!!!" ?

Two weeks before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, FDR was given a report stating that the future of naval warfare was air craft carriers and submarines, and that the day of the battleship was ending. Shortly before the attack the secretary of the navy ordered all carriers and subs out of Pearl Harbor on exercises, leaving the battleships to be torpedoed and bombed. This was the trigger which got the USA into WWII, something FDR had been pushing for but the public had been dead set against. Pretty convenient trigger to shift public opinion don't you think? Of course this was never proven, so it's just a theory. In my opinion a theory that anyone would be foolish to wave off as ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...what can you say to someone who questions the existance of bigfoot but believes in magic bullets?

Not much - neither have been proved or disproved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason why you perceive that some people need conspiracies is that we are lied to so often. As far as your brother being a truther or whatever, although I don't hold with alot of the 911 conpiracies it's tough to deny that the BBC in London reported WTC 7 collapsed a full half hour before the event occured, and it's hard to deny the cell phone recording of the owner, who had just taken out a new more comprehensive insurance policy on the building, order it to be "taken down" which begs the question, why were there explosives already in the building to take it down? Compound all of this with the near total lack of reporting of these facts by the so called reliable news agencies and what choice does a reasonable person have but to scream "CONSPIRACY!!!!!" ?

Two weeks before the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, FDR was given a report stating that the future of naval warfare was air craft carriers and submarines, and that the day of the battleship was ending. Shortly before the attack the secretary of the navy ordered all carriers and subs out of Pearl Harbor on exercises, leaving the battleships to be torpedoed and bombed. This was the trigger which got the USA into WWII, something FDR had been pushing for but the public had been dead set against. Pretty convenient trigger to shift public opinion don't you think? Of course this was never proven, so it's just a theory. In my opinion a theory that anyone would be foolish to wave off as ridiculous.

Ok so there is some weird stuff regarding 9/11 but explanations have been given for almost every theory out there - maybe something odd was happening, but that don't mean it was an inside job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

order it to be "taken down" which begs the question, why were there explosives already in the building to take it down? .

It seems you need a conspiracy...where in the heck did you find this complete distortion? Let me guess...a conspiracy site. He didn't order anything "taken down", he suggested that maybe they should "pull it", "it" being the firefighting effort at WTC7, as the building was heavy with fire, and many folks had already died in the WTC fire and rescue efforts. The conspiracy folks glommed all over that, putting their interpretation into Mr Silversteins mouth.

And there were no explosives in WTC7, except the imaginary ones the CTs put there to support their conspiracy/CD storyline...

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lizard

Nice thread.

Care to work with a few definitions?

For example, would you be interested in defining "conspiracy"?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems you need a conspiracy...where in the heck did you find this complete distortion? Let me guess...a conspiracy site. He didn't order anything "taken down", he suggested that maybe they should "pull it", "it" being the firefighting effort at WTC7, as the building was heavy with fire, and many folks had already died in the WTC fire and rescue efforts. The conspiracy folks glommed all over that, putting their interpretation into Mr Silversteins mouth.

And there were no explosives in WTC7, except the imaginary ones the CTs put there to support their conspiracy/CD storyline...

OK so I got the terminology wrong, take it down, pull it, whatever. So since when does the civilian owner of a building get to have any kind of input on a fire fighting effort? Never, that's when. Pull your head out, and ask instead of only listen.

Also, since you not only remembered the exact phrase, but even the douche bags name who said it, you obviously are much more concerned with this than the average person. I wonder why?

Edited by OverSword

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
he suggested that maybe they should "pull it", "it" being the firefighting effort at WTC7.

"Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building"

http://web.archive.o...ero-sept-shame/

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so I got the terminology wrong, take it down, pull it, whatever. So since when does the civilian owner of a building get to have any kind of input on a fire fighting effort? Never, that's when. Pull your head out, and ask instead of only listen.

Also, since you not only remembered the exact phrase, but even the douche bags name who said it, you obviously are much more concerned with this than the average person. I wonder why?

The owner of a significant structure, which he owns, can say anything he wants. No, he's not in the FDNY chain, but there's nothing preventing him from expressing concern about the danger and possible further loss of life.

That I remember his name is because he is THE key figure in YOUR CT about WTC7...I'm surprised you didn't know the name of the man who you were accusing.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The owner of a significant structure, which he owns, can say anything he wants. No, he's not in the FDNY chain, but there's nothing preventing him from expressing concern about the danger and possible further loss of life.

That I remember his name is because he is THE key figure in YOUR CT about WTC7...I'm surprised you didn't know the name of the man who you were accusing.

I wasn't really accusing anyone of anything. I was pointing out that despite major questionable descrepancies between events that happened, on 911 and on Dec. 7th 1941, some people will just accept the official version of events without question. If you really want to argue about 911 specifically, as opposed to addressing the the subject of this thread, which is not single conspiracy oriented, perhaps you should post in a 911 thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
there's nothing preventing him from expressing concern about the danger and possible further loss of life.

"By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons."

http://www.nytimes.c...ml?pagewanted=2

timeline:

10:00am south tower collapsed

10:30am north tower collapsed

11:30am firefigters ordered to safety away from wtc7

5:20pm wtc7 collapses

question - what time was silverstein's phone call discussing "pulling firefighters"?

between 10:30am and 11:30am?

doesn;t make sense.

Edited by Little Fish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do some people need spelling lessuns? :st

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do some people need spelling lessuns? :st

All sorts of reasons, don't you think? It's never a good idea to ridicule people because of their poor spelling or grammar. As long as we can understand them, that's all that matters.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lizard

Nice thread.

Care to work with a few definitions?

For example, would you be interested in defining "conspiracy"?

You know what I'm talking about as I've given various examples above. Maybe I should change it to conspirAcy theories.

As for my spelling, I spelt it correctly to begin with. Someone on UM editted to discredit me and this thread.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that allot of the conspiracy theorists feel empowered by the fact that they know something other people don’t.

So that’s why I believe they defend these claims with such vigilance.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Conspiracy theorists do not thrive on truth, rather, they thrive on yanking chains.

Much like those who laugh at another's misfortune. Sometimes even causing more so they can laugh even more.

It's a psychosis marked by delusions, paranoia and a bizarre gratification for lies.

Edited by pallidin
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, lizard. :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nearly everyone agrees that our government, from top to bottom is corupted. We watch as they do unspeakable things to other countries, and thier populas. Whats so hard to believe that they would do similar things to us, if it helps reach a goal? As far as the moon landing, or Princess Diana getting killed, to me, I really dont care enough to even consider a conspiracy. But when you have bankers, who long stated goals are consolidation of economic power, depopluation, and world government, all the while attending pagan rituals and worshiping owl gods, well something has to give.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as conspiracy filling a need in people, for me that just isnt true. It was much easyer for me back when I thought governments for the most part had the best interests of its people in mind. Life was much more simple back when OSBL was the true face of evil, and that Iraq and Afgan were just wars.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.