Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3
monk 56

Sirius and Alnilam, Secret Societies

662 posts in this topic

Although much tangible evidence is frequently destroyed by earthquake, tsunami, flood, volcanic action and many cities/civilisations have 'vanished' in such ways - that does not mean those cities/civilisations never existed or that secret societies never existed within them. There are also major underground wonders such as these:

http://interestingen...-buried-cities/

Ok, and that shows that there was a secret society because of...?

Just cause it occurred to you while relieving yourself does not make it factual.

TANGIBLE FACTUAL EVIDENCE of Pavolpetri the oldest submerged city, over five thousand years old

DETAILS ACCOMPANYING THE VIDEO ARE:

'The city of Pavlopetri, underwater off the coast of southern Laconia in Peloponnese, Greece, is about 5,000 years old, and is the oldest submerged archeological town site. It is unique in having an almost complete town plan, including streets, buildings, and tombs. It has at least 15 buildings submerged in 3 to 4 metres (9.8--13 ft) of water. The newest discoveries in 2009 alone cover 9,000 m2 (2.2 acres).

Earlier, the ruins were dated to the Mycenaean period, 1600-1100 BC. Later studies showed an older occupation date starting no later than 2800 BC, so it also includes early Bronze Age middle Minoan and transitional material.

It is now believed that the town was submerged around 1000 BC. The area never re-emerged, so it was neither built-over nor disrupted by agriculture.

Although eroded over the centuries, the town layout is as it was thousands of years ago. The site is under threat of damage by boats dragging anchors, as well as by tourists and souvenir hunters.

The fieldwork of 2009 was largely to map the site. It is the first submerged town digitally surveyed in three dimensions. Sonar mapping techniques developed by military and oil prospecting organizations have aided recent work.

One of the results of the survey was to establish that the town was the centre of a thriving textile industry (from the many loom weights found in the site). Also many large pitharis pots (from Crete) were excavated, also indicating a major trading port.

~FAIR USE~ Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. !!!! DISCLAIMER!!!! I do not own any of the content of the particular file and definitely i do not make profit from it, it's strictly educational'

[media=]

[/media] Edited by AlnilamPhiSiriusly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously as i said i will start with the British in India... please note images to right on link.....wrong, they say last Delhi Durbar was 11th December 1911, when you click on images you will note it is 12th December 1911....please note this:-

http://en.wikipedia....ion_Park,_Delhi

Egyptian Day marker was observed on Date, as Sun Rose, Sirius was Setting!

Actually this is the date observed by proclamation of change of Capital of India from Calcutta to New Delhi....very important please value!

Astronomy graph below on link...obviously i'm going to go backward, much to come, but i wonder about our new found poster.....say something about Phi below

http://en.wikipedia....gold-centre.svg

http://2012forum.com...=7162&mode=view

Interesting that Star of India is GOLD....

Golden Number, known as Phi, the Golden Ratio, Golden Section, Golden Proportion, Golden Mean or the Divine Proportion...

Phi ( Φ = 1.618033988749895… )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Although much tangible evidence is frequently destroyed by earthquake, tsunami, flood, volcanic action and many cities/civilisations have 'vanished' in such ways - that does not mean those cities/civilisations never existed or that secret societies never existed within them. There are also major underground wonders such as these:

One can't, or at least shouldn't, base an argument on evidence that doesn't exist. To the italicised portion above, one could also make the ridiculous claim that there being no evidence that secret societies comprised of little green men from mars (somehow) validates a claim that there were. This would be an example of ignorance at its finest IMO.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay AlnilamPhiSirius, I will never question you again on thread, you have that merit with me, perhaps not with others, i hope you grace my thread again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AlnilamPhiSiriusly. has his own battles, he may grace my thread sometimes.....that is up to him, no doubt i value him, he has his own wants and needs, it may not be here,,,,,I hope he finds his central point...i hope he keeps here, he will give input to shake anybody....Ha Ha!

For myself i look to new dawn, be of little doubt, it is another day for me....Did you think i would put all British Indian philosophy down to one date....Get real....you know me better than that, although emotional! please wait for footnotes....you know me...i will have them! Please wait, i'm coming like a steam train ha ha! Soon i will play the Great Game ha ha! What's That?????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

~FAIR USE~ Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. !!!! DISCLAIMER!!!! I do not own any of the content of the particular file and definitely i do not make profit from it, it's strictly educational'

You might want to review the fourm rules about quoted content. Unless you yourself write something, you need to provide credit to the person who did or the place where you found it. It keeps everybody (esp. the site owner) safe from legal questions about plagiarism and encourages a healthy respect for academic honesty, which I'm sure we all (except maybe HarshPatel) want to foster! :)

2c. Plagiarism and copyright: If you quote text from an external web site then please always provide a source link. Members are asked to copy only as much as is necessary when quoting material from external sources, do not copy and paste entire articles or web pages.

--Jaylemurph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaylemurph,

I'm Original, i will be there like a steam train when i have sleep, i might be slow being disabled, so what, i will still hit you, it just means you have more time to run ha ha!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm gonna be puffing smoke after sleep, you better believe it ha ha!, yes i'm slow, but never think i don't get to Apex!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thanks for sharing..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first Delhi Durbar happened on 1st January 1876 to mark the Proclamation of Queen Victoria as Empress of India, midnight day marker was used when Sirius was culminating in the middle of the sky, information and astronomy graph on links below:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronation_Park,_Delhi

http://2012forum.com/forum/download/file.php?id=7163&mode=view

The Five pointed Star on the Star of India, link below is often used by secret societies for the symbolism of PHI or Sirius.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Star-of-India-gold-centre.svg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Eastern_Star

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One can't, or at least shouldn't, base an argument on evidence that doesn't exist. To the italicised portion above, one could also make the ridiculous claim that there being no evidence that secret societies comprised of little green men from mars (somehow) validates a claim that there were. This would be an example of ignorance at its finest IMO.

cormac

Ridiculous to ignore the fact that evidence does not exist may be because evidence has been destroyed:

to assume that no evidence has ever been destroyed is simply naive

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ridiculous to ignore the fact that evidence does not exist may be because evidence has been destroyed:

to assume that no evidence has ever been destroyed is simply naive

I don't want to speak /for/ Cormac, but that's certainly not what he's impying. (Or so I hope.)

I'm not sure if it helps or hinders your argument, but I would like to point out that history is not archaeology. It isn't a field based 100% on artefacts. It consists of (sometimes less, sometimes more) theorization. But not errant theorization, not theorization with no evidence. I'm not aware of anyone who assumes no evidence had ever been destroyed. However, I would assert is it exactly as naive for you to speculate using non-extant evidence as it would be for someone to assert no evidence has ever been lost.

The theorization that does occur (and, I would argue, should only occur) is based on the premise that theorization is of more worth the more evidence from which it is based. Theorization with out recourse to facts or reliant on nothing more than possibilities is of limited use in understanding the past. The biggest problem with using non-extant information is the (complete) inability to divide what you want to believe from the truth. Personally, the sort of thinking you seem to lionize always strikes me as fundamentally lacking in discipline and rigor, which is to say it is ultimately unlikely to be useful in understanding the past or of convincing other knowledgable people, which I take to be the point of historical debate.

--Jaylemurph

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ridiculous to ignore the fact that evidence does not exist may be because evidence has been destroyed:

to assume that no evidence has ever been destroyed is simply naive

If it doesn't exist then it's not a fact.

To assume that there was any evidence to begin with which later was destroyed, based on nothing more than the assumption, is the height of conceit IMO. Again, one can't base an argument on evidence that doesn't exist.

That evidence "may" have existed, which has since been destroyed, is a possibility. But then nobody, including yourself, would know about it to begin with so you have no argument other than trying to present a negative as a positive. It doesn't work that way.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 31st December 1857 Queen Victoria chose Ottawa as Capital of the Province of Canada, Midnight day marker was used to record event in the stars, as Sirius was culminating in the centre of the sky over Ottawa, information and astronomy graph on link below:-

http://2012forum.com/forum/download/file.php?id=4100&mode=view

The British North American Act 1867, being the Union of Canada is dated 29th March 1867, ancient Greek day marker was applied being sunset on 28th March 1867, as Sun set, Sirius was culminating in the middle of the sky over Ottawa, information below:-

http://www.solon.org/Constitutions/Canada/English/ca_1867.html

Astronomy graph below on link:-

http://2012forum.com/forum/download/file.php?id=7164&mode=view

Only evidence counts on topic with thread, as a scribe on history and intentional astronomy i can be posting for years ha ha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fond of Alexander Pope's translation of Homer's Illiad, i'm not sure if Homer would have valued Sirius as good or evil, there are many secret societies that align to it today, who knows?

Please scroll down link below on Illiad translation to "Page 65" to see Sirius the Dog Star mentioned:-

http://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/004836009.0001.002/1:3.2?rgn=div2;view=fulltext

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm fond of Alexander Pope's translation of Homer's Illiad, i'm not sure if Homer would have valued Sirius as good or evil, there are many secret societies that align to it today, who knows?

Please scroll down link below on Illiad translation to "Page 65" to see Sirius the Dog Star mentioned:-

http://quod.lib.umic...2;view=fulltext

...so this isn't even attached to anything. It's just an Augustan English poet who /mentions/ Sirius exists. Because it's already extant in the text he's translating.

Truly, deeply illuminating.

--Jaylemurph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I mention that Sirius has been valued in astrology teaching for thousands of years, fixed star observations are older than usual western astrology that has been around in its present form for about 2,000 years, obviously it is noticable that Homer could have been interested, sometimes secret societies interpret belief about Sirius differently, indeed the Romans thought this star was evil, please scroll down to "The Name" on link below:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_Days

Even if you scroll down link below to "Sirius" its interpretation isn't that favorable:-

http://www.astrothem...fixed-stars.php

There are other books on links below that i have that can give it a more favorable interpretation, but hardly a star that i think politicians who have astrology beliefs that align to constitutions and war should be thinking of doing ha ha!

http://2012forum.com...=3828&mode=view

http://2012forum.com...=4508&mode=view

http://2012forum.com...=4507&mode=view

Obviously Sirius or the Dog Star isn't only mentioned once in Alexander Pope's translation of The Illiad, please scroll down link below to "Page 74":-

http://quod.lib.umic...2;view=fulltext

Please note that studying people who are using astrology is different to believing in this myself, although i have an open mind regarding beliefs.

Edited by monk 56

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I mention that Sirius has been valued in astrology teaching for thousands of years, fixed star observations are older than usual western astrology that has been around in its present form for about 2,000 years, obviously it is noticable that Homer could have been interested,

But do you understand nothing in this post points to anyone intepreting anything about Sirius? I think you may have the same issue with the word "obviously" that you do with "political" -- whatever you mean by it is not jiving with the accepted English use of it. Nothing you've posted has been obvious to any of your readers.

And, "Could have been?" Maybe. Not that there's a great deal about it in any of his extant works, other than (as you post), passing mentions that it exists. By exactly the same logic, he could have been deeply interested in the occult associations of spears, walls and the wine-dark sea. And virtually every other word in the Iliad. It hardly makes a compelling argument.

sometimes secret societies interpret belief about Sirius differently, indeed the Romans thought this star was evil, please scroll down to "The Name" on link below:-

I'm not going to waste my time looking at whatever link you provide unless you can drum up some sort of compelling association with Homer or some other salient point. From what I can see, your critical methods seems to consist of throwing mud against a wall to see what sticks. While that may be endlessly fascinating to you, I hope you understand it is somewhat less interesting to other people and certainly doesn't make a convincing argument for... whatever it is you're arguing. As I've said, you've provided no reason to review your first 26 pages to find out. This certainly doesn't generate any reason to.

Obviously Sirius or the Dog Star isn't only mentioned once in Alexander Pope's translation of The Illiad, please scroll down link below to "Page 74":-

Obviously you still haven't made a convincing argument why it might be worthwhile to notice this. Perhaps you could provide some sort of framework to judge what is worth noticing in the Iliad and what is not.

--Jaylemurph

Edited by jaylemurph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaylemurph,

Evidence just keeps on coming on topic to thread, please read first page to understand, Canada Day comes from 1st July 1867, i look to this with location of Capital Ottawa, midnight day marker was used while Sirius was aligned to Nadir, information below:-

http://www.timeanddate.com/holidays/canada/canada-day

Astronomy graph below:-

http://2012forum.com/forum/download/file.php?id=7165&mode=view

Malaysia day or Proclamation of Malaysia happened in Kuala Lumpur on 16th September 1963, information below, as another example:-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_of_Malaysia

Egyptian Sunrise day marker was chosen as Sun rose at location, Alnilam, Belt of Orion and Osiris star was culminating in the middle of the sky, astronomy graph on link below:-

http://2012forum.com/forum/download/file.php?id=7114&mode=view

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it doesn't exist then it's not a fact.

To assume that there was any evidence to begin with which later was destroyed, based on nothing more than the assumption, is the height of conceit IMO. Again, one can't base an argument on evidence that doesn't exist.

That evidence "may" have existed, which has since been destroyed, is a possibility. But then nobody, including yourself, would know about it to begin with so you have no argument other than trying to present a negative as a positive. It doesn't work that way.

cormac

Interesting opinion.

Until the ancient city featured on this video was found, its existence was merely theoretical.

It's not complicated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting opinion.

Until the ancient city featured on this video was found, its existence was merely theoretical.

[media=]

[/media]

It's not complicated.

Not hardly since Hattusa was first established by the Hatti and later used by the Hittites. There was nothing theoretical about it.

Obviously it's too complicated for you since you don't seem to understand the difference between "legendary" and "theoretical". The former of which has been applied to this settlement of the Hattians/later capital of the Hittites. The latter of which doesn't apply to anything here. Plenty enough was known about the Hattian and Hittite peoples before Hattusa's discovery to know that it existed.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaylemurph,

Evidence just keeps on coming on topic to thread, please read first page to understand, Canada Day comes from 1st July 1867, i look to this with location of Capital Ottawa, midnight day marker was used while Sirius was aligned to Nadir, information below:-

http://www.timeandda...nada/canada-day

Astronomy graph below:-

http://2012forum.com...=7165&mode=view

Malaysia day or Proclamation of Malaysia happened in Kuala Lumpur on 16th September 1963, information below, as another example:-

http://en.wikipedia....ion_of_Malaysia

Egyptian Sunrise day marker was chosen as Sun rose at location, Alnilam, Belt of Orion and Osiris star was culminating in the middle of the sky, astronomy graph on link below:-

http://2012forum.com...=7114&mode=view

You just are not getting this. You're not making any sense. To be frank, I think part of it may be your English skills, but part of it is not. Part of it, it seems to me, is the fact you don't have any particular single idea or point you're making, and you're just amassing things that intrigue you in the same way magpies collect shiny objects, and you assume this speaks for itself. It doesn't. You seem frustrated other people aren't engaging you in the way you want, but you are not leaving anyone a solid idea to react to and give you feedback for. I hope you see now, as well, that nobody's going back to read the old pages in this thread, even after the time you (graciously) allowed.

But maybe I'm wrong. Are you able to put forth a coherent, intelligible statement of your theory in your own words? Not a link to another site, not someone else's work, not a Youtube video, and not buried in your previous 30 rambling, semi-coherent pages? As in "I believe that Sirius or X, Y or Z means this." "I think secret group A is performing actions B, C and D to achieve the ends E, F and G." "The Association between the Star Sirius and Secret Society Alpha is this."

--Jaylemurph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jaylemurph,

My interest isn't to bury you, i fully understand how you debate, perhaps sometimes i use another language it is called Math, members will note that i do win battles in math, please show where you win battles in this area and astronomy??

My philosophy is odds of chance regarding terrorist attacks, constitutions, war etc with math, it must be noted i give prime examples all the time and accurate astronomy, if you want me to start on Washington DC thats my candy bar.....you may not understand me in English...how good are you in math and odds of chance?

Because of the roll of the Earth in astronomy it gives factors in math regarding Latitude and Longitude, both are different measures, both are valued in odds of chance, if you don't understand me it is you are not using math or astronomy, or do not respect my graphs....math isn't English where you can debate odds of chance!

I'll try this to be simple with video, but you must know math to compete in debate....i have left the door open to attack but be aware of me!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGdw2743vKc

I will say this may be synchronicity, but then the odds favour that astrology works but not how most think! oops!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronicity

Be careful how you go Jaylemurph.....don't try me in math, even if you try in English....i leave two links below, no doubt you won't understand math language ha ha!

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10705808

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermeticism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell i come from London, the debate is i'm not using English Language.....oops could it be why many don't understand...oops could the philosophy be what i apply be Math Language.......question mark?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, that's a "No, I can't put forth a coherent, intelligible statement or theory" in your own words.

And unless you mean something completely different from the rest of the species by "mathematics" -- which your longitude as probability idea certainly suggests -- then you don't speak that very effectively, either.

--Jaylemurph

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.