Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
Imaginarynumber1

Papyrus refers to Jesus' wife

160 posts in this topic

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — A historian of early Christianity at Harvard Divinity School has identified a scrap of papyrus that she says was written in Coptic in the fourth century and contains a phrase never seen in any piece of scripture: "Jesus said to them, 'My wife …'"

The faded papyrus fragment is smaller than a business card, with eight lines on one side, in black ink legible under a magnifying glass. Just below the line about Jesus having a wife, the papyrus includes a second provocative clause that purportedly says, “she will be able to be my disciple.”

The finding is being made public in Rome on Tuesday at an international meeting of Coptic scholars by the historian Karen L. King, who has published several books about new Gospel discoveries and is the first woman to hold the nation’s oldest endowed chair, the Hollis professor of divinity.

The provenance of the papyrus fragment is a mystery, and its owner has asked to remain anonymous. Until Tuesday, King had shown the fragment to only a small circle of experts in papyrology and Coptic linguistics, who concluded that it is most likely not a forgery. But she and her collaborators say they are eager for more scholars to weigh in and perhaps upend their conclusions.

http://www.msnbc.msn...__utmk=75201554

Well, this is interesting. This could certainly change things a bit if it is not a forgery, which at this time, it does not appear to be.

Edited by Imaginarynumber1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

isnt jesus having a wife and family wat the Da Vinci code is about?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

isnt jesus having a wife and family wat the Da Vinci code is about?

Yeah, but in a very historically inaccurate and boringly fictional way.

This article goes on about how snippets in this are very similar to lines in the Gospels of Thomas and Mary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very interesting. Wonder how it will change Christianity. I know the thought of Jesus having a wife upset some people. Wonder about kids.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's yet to be verified as authentic, but even if it is - out of context, it's impossible to say what it's referring to. It could just as easily be a verse from the Old Testament that Jesus was quoting, or part of a parable that he was telling the disciples.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very interesting. Wonder how it will change Christianity. I know the thought of Jesus having a wife upset some people. Wonder about kids.

Be a bit rude to bring kids into the world knowing how you're going to leave it.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that it IS a FOURTH CENTURY document, which is at least 300 years after the death of Jesus.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the 4th century there were already many alleged "heretical" writings in circulation.So,it would be no big surprise even if it was authentic.

Edited by Dash--

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that it IS a FOURTH CENTURY document, which is at least 300 years after the death of Jesus.

All the canonical gospel after long after his death anyway. If he were real.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is highly likely that Jesus had a wife, as he was Human after all, just like us

It would be more bewildering if he was not married, as the churches state/dictate, which when anyone mention's such a thing they call them heretic's

and the fact Jesus could of possibly been married as heresy

There is a lot of Gospel's that the church have omiited from the Bible due to it not fitting in with what they believe it should be (council of nicea), it is possible that

the Vatican have known about such text's s like the one in the OP from day one

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of thought he was more interested in men.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that it IS a FOURTH CENTURY document, which is at least 300 years after the death of Jesus.

Depends what you mean by problem.

The first fragment we have of Jude is also from the 4th Century. That still made the Biblical Canon.

The date of this particular document only establishes the latest possible end date (the terminus ante quem) for the autograph - the original text.

It would only be problematic if you could establish that it was, in fact, the autograph, and had not been copied from an earlier document. From the linked article in the OP:

"She surmises that this fragment is also copied from a second-century Greek text".

If so, then it's possibly within a century of Jesus' death.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the "canon" would have a problem with it. I wouldn't, it doesn't change the message just the Patriarchal dogmatics' interpretation of it.

Edited by libstaK
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah if only it was a little bit bigger... just a few more words.....

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife Peter and I have made Brunch for all 5000 of you'…'"

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is pretty much worthless without context, as Tiggs pointed out. Still interesting, though. More inline with the Gnostic gospels than the canonical ones.

Here are all the translated bits that I can find for those that are interested. (I do not know if this is the sum of the writing on the piece)

"'... not [to] me. My mother gave to me li[fe] ...'"

"The disciples said to Jesus, '..."

"deny. Mary is worthy of it" (Or: "deny. Mary is n[ot] worthy of it")

"...' Jesus said to them, 'My wife...'"

"... she will be able to be my disciple ..."

"Let wicked people swell up ..."

"As for me, I dwell with her in order to ..."

"an image"

"my moth[er]"

"three"

"forth which ..."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WHAT?!?! The Catholic Church is covering something up?? Shocking.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that it IS a FOURTH CENTURY document, which is at least 300 years after the death of Jesus.

If we used that criteria then we wouldnt trust in Vikings saga neither.

Its just how religions works. We have examples in plenty religions.

WHAT?!?! The Catholic Church is covering something up?? Shocking.

Me too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All the canonical gospel after long after his death anyway. If he were real.

You see historians sees part of Bible as historical book. Can provide more info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of thought he was more interested in men.

Now thats hilarious and with intention to hurt feelings of believers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is pretty much worthless without context, as Tiggs pointed out. Still interesting, though. More inline with the Gnostic gospels than the canonical ones.

Here are all the translated bits that I can find for those that are interested. (I do not know if this is the sum of the writing on the piece)

"'... not [to] me. My mother gave to me li[fe] ...'"

"The disciples said to Jesus, '..."

"deny. Mary is worthy of it" (Or: "deny. Mary is n[ot] worthy of it")

"...' Jesus said to them, 'My wife...'"

"... she will be able to be my disciple ..."

"Let wicked people swell up ..."

"As for me, I dwell with her in order to ..."

"an image"

"my moth[er]"

"three"

"forth which ..."

I think that is mistake in traslation. We would already hear about his wife in other texts.

Its like beging of Bible. "In the beging it was a word." (Logos on greek)

Erasmus translated Bible as "In the beging there was conversation." (Because Logos can mean and conversation)

Conversation with whom?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that the "canon" would have a problem with it. I wouldn't, it doesn't change the message just the Patriarchal dogmatics' interpretation of it.

I agree. Christs message is unaffected.

It does open up some interesting posibilities though......

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife and seven sons.........."

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife is a Roman you know?"

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife's father, Mr Abbas is coming over for dinner...."

Edited by Atlantia
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no significant way in which christ having a wife and kids detracts from any part of the bible or the significance of christ. Nor his nature, nor the significance of his death, nor the possibility of his ressurection. Certainly it might offend some catholic views which evolved in the centuries after christ about women, sex and marriage.

I think it very probable that christ was married and perhaps had children, although many jewish men did not marry until they were reasonably old because they had to prove themselves capapble of providing for a wife and family.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree. Christs message is unaffected.

It does open up some interesting posibilities though......

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife and seven sons.........."

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife is a Roman you know?"

"Jesus said to them, 'My wife's father, Mr Abbas is coming over for dinner...."

"Jesus said to them, "My wife is an atheist and thinks I have a "God" complex ....." :P

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Jesus said to them, "My wife is an atheist and thinks I have a "God" complex ....." :P

LOL!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's a load of rubbish ,If it were true how would that effect the "Trinity "would we have to change it to

The Quadrality " The Father The son and the grandson and the holy spirit "

fullywired

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.