Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
AN.UNNA.KI

Connection Between 911 and 2012

295 posts in this topic

Yes. You would discover major flaws because you are a single minded person.

The flaws were clearly evident and not supported by the physical evidence. BTW, How many eyewitness claims were of a cruise missile striking the Pentagon? I think you backed yourself into a corner by posting that video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You want more pictures of debris?

Here's one of skyeagle's posts from that thread I suggested you go review.

We have photo evidence of B-757 wreckage lying around outside and inside the Pentagon, in addition to downed light poles along with strutural damage within the building.

911plane-video.jpg

Apparently, we have many clear photos of B-757 wreckage.

b757debrisquestion.png

comparisonimagenasa757p.jpg

pentwtcplanedebriscomp.jpg

pennydebriscopy.jpg

Flight_77_plane_debris_American_Airlines.png

Flight_77_plane_debris_American_Airlines_wide.jpg

debris2.jpg

In addition, here's a video, also from that thread I suggested you go read:

I don't suppose this is sufficient for you though, right? Nah, you should be able to just see 100% of the debris that comprised the aircraft despite the speed with which it impacted the building, is that right?

Upon what basis do you make such an assumption? Can you please explain the reasoning behind this?

Thanks.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To use an old Internet meme 'pics or it didn't happen'. You require everyone else to toss up pictures to support every detail of their argument, I hold you to the same standard, I'll disregard this point until you prove it.

There were no passengers? There. Were. No. Passengers. Do you realize how silly that sounds? Let's have someone trot out the list of passengers who died on the flight (I can't because I'm replying from my phone at the moment).

Again you go with the 'they were planted there' argument. What's your proof of that? That there isn't enough pieces to make a full 757? Wouldn't it be better if the government just slammed an actual 757 into the Pentagon then go through this half baked thing that you believe they did, especially since people such as yourself can soooooo easily prove them wrong?

I can make you a list also.There you go believeing everything. Of course there is going to be a passenger list. That is standard for a flight. Where are the bodies? Where are the seats? Where is there luggage? Stop looking at what you have and find what is missing. Don't you get it. This is all a set up. Just like a hollywood move. Better yet look at it as a murder mystery and find what is missing. You guys are followers. Do you realize how utterly hopeless you are. You can't think, you can't see. you can't think outside the box! Because you are in the box. No windows no doors. Just stay where you are. Just keep the same thoughts. You are puppets. And the government is pulling your strings!

Now you are thinking. Good point. Why did'nt they slam a plane into the Pentagon. All of this would not be happening. Well i guess they had to draw the line somewhere. But you made a good point. You did open your mind a little. Way to go!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is not enough wreakage to be a 757 man. Open your eyes. If it were 757 there should be at least 100% more wreakage. Do the damn #'s man. You sound like you have some inteigence, us it. Also how in the hell would a 757 penatrate through from one side of biulding to the other if, like you guys have been saying, the building was so strong.

How would a cruise missile penetrate the wall?

You realize that most of the wreckage is inside the pentagon, right? A highly classified area that they.re not going to show you even if it is on fire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can make you a list also.There you go believeing everything. Of course there is going to be a passenger list. That is standard for a flight. Where are the bodies? Where are the seats? Where is there luggage? Stop looking at what you have and find what is missing. Don't you get it. This is all a set up. Just like a hollywood move. Better yet look at it as a murder mystery and find what is missing. You guys are followers. Do you realize how utterly hopeless you are. You can't think, you can't see. you can't think outside the box! Because you are in the box. No windows no doors. Just stay where you are. Just keep the same thoughts. You are puppets. And the government is pulling your strings!

Now you are thinking. Good point. Why did'nt they slam a plane into the Pentagon. All of this would not be happening. Well i guess they had to draw the line somewhere. But you made a good point. You did open your mind a little. Way to go!

I highly dislike the patronizing words you keep using. This isn't a debate when you yourself are jammed so far up your own 'conspiracy theory' that all you smell is yesterdays lunch.

What happened to the passengers I ask.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. You would discover major flaws because you are a single minded person. You can't open your mind to anything other than what is in there already. You spend your whole life disproving things that you do not or will not understand. You are just so brainwashed into this whole government conspiracy that you can't see the forest for the trees. All the evidence is right there in front of your faces. But all you can say is that a 757 disintegrated/vaporized and that all those parts you have pic's of are the only ones that did not DISINTEGRATE! How convenient is that! The mere fact that I can find so many holes in your cover-up stories proves that this never happened. I came into a cold case with new claims. These claims are that the original findings were false and were part of a US Government cover-up. I look around to see you I can question and all I find are BRAINWASHED ZOMBIE'S who just keep saying the same thing over and over when asked where is the 757? Answer- It disintegrated on impact or inside the building. Well there should have been some very large parts of this 757 wreakage. Where are they? Here we have some pictures. This is a 757 airliner? Yes sir. That's it. You can't be serious. Yes sir we are. Is that the hole the 757 made in the Pentagon? Yes sir it is. Well it looks like the wings must have been sheared off. Yes sir they were. You have the pictures. I don't see any wings here. Yes sir look closer. See these parts are wing parts. Really. They don't look like they were in a crash. Yes sir tey were. You can see where the impact of the wing left and inpression on the wall. Yes I see that but I don't see the wing. Well those are the parts we showed you. All those parts do not make one wing. Where is the other one? Oh. It disintegrated too. Did the engines disintegarte too? Yes sir they did. The landing gears? Oh we have one. I guess the other one disintegrated also. Yes sir it did. Ok. What about the fuselage, the passengers,the seats and luggage? Oh. That's inside the building. Oh Great can we take a look. Sure sir right this way. Wow. This looks like a bullet went through it. No sir no bullet or missle. Just the 757. So where are all the parts. You're standing on them. That's it? You mean to say that this is all that is left of a 757 airliner? Yes sir. Who came to this conclusion? The Government and Popular Mechanics . The magazine? Yes sir. What do they have to do with it? Don't know sir but we believe anything they say. Can't you guy's make up your own minds? No sir. The government told us what happened. And you agree with what they say? Yes sir. The government does not lie. So you also believe that we went into Iraq looking for WMD's? Yes sir. Yeah. I know, the government does not lie. Is ther anyone else aroung here I can talk to? Yes sir, but you don't want to talk to them. Why not? Oh they don't think like us. We think they are looney. Really, and you guy's. Oh no sir we are of sound mind. We are not looney. Every one else is but not us! Who are these other guy's. Bae Roth, Alex Jones and this new guy, An.unna.ki. Well guy's I wish I could say you have been helpful but it seemd you guy's are just followers. I want to go talk to the other guy's. They may be able to help me get down to the bottom of this missing 757. Oh sir? Yes. Don't forget to tell every one that it was a 757 that hit the Pentagon. No I can't do that guy's. I rather know the truth then be a brainwashed governemnt puppet. Sir we are not puppets! Bye guy's. When ever you get out of your diaper's we may be able to exchange ideas. Sir! What are ideas?? Use your imagination. Sir! What is imagination? Forget it.

Ha, wow, great rant, words in all caps, a generous helping of exclamation points, and even a cameo appearance by the rare double question mark; you nailed it. Indeed, please do go "talk to the other guy's", and consider giving your imagination a rest, I fear it's a bit overworked.

(if you have any response to this please direct it to your favorite government agency, after all, as you have decreed, the government told me to type this to you. "I" couldn't have had anything to do with it, being a brainwashed puppet and all)

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can make you a list also.

This is what seperates the Conspiracy Believer and a Conspiracy Theorist.

A theroist will come up with some semblence of evidence supporting their view.

A Believier will always use the liar liar pants on fire claim. Claiming that people are lying or producing faked evidence without proof of such acts is such a cop-out of having an ADULT debate.

You think those passenger lists were faked? If so, then why have the victims families stepped forward to claim the loss of their loved ones?

Get over yourself.

There you go believeing everything. Of course there is going to be a passenger list. That is standard for a flight. Where are the bodies? Where are the seats? Where is there luggage? Stop looking at what you have and find what is missing. Don't you get it. This is all a set up.

You do not seem to understand one single damned thing at all.

Why would there be full bodies of the passengers just lying around? Can you imagine the amount of energy that was released on impact? You may think the human body is this hard steel piece that is literally unbreakable, but that just goes to show that you know nothing about physics or human anatomy to even understand what happened.

Just like a hollywood move.

Yes, like your supposed C-130 firing a cruise missile theory. Pure hollywood.

Better yet look at it as a murder mystery and find what is missing.

Nothing is missing, forensics found the remains of the passengers.

You guys are followers. Do you realize how utterly hopeless you are. You can't think, you can't see. you can't think outside the box! Because you are in the box. No windows no doors. Just stay where you are. Just keep the same thoughts. You are puppets. And the government is pulling your strings!

Keep telling yourself that you are above everyone else. Must be those crystal skulls the Nazi's are trying to find to bring the Annunakis back to earth.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to know what stuff you are on... A 10 year old would be smarter than you, a whole class or 20 schools would be smarter than you

Again. What the heck is your point. I do need to be smart to see what is in front of my face. You on the other hand can't see passed your nose.

You want more pictures of debris?

Here's one of skyeagle's posts from that thread I suggested you go review.

In addition, here's a video, also from that thread I suggested you go read:

I don't suppose this is sufficient for you though, right? Nah, you should be able to just see 100% of the debris that comprised the aircraft despite the speed with which it impacted the building, is that right?

Upon what basis do you make such an assumption? Can you please explain the reasoning behind this?

Thanks.

I will say this is the most impressive photo's yet. Let me ask you than. If you take all those parts. Plus the ones found outside. How much of that aircraft would you have? Well what ever it is to you that is all you need to say that this is all there is of a 757? What doe sthe speed have to do with it? A 265,000 lb aircraft does not vanish/vaporize or disintegrate into such small pieced that you have a hard time finding them. As I have said before. Show me some significant parts of the plane. Like these:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can make you a list also.There you go believeing everything. Of course there is going to be a passenger list. That is standard for a flight. Where are the bodies?

Let's listen to coroner, Wally Miller.

Where are the seats?

You tell us why no seats are seen at this crash site.

image.jpg

Where is there luggage?

You tell us why no luggages are seen at this crash site.

87crash.jpg

Stop looking at what you have and find what is missing.
]

Well, point out the seats and luggage in the photos above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will say this is the most impressive photo's yet. Let me ask you than. If you take all those parts. Plus the ones found outside. How much of that aircraft would you have? Well what ever it is to you that is all you need to say that this is all there is of a 757? What doe sthe speed have to do with it? A 265,000 lb aircraft does not vanish/vaporize or disintegrate into such small pieced that you have a hard time finding them. As I have said before. Show me some significant parts of the plane. Like these:

I will ask again. You appear to be making an assumption that we should see a significant amount of sizable debris and that you should be able to visually reconstruct the majority of the aircraft from that by using these and/or other photos.

Upon what basis do you make such an assumption? Can you please explain the reasoning behind this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again. What the heck is your point. I do need to be smart to see what is in front of my face. You on the other hand can't see passed your nose.

I will say this is the most impressive photo's yet. Let me ask you than. If you take all those parts. Plus the ones found outside. How much of that aircraft would you have?

What difference does that make? How much of PSA 1771 was recoverable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the wreckage outside the exit hole, that is clearly aircraft wreckage, which has nothing to do with a cruise missile.

How can you know what is from a missle and what is from a 757. There is not enough wreakage inside to be from a 757. Why did we not see significant parts of the 757 like these? Don't give me the BS about it slammed into the building. Most times the tail section survives. In your case even the tail section disapeared. really odd. If I did not know better I would think some faked the whole crash. Another thing. You guys made me watch a video showing that the757 crashed into the Pentago from above but the official reports say ground level. Which one is it.

Here you go . You guys don't seem to know what sizeable parts of a plane wraek are so look at these and see if you can find any like this. Most time the tail section survives. But not in your case even the tail vanished!

nigeria-plane-crash-10.png?w=560Plane-wreckage-from-Smole-006.jpgOB-LJ904_crash1_G_20101217092836.jpgchinaplanecrash11_full.jpgtag-reuters_27_1338809866.jpgnewspic4bea9a94b8064.jpga192292b-39cd-4cd6-9886-66b16c612a5dHiRes.JPG1648934_G.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How can you know what is from a missle and what is from a 757. There is not enough wreakage inside to be from a 757. Why did we not see significant parts of the 757 like these? Don't give me the BS about it slammed into the building. Most times the tail section survives. In your case even the tail section disapeared. really odd. If I did not know better I would think some faked the whole crash. Another thing. You guys made me watch a video showing that the757 crashed into the Pentago from above but the official reports say ground level. Which one is it.

Here you go . You guys don't seem to know what sizeable parts of a plane wraek are so look at these and see if you can find any like this. Most time the tail section survives. But not in your case even the tail vanished!

nigeria-plane-crash-10.png?w=560Plane-wreckage-from-Smole-006.jpgOB-LJ904_crash1_G_20101217092836.jpgchinaplanecrash11_full.jpgtag-reuters_27_1338809866.jpgnewspic4bea9a94b8064.jpga192292b-39cd-4cd6-9886-66b16c612a5dHiRes.JPG1648934_G.jpg

Once again, you showing your lack of knowledge. American 77 and United 93 impacted at very high airspeeds.

Now, tell us why the following crash site does not look like the crash sites you've posted.

art.iran.crater.afp.gi.jpg

This is a Tu-154, of the type that created the crash site above. Go ahead, and point out the seats, luggage, fuselage or tail section in the photo.

Tu-154_RA-85570-600x450.jpg

Edited by skyeagle409
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What difference does that make? How much of PSA 1771 was recoverable?

hey that flight of hero's went straight down. I think the estimated speed was somewhere around 800-900mph. That's twice your speed. and more was found there then at your site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, you showing your lack of knowledge. American 77 and United 93 impacted at very high airspeeds.

Now, tell us why the following crash site does not look like the crash sites you've posted.

art.iran.crater.afp.gi.jpg

here we go again. What was the air speed of AA 77 when it impacted the Pentagon? And don't forget to find the pic's of large parts like the one's I just posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again, you showing your lack of knowledge. American 77 and United 93 impacted at very high airspeeds.

Now, tell us why the following crash site does not look like the crash sites you've posted.

art.iran.crater.afp.gi.jpg

This is a Tu-154, of the type that created the crash site above.

Tu-154_RA-85570-600x450.jpg

And your point is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And your point is?

If an aircraft strikes the ground at a steep angle or a building at over 500 mph, you are not going to find an intact tail section or fuselage. The aircraft you have posted did not strike the ground in the same manner as United 93.

In the case of American 77, there is enough wreckage remaining to identify the aircraft as a B-757.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And your point is?

You are not even presenting and argument for your points nor are you engaging in debate. You are simply contradicting every post made.

You are the one who originally made the outrageous claim when you started the topic...so why don't you present your case.

Why, after over a decade, are you bringing forth these accusations?

Conspiracy theorists started bringing forth all the accusations you are making here before the sun set on 9/11.

What do you hope to accomplish by digging up a horse that has been beaten to death long ago?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not even presenting and argument for your points nor are you engaging in debate. You are simply contradicting every post made.

You are the one who originally made the outrageous claim when you started the topic...so why don't you present your case.

Why, after over a decade, are you bringing forth these accusations?

Conspiracy theorists started bringing forth all the accusations you are making here before the sun set on 9/11.

What do you hope to accomplish by digging up a horse that has been beaten to death long ago?

Because I was like you all those years. And one day I said I've had enough. I want to know the truth about 911. Plus I was interseted in 2012. So my reserch on 2012 led me to 911. So I got both at the same time. I have persented my case. There is no real solid proof of a 757 hitting the Pentagon. where is teh fuselage? Where is the tail section. I You guy's tell me they disintegrated. And you expect me to believe that? You believe it. All of the people I have been debating with believe it. how I do not know. But it does not add up. An ebtire 757 disintegrates. And don't tell me about those few parts that you have managed to find. They do not Make up 1% of the total mass of that plane. Where is the rest of it? Oh. Disintegrated

Get your info corrected. I have been at this computer for 2 daus debating. You need to start from the beggining.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread closed for moderator review.

Edit to add: AN.UNNA.KI you keep asking for evidence and claim to have received none yet there are 21 pages to the contrary which you have chosen to ignore. Quite rudely, I might add.

Given all the disruption and bickering in this thread there is little we can do to salvage a constructive discussion.

Thread closed.

Edited by Daughter of the Nine Moons
Thread closed
6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.