Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
egyptian lad

The Giants of ancient egypt are fact

531 posts in this topic

It's twue, it's twue.....

1377791-ram1.jpg

From which temple is this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that Giants existed.

Why is hard to imagine that Giants existed?! We have had giants animals in all area of the world. Giant penguins in Antartica for example. Its life adaptation. I think we must look for giant bones in areas that were once hard to found food. Look at elaphant. His stomach is big because it was hard to him to find good nutrition food so to survive he must eat a lot of low quality food that his stomach could choose best nutrition from it. So to become Giant we must first asumme that Darwin theory is right and give homo spieces enough time and area with low quality food and you will get Giants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

~SNIP~

post-132711-0-47017400-1348510498_thumb.

Do you think even 20 guys were able to lift this large stone?

Since this block is about the size of the average block in the Great Pyramid that would put it at around 2.5 tons/5000 pounds. So yes, with the right equipment 20 men could lift/move this block and it actually wouldn't even take 20 men.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we wanted to construct a building todays:

Machines:

post-132711-0-83458800-1348510665_thumb.

small bricks:

post-132711-0-92051700-1348510871_thumb.

Iron bars:

post-132711-0-56997400-1348510953_thumb.

cement and other construction materials:

post-132711-0-12564300-1348511126_thumb.

But in ancient egypt:

Only lime mixture and large stone of granite and other solid rocks

post-132711-0-24328300-1348511344_thumb.

In ancient egypt, the giants used those large stones because it was in their nature, the big stones were in their capacity....You can say: a large stone to us, was a small stone to them.

After giants era was over, people of our size came , they lived in homes of small muddy and sandy stones.

They even completed some large stones wall with small muddy stones they were unable to use large stones and re-build the wall front of temples by same substance of blocks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ty, yes they sell their consciences for sake of fame and money

by God's will, the truth of giants will apear more and more, egypt is full of giant human skeletons who still earthed, There were a big nation of numerous giants in egypt

They would make all the fame and all the money they want by bringing forth just one giant skeleton or mummy. Keeping them hidden deprives them of that.

Actually "God's Will" has nothing to do with it. The giants you want to be there simply aren't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that Giants existed.

Why is hard to imagine that Giants existed?! We have had giants animals in all area of the world. Giant penguins in Antartica for example. Its life adaptation. I think we must look for giant bones in areas that were once hard to found food. Look at elaphant. His stomach is big because it was hard to him to find good nutrition food so to survive he must eat a lot of low quality food that his stomach could choose best nutrition from it. So to become Giant we must first asumme that Darwin theory is right and give homo spieces enough time and area with low quality food and you will get Giants.

I'll tell you something.

Egyptians, and Mediterranean people (ancient Italians, Greek, Egyptians) in general were always rather small, in ancient times and many still are now.

And then there were the Nordics: Scandinavians, Danes, Frisians, and so on.

The people living at the coasts of the Med thought of them as giants.

They were on avarage 6 feet tall, and some were a bit larger.

What would you have thought. of them, living there back then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People of our size whatever they are romans or pharohs or israelites or persians, were unable to re-build some crashed large stone wall:

View this image to see this fact:

post-132711-0-55241600-1348512091_thumb.

Completed large stones wall by small muddy bricks( bricks like we use todays):

post-132711-0-52388400-1348512280_thumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll tell you something.

Egyptians, and Mediterranean people (ancient Italians, Greek, Egyptians) in general were always rather small, in ancient times and many still are now.

And then there were the Nordics: Scandinavians, Danes, Frisians, and so on.

The people living at the coasts of the Med thought of them as giants.

They were on avarage 6 feet tall, and some were a bit larger.

What would you have thought. of them, living there back then?

Nordics also have stories about Giants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we wanted to construct a building todays:

Machines:

post-132711-0-83458800-1348510665_thumb.

small bricks:

post-132711-0-92051700-1348510871_thumb.

Iron bars:

post-132711-0-56997400-1348510953_thumb.

cement and other construction materials:

post-132711-0-12564300-1348511126_thumb.

But in ancient egypt:

Only lime mixture and large stone of granite and other solid rocks

post-132711-0-24328300-1348511344_thumb.

In ancient egypt, the giants used those large stones because it was in their nature, the big stones were in their capacity....You can say: a large stone to us, was a small stone to them.

After giants era was over, people of our size came , they lived in homes of small muddy and sandy stones.

They even completed some large stones wall with small muddy stones they were unable to use large stones and re-build the wall front of temples by same substance of blocks

Most of the stones in the pyramids are sandstone and they could and were cut, moved and put in place by people of average size using pulleys and levers.

You should check out Coral Castle. The average weight of most of the stones is 15 tons, 6 times the average weight of the stone blocks used in building the great pyramid. It has larger stones up to 35 tons in weight. It was built with simple machines (no cranes) by an average size man who weighed a mere 100 pounds. He did it by himself with no others to help.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People of our size whatever they are romans or pharohs or israelites or persians, were unable to re-build some crashed large stone wall:

View this image to see this fact:

post-132711-0-55241600-1348512091_thumb.

Completed large stones wall by small muddy bricks( bricks like we use todays):

post-132711-0-52388400-1348512280_thumb.

Temple_of_Edfu.jpg

As can be seen in the above the arch itself would be approximately 40 foot tall. The "small muddy bricks" that you claim are there, in your picture, would appear to actually be about 2 foot tall and show evidence of weathering. This does not support your claim in the least.

cormac

Edited by cormac mac airt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King Tut must've been the family midget then .

Strange how if all these giant pharaohs are limited to the ancient pre-dynastic period that we should have depictions of Ramses, several Ramses, as a giant, on New Kingdom period buildings...

http://en.wikipedia...._familjebok.png

http://riversfromede.../ramses3sea.jpg

...But a very normal-sized Ramses mummy.

http://en.wikipedia....messes_II#Mummy

The problem with you guys, u believe the archaeologists and egyptologists blindly

The mummification so called science actually never existed in ancient egypt or world wide.

Mummies were saved by Nature or god.

Some bacteria and heat,coldness,soil factors can save the dead bodies of some people unrotten with flesh

The british early archaeologists took some saved dead bodies of some people from different ages and put them into the pharaohs coffins and sarcophaguses, to create FAKE LEGEND and cheat over history that people had mummification science in the ancient times.

If you open the tombs and graves of modern people, You would find some saved dead bodies of modern people like what we call mummies.

I remember in my own city, news spread over dead guy who was buried in 1974, by the 90s people opened his tomb to put his dead father with him, they got shock and surprise by his saved body unrotten, they called the police called to come, the police rushed to surround the place of tombs and didnt allow any person to know what happen.

Of course, supersition was previaled in the city that this guy is angelic and connected to God and so.

Briefly, Some dead bodies of people be saved by nature or soil factors.

In ancient egypt: There is no record for mummifaction science.

The mad egyptologists suggested by depicted arts of Anubis the Dog God, god of afterlife and his check to the dead people in the coffin, That was mummification work.

Anubis the dog god and his check to the dead:

post-132711-0-84803900-1348513492_thumb.

Is that mean a mummification??? No its rather a blessing spiritual action Not mummification.

As i said the early british archaeologists took some unrotten dead bodies for anonymous guys and put them in the coffin of pharaohs to claim it was king so and king so.

They created a myth.

Even now by their lies, they say: that stomach of mummies were brought out in some cups

SOME cheaters!

You may know mummies or unrotten dead bodies were found world wide, Not only egypt.

In mexico,persu,eithiopia,iran,china,north america,some european countries,egypt

Its all nature work, including the ones in egypt.

__________________________________________________

when i discuss with many guys about giants subject, they would say to me" the pharaohs had sciences of mummification, so u think they were unable to lift those large stones".

The poor guys dont know that mummification was actually a mythy and one of biggest lies that archaeologists created over ancient egypt.

You also would find, The coffin face is different than the mummy facial features because those mummies were anonymous, not bodies of kings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays, we reached the farest advanced stage of medicine science, or to accurate " the western scientists" reached a stage that they play genes of creatures and went on surgeries to something could never happen.

So with all progress in the medicine field?? The western scientists still unable to mummify a guy for 100 or 200 years.

But according to the cheating archaeologists, the dishonest guys:

Pharaoh mummies were infected by malaria and other diseases But they reached a science , the west didnt reach it yet LOL

In the medical papyrus of Edwin smith:

You gonna find that the ancient egyptians were highly primitive and backward on their medicine.

So those backward ancient people on medicine would go for a science of mummification? No and never.

Its all archaeologists's game over ancient egypt history

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its all nature work, including the ones in egypt.

Nature didn't remove all the internal organs, apply natron to the body inside and out and then wrap it. Nor did nature remove the brain through an individuals nose. Nor did nature even leave embalming fluid within the skull of the deceased.

cormac

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the stones in the pyramids are sandstone and they could and were cut, moved and put in place by people of average size using pulleys and levers.

You should check out Coral Castle. The average weight of most of the stones is 15 tons, 6 times the average weight of the stone blocks used in building the great pyramid. It has larger stones up to 35 tons in weight. It was built with simple machines (no cranes) by an average size man who weighed a mere 100 pounds. He did it by himself with no others to help.

why you compare something in modern times regarding the construction after machine lifters were invented?

it seems you dont know much about stones in ancient egypt, have you look at the size of stones at bases of pyramids? or stones around sphinx? or obelisks?

Even the solar ship woods were buried in a hole who covered by stones, each stone was 18 ton

sphinx stones, too massive stones:

post-132711-0-55140900-1348514990_thumb.

post-132711-0-23071100-1348515335_thumb.

post-132711-0-15851600-1348515390_thumb.

In the past, Technology was not invented yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By logic: if you are a king or queen in your country, you would make a statues by different people and say its your statues?

I may give you an example, of ex president of egypt Mubarak:

Mubarak statues were made to represent himself..................NOT OTHER PEOPLE!

post-132711-0-41906800-1348509247_thumb.

But King Tut according to the hypocrite archaeologist, King tut had many various statues representing him, these statues were not for one person but multi different people, So why this contradictions?

Have we got a brain???? sorry for saying, Its idiotic people who would say these statues were figurative, why shall a king leave figurative statues, while he was about glory and to be memorized like his own lookings over history, So some people and next generation would come and say : This is king tut.......His features must be all ONE and Unique!

I do not know why you fail to accept or understand the symbolism of portraying the Pharaoh as a larger than life figure!

Since you brought up a comparison with modern Egypt, I will continue to use your example as an illustration of the concept (in a very loose sense). Do you remember when a few months before the revolution Mubarak visited the White House and the photograph was photoshopped by Ahram? They placed Mubarak ahead of Obama and all the others; their motive was to add to the 'stature' and 'status' of Mubarak by placing him ahead. Within the means available to the ancient sculptor using a 2 dimensional image, 'status' is expressed as physical stature: the royal figure is portrayed as much larger than his enemies or subordinates. That does not mean that he was actually, physically, a giant.

Take the Arabic language as an example, we say "el nas maqamat" denoting authority and social status, but the root of 'maqamat' is the same as 'qama' which literally means physical stature or height/size (the same applies to the English word 'stature'). Symbolism employed linguistically or artistically should not be interpreted literally or at face value.

Finally, the only way prove your hypothesis is to provide a giant human bone which can be tested for 'human' DNA

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nature didn't remove all the internal organs, apply natron to the body inside and out and then wrap it. Nor did nature remove the brain through an individuals nose. Nor did nature even leave embalming fluid within the skull of the deceased.

cormac

cormac: its lies of archaeologists>>>>>>>>>> the internal organs were not removed.......it was removed by surgeons.

The natron>>>>>>>>was such something added.

The sheet wrap was either work of some doctors.

it was a game made by the cheaters.

The nature saved them.

Even on 1884, its reported that some british divers found mummy in the red sea and after they had>>>>>> the archaeologists rushed to run their game over it and put in the coffin to claim king so and king so.

You speak as if people are that honest! Hypocrisy and hishonesty is all the way in this field......Fame and Money is all the interest

I will show some mummies who were saved by nature in egypt too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you think over thos rotten mummies?

the ancient egyptians forgot to wrap them into the sheets?

Many mummies are found in mountain caves and desert in egypt, and ethiopia too

post-132711-0-92848500-1348516234_thumb.

post-132711-0-46817900-1348516291_thumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Temple_of_Edfu.jpg

As can be seen in the above the arch itself would be approximately 40 foot tall. The "small muddy bricks" that you claim are there, in your picture, would appear to actually be about 2 foot tall and show evidence of weathering. This does not support your claim in the least.

cormac

how come????

Did you see the giant portraits on wall? those were in the same size of large giants, the ones who lifted the obelisks by their hands

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you think over thos rotten mummies?

the ancient egyptians forgot to wrap them into the sheets?

Many mummies are found in mountain caves and desert in egypt, and ethiopia too

post-132711-0-92848500-1348516234_thumb.

post-132711-0-46817900-1348516291_thumb.

Predynastic mummies, naturally desiccated by the arid hot climate & desert sands; probably what inspired the mummification process

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why you compare something in modern times regarding the construction after machine lifters were invented?

it seems you dont know much about stones in ancient egypt, have you look at the size of stones at bases of pyramids? or stones around sphinx? or obelisks?

Even the solar ship woods were buried in a hole who covered by stones, each stone was 18 ton

sphinx stones, too massive stones:

post-132711-0-55140900-1348514990_thumb.

post-132711-0-23071100-1348515335_thumb.

post-132711-0-15851600-1348515390_thumb.

In the past, Technology was not invented yet.

Your posts indicate that you don't think average sized humans could build the pyramids. I gave an example of one average sized human building with blocks that were heavier on average than those in the pyramids. I even indicated that no machine lifters were used and that only pulleys and levers were used in it's construction

The average weight of the pyramid blocks are 2 1/2 tons. That is not the weight of each block but just the average weight.

You say that giants did all the work because the blocks were too big and heavy for average men to move and put in place. I have showed where that conclusion is invalid with my comparison to Coral Castle. However let us add one further thing. The following image is a depiction of one of the large statues being moved by men of average height, and in the lower left one of the large pieces of stone being moved by average sized men. So based on that we can see that average sized men did the work.

SLH11-Colossal-statue-being-dragged-on-a-sled.png

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not know why you fail to accept or understand the symbolism of portraying the Pharaoh as a larger than life figure!

Since you brought up a comparison with modern Egypt, I will continue to use your example as an illustration of the concept (in a very loose sense). Do you remember when a few months before the revolution Mubarak visited the White House and the photograph was photoshopped by Ahram? They placed Mubarak ahead of Obama and all the others; their motive was to add to the 'stature' and 'status' of Mubarak by placing him ahead. Within the means available to the ancient sculptor using a 2 dimensional image, 'status' is expressed as physical stature: the royal figure is portrayed as much larger than his enemies or subordinates. That does not mean that he was actually, physically, a giant.

Take the Arabic language as an example, we say "el nas maqamat" denoting authority and social status, but the root of 'maqamat' is the same as 'qama' which literally means physical stature or height/size (the same applies to the English word 'stature'). Symbolism employed linguistically or artistically should not be interpreted literally or at face value.

Finally, the only way prove your hypothesis is to provide a giant human bone which can be tested for 'human' DNA

hello we talked once before i think

really? your comparison is funny ya akhi

perhaps, you didnt search alot into the depicted arts of ancient egyptians.

If a giant portrait was to make the king superior to others, or to be known as supreme figure, then all egyptian kings would to be drawn like this ...............You agree?

Why the variety in kings's portraits then?

The ancient egyptians recorded Some kings by giant art, but other kings were in the same size around them.

Let me bring PROOF

I actually have answered this question many times and over, all guys i discuss with they say Its was symbolic figures to express the royal kings and so..... No it was not.

First: what do you think of this image?

Giant servant and small servant in same picture

post-132711-0-90293700-1348517276_thumb.

Kings beat guys in their size Vs giant kings beat smaller guys:

post-132711-0-91535600-1348518034_thumb.

post-132711-0-49796900-1348518190_thumb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You seriously think the ancient artists forgot to give gigantic figure of kings ???????

Dude, They were very accurate!

As i said, that art of giant king was made in early era of egypt, the other art was made in an era where people were equalized in size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cormac: its lies of archaeologists>>>>>>>>>> the internal organs were not removed.......it was removed by surgeons.

The natron>>>>>>>>was such something added.

The sheet wrap was either work of some doctors.

You're right, there are lies here. But it's not the archaeologists doing it. The internal organs were removed, prepared with natron and wrapped, then placed into canopic jars. The body was also treated in this way before being wrapped.

You speak as if people are that honest!

You're certainly not being honest.

what do you think over thos rotten mummies?

the ancient egyptians forgot to wrap them into the sheets?

Only royalty and nobility were given the opportunity to be mummified at first. Later this was extended to those wealthy enough to afford it. Not everybody could.

how come?

Did you see the giant portraits on wall? those were in the same size of large giants, the ones who lifted the obelisks by their hands

Because the "small muddy blocks" you claim are there don't exist. As well as the fact that there are no verifiable remains of people of that height. And further it can be shown from a human anatomical/biological standpoint that such an individual couldn't have existed since the weight of his own structure would be enough to impair his ability to even move around. A good example of this being Robert Pershing Wadlow, who at 8 foot, 11.1 inches was so large that his anatomy was effectively crushing his feet, ankles and legs as well as causing him other problems. You can't get around the biology.

cormac

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with you guys, u believe the archaeologists and egyptologists blindly

The mummification so called science actually never existed in ancient egypt or world wide.

Mummies were saved by Nature or god.

Some bacteria and heat,coldness,soil factors can save the dead bodies of some people unrotten with flesh

The british early archaeologists took some saved dead bodies of some people from different ages and put them into the pharaohs coffins and sarcophaguses, to create FAKE LEGEND and cheat over history that people had mummification science in the ancient times.

If you open the tombs and graves of modern people, You would find some saved dead bodies of modern people like what we call mummies.

I remember in my own city, news spread over dead guy who was buried in 1974, by the 90s people opened his tomb to put his dead father with him, they got shock and surprise by his saved body unrotten, they called the police called to come, the police rushed to surround the place of tombs and didnt allow any person to know what happen.

Of course, supersition was previaled in the city that this guy is angelic and connected to God and so.

Briefly, Some dead bodies of people be saved by nature or soil factors.

In ancient egypt: There is no record for mummifaction science.

The mad egyptologists suggested by depicted arts of Anubis the Dog God, god of afterlife and his check to the dead people in the coffin, That was mummification work.

Anubis the dog god and his check to the dead:

post-132711-0-84803900-1348513492_thumb.

Is that mean a mummification??? No its rather a blessing spiritual action Not mummification.

As i said the early british archaeologists took some unrotten dead bodies for anonymous guys and put them in the coffin of pharaohs to claim it was king so and king so.

They created a myth.

Even now by their lies, they say: that stomach of mummies were brought out in some cups

SOME cheaters!

You may know mummies or unrotten dead bodies were found world wide, Not only egypt.

In mexico,persu,eithiopia,iran,china,north america,some european countries,egypt

Its all nature work, including the ones in egypt.

__________________________________________________

when i discuss with many guys about giants subject, they would say to me" the pharaohs had sciences of mummification, so u think they were unable to lift those large stones".

The poor guys dont know that mummification was actually a mythy and one of biggest lies that archaeologists created over ancient egypt.

You also would find, The coffin face is different than the mummy facial features because those mummies were anonymous, not bodies of kings.

Herodotus, who lived in the 4th centuty BCE wrote about the Egyptian mummification process.

http://ib205.tripod.com/herodotus_mummification.html

This disproves your statements concerning mummification.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On the entrance of most gigantic temples in egypt:

Giant kings beat up smaller guys, such like this portrait

post-132711-0-39357200-1348518466_thumb.

Giant king with his giant wife and small servants..........Vs.....King in same size of his servants

post-132711-0-29372800-1348518847_thumb.

It means one thing, They take a big consideration for size of people and kings, they recorded the reality of their ages

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.