Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
egyptian lad

The Giants of ancient egypt are fact

531 posts in this topic

Zero answer my ***. Refer to my previous post on with subject, and Kmt's corrections of my numbering. It's a moot point anyway. Eliminating the two on the right as one is dehydrated and the other is guesswork, the similarities between all the faces should be unmistakable to anyone but you..

i will answer u later, i just dont have lot of free time thats why i dont answer all

i dont ignore any answer though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really not sure whether I believe egyptian lad is serious or a troll. This seems to be getting sillier and sillier.

Im serious and do research for years, im actually after finding giant skeleton....its one of my dream to make the truth more clearer

This truth must be gotten out for the light

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No u total wrong.....Just view the variety on depictions , it tells the story

They were depicted big cuz they were giants

There are depictions for kings and queens in the same size of their servants.......on the other side, giant kings and queens bigger than their servants in the size, It was the reality of ancient egypt, Where giants lived and had a unique civilization

In the early ancient egypt: there were a big mighty nation of giants,where thousands of giants lived in egypt

This is an image for two giant human skeletons discovered in egypt, They continuously discover giant human skeletons in egypt but keep it hidden and in secret:

2n9m72t.jpg

Yep, and Muhammad Ali's right fist is bigger than his head:

Muhammad-Ali-Punch-01.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they found a mummy in jabalain area of red sea, after it was documented, they removed it in order to fabricate one of the biggest lies in ancient egyptian history " The mummification".

Those muslims who claim it was mummy of moses's pharaoh king, They are stupid and highly idiotic, because this mummy which was discovered in jabalain belongs to a guy from the modern ages....not the ancient times.

If there's no mummy, then there's nothing but hearsay to indicate it ever existed.

u should know: many mummies been found in deserts and mountains

many researchers in egypt claim" that climate and some bacteria can create a mummy"

Mummies been found in snowy lands :

Mummy belongs to 700 years in china:

another mummy in china for a caucasian lady

Even nature saved some dead animals and made them mummy:

Mummification is all made by NATURE NATURE

Not mankind work at all........the mummies of egypt were all made by nature, its the lies of egyptologists and archaeologists who created that myth

Mummies were moved from the graves to be put in the sarcophaguses and coffins of ancient egyptians.

Most mummies of egypt that in good condition belongs to the modern egyptians not the ancient egyptians, its the blessin work of cheating archaeologists

They think no one can catch their tricks over history, But the truth is already known

The school of hypocrisy = archaeology

The fact that mummies occur in nature in no way precludes the practice of induced and enhanced mummification as evidenced in those from Egypt. It's a fact that bodies dating from before deliberate mummification came into vogue have not held up well. The AE weren't idiots. They would've noticed this and noticed what conditions were optimal for preservation, and we know they were concerned with keeping the body intact. Why else go to the trouble of sticking it in a special tomb sealed in a coffin in the first place? We know about their beliefs about the Ka and the other parts of the soul because they told us, and the use of grave goods backs it up. It only makes sense that they would take pains to try and keep the body as incorrupt as possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Egyptian Lad, are you really Egyptian? It is really sad to see how facile it is for you to persistently try to demolish your own heritage and history with uninformed, uneducated pictorial fantasy tales!

If you want to be taken even half seriously, bring proof to the table, one giant knuckle bone would suffice!

As long as you reject Egyptology as 'lies' and unless you learn to read and translate hieroglyphs yourself, you have no way to discern on your own what had or had not been referred to, and that includes mummification. Reliance on 'pictures' isn't enough, in other words, you have no clue!

You seem to be unaware that organic materials are examined using techiques like carbon14 dating which, along with DNA studies, requires the collaboration of scientists in disciplines other than Egyptology and archaeology. Are you proposing a 100% leak-proof, world wide multi-discipline conspiracy that spans 2 centuries, and that seems logical or rational to you?! The 'wicked' Egyptologists mummified bodies, reburied them all over Egypt -sometimes under tons of sands- while altering tombs and inscriptions on stone & papyri...they did all that without anyone ever noticing, or are hundreds of Egyptian workers and their families also complicit in this grand conspiracy?

As for your offhand dismissal of archeogenetics and DNA studies, I blame the dysfunctional education system in Egypt that has been left to deteriorate & collapse since 1952!

According to you everything the Egyptians did is meticulously recorded otherwise it doesn't exist; so please tell us the rules of senet, recipes of food they ate, notation of their music, I am asking you for only simple activities practiced by all individuals on daily basis, not technical knowledge reserved to the initiated, trained specialists; should be easy for you to answer.

When Cormac used the word 'drivel', he was being kind!

My own heritage is not that history, which the occupier british put and created........My own heritage gonna be made by egyptians themselves, The history will be re-written from the beginning

When an egyptian researcher discovered some errors in the translation of champollion for the hieroglyphic language, he was rejected by the egyptian antiquities authority why? because trying to correct the truth,its is so dangerous on the fake history they documented

when he met professors in archaeology college, they replied him" Are you mad? we will never recognize your research and never re-write our history", some professors even tried to steal his own research

For the giants subject: im already doing lot of awareness between people and get lot of acception, this is the only logical theory and only truth

On the future, i will find giant skeleton to kill all rejecters

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kudos, Egyptian Lad for keeping this going for 33 pages.... so far. :nw:

Edited by Eldorado
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really not sure whether I believe egyptian lad is serious or a troll. This seems to be getting sillier and sillier.

One can only hope - for him - he's a troll...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no evidence of giants in Egypt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no evidence of giants in Egypt

And the 'photos' of giant skeletons were nothing but Photoshopped fakes, and actually part of a contest.

As we all (should) know by now.

But like Kmt-sesh already said, within a short time someone else will start again about these socalled giants.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the 'photos' of giant skeletons were nothing but Photoshopped fakes, and actually part of a contest.

Am not so sure, Abe. Look at the size of Buddha's flip-flops!

p1000833.jpg?w=300&h=225

http://jaamata.wordpress.com/

Edited by Eldorado
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My own heritage is not that history, which the occupier british put and created........My own heritage gonna be made by egyptians themselves, The history will be re-written from the beginning

When an egyptian researcher discovered some errors in the translation of champollion for the hieroglyphic language, he was rejected by the egyptian antiquities authority why? because trying to correct the truth,its is so dangerous on the fake history they documented

when he met professors in archaeology college, they replied him" Are you mad? we will never recognize your research and never re-write our history", some professors even tried to steal his own research

For the giants subject: im already doing lot of awareness between people and get lot of acception, this is the only logical theory and only truth

On the future, i will find giant skeleton to kill all rejecters

I hope you mean all rejections, not rejectors! I reject your hypothesis but prefer to stay alive for a while longer :lol:

Seriously E.Lad, your source is Lebanese tv?!!! Come on, are you serious? Who is this "Mike", what is his expertise, what proof does he have other than photoshopped pictures and hearsay? He's claiming that huge giants are living underground in 'holes' (yet always undetectable)... in a few generations, let alone millenia, they would be blind as bats! His theory is that the West in order to advance must push back the ME (why exactly & how does that work); and that the more technology is advanced, the less intelligent people become. His example to prove his point is that people no longer memorize phone numbers because they rely on their cell phones!!! I had to translate a part for non-Arabic speakers here. Whatever 'Mike' is claiming, it remains at best a mere tale based on hearsay, maybe a lucrative means to fame but not much more.

What is the name of the Egyptian Egyptologist who discovered the mistakes in the translation of the Rosetta stone? When exactly did this happen, why are there no traces of this story even on the net? If it is such a well kept secret, how did you know about it, i.e., what is your source?

Are your giants 'qawm 3ad'?

Being an Egyptian is not a matter that is decided by historians and archaeologists, are you Egyptian?

A word of advice, try to explain your conspiracy theory by stating clearly:

-Who are the conspirators

-When did they start their plotting

-Motive?

-Means ( try to include how could a totally dessicated dead body, in mortis rigor for 20,000 years as you claim, be stretched out without crumbling into dust)

Try not to use such things as the dirty wrappings excuse, you are aware of carbon dating, mudding modern cloth doesn't work!

-What did the giants evolve from, when?

-How did they disappear and why (please something more credible than cataclysmic thunder storms)

-How do homo sapiens fit into the giant time line

-Providee evidence (non-pictorial) to all of the above

Finally, if you are Egyptian, did our ancestors spend several thousand years just twirling their thumbs? What a waste of time!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kmt, I told you so! Almost verbatim :innocent:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kudos, Egyptian Lad for keeping this going for 33 pages.... so far. :nw:

He got by with a little help from his friends...

or should I say opponents.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've a question for EL, assuming there were giants, how did THEY lift all those huge stones far FAR above their heads if they're 3-5 metres tall?

We erected Stonehenge, and that's relatively in the same scale with "mundane" humans as some of those temples are to giants and we had to use pulleys and ditches and complex mechanisms.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Giants made them too, obviously.....duh.

you thickie!

:whistle:

Infact all major megalithic works were undoubtedly made by giants, easily....probably only took a morning or so.

Edited by The Gremlin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...in fact I have found that half of the Egyptology don't like the other half and are doing their best to show their results wrong. Very bad environment for a conspiracy.

...

And that's what I'm talking about. Egyptian lad's stance that it's all a conspiracy really just shows that egyptian lad has no understanding of the workings of academia. It's simply preposterous.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Egyptian lad, perhaps you missed it or perhaps you ignored it for the sake of convenience, but you need to go back and read my Post 405. You need to take its cautionary note seriously. You should also carefully review meryt-tetisheri's excellent Post 486, particularly the list of questions at the bottom of this post. You should really try to answer each of these questions as fully as possible before you post anything further about giants.

Since your return you've recycled a lot of the same misinterpreted images and the same uninformed arguments—about stuff we've already dealt with in some detail. The posts about King Tut and his images and statues really put me off. This one in particular was already evaluated and fully explained.

For the moment this thread will continue. I personally see no reason for it to do so, but it's under review.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Second, I am speaking as a Moderator at UM. I am tired of your approach. You've written dozens of posts containing nothing but random photos, your misinformed interpretations of them, and the casual dismissal of professional historical research and scientific investigation. My patience is wearing very thin. In essence all of the posts you've submitted are the same, only with different misinterpreted photos.

Many posters have called you on this. Your only response is "archaeologists have lied." This is a lazy copout, not an explanation.

If archaeologists have been so successful in hiding "the truth" from everyone, then how is it you alone know "the truth"? At this time I am officially advising that you explain yourself better. What are your sources and how do you know what you claim to know?

Please reply. At the present I am not sure how much longer this thread need go on. You have done nothing to address other posters' questions and challenges, and you have proved nothing of substance for your own claims.

Egyptian Lad,

I am going to make the kinder assumption that you missed and did not ignore a moderator's request.

For the final time, if you are not prepared to answer other posters questions to you and substantiate your extraordinary claims then this thread will be closed and everyone can stop wasting their time.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

~Dot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've a question for EL, assuming there were giants, how did THEY lift all those huge stones far FAR above their heads if they're 3-5 metres tall?

We erected Stonehenge, and that's relatively in the same scale with "mundane" humans as some of those temples are to giants and we had to use pulleys and ditches and complex mechanisms.

Giant ramps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hypocrite archaeologists thought by removing and hidding the skeletons and mummies of giants in egypt, so No one gonna catch their conspiracy

They should know there are smart people around them,who going to hunt their tricks

The truth of giants is already told through the ancient egyptians,they depicted it.......they did even refer to it by quotes about the power of pyramids's builders

The entire history of ancient egypt is made up and fabricated, Fabrication over mummification lie, Fabrication over the actual dates of Ancient egypt, fabrication over the dynasties......etc

Don't forget they also hid all the large furniture, homes and temples the nation of giants built.

When you come across any of those smart people who are hunting the archeologists tricks send them to UM. We love intelligent conversation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hypocrite archaeologists thought by removing and hidding the skeletons and mummies of giants in egypt, so No one gonna catch their conspiracy

Many early archaeologists actually were strict Christian and were actively looking for Giants to proove the Christian Bible was factualy correct. Several even found mammoth skeletons and arranged them into humanoid shape to give the impression of a giant.

If there were actually giant bones to be found, early archaeologists would have been eager to profess such to Science and the world. That giants have been hidden by science since ancient times is a myth and a conspiricy theory.

He also expected that these countries are gonna declare this truth of giants in the coming years because its cant be hidden anymore.

I'll believe when I see it. But HOW is it that the truth can not be hidden any longer? It would seem that today we could hide the truth even better then before, using many vectors of false information.

Another evidence on the truth of egyptian giants:

The large coffins of giants are still hidden by archaeologists in order to kill the truth of giants

Records of the ancient egyptians, People were lifting large coffin of giant egyptian

There are many depictions of animal headed Gods also. Do you believe there were animal headed Gods? They are depicted and so must be real, right?

Its not the arabs who used the stones of ancient egypt, it was the mamuliks.....Mamuliks were a foreign soldiers rent from multi countries, they had a coup over the arab caliphs and ruled egypt, The mamuliks used some of the casing stones of pyramids which were fallen around the pyramids, they cut it into small piece.

It looks like you are right that most was taken by the Turks. But, I have to laugh that ALL the cladding stones fell off, but almost none of the core stones. Clearly the cladding was taken, because it was very fine limestone, yet NO giants were used by the Turks.

Even when i ask guys who work in construction field about the large stones of pyramids, they answer, we dont know how people lifted them.

It is true we don't know how they lifted them, but dozens of experiments have show many ways it could have been done. Giants were not needed.

13yo7dg.jpg

Block appears to be about 1 meter high, 1.5 meters wide and 2.5 meters long. So it probably weighs (assuming limestone) about 5 to 6 tons. The average person can pull easily about 100 pounds. (A person and usually drag another person, right?). Especially if they are physically strong and fit, as the Egyptians of the time would have been from laboring and farming. So that about 100people to lift it. But, wait!!! Using a ramp of sand and clay you can lift a block with only the force needed to break friction and the fractional weight due to the angle of incline. So, clearly it is possible. Maybe 20 to 30 people would be needed to drag it over a sandy surface. Less on a sledge.

You display a lack of basic math and basic science skills.

This is a giant human finger of 5.5 meter tall mummy :

1180twy.jpg

This one I've not quite figured out yet. But, I have seen other pics where those bills (money) are larger, and that makes me think that some of the pictures of these giant fingers are photoshopped also.

Edited by DieChecker
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a note on the "giant mummy finger", has anybody noticed the "bone" at the base (in the upper right of the four photos)? It doesn't look like a millennia-old mummified bone to me... I could be wrong, I'm not an expert on mummification, but it doesn't look like bone, particularly in the way it's broken of. At the very least, it looks as though it's been tampered with; though it's more probable that it outright betrays a wholesale fabrication. What's visible of the 'interior' of the "bone" in particular doesn't look at all like the interior of a human bone.

I'd also be keenly interested to know where these people claim that the rest of this "giant" mummy went... I mean, it would be rather odd to find just a mummified finger, wouldn't it? Where's the rest of it's body suppose to be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a note on the "giant mummy finger", has anybody noticed the "bone" at the base (in the upper right of the four photos)? It doesn't look like a millennia-old mummified bone to me... I could be wrong, I'm not an expert on mummification, but it doesn't look like bone, particularly in the way it's broken of. At the very least, it looks as though it's been tampered with; though it's more probable that it outright betrays a wholesale fabrication. What's visible of the 'interior' of the "bone" in particular doesn't look at all like the interior of a human bone.

I'd also be keenly interested to know where these people claim that the rest of this "giant" mummy went... I mean, it would be rather odd to find just a mummified finger, wouldn't it? Where's the rest of it's body suppose to be?

It seems you're not Robinson Crusoe regarding the bone.

...

Now, call me crazy but that bone sticking out looks a lot more like wood than bone to me. I mean, from what I understand, bone doesn’t have a grain pattern. Of course, I could be seeing things and I’m not here to debunk this story today…if that’s OK with our readers?

...

What is the usual length of a finger nail, relative the length from the tip the knuckle - is it usually about half the length? Does the nail in this photo look a little small, or am I seeing things?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems you're not Robinson Crusoe regarding the bone.

Robinson Crusoe? (am confused but that ain't easy... could you explain, please?)

Edited by Eldorado
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Robinson Crusoe? (am confused but that ain't easy... could you explain, please?)

I think he means as in your not alone with that sentiment.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he means as in your not alone with that sentiment.

Thanks, Tipsy. Is that a common phrase? (am losing my mind methinks.. I used to know stuff)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.