Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Still Waters

Stephen Fry: "only humans are homophobic"

152 posts in this topic

Or perhaps, people shouldn't assume things about others when they really don't know them. I am not to blame for the false assumptions others make about me.

If those 'false assumptions' bother you so much, you can clear them up rather simply.

You are correct. I don't deny that.

I have done so because I don't feel comfortable discussing my sexuality and what persons I have been sexually attracted to in an open forum. There are certain things about myself I prefer to keep private and discuss only with those I trust.

Then I think you need to be careful with the language you've used. Your sexuality is your buisness but being both critical of others and secretve at the same time is not the way to go.

It is a complicated matter to discuss in full detail, and unfortunately I do not have confidence that others will have a respectful dialogue with me on this forum when it comes to this topic.

The best way to have a respectful dialogue is to be open and honest about this. If you can't do that, then the dialogue can't get anywhere.

I believe that sexual intimacy between two members of the same sex is not "appropriate" (for lack of a better word) in the eyes of God. I believe it is sinful.

And there you go. You say you want to have a respectful dialogue but then you use that which isn't very respectful. That's what people tend to forget.

That said, I do not judge those who do such things poorly. I do not think of them as "bad" people. I do not declare that there is something wrong with them and that they need to "fixed." I do not look upon homosexuals with scorn and refuse to be around them or blindly decide I will not now or ever be friends with someone who is gay, bi, or transgendered. In fact, I may even find it quite arousing myself.

It amases me how many people attempt to cover their tracks by saying something along those lines. Sorry, but you do judge them poorly. You've already said as much.

This is the thing people fail to understand. There's really two ways you can be. You can be pro-gay, treat gay people respectfully and as full equals. Or you can act like an ass. Call gay people names, disprepect them, call them sinners and tell them to burn in hell. You ca't have it both ways.

You wanna respect gay people? Great. Start by stopping thinking of them as sinners and work from there. Don't try and incorporate that belief because no it's not helpful and no, it's not respectful.

That said, it does not change my thoughts that it is still a temptation not to be indulged in.

Back to the disrespecting.

Where it becomes more cloudy for me, however, is that I fully believe some people feel 100% that they have been born into the wrong body. Again, I have had experiences with such thoughts myself at times throughout my life.

Transgendered people aren't the same as gay people. What you say is accurate, but doesn't really have much to do with gay people.

I also know that there are children as young as at least 6-years old who are either a boy that clearly desires to partake in things commonly associated with females (or vice-versa in regards to girls who feel more comfortable with things commonly associated with boys).

People are people. Some people are more comfortable with something associated with the other gender. That doesn't make them gay or transgendered, it just means they like it. Personally it shouldn't really matter.

Hopefully my above comments help to clarify some of my thoughts.

Not really.

When one has conflictions regarding a certain topic it is not unusual for the things they say to be taken by others in a manner that is not truly reflective of what the person deals with on an emotional and personal level regarding the topic.

As for the vagueness, again, it is because I do not feel comfortable openly discussing my sexuality or sexual preference to strangers on an open forum.

I don't see why that is considered a "negative" or unreasonable position for me to hold.

You know what helps with that? If you actually say what YOU think and what YOU feel. We are not psychic. We don't know what you feel on an emotional or personal level unless you say it. All what you sad is 'god thnks this' and 'god thinks that' well newsflash: you are a thinking, feeling individual. What do you think? Ignore what god says. Ignore what the bible says. ignore what your pastor says. Think on the issue and do it yourself.

It's considered negative because what you've been spouting is negative. That shouldn't be too surprising.

None of what I have said was cause for anyone to mock me or partake in laughter at my expense. If people want to question me I have no issue with that. To mock me, poke fun at me, and laugh at my expense is what I take issue with.

For example, your post above asked questions and made statements pertaining to my comments and I have no issue with anything you have stated. You did not partake in the mocking and laughing at me however because quite frankly, there is no reason or need for anyone to be doing so. And that is all I ask.

I don't necessarily agree with what was said, but if you want them to stop questioning, you give them straight answers, something they should work with and somethng that should silence them. All you're doing is encouraging them by beng vague.

I don't see any reason to laugh at or mock you. There was a time in my life when I was mocked and laughed at and that was by bullies who have a negative attitude towards gay people solely because the bible says so. So I don't think mocking is the right thing to do, even when a person says things which are negative.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've attempted to put words in my mouth shadowhive and have mischaracterized me.

Simply because I believe homesexuality is a sin and not an act to be partaken in does not mean I am disrepecting homosexuals.

That would be like me stating atheists disrespect me simply by stating they are atheists because I happen to believe in God.

If you can't understand that then I'll simply let you carry on with your misconceptions about me, my beliefs, and how I regard others rather than partake in further conversation with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another question of mine, why are sexual acts between people of the same gender wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've attempted to put words in my mouth shadowhive and have mischaracterized me.

Simply because I believe homesexuality is a sin and not an act to be partaken in does not mean I am disrepecting homosexuals.

I've not put words in your mouth.

The belief that homosexuality is a sin IS disrespecting homosexuals. You hold that belef, by your own admission, therefore the disrespect is there. Like it or not.

That would be like me stating atheists disrespect me simply by stating they are atheists because I happen to believe in God.

If you can't understand that then I'll simply let you carry on with your misconceptions about me, my beliefs, and how I regard others rather than partake in further conversation with you.

I'm a bisexual. I've been called mny names. I've been abused, physically, mentally and verbally. Guess what those people believed? I'll give you a hint, it's the belief you hold. That belief enabled them to do those things. You know what makes it worse? It enables fully grown adults to do the same and worse. If you are serious about respecting homosexuals, throw out the belief that is causing them so much harm, don't try to cling to it and act high and mighty.

From the looks of it, you're a conflicted person. I can see that from the way that you flip and flop. Make up your mind and think for yourself.

Edited by shadowhive
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll never understand why some people still cling to the idea of sexual identity being only straight, bi or gay. Those aren't the only options and the need to categorize does more harm than good when it comes to things like sexuality and race.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Psychological studies have shown that children are most definitely born with a sense of right and wrong.

Your comment above that "bad parenting can create people who have little to no morals" only serves to further demonstrate what I have said (and psychological studies have shown) rather than stand in contrast to it.

Bad parenting or a bad atmospheric upbringing in general can most definitely shape one into having bad morals. Take the bad parenting (or surroundings) out of the equation however and a child (barring mental illness) will grow up on their own with a sense of knowing it is wrong to steal, kill, make fun of others, and all other sorts of things along those lines.

Okay, then point me to some sources because my observations tell me this is wrong. Oh and the animal thing, wishful thinking and egocentrism no matter how many times you say it.

Edited by FurthurBB
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll never understand why some people still cling to the idea of sexual identity being only straight, bi or gay. Those aren't the only options and the need to categorize does more harm than good when it comes to things like sexuality and race.

I'm an attractisexual, I'm only attracted to attractive people. ;D

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll never understand why some people still cling to the idea of sexual identity being only straight, bi or gay. Those aren't the only options and the need to categorize does more harm than good when it comes to things like sexuality and race.

What other options are there? You said options.. I didnt know sexuality was an option... Apart from gay, straight and bi ..what else is there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What other options are there? You said options.. I didnt know sexuality was an option... Apart from gay, straight and bi ..what else is there?

I meant that sexuality is just as diverse as everything else, but in the western world we like to label it as gay, straight or bi. There are men who may be slightly attracted to men, or women who aren't attracted to anyone. Human sexuality is a spectrum, not just a label. I should have been more clear and not used the word 'option'.

Gender roles are different than sexuality, but there are cultures that recognize third, fourth and even fifth genders,

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay, then point me to some sources because my observations tell me this is wrong.

"Humans do have a rudimentary moral sense from the very start of life. With the help of well-designed experiments, you can see glimmers of moral thought, moral judgement, and moral feeling even in the first year of life. Some sense of good and evil seems to be bred in the bone."

- Paul Bloom, Yale Psychology Professor

The Moral Life Of Babies

Psychologists Say Babies Know Right From Wrong Even At Six Months

The Babies Brain: Children Born Knowing Right From Wrong?

Children Are Born To Know Right From Wrong New Research Shows

Sense Of Fairness, Altruism Observed In Infants As Young As 15 Months Old

Oh and the animal thing, wishful thinking and egocentrism no matter how many times you say it.

It is a fact that the human mind is far superior to that of any animal. This is not a matter of opinion. And there is no wishful thinking or egocentrism involved in the matter.

If you feel your mind isn't superior to and far more capable of things than even the smartest of animals then you must be lacking a great deal of intelligence and/or knowledge about such things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, it is wishful thinking and egocentrism that leads people to believe we are somehow special in the animal kingdom just because we have been ultra successful in our niche.

NO it is not. It is a factual realisation of our uniqueness and thus specialness. While each animal type may be special and unique, humanity has certain characteristics which distinguish it clealry nd physically from all oher types, at this time. The single most powerful point of separation is our combined ability to speak and to think in complex symbolic forms, using symbols and mental constructs atached to labels via language, to facilitate communication. If you understand human neurology and the way our brains work, to establish first memory then language and sophisticated thought forms and understandings, you will know that no other animal approaches us in this area. They are probalby 100000 years behind us in evolutionary terms.

We are NOT niche animals we do not SPECIALISE in adaptations to a niche nvironment, rather, our language and sapience makes us non- specialist adpators. We adapt ourselves to every environment on earth, through imagination, desire, and technology and adapt environments to our own needs through technology.

Ps on the other handyou are a

The technology comes from our sapience, but more importantly comes the abilty ot see how it cna be used and applied and the consequences of doing so. We cna plan, create, build and alter, everything around us and even our selves.

It is dangerous not to understand and apppreciate this, and to think of us as "just another animal because of the ability a power we have to create and destroy. We became separate from the rest of the animal kingdom when we reached present human levels of sapient self awareness, probably up to 100000 years ago, and certainly in homosapiens, cromagnon, neandertal, and similar times.

On the other hand, you are absolutley right about morals and ethics Children are not born good or bad, because there is no absolute good or bad, only what a society determines. Children, because of the attributes dicussed above, have a unique potential to learn/ be taught, values ethics and beliefs

They learn these from birth (and possibly earlier, as they learn language and how to think and process. There are no absolute human values. ALL of these are cultural. But because the human brain is a biological entity not influenced by culture, all humans tend towards similar conclusions given similar inputs. SO some ethics moralities appear more univeral than others, but that is a qualit y of the commonality of the human brain, more than anything we are born knowing.

It is impossible for child to be born good or evil loving hating empathetic or selfish because ALL those qualities abilities are learned (they are actually mental constructs and behaviours,) as our brains physically develop and as our language is learned. We have to learn be taught how to love, for example. No human intrinsically knows how to do this or even understands the nature of human love. It is not a biological force like the natural biological bonds of mother and baby, for example.

Edited by Mr Walker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Humans do have a rudimentary moral sense from the very start of life. With the help of well-designed experiments, you can see glimmers of moral thought, moral judgement, and moral feeling even in the first year of life. Some sense of good and evil seems to be bred in the bone."

- Paul Bloom, Yale Psychology Professor

The Moral Life Of Babies

Psychologists Say Babies Know Right From Wrong Even At Six Months

The Babies Brain: Children Born Knowing Right From Wrong?

Children Are Born To Know Right From Wrong New Research Shows

Sense Of Fairness, Altruism Observed In Infants As Young As 15 Months Old

It is a fact that the human mind is far superior to that of any animal. This is not a matter of opinion. And there is no wishful thinking or egocentrism involved in the matter.

If you feel your mind isn't superior to and far more capable of things than even the smartest of animals then you must be lacking a great deal of intelligence and/or knowledge about such things.

I understand that it is hard to analyze studies when you have no formal training, but you posted links that are all about the same study in which the researchers determined that children "LEARN" right from wrong much earlier than previously thought. The study does not prove your premise, though as demonstrated by your links, you are not the only person to misunderstand the conclusions of that study.

Everything you are saying about the human brain or mind is just wrong and in the wrong context entirely. Our brain is superior for our species to be successful in the niche that we occupy. That niche requires a large brain and complex thought processes. Our mind is not far superior to any other animal. Bacteria are more successful in their niche than we could ever dream of being. Would you say bacteria are superior to humans? Also, do you know that infant chimps respond the same way to similar studies as the one that showed children learn right from wrong earlier than previously thought? I wll just ignore the childish insult.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NO it is not. It is a factual realisation of our uniqueness and thus specialness. While each animal type may be special and unique, humanity has certain characteristics which distinguish it clealry nd physically from all oher types, at this time. The single most powerful point of separation is our combined ability to speak and to think in complex symbolic forms, using symbols and mental constructs atached to labels via language, to facilitate communication. If you understand human neurology and the way our brains work, to establish first memory then language and sophisticated thought forms and understandings, you will know that no other animal approaches us in this area. They are probalby 100000 years behind us in evolutionary terms.

We are NOT niche animals we do not SPECIALISE in adaptations to a niche nvironment, rather, our language and sapience makes us non- specialist adpators. We adapt ourselves to every environment on earth, through imagination, desire, and technology and adapt environments to our own needs through technology.

Ps on the other handyou are a

The technology comes from our sapience, but more importantly comes the abilty ot see how it cna be used and applied and the consequences of doing so. We cna plan, create, build and alter, everything around us and even our selves.

It is dangerous not to understand and apppreciate this, and to think of us as "just another animal because of the ability a power we have to create and destroy. We became separate from the rest of the animal kingdom when we reached present human levels of sapient self awareness, probably up to 100000 years ago, and certainly in homosapiens, cromagnon, neandertal, and similar times.

On the other hand, you are absolutley right about morals and ethics Children are not born good or bad, because there is no absolute good or bad, only what a society determines. Children, because of the attributes dicussed above, have a unique potential to learn/ be taught, values ethics and beliefs

They learn these from birth (and possibly earlier, as they learn language and how to think and process. There are no absolute human values. ALL of these are cultural. But because the human brain is a biological entity not influenced by culture, all humans tend towards similar conclusions given similar inputs. SO some ethics moralities appear more univeral than others, but that is a qualit y of the commonality of the human brain, more than anything we are born knowing.

It is impossible for child to be born good or evil loving hating empathetic or selfish because ALL those qualities abilities are learned (they are actually mental constructs and behaviours,) as our brains physically develop and as our language is learned. We have to learn be taught how to love, for example. No human intrinsically knows how to do this or even understands the nature of human love. It is not a biological force like the natural biological bonds of mother and baby, for example.

Of course we are unique, so are rabbits. We have evolved to be successful in our unique niche, so have E. coli. You can write all the big long posts you want, it will not change my mind because it is all meaningless to any understanding about thought or learning or life.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our brains are more complex then any other animal species

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I understand that it is hard to analyze studies when you have no formal training, but you posted links that are all about the same study in which the researchers determined that children "LEARN" right from wrong much earlier than previously thought. The study does not prove your premise, though as demonstrated by your links, you are not the only person to misunderstand the conclusions of that study.

You're wrong. Read again. LEARN.

Some of the links are referring to the same study, not all of them are, however.

Furthermore, you are the one misunderstanding the conclusions of the overall studies.

The quote I'm about to give, which I already gave, sums it up quite nicely. How you can read it and then argue that the man who gave it (which is the man who did the study you are referring to) doesn't understand his own study is simply stubborness on your part to accept the conclusion he arrived at which differs from what you desire to believe is true.

"Humans do have a rudimentary moral sense from the very start of life. With the help of well-designed experiments, you can see glimmers of moral thought, moral judgement, and moral feeling even in the first year of life. Some sense of good and evil seems to be bred in the bone."

- Paul Bloom, Yale Psychology Professor

"From The Very Start Of Life" ..... or in other words from the very moment they are born (or perhaps even conceived, but certainly no later than the moment of birth). This means prior to any dealings with human beings or any other species. It means they are born into this world with a moral sense of right from wrong.

"Bred In The Bone" ..... again, this means humans are born knowing good from evil. We do not need such things to be taught to us. It is present within us (bred in the bone in other words), from the very start. We are born already knowing what is right (good) and what is wrong (evil).

This flies directly against your statement that the study simply concluded that "children learn right from wrong much earlier than previously thought."

Children learn what is "considered" right from wrong from the moment they are born and all throughout the remainder of their lives. That means if they are born into a culture where it's acceptable to treat woman woman like they are not equal counterparts to men then they grow up understanding they can behave in such a manner and not expect to be ridiculed by most of the people within their culture because their culture finds such treatment of woman acceptable.

It does not mean that if the child weren't wrongly influenced by their culture into thinking in such a way that they wouldn't grow up knowing it is wrong to treat anyone as an unequal regardless of their sex, race, or nationality, etc.

Culture heavily influences such things. I am well aware of that. It doesn't mean children are solely dependant upon culture, however, to know what is right and what is wrong. They know such things because we are born with a sense of moral judgement. That is part of what the study concluded whether you accept it or not.

Everything you are saying about the human brain or mind is just wrong and in the wrong context entirely.

No, it really isn't. Our minds are superior to those of the animal kingdom or any other known species that exists. To contend otherwise is pure ignorance.

Name me one other species capable of dominating the world like humans do. Not one little segment of the world, or part of the world, but the entire world.

Name one other species cable of the immense realm of thought the human mind is capable of. Name one other species capable of the incredible architecture human beings accomplish. Name one other species that understands such a broad range of emotions as humans. Name one species that understand the concept of forgivesness.

The list goes on and on.

And then when you're done giving examples of each one seperately, name me one species (aside from humans) capable of doing all these types of things combined.

No such species outside of human beings can do so.

Edited by Left-Field

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're wrong. Read again. LEARN.

Some of the links are referring to the same study, not all of them are, however.

Furthermore, you are the one misunderstanding the conclusions of the overall studies.

The quote I'm about to give, which I already gave, sums it up quite nicely. How you can read it and then argue that the man who gave it (which is the man who did the study you are referring to) doesn't understand his own study is simply stubborness on your part to accept the conclusion he arrived at which differs from what you desire to believe is true.

"Humans do have a rudimentary moral sense from the very start of life. With the help of well-designed experiments, you can see glimmers of moral thought, moral judgement, and moral feeling even in the first year of life. Some sense of good and evil seems to be bred in the bone."

- Paul Bloom, Yale Psychology Professor

"From The Very Start Of Life" ..... or in other words from the very moment they are born (or perhaps even conceived, but certainly no later than the moment of birth). This means prior to any dealings with human beings or any other species. It means they are born into this world with a moral sense of right from wrong.

"Bred In The Bone" ..... again, this means humans are born knowing good from evil. We do not need such things to be taught to us. It is present within us (bred in the bone in other words), from the very start. We are born already knowing what is right (good) and what is wrong (evil).

This flies directly against your statement that the study simply concluded that "children learn right from wrong much earlier than previously thought."

Children learn what is "considered" right from wrong from the moment they are born and all throughout the remainder of their lives. That means if they are born into a culture where it's acceptable to treat woman woman like they are not equal counterparts to men then they grow up understanding they can behave in such a manner and not expect to be ridiculed by most of the people within their culture because their culture finds such treatment of woman acceptable.

It does not mean that if the child weren't wrongly influenced by their culture into thinking in such a way that they wouldn't grow up knowing it is wrong to treat anyone as an unequal regardless of their sex, race, or nationality, etc.

Culture heavily influences such things. I am well aware of that. It doesn't mean children are solely dependant upon culture, however, to know what is right and what is wrong. They know such things because we are born with a sense of moral judgement. That is part of what the study concluded whether you accept it or not.

No, it really isn't. Our minds are superior to those of the animal kingdom or any other known species that exists. To contend otherwise is pure ignorance.

Name me one other species capable of dominating the world like humans do. Not one little segment of the world, or part of the world, but the entire world.

Name one other species cable of the immense realm of thought the human mind is capable of. Name one other species capable of the incredible architecture human beings accomplish. Name one other species that understands such a broad range of emotions as humans. Name one species that understand the concept of forgivesness.

The list goes on and on.

And then when you're done giving examples of each one seperately, name me one species (aside from humans) capable of doing all these types of things combined.

No such species outside of human beings can do so.

This is the last time I will answer you if you keep on with the extraneous passive-agressive insults. I have not insulted you, I have been calm and respectful and I expect the same from you.

The quote you are refering to is from one of the researchers feelings, not the conclusion of the study. He never even makes that claim. Humans have more brain development in the first five years of life than all the years remaining. Why would it be unusual that knowing right and wrong would be a very early learned trait? It seems pretty important for humans to be successful, like language development. The study does not have the power to say that it was there from birth, just that it develops very early. You would need a completely different type of study to look at that issue. Also, the articles are about the same study. I looked a second time to make sure.

As far as the last part goes, I am actually glad you worded it this way because it shows me that I was right to think you were not thinking about things in the right context. Human brains have much larger frontal lobes than any other animal. The frontal lobes are thought to be associated with reasoning, planning, abstract thinking and self-control. Therefore humans, by nature, are going to have a better concept of time (planning), be more creative (abstract thinking and self-control), have long term projects which lead to technological advances (reasoning, planning, abstract thinking, and self-control), so pretty much everything that sets us apart from all other animals. See, we have these abilities not because we are special, but because the components are in our genetic toolbox and is important for success in the niche we occupy. Also, another thing you are not thinking about is that there are many animals alive right now who would have little problem occupying our niche if we abandoned it. Though, since they do not have the genetic abilities we have evolved in the many years we have occupied this niche, they would have to start from the beginning. There is no selective pressure for a successful species to move to an occupied niche and in our case an overly occupied niche.

Edited by FurthurBB

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is the last time I will answer you if you keep on with the extraneous passive-agressive insults. I have not insulted you, I have been calm and respectful and I expect the same from you.

I'll respond to the rest later, but I have not done any of the above to you. In my last post I don't even know how you could mistake anything I said as any of the above - especially when you consider how I could mistake comments you made to me in your response previous to this one in the same manner you have apparently taken mine.

I'd bring up which ones, but that type of back and forth nitpicking about who did what won't accomplish anything for either of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course we are unique, so are rabbits. We have evolved to be successful in our unique niche, so have E. coli. You can write all the big long posts you want, it will not change my mind because it is all meaningless to any understanding about thought or learning or life.

Doesnt matter if the posts are long or short. We have NOT evolved into a niche, for about the last 50000-100000 years. That is the prime biological differnce between other animals and man. The rest of the post expalined why this is so.

Either you and i have a completely different understanding in what we are speaking about (eg what constitutes specialisation and niches) or you may just want to believe that humans are essentially just another animal. We are animals but our self aware sapience determines what we are, not our biological heritage. We are no longer constrained by biological or even genetic heritage to fit into a niche or niches, nor by the imperatives of those forces. At present we are unique, but eventually other animals and artificial intelligences will evolve/be built which will have the same qualities as humans .

Your world view is perhaps a reaction to the overly humano- centric view which evolved in the last century where humans tended to see animals as having human characteristics. This was countered by the view that, rather humans are simply animals, albeit intelligent animals. The truth is different again.

Humans evolved, along with other animals to a certain point,but when they evolved sapient self awareness and particularly language and symbolic thought at a certain level, they began changing themsleves; sometimes quite deliberately and consciously, at other times in response to perceived abilities and advantages Humans can remake themsleves as they imagine themsleves to be. They can reshape the earth as they desire it to be. No other animal can do that, or even contemplate doing so.

Thuis should not be seen as an excuse to dominate the world or do as we wish, rather it confers an obligation and responsibility on us as a part of gaea, to care for our planet (and later our solar system, galaxy and potentially universe) so we can remain an constructive integrated part of it, rather than a destructive parasite living off it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can write all the big long posts you want, it will not change my mind

I rarely will read a long post.. I see no point..If the first few lines bore me.. I skip it.. I might tackle a point made, but the long winded drones... never get me to take interest...

Edited by Beckys_Mom
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, the thing that really makes humans different from animals is language - we can understand each other but have not yet learned to understand anything any other animal may possibly be barking, meowing, mooing or tweeting to each other.

Therefore, whether they even have a "developed concept" of homosexuality versus heterosexuality is a complete unknown imo. It seems more likely they would learn behaviours that will allow them to dominate, instill fear or bond with others for the sake of survival rather than develop "phobias" as we do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rarely will read a long post.. I see no point..If the first few lines bore me.. I skip it.. I might tackle a point made, but the long winded drones... never get me to take interest...

There are a lot of kids like that at school. Unfortunately all complex issues require some length and complexity to communicate. Language is how we communicate ideas which would otherwise exist only in our head. How any one can find it boring to learn anything is beyond me.

But then i am "lucky". I speed read and it only takes me a second or two to read a page of text.For some children, reading is so challenging that it is painful, and they never read anything..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a lot of kids like that at school.

Someone who likes to post about themselves all the time.. can bore many people.. School educational material differs..If a teacher cannot get a kid to read educational material.. that teacher is not that good

Edited by Beckys_Mom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone who likes to post about themselves all the time.. can bore many people.. School educational material differs..If a teacher cannot get a kid to read educational material.. that teacher is not that good

Boredom is a state of mind induced by the reader, not the writer or the speaker. Again i cant understand how anyone can find any ideas or information boring. Not personally relevant perhaps, but how can anyone ever be bored with life, or any part of life, is beyond me. Humans have minds. In some respects the whole of our existence is based around using those minds, otherwise we are no different to any other animal. If you use your mind to its biological potential, it is not possible to be bored. There is always something fully occupying it .

However, as i said, I am lucky. I read every post on the threads i read, but i can read them as quickly as i can scroll the cursor down the page without blurring the text That means i do not have to discriminate in what i read, which might be necessary if i was a slower reader. I also enjoy every word i read. I learn a lot, even when i disagree with a poster.

As to getting kids to read, some just do not, some can't, and some find it too hard to be worth their while. The kids i teach are 13 plus and while i can significantly improve reading and comprehension skills, it is very late to try and teach someone who cant read, to do so by then.

A child should be reading, well before they go to schoo,l when their brain is most plastic and learns/assimilates most easily. You can teach a child to read and speak several languages fluently by the age of two, but i know how hard it is to try and teach chinese to an english speaking teenager.

Edited by Mr Walker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boredom is a state of mind induced by the reader, not the writer or the speaker.

Yes boredom is a state of mind, but it doesn't help when the writer or speaker is a boring twonk

Again i cant understand how anyone can find any ideas or information boring.

No one said anything about ANY information... It depends on the subject / topic at hand. For example - I would rather sit and listen to a two hour lecture on the history of the moon landing, rather than a two hour lecture on the life cycle of a potato.....Nor could I listen to someone who craved attention and droned on about themselves ..I cannot find that educational or interesting . well unless the person is a well known scientist or someone who wrote many books and done something that has made a change in the world......It will always depend on the topic.

Edited by Beckys_Mom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Humans are animals, that being said, we don't have THE most complex minds, we have more complex brains than most creatures on earth but there are others with just complex (might even me more) brains like dolphins and gorillas. The difference is culture and culture only that makes homosexuality an issue with humans. Animals may even in some cases have rudimenary cultural structures but they no not have complex cultural rules. Humans have evolved their cultural rules over a short time (evolutionarily speaking). We are not far removed from as comedian Patton Oswalt calls it "having rape for dinner". Those cultural rules are sometimes arbitrary in nature, in that they serve to build a society. IF we lived in a time where were say short on humans then a taboo on homosexuality would possibly make sense. However in this day and age, humans are overpopulating the earth, so the only cultural reason to have a taboo on homosexuality is moot.

Edited by darkmoonlady

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.