Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Big Bad Voodoo

China before Qin debate

14 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

Hello dear UMers!

Recently I was involved in one debate in which we discuss who deserve to be called civilization, culture, tribes and who not.

I pointed out that civilization emerged in Sumer, Egypt, India, and China. However our Kmt Sesh pointed out that China was not civilization till Qin dynasty in 221 BC. I agreed. But...

I didnt respond well about China civilization because I was in hurry plus I was not sure about my knowledge. Now I talked with on history professor. Here is correction.

I love Mongolia, China, Japan, India. I especially like Han, Tang, Song, Ming dynasties. From Han dynasty China become center of the world till industruial revolution and that we can easy explain. Who needs machines when you have popluation who can do it? Famous Needham question goes why China didnt developed modern science since China was center of science till modern science took place. Famous four great inventions Paper, Gunpowder, Printing and Compass changed the world and they were all Chinese inventions. Even toilet paper was their invention. (?) For example after Arabs and Tang dynasty clashed paper making spread through Arab world to Spain. And in Spain King said: „What ever yo do just dont write on that thin?“ Thats kind explain where Europe was to China. Anyway, from 221 BC to 1911 China was Empire. Before that many interesting things happened such as cultures and civilization. China is often refuted for unknown reasons. I guess because rulers there were doing all kind repressions. Such as Qin burned books or when Emperor Yuan of Liang (ruled 552-555) burned collection of paints when he wanted to become Budhist monk or because human sacrifice was common till Han.

In 1921 Swede Gunnar Andersson found near village Yangshao culture. 5000 BC to 3000 BC Yangshao culture in China near Yellow river. It was matriarchal society

Then in 1928 we found amazing black thin ceramics in village Longshan in Shadong province. Longshan culture is from 3000 BC to 2000 BC. Longshan culture have realy amazing pottery.

Then came (mythical) Xia (2050-1500 BC) and five emperors such as Yu the great. However for this culture we dont have evidence but many things hints us that actually existed. Also many Chinese archaeologists claim that we already found some sites from Xia like Erlitou culture.

We also have Dawenko culture 3000-2500 BC, Huating culture where we can see probably firsts atempt of writing but this still science didnt accepted.

Before we get to term civilization I will point out that before we have Zong-mysterious objects realy beautifull probably for astronomical purpose. Or jade bi disks.

Then came what many believe to be beging of Chinese civilization in full term.Shang dyansty or Yin dynasty from 1700 to 1200 BC. They done extraordinary work in Bronze and worked with very hard Jade.City Yin / Yinxu near Anjang in Henan province is fine example that they were civilization.Where we can found earliest example of Chinese writing. Because Shang were so sophisticated from beging it wouldnt be surprise to world of archaeology that we one day found Xia. Shang had highly developed urban culture in Anyang. Shang were experts in casting bronze. One interesting city was Zhengzhou which many think it could be Ao first capital of Shang . Or city Gaocheng in Hebei. Taotie mask and vases were trademark of this civilization. Intersting statues of animals such as tiger, snake, elephant and surprisingly cricket which we can see on pottery too. Many graves of Shang civlization were robbed. One grave which show us how Shang was developed and rich is tomb of lady Fu Hao.

Xian become capital of Zhou dynasty. Next dynasty or civilization which ruled from 1200 BC to Qin 221 BC. This civilization show us high tech of poterry, bronze making, jade disks with details. Suprisingly show us Siberian influence such as that animals have curved fangs/claws. What marked Zhou is money. Long coins like spear or ball looking coins or even polyigonal gold coins like those in state Chu. So we have usage of gold as money before Han as people used to believe. They were great iron casters. Ceramics was burned at 1200 C. They have had like feudalism society. Philosophy was in zenith till that time. Master Kong or Confucius, Lao Tse and etc. They have bronze seals of families. They done paints on silk. First terracota warriors dates from this period.

So I want to hear whats your opinion about Chinese. When China ends to be culture and become civilization? Do we have cut and dry time line where we can see how different civilization rise in full meaning of that world?

Thanks in advance.

L.

Edited by the L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now look this Longshao black thin pottery. 3000-2000 BC.

42524-004-7415436A.jpg

Or Yangshao city 5000-3000 BC

3fe4314f0fc10deef4f2b9a99bc4cf96.jpg

2123591a23a6c5303f389bc87507858c.jpg

Although city doesnt mean civilization I will stressed out that we can see urban planing such as in Indus valley civilization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

From 1700 to 1200 BC Yin(shang) civilization made tombs for their leaders. Almost all tombs are robbed as I said. Now look some piceies from Lady Hao tomb.

I made this compilation so it isnt something. So is this done by cultural people or civilized people or tribe people?

23i7bl5.jpg

Edited by the L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

So I will again point out that civilization start in Sumer following by Egypt, China, India and I will add Peru to the list. As far as we know for now...

Edited by the L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly think the biggest "clue" to there being a thriving Chinese "civilisation" befoe Qin is the Terracotta Warriors. It was firstly a massive undertaking to creae them, involving specialised techniques and fine and intricate art detailing - inclusing copying people's faces realistically to he point that archaeologists tell us no two warriors are the same.

This is not therefore a "recent" (ie contemporary woth Qin) development, it's the culmination of decades if not centuries of craftsmen eaching and refining their trade anymore then Michaelangelo's David is an isolated case of marblework.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly think the biggest "clue" to there being a thriving Chinese "civilisation" befoe Qin is the Terracotta Warriors. It was firstly a massive undertaking to creae them, involving specialised techniques and fine and intricate art detailing - inclusing copying people's faces realistically to he point that archaeologists tell us no two warriors are the same.

This is not therefore a "recent" (ie contemporary woth Qin) development, it's the culmination of decades if not centuries of craftsmen eaching and refining their trade anymore then Michaelangelo's David is an isolated case of marblework.

Sorry WoH, but the Terracotta Warriors are Qin, since they are sculptures of the warriors of Qin Shi Huang from whom China gets its name.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry WoH, but the Terracotta Warriors are Qin, since they are sculptures of the warriors of Qin Shi Huang from whom China gets its name.

cormac

First terracota warriors came from Zhou period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First terracota warriors came from Zhou period.

The most notable Terracotta Warriors are Qin though, which is how Wearer of Hats wrote it.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry WoH, but the Terracotta Warriors are Qin, since they are sculptures of the warriors of Qin Shi Huang from whom China gets its name.

cormac

exactly my point, they're from the Qin dynasty, what ... 50 years into hos reign? there's no way IMO that the skills needed to create them as artistically and technically sophisticated as they are in that short amount of tme,therefore they,re the result of a long chain of refining and devekopment that started long before Qin. Qin is reaping the rewards of the work of sn obviously "vcultured" people from before his reign.

You need leasure time and an artistic class o peopl in order to refine art, something lik that requires civilisation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly my point, they're from the Qin dynasty, what ... 50 years into hos reign? there's no way IMO that the skills needed to create them as artistically and technically sophisticated as they are in that short amount of tme,therefore they,re the result of a long chain of refining and devekopment that started long before Qin. Qin is reaping the rewards of the work of sn obviously "vcultured" people from before his reign.

You need leasure time and an artistic class o peopl in order to refine art, something lik that requires civilisation.

I understand and agree with most of what you're saying, with one exception. What prior culture meets the requirements of "civilization" which is the word you used? You can have art and the progressions thereof without having an actual civilization.

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

true, you can have a civilised opele without them eing a civilisation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, according to you, when China ends to be culture and become civilization?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, according to you, when China ends to be culture and become civilization?

Since China, as such, doesn't begin until the reign of Qin Shi Huang then one can't call China a civilization before that. Prior to his reign there were several cultures/dynasties in existance, sometimes at the same time. So the real question would be which culture/dynasty began the earliest civilization in what is now known as China? Was it the Xia, the Shang, the Zhou or some other? An argument could probably be made for any of the three, but they were not "China".

cormac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since China, as such, doesn't begin until the reign of Qin Shi Huang then one can't call China a civilization before that. Prior to his reign there were several cultures/dynasties in existance, sometimes at the same time. So the real question would be which culture/dynasty began the earliest civilization in what is now known as China? Was it the Xia, the Shang, the Zhou or some other? An argument could probably be made for any of the three, but they were not "China".

cormac

Lets put this this way, Is Shagn dynasty civilization or culture?

Same on Xia?

What do you say about Longshao pottery, they found it very small portion of it and scientists think that they are too sophistiaced to be unique.

In some vases and pots walls are thiny as shell of egg.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.