Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

White House knew 2 hrs after attack started


Merc14

Recommended Posts

What question, "NO ONE CARES!" or "Do you think we have military base in Lybia?!!(sic)" I answered the second and the answer to the first is a LOT of people care, just not you guys. Don't worry, laugh it off, that is what we want. The MSM has lost much of its credibility and the rest will go come November 6th. Keep laughing and believing though, works for me.

As an aside, have you noticed that all the things I predicted months ago are coming true? I have been battling with you for months about this election and you have derided me every step of the way but things that I predicted months ago are slowly coming true. Does that mean anything to you? Do you comprehend that or am I still crazy?

Edited by Merc14
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not a wit.

what conspiracy are your flogging now? Because nothing like that occured.

only in conservamedia. no one else cares.

I'm thinking you'll wish you had THAT little gem back before this is all over.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking you'll wish you had THAT little gem back before this is all over.

nope. You guys keep thinking that fox and the radio and your region of the country somehow means that everyone else thinks the same thing. Just because you can't find a democrate for hundreds of rural miles where you live does not mean we don't exist in vast numbers elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope. You guys keep thinking that fox and the radio and your region of the country somehow means that everyone else thinks the same thing. Just because you can't find a democrate for hundreds of rural miles where you live does not mean we don't exist in vast numbers elsewhere.

No answer for me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the whole point here is, most people knew the night it happen this was preplaned and premeditated attack to mark the annniverasry of 9-11, a act of terrorism. I know I did, good grief people it was 9-11,but why the Obama`s adminsration went on for days claiming it was a spontaneous attack from a protest is beyond me.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope. You guys keep thinking that fox and the radio and your region of the country somehow means that everyone else thinks the same thing. Just because you can't find a democrate for hundreds of rural miles where you live does not mean we don't exist in vast numbers elsewhere.

So true! Dems seem to congragate in mass...like flies on poop! ( visual of Occupy Crowd)

This is just part of the change that he was talking about in '08.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the whole point here is, most people knew the night it happen this was preplaned and premeditated attack to mark the annniverasry of 9-11, a act of terrorism. I know I did, good grief people it was 9-11,but why the Obama`s adminsration went on for days claiming it was a spontaneous attack from a protest is beyond me.

Is hindsight good for you? 9/11 happens every year. Have there been attacks every anniversary? no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope. You guys keep thinking that fox and the radio and your region of the country somehow means that everyone else thinks the same thing. Just because you can't find a democrate for hundreds of rural miles where you live does not mean we don't exist in vast numbers elsewhere.

I don't live in the stix dude. My city is small - about 300K - but far from rural. And we have a vibrant population of dems - just not a working majority. We are socially conservative because our church to bar ratio is still equal or slanted to the church side though :)

We are painfully aware that most of the country thinks us to be hillbillies and idiots. Our opinions of "Yankees" aren't much better, truth to tell they may be worse. But we still believe in our country and long for a better day for our kids - just as you do.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK that video might seem funny, but I don't think the ambassador and three other Americans dead is a laughing matter...and the insinuation that only the right pounces on fishy politics seems ludicrous to me. The only reason the left doesn't pounce more imo is because the right doesn't give them as much material to go on. And if we're talking petty, as your video clip implies, what about all the ridiculous lawsuits brought against Sarah Palin?

On a more serious note:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2216556/Vice-Presidential-Debate-2012-Joe-Biden-DENIES-Libya-consulate-asked-security.html

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

NO ONE CARES!

Do you think we have military base in Lybia?!!

Yes they do care. Many many millions of people care. You'll see. Look how many of us here in one little Internet chat room are concerned. No need to yell. We know that you know you're full of it. This is much more than a stained blue dress.

I'm sure that we have plenty of capabilities. I imagine there are several options that could transport military squads anywhere in he Middle East within 7 hours. Hell, that base in Italy a thousand miles away, no wait, 480 miles away could of worked. I can drive 480 miles in 7or 8 hours going the speed limit. I've flown to Vegas twice from Pittsburgh. It takes around 4.5-5 hours in a commercial jet. That's around 2000 miles away from me. Can you really believe our military is incapable of similar or better travel times? They could of flown a commercial jet with 250 troops from anywhere in the Mideast, landed at the nearest landing strip, and driven cars to the scene of the crime with time to spare and save the lives of the last two Americans killed in hour 6.

Edited by Is it for real
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More;

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/petraeus-throws-obama-under-bus_657896.html

Petraeus Throws Obama Under the Bus

Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”

So who in the government did tell “anybody” not to help those in need? Someone decided not to send in military assets to help those Agency operators. Would the secretary of defense make such a decision on his own? No.

It would have been a presidential decision. There was presumably a rationale for such a decision. What was it? When and why—and based on whose counsel obtained in what meetings or conversations—did President Obama decide against sending in military assets to help the Americans in need?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: "No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

snapback.pngninjadude, on 26 October 2012 - 04:40 AM, said:

NO ONE CARES!

I care, several others on this website care, Tyrone Wood's dad cares, a lot of people care. The question is: why don't you care?

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope. You guys keep thinking that fox and the radio and your region of the country somehow means that everyone else thinks the same thing. Just because you can't find a democrate for hundreds of rural miles where you live does not mean we don't exist in vast numbers elsewhere.

I love the stereotypes from the libs, keep them coming!

And by the way, the people DO care. Especially when a president intentionally avoids the phrase "terrorist attack" because it will look bad on his foreign policy resume. You know it, I know it, we all know it. As another poster wrote, I could only imagine the outcry from libs if it was Romney in office. Oh god, just imagine...

If no one cared, then CNN, MSNBC, CBS, and the rest of the lib media wouldn't be forced to report about it. I find it offensive that you don't care that there was an obvious cover up at the cost of American lives, you heartless little twit.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The U.S. military did not get involved during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, last month because officials did not have enough information about what was going on before the attack was over, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said Thursday.

At a Pentagon news briefing, Panetta said there was no "real-time information" to be able to act on, even though the U.S. military was prepared to do so.

"You don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on," Panetta said. "(We) felt we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

A defense official provided more context on Panetta's comments about the decision-making involved in not sending U.S. troops to the consulate being attacked in Benghazi.

He said there was a drone aloft but not directly over the area at the time the attack began.

He said the drone was redirected and arrived in time to record some of the attack. But he described what the drone saw as "looking down, seeing a bunch of buildings and fires, a lot of chaos on the ground."

Two of our buildings a mile apart on fire and cries of help we are we being attack, and they had no idea of what was going on ?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can drive 480 miles in 7or 8 hours going the speed limit. I've flown to Vegas twice from Pittsburgh. It takes around 4.5-5 hours in a commercial jet. That's around 2000 miles away from me. Can you really believe our military is incapable of similar or better travel times? They could of flown a commercial jet with 250 troops from anywhere in the Mideast, landed at the nearest landing strip, and driven cars to the scene of the crime with time to spare and save the lives of the last two Americans killed in hour 6.

What you fail to realize is that you have safe logical government socialist roads to drive on. Skies that are linked by government controlled socialist radar with ground markers and landmarks. The military didn't have the area planned so that they could just fire into it. The scenarios you arm chair general would expose more Americans to being killed. Commercial jets into a war zone? No it just doesn't work like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way, the people DO care. Especially when a president intentionally avoids the phrase "terrorist attack"

the don't care comment was pointed directly at this. What does using one phrase or another matter to you? (even though it has been proven over and over again that he did)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The U.S. military did not get involved during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, last month because officials did not have enough information about what was going on before the attack was over, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said Thursday.

At a Pentagon news briefing, Panetta said there was no "real-time information" to be able to act on, even though the U.S. military was prepared to do so.

"You don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on," Panetta said. "(We) felt we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

A defense official provided more context on Panetta's comments about the decision-making involved in not sending U.S. troops to the consulate being attacked in Benghazi.

He said there was a drone aloft but not directly over the area at the time the attack began.

He said the drone was redirected and arrived in time to record some of the attack. But he described what the drone saw as "looking down, seeing a bunch of buildings and fires, a lot of chaos on the ground."

Two of our buildings a mile apart on fire and cries of help we are we being attack, and they had no idea of what was going on ?

yeah really. Bengazi is not NYC. It's not like we have a push button McDonalds military. We don't have instant information or many times even very good information. Where do you guys get this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you fail to realize is that you have safe logical government socialist roads to drive on. Skies that are linked by government controlled socialist radar with ground markers and landmarks. The military didn't have the area planned so that they could just fire into it. The scenarios you arm chair general would expose more Americans to being killed. Commercial jets into a war zone? No it just doesn't work like that.

*snip* The point was that if civilian aircraft can do something the military could do it better, faster. You're an arm chair general too. You apparently know for a fact exactly what can and can't be done. The difference is that I don't know what could've been done but I highly doubt the answer is nothing.

Edited by Saru
Removed personal attack
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the don't care comment was pointed directly at this. What does using one phrase or another matter to you? (even though it has been proven over and over again that he did)

Wrong. He was speaking in generalities about acts of terrorism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Senators Corker and Isakson have requested the disclosure of all communications relevant to the security situation in Bengazi.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can Barry use an Executive Order to seal the records? Probably. Will it end his presidency if he does? Yes.

Tigers have the bases loaded one out!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preach it brother. I bet one of these whiners Romney would get 320 Electoral votes. I screwed up, it will be more like 350.

That's bold. I like it. I'll put five on it.

Edited by Is it for real
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.