Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
Big Bad Voodoo

Did Neanderthals Sail to Mediterranean?

20 posts in this topic

Homo Erectus teehee.gif

Sorry.... :blush:

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Homo Erectus teehee.gif

Sorry.... :blush:

Don’t be sorry, except for the fact that I’d personally prefer Hetero Erectus :D For obvious reasons.

Seriously now, Neanderthals sailing around would be far more advanced than anyone (officially) considered.

It’s almost funny how much the perception of early humans has changed in last few years.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we have to believe this (and something tells me we better not...) then Neanderthals even ended up in America:

http://annalsofsubma...01_archive.html

post-18246-0-32241900-1353231395_thumb.j

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we have to believe this (and something tells me we better not...) then Neanderthals even ended up in America:

http://annalsofsubma...01_archive.html

Yes, for starts, the Venus dagger looks far, far too symmetrical.

I admit I only skimmed the article, so do they claim this is the actual photo (which it obviously is not) of the dagger or they state anywhere this is a reconstruction of the actual find?

Where are the actual photos of the actual find?

(Note that I have no problem with Neanderthal finds popping up in seemingly unexpected places, I have a problem with computer generated presentation. Is it possible someone would really find something so intriguing and then say: “But we’ll publish only nice photoshops, no one wants to see the real thing.”)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Homo Erectus sounds far more entertaining.. lol..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, for starts, the Venus dagger looks far, far too symmetrical.

I admit I only skimmed the article, so do they claim this is the actual photo (which it obviously is not) of the dagger or they state anywhere this is a reconstruction of the actual find?

Where are the actual photos of the actual find?

(Note that I have no problem with Neanderthal finds popping up in seemingly unexpected places, I have a problem with computer generated presentation. Is it possible someone would really find something so intriguing and then say: “But we’ll publish only nice photoshops, no one wants to see the real thing.”)

Of course. after I accidentally hit upon that website, I googled to find anything official, but nothing showed up. Just another website repeating the same story.

Try it yourself: "Neanderthal skull" AND "Monterey".

And I thought the same thing as you did about the dagger: it looks too symmetrical, as though someone had simply mirrored some artefact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Homo Erectus sounds far more entertaining.. lol..

post-18246-0-64948300-1353234438_thumb.j

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course. after I accidentally hit upon that website, I googled to find anything official, but nothing showed up. Just another website repeating the same story.

Try it yourself: "Neanderthal skull" AND "Monterey".

And I thought the same thing as you did about the dagger: it looks too symmetrical, as though someone had simply mirrored some artefact.

Definitely mirrored. Some cracks were shopped in asymmetrically, but that doesn’t help the overall impression at all.

And definitely only that one same article repeated elsewhere.

Sometimes I hate modern technology.

Back in the old days, people had to put some effort into making stuff up <_<

And what’s even worse, when something real pops up, the chance of getting it written off as another hoax is bigger than ever. I mean, let’s assume there was the actual find and people only wrongly assumed reconstruction would be better choice for publishing than actual photo... so the find gets buried in enormous pile of scaled up bones and mermaid corpses.

But the article L posted looks far more serious and realistic. Seafaring or accidentally floating too far away from your home shore in your fishing proto-boat is equally fascinating for Neanderthals the way we see them. And Homo hopefully Erectus tonight, of course ^_^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12,000 years ago? Weren't they modern humans at that point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There really is something wrong with these archaeologists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For instance, stone artifacts on the southern Ionian Islands hint at human sites there as early as 110,000 years ago. Investigators have also recovered quartz hand-axs, three-sided picks and stone cleavers from Crete that may date back about 170,000 years ago. The distance of Crete about 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the mainland would have made such a sea voyage no small feat.

The exceedingly old age of these artifacts suggests the seafarers who made them might not even been modern humans, who originated between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. Instead, they might have been Neanderthals or perhaps even Homo erectus.

Thou shall read the whole article before trying to spoil the fun we are having here with Homo Erectus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think anything is possible. Look at the Clovis people

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is possible that neanderthals floated over on logs. They saw an island, got on a log and paddled over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is possible that neanderthals floated over on logs. They saw an island, got on a log and paddled over.

That is possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sailing in the Mediterranean is so easy that a caveman can do it.

caveman_2.jpg

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the Mediterranean like during the ice age when sea levels were around 130m (425 feet) lower?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If sea levels were that much lower it might not been as difficult as it would of been with today's sea levels. There would of been more islands I would think.

Maybe they just found something that would float to use as a boat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the Mediterranean like during the ice age when sea levels were around 130m (425 feet) lower?

Good point, I'd forgotten that angle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.