Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 14
Alphamale06

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True

10,149 posts in this topic

You're the one that need to come up with something else.

Deformed skulls and megalithic structures are not evidence of extraterrestrial involvement. Period.

Could be. Your jumping to conclusions. No other feasible explanation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gather this wouldn't be a good time to move the topic on with another clip?

Anyhow it's 22:05 GMT, and I need to go off and do other things.

Be back tomorrow.

Have a good night all.

Edited by zoser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is you explained to me?

See, you didn't even read what was explained to you. I feel bad for Abe, Seeder, Psych and the rest who have spent time and effort providing evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do really think that rock cutting example was a fake? How do you suppose he did it?

You are so stuck on the flawed AA logic. Just because I don't know how it was faked doesn't mean it wasn't faked.

I'm saying it could be faked.

He might have rented one of these at a nearby village:

concretecutter_zps75ab40c6.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no evidence on aliens being here at all. Atleast anything that can prove it once and for all. We'll never know the truth until we venture out and find the answers ourselves.

For now we can only assume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be. Your jumping to conclusions. No other feasible explanation.

You're amazing! You think I'm jumping to conclusions when you are the one saying ancient aliens did this work because you don't accept how ancient man did it?

We can't possibly debate with your mindset. :no:

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no evidence on aliens being here at all. Atleast anything that can prove it once and for all. We'll never know the truth until we venture out and find the answers ourselves.

For now we can only assume.

You are correct. There is not any evidence. You seem to be level-headed. I for one welcome your addition.

The issue most people have is that folks such as Zoser portray our ancients as dumb or not qualified. Humans are capable of amazing feats.

Zoser believes the entertainment show Ancient Aliens to be 100% fact. He believes this because it is on the History channel (and is a video). This is why I do not let my 10 year old daughter watch the show. It is presented as fact on the History channel. Sometimes right after How States Got Their Shapes. Why is one show true and the other not? Hard to explain to a 10 year old (or Zoser).

Edited by Myles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're amazing! You think I'm jumping to conclusions when you are the one saying ancient aliens did this work because you don't accept how ancient man did it?

We can't possibly debate with your mindset. :no:

In my opinion I don't think that aliens actually brought down their tools and built for us, but I do like to think (lol) they gave ancient man little tips and tricks that would make the construction of these marvels easier.

On the other hand ancient man had alot of time on their hands. I'm not surprised they managed to build these structures. They obviously weren't built overnight. And I'm pretty sure they would of been great at utilising the tools that were avalible to them at the time. Ancient man had alot of will power, You can see the amount of heart and dedication that was poured into these magnificent structures. Not like today were most buildings aren't built to last, and it's all about getting it done as quickly and on schedule.

Edited by Classified Document

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are correct. There is not any evidence. You seem to be level-headed. I for one welcome your addition.

The issue most people have is that folks such as Zoser portray our ancients as dumb or not qualified. Humans are capable of amazing feats.

They certainly are. That's the point I was making about fire, spears and the bow and arrow.

Seems Zoser is standing alone on this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They certainly are. That's the point I was making about fire, spears and the bow and arrow.

Seems Zoser is standing alone on this issue.

He has his youtube videos. :tsu:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another interesting clip.

A doctor and a dentist examine the 'alien' baby.

The theory of disease such as Hydrocephalus is completely rejected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fontanelle

"The much larger, diamond-shaped anterior fontanelle where the two frontal and two parietal bones join generally remains open until the child is about two years of age, however, in cleidocranial dysostosis it is often late in closing or may never close"

Check out the skull on this poor fellow with just that affliction:

http://stjoeslitreview.blogspot.com/2011/04/cleidocranial-dysplasia.html

The dentist has an interesting theory about the teeth!

I must've missed that in the video. I don't see where the mere presence of molars in general means anything, since he seems to be a little off on that:

http://www.webmd.com/oral-health/guide/dental-health-your-childs-teeth

I only have 28 teeth. Always have. Does that make me an alien?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Figure-34_-Saw-Marks.jpg

There doesn't seem to be a lot of weathering on those cuts, although they don't seem "fresh", they don't seem to be thousands of years old.

Also, why are there two tentative cuts? Surely precision cutting technology would preclude test cuts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There doesn't seem to be a lot of weathering on those cuts, although they don't seem "fresh", they don't seem to be thousands of years old.

Also, why are there two tentative cuts? Surely precision cutting technology would preclude test cuts.

A lot of these look too "fresh". That's why I think some are faked or the age is misrepresented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no evidence on aliens being here at all. Atleast anything that can prove it once and for all. We'll never know the truth until we venture out and find the answers ourselves.

For now we can only assume.

agree it is a losing battle. Evidence is there was a more advanced civilization then mainstream generally gave credit. There were ancient people that may even have some genetic differences then us in general, large skulls etc what ever that can just be another off shoot relative of man.

Even if we found something totally alien to human genetics that linked some of these ancient human to the mixing with some of us, it could just be said to older earth species missing link. If we found edvidence of them off the earth itself we still coudn't say alien as in ET because we still would not know their point of origination..still could be earth! If they were found alive we still would only guess where they really came from.

Ancient alien theory is probably a losing battle even if it is correct in some assumptions.

Edited by White Unicorn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

agree it is a losing battle. Evidence is there was a more advanced civilization then mainstream generally gave credit. There were ancient people that may even have some genetic differences then us in general, large skulls etc what ever that can just be another off shoot relative of man.

Even if we found something totally alien to human genetics that linked some of these ancient human to the mixing with some of us, it could just be said to older earth species missing link. If we found edvidence of them off the earth itself we still coudn't say alien as in ET because we still would not know their point of origination..still could be earth! If they were found alive we still would only guess where they really came from.

Ancient alien theory is probably a losing battle even if it is correct in some assumptions.

Even with DNA testing what would demostrate "alien". Maybe alien DNA would be too different from Earth life and our testing methods wouldn't work. And if it did work and show something unknown, then how can we conclude it's extraterrestrial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even with DNA testing what would demostrate "alien". Maybe alien DNA would be too different from Earth life and our testing methods wouldn't work. And if it did work and show something unknown, then how can we conclude it's extraterrestrial?

Exactly, that's why the AA theory is a losing battle even if it were true!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Abe take a look at this: Foerster is at Ollantaytambo presumably with an engineering specialist. They discuss how a fine cut was made in this stone block:

[media=]

[/media]

At the side of the stone cut that you can see in the video there is a wider gap. To me it looks like it is done using a wedge, to split the stone, like we can see demonstrated in a couple of videos on YouTube.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the side of the stone cut that you can see in the video there is a wider gap. To me it looks like it is done using a wedge, to split the stone, like we can see demonstrated in a couple of videos on YouTube.

It doesn't look exactly straight as you would expect with a cable or saw cut. More like the rock has split or cracked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a quick look at this short clip:

[media=]

[/media]

Here's a newspaper artcile about the skull:

http://www.dailymail...huaylillas.html

I would like to see those molars from an other angle and from up close. But from what I see the molars are not very worn, and it may be that although now visible in the skull, they may have been only partly descended and were partly still hidden in the gums.

.

Edited by Abramelin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't start that again. How did they extrude these:

http://peruenroute.w...ow-incas-built/

I hope you noticed there was an error in that article: the hihuana should not be translated as 'iron' but as 'pebble or 'stone'.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question for you zoser. What do you think about things like worry stones or the Black Stone at Mecca that have been worn smooth just by human contact. According to your logic such a thing would be impossible, and yet there is proof that softer materials (human lips even) can wear and smooth stone. Furthermore, if harder materials could not possibly be worn by softer materials then explain tool wear on things like drill bits and saw blades. Your refusal to admit that a copper/sand 'bit' can be used to drill stone is basically a refusal to be even remotely reasonable. The ancients had the means, time and manpower to accomplish these feats of engineering, hands down...pun intended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a newspaper artcile about the skull:

http://www.dailymail...huaylillas.html

I would like to see those molars from an other angle and from up close. But from what I see the molars are not very worn, and it may be that although now visible in the skull, they may have been only partly descended and were partly still hidden in the gums.

.

That article is over a year old and mentions DNA testing. Where's the results?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question for you zoser. What do you think about things like worry stones or the Black Stone at Mecca that have been worn smooth just by human contact. According to your logic such a thing would be impossible, and yet there is proof that softer materials (human lips even) can wear and smooth stone. Furthermore, if harder materials could not possibly be worn by softer materials then explain tool wear on things like drill bits and saw blades. Your refusal to admit that a copper/sand 'bit' can be used to drill stone is basically a refusal to be even remotely reasonable. The ancients had the means, time and manpower to accomplish these feats of engineering, hands down...pun intended.

Good point. Even steel saws used to cut wood have to be sharpened regularly.

...and flowing water carved out the Grand Canyon.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you noticed there was an error in that article: the hihuana should not be translated as 'iron' but as 'pebble or 'stone'.

Truthfully I wasn't even paying attention to that part. I just wanted to show off some of the "impossible" soft metal artifacts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 14

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.