Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 14
Alphamale06

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True

10,149 posts in this topic

Pyramid issue all proven. Not stone age men. Not tomb. Advanced power generator. The work of ancient aliens.

Anyone researching the issue particularly looking at the work of Dunn and supporting ideas from other contemporary researchers would naturally reach the same conclusion.

Zoser, you said you had been an engineer.

Well, I have a brother who is head-engineer of an American company here in Holland, and he regularly travels to Russia, Sweden, Italy and so on for his work.

I showed/sent him this thread, and he just asked me this simple question, "Why do believe this man Zoser is an engineer?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do some appear pointed and some not?

Could it be that some bulged out more than others?

Come on chaps think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoser, you said you had been an engineer.

Well, I have a brother who is head-engineer of an American company here in Holland, and he regularly travels to Russia, Sweden, Italy and so on for his work.

I showed/sent him this thread, and he just asked me this simple question, "Why do believe this man Zoser is an engineer?"

Come on Abe; your a clever chap.

Look at the pics and try and explain it any other way.

Edited by zoser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Abe; your a clever chap.

Look at the pics and try and explain it any other way.

No zoser, do not swerve when asked a direct question. Answer it.,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their traces are clearly discernible.

Try and explain the three distinct types of marks if you would.

Nice avatar btw.

Why leave marks like that?

No, I tried to ask you where you get the info from that the artefacts were made using alien technology. All you can say that you don't know how it was made, but not that aliens did it.

Meaning: you will have to compare it with known alien technology, and I doubt you can.

==

The avatar is based on an old book by Priestley.

I added the 2 raven banners on top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Abe; your a clever chap.

Look at the pics and try and explain it any other way.

we already know the answer.. so

back to you zoser.. why would they leave it like that if the stone was made soft.. why didnt they just smooth it out.. what purpose for leaving the marks in it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No zoser, do not swerve when asked a direct question. Answer it.,

Answer what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No zoser, do not swerve when asked a direct question. Answer it.,

Don't expect him to answer it. He'll avoid it like my post where I totally disproved the "Great Pyramid is a reactor/generator" theory

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we already know the answer.. so

back to you zoser.. why would they leave it like that if the stone was made soft.. why didnt they just smooth it out.. what purpose for leaving the marks in it?

Did they need to make them completely flat? Obviously not. The Coricancha wall petty much is completely flat so there is proof that they could.

It looks to me as if there were only interested in removing some bulges.

zoser61_zps2dd55b1c.jpg

Your turn; what are the marks doing there?

zoser115_zpsc4ee57a5.jpg

Edited by zoser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't expect him to answer it. He'll avoid it like my post where I totally disproved the "Great Pyramid is a reactor/generator" theory

Precisely. One can expect very little from zoser except youtube vids with no explanation in advance, and constant back and forth between subjects. He knows he is wrong...I firmly believe he just gets bored and so wants to bait everyone..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Abe; your a clever chap.

Look at the pics and try and explain it any other way.

Smart enough to say that we maybe don't know YET how the ancients may have done it, but not that it is proof aliens did it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I maintain:

1) Stamping

2) Scraping

3) Pointing.

All in a condition of softened stone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they need to make them completely flat? Obviously not. The Coricancha wall petty much is completely flat so there is proof that they could.

It looks to me as if there were only interested in removing some bulges.

zoser61_zps2dd55b1c.jpg

Your turn; what are the marks doing there?

zoser115_zpsc4ee57a5.jpg

those are just shaping marks.. your point?

it could have been a bump that needed to be removed.. maybe a odd color patch..

your turn.. what are the marks doing there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they need to make them completely flat? Obviously not. The Coricancha wall petty much is completely flat so there is proof that they could.

It looks to me as if there were only interested in removing some bulges.

zoser61_zps2dd55b1c.jpg

Your turn; what are the marks doing there?

zoser115_zpsc4ee57a5.jpg

All these numerous little dents.

I just love'm, lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Smart enough to say that we maybe don't know YET how the ancients may have done it, but not that it is proof aliens did it.

That's ok.

There is also the 'why'. If that was not softened stone then why do it. Some pointed some not, some stamped some not, some scraped some not.

Why are they there at all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't expect him to answer it. He'll avoid it like my post where I totally disproved the "Great Pyramid is a reactor/generator" theory

What? Did you? Where??

LOL.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I maintain:

1) Stamping

2) Scraping

3) Pointing.

All in a condition of softened stone.

remove no 1 and you also have it from stone carving and shaping.. again.. your point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

those are just shaping marks.. your point?

it could have been a bump that needed to be removed.. maybe a odd color patch..

your turn.. what are the marks doing there?

Why put shaping marks there when they obviously could produce flat stone (Coricancha)?

They had to be moulding marks.

The same effect is exactly reproducible in clay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's ok.

There is also the 'why'. If that was not softened stone then why do it. Some pointed some not, some stamped some not, some scraped some not.

Why are they there at all?

Zoser, why and how we may never know, or not exactly.

But because we may never know doesn't automatically mean alien intervention.

THAT is my pioint.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly, if they did leave all those bulges and marks and creases in it when they built it with the incredible precision using their mind blowing technology, then a pretty shoddy job they did of it. Suppose you'd hired a firm of builders to build you an extension, and they'd left drill holes and chisel marks and chipped bits off and squeezed anything in wherever they could fit it any old how; you'd call them a right bunch of cowboys, wouldn't you. Frankly this looks like anything but mind blowing precision.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

* see below. *

Edited by Lord Vetinari

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been stamped. My guess is that they needed to press the bulging stone back in.

zoser114_zps54ab40cd.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why put shaping marks there when they obviously could produce flat stone (Coricancha)?

They had to be moulding marks.

The same effect is exactly reproducible in clay.

ok quite true.. but also like clay.. you can remove the molding marks.. so again.. why were they left? you asked us why they were they.. we are asking you the same thing..

we say its from the stone carving.. you say its from molding..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been stamped. My guess is that they needed to press the bulging stone back in.

zoser114_zps54ab40cd.jpg

Good, so let's say they softened the stone by a yet unknown process.

But where is the proof of aliens?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zoser, why and how we may never know, or not exactly.

But because we may never know doesn't automatically mean alien intervention.

THAT is my pioint.

I see your point Abe.

Other evidence supports the use of high tech. It's when the weight of evidence all stacks up to the same conclusion.

zoser85_zps4956d3f9.jpg

ok quite true.. but also like clay.. you can remove the molding marks.. so again.. why were they left? you asked us why they were they.. we are asking you the same thing..

we say its from the stone carving.. you say its from molding..

No need to do that with stone carving. No one carves stone with stamp marks (think about it).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 14

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.