Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 14
Alphamale06

The Ancient Alien Theory Is True

10,149 posts in this topic

It's only funny because zoser actually said that if it is on video then it is true.

I wish I had the patience to go back through 500 pages and find his actual quotes.

yes I wish you had the patience to as well...because I suspect you are making it up...

or getting carried away...

As you repeat it ad nauseam..I think the least you could do is back up your words with

some proof. Let's see the post and everything in context...(if it exists)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I wish you had the patience to as well...because I suspect you are making it up...

or getting carried away...

As you repeat it ad nauseam..I think the least you could do is back up your words with

some proof. Let's see the post and everything in context...(if it exists)

And what if he does..... would that mean something to you!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And what if he does..... would that mean something to you!?

have you heard the saying...put up or shut up...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you heard the saying...put up or shut up...?

You hypocrite!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Where is my experimental holographic projector?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts on the matter is the so called aliens is that thasy are survivers of the flood.

Flood did not happen, freshwater organisms that far outdate the flood, and would have died if the flood was fact, prove it. Also, where does the BIble say there were two peoples who survived the flood?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Repeated assertion will not do. You have to say where Al Mamun wrote that he found a body. He found no treasure either. You have to explain why the GP is not adorned with art, colour, Heiroglyphic texts relating to the Kings passage into the after life.

It's just not there.

You have to explain why the passage ways are not designed for human beings. Some are just too low for a dignified funery procession.

Nothing fits.

That is the nature of objective facts psyche. No argument can change it.

No one is going to come up with a new revelation in the next few months to alter this. The skeptics are stuck with these facts and will continue to embarrass for decades to come.

Better to admit it now that it was all tosh to begin with and begin afresh I would have thought.

What is tosh is that you refuse to accept the robbers steal things. There is evidence where robbers broke in, if that is not obvious enough for you, then the problem be your comprehension skills, but that is all.

Better to admit now that you were never an architect or you would know the main passage was never meant to have the sarcophagus carried down it so it was placed there first and the structure built around it. This is still done today with large items like Generators that take over electrical supply to large installations.

The Sarcophagus is proof this was the kings burial chamber and the robbers entrance prove it was cleaned out. Some artifacts were found in air shafts. What would they be doing there? And what are you talking about with a funeral procession? When a Pharaoh passed, a formal announcement was made, "The falcon is flown to heaven and (his successor) is arisen in his place". It is interesting to note the similarity with the more modern phrase, "The King is dead, long live the king". But I digress. It normally took about three months to bury the newly deceased pharaoh in his tomb in the Valley of the Kings on the West Bank across from modern Luxor. This was because the embalming process was complex, and included a period of 70 days when the dead pharaoh's body was immersed in natron, a type of salt and a primary ingredient to the mummification process. After the immersion in natron, the body was wrapped in first one layer of bandages, on which protective amulets were laid in specific places, and then a second layer of broader bandages. The second layer of bandages were first soaked in resin and aromatic essential oils. There was no procession. As such it does fit. If you actually read something about history, you might not appear as confused and ignorant as you do. You need to stop throwing away textbooks and try reading at least one of them, and then trying to understand it.

Robbery should be something you know well. You try to steal real knowledge constantly. For that you ought to be ashamed.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greenpeace also claims that nuclear power is far from the cheapest, most efficient, or even the cleanest alternativepower source and the United Nations agreed in 2000, when delegates refused to grant greenhouse gas credits tonuclear power plants. A year later, nuclear power failed to receive a sustainable energy label from the UN, since uranium is still derived from non-renewable resources, such as coal and granite. However many estimates, including those of physicist Bernard Cohen, suggest that uranium ore could provide electricity for several billion years, which, while finite, is still much longer than the expected life of such power sources as oil and coal.

http://connection.eb...ergy-production

Much? How much? Sweet FA?

Table 1. The largest-producing uranium mines in 2011

Mine Country Main owner Type Production (tU) % of world McArthur River Canada Cameco underground 7686 14 Olympic Dam Australia BHP Billiton by-product/

underground 3353 6 Arlit Niger Somair/ Areva open pit 2726 5 Tortkuduk Kazakhstan Katco JV/ Areva ISL 2608 5 Ranger Australia ERA (Rio Tinto 68%) open pit 2240 4 Kraznokamensk Russia ARMZ underground 2191 4 Budenovskoye 2 Kazakhstan Karatau JV/Kazatomprom-Uranium One ISL 2175 4 Rossing Namibia Rio Tinto (69%) open pit 1822 3 Inkai Kazakhstan Inkai JV/Cameco ISL 1602 3 South Inkai Kazakhstan Betpak Dala JV/ Uranium One ISL 1548 3 Top 10 total 27,951 52%

Uranium mines operate in some twenty countries, though in 2011 some 52% of world production comes from just ten mines in six countries (Table 1), these six providing 85% of the world's mined uranium. Most of the uranium ore deposits at present supporting these mines have average grades in excess of 0.10% of uranium – that is, greater than 1000 parts per million. In the first phase of uranium mining to the 1960s, this would have been seen as a respectable grade, but today some Canadian mines have huge amounts of ore up to 20% U average grade. Other mines however can operate successfully with very low grade ores, down to about 0.02% U.

LINK

The Uranium scare is unwarranted and is holding back a cheap source of energy.

Ignorant people are to blame, the sort of people that think a pyramid is a generator. They should just read some.

Edited by psyche101

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why people are pasting images of ship propellers? I'm sure they must have a good reason. Not relevant to the discussion though. Maybe they just like ships?

Because it proves that you do not have a clue what you are talking about.

I'm not going to give you a hint either. It is appropriate to put your deliberate ignorance on a pedestal for all to see. I think you might be the only one who does not "get it" Zoser.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I wish you had the patience to as well...because I suspect you are making it up...

or getting carried away...

Neither. Myles isa good guy. Zoser tells us to do wrong things like refuse to read, refuse to learn, and he sells us known lies, like the Buzz Aldrin Apollo 11 UFO and Roswell Rods. Myles contributions are superior in every way possible, volume does not make a good poster. Zoser can ask how man managed to stack rocks till the end of time, yet still, the same answer will provide the truth. That answer we see here, repeatedly.

Forget the framework; forget the textbooks, forget the dates and look at the evidence and what the specialists say about it.

If you advocate that, then you should be ashamed of yourself. Deeply.

Edited by psyche101
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too real for any deal psyche101 ! THe "Z" master has a funny way of proving anything ! Well If the Shoe Fits ,they say Put it where the sun dont shine ! :tu:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I wish you had the patience to as well...because I suspect you are making it up...

or getting carried away...

As you repeat it ad nauseam..I think the least you could do is back up your words with

some proof.

Bearing in mind all the scientific facts we've been given about Pyramids being nucular power generators and the real meanings of the words 'granite' and 'generation', (to take just two examples), that's very lol.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25537435.jpg
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The factor you are missing is time, which could have run into hundreds or even thousands of years. It acted like a radiating beacon.

Not like a nuclear reactor of today which is depleting far more rapidly through heat and high usage.

I think the factor your missing mate is the output of said piece of rock. is the decay output is minimal.. as it sits.. it would be lucky to power a single LED light..

I really wish Dunn.. yourself and other followers of this theory.. would actually get some basic understanding in nuclear and particle physics.. if you did you would not be going Hey this is true or even possible..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unsupportable.

Limestone within the pyramid lasts just as long. The theory that the granite provided mechanical and structural support is invalid.

Think it through.

LOL... your a engineer right? ever looked at structural stress.. and how things are built.. the weight per square cm or inch if you prefer.. why when the archi's design a building.. then give it to a engineer to figure out if its possible..

sorry again.. that has been explained why it is the way it is.. yet you just cant see it..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's only funny because zoser actually said that if it is on video then it is true.

I wish I had the patience to go back through 500 pages and find his actual quotes.

i am actually tempted to go back through all 500+ pages and copy down all the classic zoserisms and make it into a pic to post..

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too real for any deal psyche101 ! THe "Z" master has a funny way of proving anything ! Well If the Shoe Fits ,they say Put it where the sun dont shine ! :tu:

Well, I am sure if he is a master, it's not something to be proud of! But I do like your advice, wise people in Texas!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL... your a engineer right?

One thing he has proven is the he is not. He never has even entered an engineering facility I would say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Reading made Don Quixote a gentleman. Beleiving everything he read made him a madman" Georgr Bernard Shaw.

I have no idea why that quote seems apposite.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Reading made Don Quixote a gentleman. Beleiving everything he read made him a madman" Georgr Bernard Shaw.

I have no idea why that quote seems apposite.

I just do not know what to say to that................... :D

But I know what I like :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just do not know what to say to that................... :D

But I know what I like :D

How about :

gallery_89737_14_21823.jpg

Edited by TheSearcher
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Sarcophagus is proof this was the kings burial chamber

Just because modern man has called it a sarcophagus..that doesn't mean it actually was one.

and the robbers entrance prove it was cleaned out.

This is speculation not proof...

Assumptions do not equal fact...but you are free to believe what you like, of course.... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind all the scientific facts we've been given about Pyramids being nucular power generators and the real meanings of the words 'granite' and 'generation', (to take just two examples), that's very lol.

there's a difference between able to prove ...what happened thousands of years ago..

and something that was allegedly said on this thread, in black and white, in the last few weeks.

capiche..?

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always wondered why anyone thought that humans needs aliens to evolve into what human civilization is today, or why we even need aliens to ensure mass destruction and a collapse towards extinction.

the humans are more than adequately equipped with means and physical capacity to achieve that, we see it everyday and everywhere.

Humans today have the best standards of living,life expectancy and wellness of being compared to anytime in the known history of human civilization. Without the destructive nature so inherent in modern society today, imagine .... (cue : John on keyboard and Yoko for inspiration)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Humans today have the best standards of living,life expectancy and wellness of being compared to anytime in the known history of human civilization.

i think we were more healthier back then....

http://robbwolf.com/what-is-the-paleo-diet/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think we were more healthier back then....

http://robbwolf.com/...the-paleo-diet/

That depends on choices, bad dietary habits aside, humans still have access to healthy choices, or even more unhealthy choices, more because that's where the profitability is . It's still choices. It doesn;t have to be that way.

I live on a diet not unlike the one in the link you posted, didn't know it was elevated to 'fad' status..

The Paleo concept is new for most people and this newness can spark many questions. We like people to not only read about and educate themselves on this topic but also to “get in and do it.” Experience is perhaps the best teacher and often cuts through any confusion surrounding this way of eating. Now, all that considered, there are still some common counter arguments to the Paleo diet that happen with sufficient frequency that a whole paper was written on it. Enjoy:Evolutionary Health Promotion. A consideration of common counter-arguments.

Why does he says "new" when that's the way humans been eating all this time ?

Edited by third_eye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 14

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.