Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4
iforgot

Where do athiests think we came from?

463 posts in this topic

I'll start by saying that I'm not religious at all, and that I (probably) never will be. I guess a good description would be spiritual!

However, I'm really curious where, or what force, non-believers think we (and physical reality itself) came from. If everything in physical reality needs a cause to have an effect (simple laws of physics), then what was the initial cause to create the physical reality we live in? If everything in our physical reality needs a cause to have an effect, the only way for initial creation was for some outside force to essentially create our physical reality, or our reality must have broken its own laws of physics at the beginning of time.

By saying there was no cause, and knowing that our universe has not been around for an infinite amount of time means that a mystical (paranormal) force caused creation. By saying there was a cause, then something had to have created our universe (such as what many people would describe as 'God'). It seems like a simple and self defeating argument.

It's clear that our universe wasn't always in existence, so I'm anxious to hear your opinions. This simple reason is why I do not understand the die hard atheists, or people who take a close-minded skeptical stance instead of open-minded and skeptical view of our reality.

Edited by iforgot
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The real problem here is how to comprehend that which appears to be incomprehensible.

For me it is simple, the Universe (as we understand it) cycles through phases. We are living in an expanding phase giving plenty of time for Solar System creation and Evolution to exist, not forgetting "Time". When this phase submits itself to Entropic forces then the Universe (Ours) will contract again in preparation (not cognitive) for the next expansion.

No real Mystery here, and no need to invoke a "God" principle. IMO

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't athiests believe we evolved from protoplasm growing in a puddle of slime in the far distant past?

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, I'm really curious where, or what force, non-believers think we (and physical reality itself) came from. If everything in physical reality needs a cause to have an effect (simple laws of physics), then what was the initial cause to create the physical reality we live in?

There's absolutely no way to find the answer to this question. I prefer to spend my time finding answers to answerable questions that may benefit someone.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't athiests believe we evolved from protoplasm growing in a puddle of slime in the far distant past?

The OP is asking a much harder question: where did everything come from?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like these two theories:

Stephen Hawkings' idea that the Universe has no beginning or end . . . it just IS.

And IMO the better explanation by Alexander Vilenkin that the Universe started from "literally nothing", meaning not only the absence of matter, but the absence of space and time as well.

The Universe started in totally empty geometry and then made a quantum tunneling transition to a non-empty state (subatomic in size), which through inflation (the Universe expands exponentially fast for a brief period of time which causes its size to increase dramatically) came to its current size.

The objective universe is one big meme, creating new things out of itself, recreating things, destroying things that don't prove beneficial to the survival of the Universe Meme.

Edited by Etu Malku
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my answer is the same as the likes I have clipped above,

One thing i can most certainly definately tell you is where we did not come from....god. IMO

Edited by freetoroam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP is asking a much harder question: where did everything come from?

Yup! Thank you.

The real problem here is how to comprehend that which appears to be incomprehensible.

For me it is simple, the Universe (as we understand it) cycles through phases. We are living in an expanding phase giving plenty of time for Solar System creation and Evolution to exist, not forgetting "Time". When this phase submits itself to Entropic forces then the Universe (Ours) will contract again in preparation (not cognitive) for the next expansion.

No real Mystery here, and no need to invoke a "God" principle. IMO

Personally, I'm not a fan of the 'God' principle either. The idea of an egotistical, judgmental, and therefore fearful God seems a little silly to me :)

That's not to say that I don't have an idea of where we came from though. Tom Campbell's explanation seems like the best one to me (if you want his full theory of everything, read his book 'My Big TOE' on Google books. Great book!). His idea is something to the effect of physical reality is a product of non-physical reality which is in turn a product of some primordial (beginning of time) consciousness.

To really briefly summarize his idea, the primordial consciousness functions as an extremely evolved and powerful super computer. Physical reality (as well as non-physical reality) stems from a sort of simulation run by this computer to evolve consciousness to lower forms of entropy (to have a greater potential to do work). Obviously, there would be many simulations all running at the same time but I'm starting to sound like a lunatic so I'll leave these ideas here.

Comprehending what created the conditions necessary for a consciousness super computer- now that's incomprehensible!

I like these two theories:

Stephen Hawkings' idea that the Universe has no beginning or end . . . it just IS.

And IMO the better explanation by Alexander Vilenkin that the Universe started from "literally nothing", meaning not only the absence of matter, but the absence of space and time as well.

The Universe started in totally empty geometry and then made a quantum tunneling transition to a non-empty state (subatomic in size), which through inflation (the Universe expands exponentially fast for a brief period of time which causes its size to increase dramatically) came to its current size.

The objective universe is one big meme, creating new things out of itself, recreating things, destroying things that don't prove beneficial to the survival of the Universe Meme.

Both of these ideas clearly violate the cause and effect relationship that we know must exist in physical reality. They do not explain the paranormal or mystical events at all. precognitive dreaming and Out-of-body experiences are all pretty common (for me at least), so in my opinion, a good theory of everything would explain that too. Or in the very least, give a logical reason for them to happen!

Stay with me here, we are on a paranormal-centered discussion board after all.

Edited by iforgot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me think of the joke: 'When did time start?' 'Even Time doesn't remember, it was before his time.'

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, I'm really curious where, or what force, non-believers think we (and physical reality itself) came from. If everything in physical reality needs a cause to have an effect (simple laws of physics), then what was the initial cause to create the physical reality we live in? If everything in our physical reality needs a cause to have an effect, the only way for initial creation was for some outside force to essentially create our physical reality, or our reality must have broken its own laws of physics at the beginning of time.

My issue with how you have phrased this is that you are including 'everything needs to have a cause' in the argument. We don't know how valid it is to apply the laws of physics of this physical universe we live in to something outside the universe or to 'before' the Big Bang occurred. If time was created at the same time as the Big Bang, then how can there even be a cause and an effect since those requires time to exist?

By saying there was no cause, and knowing that our universe has not been around for an infinite amount of time means that a mystical (paranormal) force caused creation. By saying there was a cause, then something had to have created our universe (such as what many people would describe as 'God'). It seems like a simple and self defeating argument.

If everything needs a cause, then what caused God or the mystical creation force to exist? If those can exist without having been caused, then why does the Big Bang need a cause?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe WE created it, man. Wooaah... :o

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your answer just sounds like a fancy way to say god, where did the primodial mind come from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know, that's the thing. Scientists may never know, but to assume that we have been created through processes of divinity due to dictation from one lone book is nothing short of ignorance.

Edited by Alienated Being
4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

god is meant to be perfection and u cant be perfection with out being self existing, so god always existed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe WE created it, man. Wooaah... :o

We aint that cleva!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

god is meant to be perfection and u cant be perfection with out being self existing, so god always existed.

But in order for change to occur, it requires time; and time cannot exist within a singularity, as it is based on relativity...

It is a complex concept that makes my brain hurt whenever I think about it.

Edited by Alienated Being

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't know, that's the thing. Scientists may never know, but to assume that we have been created through processes of divinity due to dictation from one lone book is nothing short of ignorance.

all the christians i know base their beliefs not just on the bible but the experiences they have that confirm the bible.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We aint that cleva!

Not yet, man, but think about it. If future you was all 'woah, past me was pretty awesome, we should hang', then when, like, future you makes a time machine, it just creates... THE PAST.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But in order for change to occur, it requires time; and time cannot exist within a singularity, as it is based on relativity...

It is a complex concept that makes my brain hurt whenever I think about it.

for god to have existed for ever he would have to exist out of time, to create time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My issue with how you have phrased this is that you are including 'everything needs to have a cause' in the argument. We don't know how valid it is to apply the laws of physics of this physical universe we live in to something outside the universe or to 'before' the Big Bang occurred. If time was created at the same time as the Big Bang, then how can there even be a cause and an effect since those requires time to exist?

If there was nothing, then how does that spawn something?

If everything needs a cause, then what caused God or the mystical creation force to exist? If those can exist without having been caused, then why does the Big Bang need a cause?

understanding the force that created us is clearly outside the realms of our comprehension.

What we know for sure is that everything in this reality needs a cause in order to have an effect. The big bang is no exception. If it came from somewhere where things needed no cause, then that would leave a gray area for it to have spawned from somewhere mystical all the same (because everything we know in this reality needs a cause).

Edited by iforgot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet, man, but think about it. If future you was all 'woah, past me was pretty awesome, we should hang', then when, like, future you makes a time machine, it just creates... THE PAST.

Sorry you have lost me there, maybe you are ahead of me, by 3 bottles.

Edited by freetoroam
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not being difficult and perhaps it is a bit OT, but "It's clear that our universe wasn't always in existence." I'd love some info about why this is clear.

I was always of like mind with Stephen Hawking... it has no beginning and end. It just is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if the universe has always been then why is it expanding and speeding up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry you have lost me there, maybe you are ahead of me, by 3 bottles.

Probably, personally I have no theory about where the universe came from. It's like a locked room mystery where you can only use information to solve the mystery from inside that room, no outside knowledge, nothing, just everything in that room, no assumptions based on outside info either.

Edited by Hasina
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

god is meant to be perfection

No he's not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.