Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
subhumn

Hurricane Sandy... Manufactured?

53 posts in this topic

Look, subhumn, just take a little time to Google how hurricanes are formed.

Then, once you understand it, get back to me as how in hell anyone could "manufacture" those monsters.

Don't you think after reading the coincidences that I have presented that the storm should at least prompt proper scientific research into whether it MIGHT be manufactured? Or didnt you read the article/website?

The following five coincidences were taken from the main article.

#1 – Hurricane Sandy was the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded.

#2 – If you look at the topography, when the storm reaches North America it continues to stay the around the same distance away from the coastline. (I didn’t think that the coastline effects the path of a storm. Most storms that I see tend to stick to a direct path).

#3 – The storm curves with with the coastline of North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. (Once again, I didn’t think that the coastline effects the path or curvature of a storm).

#4 – The storm speeds up just as it heads for New Jersey. (From the start, the storm moved at a steady rate and then just before the major catastrophe of the storm, it speeds up, just before it circles New York City).

#5 – The storm moves in a circle around New York City (New York City is the business capital of the United States and the world. It is also the most recognized city in the United States. New York City would be the most likely place for an attack. United States is where the Twin Towers were destroyed on September 11, 2001).

The following were taken from the additional coincidences sub section of the website.

#6 – Hurricane Sandy is the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded and it hits late in the hurricane season. (You would think that think the largest hurricane ever recorded would be at least close to peak period).

#7 – This hurricane is very far north in comparison. (Most Atlantic hurricanes hit Florida and very rarely go any further. If hurricanes do go any further, they usually head from west to east because the prevailing winds blow that direction. What happened was the complete opposite).

#8 – Sandy had the biggest storm surge ever seen. (The storm surge of Sandy has created some of the worst flooding from a hurricane in a very long time).

#9 – Hurricane Sandy is very fast for a hurricane. (Okay, so lets get this straight. Hurricane Sandy is the largest, its very fast, its not at the right time, its very far north for a hurricane and had the worst flooding from a hurricane in a very long time. Too many major coincidences for me to accept that this storm was a natural creation).

#10 – Last but not least (Just for ****s and giggles). Forecasters labeled Hurricane Sandy “Frankenstorm“… If you remember “Frankenstein” was created, he was not born, he was manufactured too

Edited by subhumn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I guess some people will believe what they want to, regardless of anything else.

Jesus, we can't even get rid of a hurricane, much less create one.

Wouldn't THAT be a more productive idea to work on?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good God, nevermind, but welcome to UM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I guess some people will believe what they want to, regardless of anything else.

Jesus, we can't even get rid of a hurricane, much less create one.

Wouldn't THAT be a more productive idea to work on?

I really don't see the harm in exercising an idea.

But ya, I agree... THAT is a very productive spin on the idea.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I guess some people will believe what they want to, regardless of anything else.

Jesus, we can't even get rid of a hurricane, much less create one.

Wouldn't THAT be a more productive idea to work on?

No, your just ignorrant and closed minded. Maybe someone knows how to soften the impact of a hurricane?

Heres two articles, one on engineering hurricanes and one on a machine to get rid of hurricanes. Maybe they are not 100% credible but at least we have a DISCUSSION going rather than a troll thread, right?

http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs/engineering.pdf

http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/docs/machine.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the below is from this link: Haarp: High-Frequency Vandalism in the Sky

HAARP Boils the Upper Atmosphere

HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an "ionospheric heater." (The ionosphere is the electrically charged sphere surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40 to 600 miles above Earth's surface.)

Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope: antennas send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a superpowerful radio-wave beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto Earth and penetrate everything — living and dead. HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Project is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However, other U.S. military documents put it more clearly: HAARP aims to learn how to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." Communicating with submarines is only one of those purposes.

The military says the HAARP system could:

  • give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option through at least 1986);
  • replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology;
  • be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP with a more flexible and accurate system;
  • provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communications systems working;
  • provide a wide-area Earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements;
  • be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area; and
  • be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete.

The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound national defense and to those concerned about cost-cutting. However, the possible uses which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be found in U.S. Air Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency records, are alarming. Moreover, effects from the reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield — the ionosphere — could be cataclysmic, according to some scientists.

The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what exactly will happen, but a Penn State science article brags about that uncertainty. Macho science? The HAARP project uses the largest energy levels yet played with, by what Begich and Manning call "the big boys with their new toys." It is an experiment on the sky, and experiments are done to find out something not already known. Independent scientists told Begich and Manning that a HAARP-type "skybuster" with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global vandalism.

HAARP History

Twelve patents are the backbone of the HAARP project, and are now buried among the thousands of others held in the name of Raytheon.

Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent #4,686,605, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere," was sealed for a year under a government secrecy order.

The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different: the radio frequency (rf) radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter, compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.

This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways necessary to create futuristic effects described in the patent. According to the patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900's formed the basis of the research.

What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They could make enormous profits by beaming electrical power, without wires, from a powerhouse in the gas fields to the consumer.

For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the intended uses for HAARP. In April 1995, however, Begich found other patents connected with a "key personnel" list for APTI. Some of these new APTI patents were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power.

Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability to spray large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies — and to control changes in those waves — makes it possible to knock out communications on land or sea as well as in the air. The patent said:

"Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes. . . .

"It is possible not only to interfere with third-party communications but to take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications network even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put another way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the same time.

"Large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction. . . .

"Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper-atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device. . . . Molecular modifications of the atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence. For example, ozone, nitrogen, and other concentrations in the atmosphere could be artificially increased. . . ." Begich found eleven other APTI patents. They told how to make "Nuclear-sized Explosions without Radiation," power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon radar, detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads, electromagnetic pulses previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and other "Star Wars" tricks. This cluster of patents underlays the HAARP weapon system.

Mental Manipulation

Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes. For example, U.S. Air Force documents revealed that a system had been developed for manipulating and disrupting human mental processes through pulsed radio-frequency radiation (the stuff of HAARP) over large geographical areas.

The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the work of Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva. It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur the same ranges which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.

The following statement was made more than 25 years ago in a book which Brzezinski wrote while a professor at Columbia University:

"Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J. F. MacDonald specialist in problems of warfare says accurately timed, artificially excited electronic strokes 'could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the Earth. . . . In this way, one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period. . . .' No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades."

In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist was:

""The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy."

While yesterday's geophysicists predicted today's advances, are HAARP program managers delivering on the vision?

In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims:

"The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi military situations. . . . Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM (electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be combat-ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent, and countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop. . . . One last area where electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of individuals for anomalous phenomena."

Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed?

The United States Congressional Record deals with the use of HAARP for penetrating the Earth with signals bounced off the ionosphere. These signals are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in order to locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. For 1996, the U.S. Senate has set aside $15 million to develop this ability alone: Earth-penetration tomography.

The problem is that the frequency needed for Earth-penetrating radiations is within the frequency range most cited for disruption of human mental functions. It may also have profound effects on migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an undisturbed energy field to find their routes.

Bubble of Electric Particles

Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews with independent scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D., a long and impressive career in high-energy physics, and has been published in prestigious science journals and books. Rauscher commented on Haarp: "You're pumping tremendous energy into an extremely delicate molecular configuration that comprises these multilayers we call the ionosphere."

The ionosphere is prone to catalytic reactions, she explained: if a small part is changed, a major change in the ionosphere can happen. In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr. Rauscher shared her mental picture of it (the ionosphere): a soap-bubble like sphere surrounding the Earth's atmosphere, with movements swirling over the surface of the bubble. If a big enough hole is punched through it, she predicts it could pop.

Slicing the Ionosphere

David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background in electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP radiations with the ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid:

"HAARP will not burn 'holes' in the ionosphere. That is a dangerous understatement of what HAARP's giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning relative to thin electric shells of the multi layer membrane of ionospheres that absorb and shield Earth's surface from intense solar radiation, including charged-particle storms in solar winds erupting from the Sun. Earth's axial spin means that HAARP in a burst lasting more than a few minutes will slice through the ionosphere like a microwave knife. This produces not a hole, but a long tear an incision."

Crudely Plucking the Strings (Second Concept)

"As Earth rotates, HAARP will slice across geomagnetic flux . . . a donut-shaped spool of magnetic strings like longitude meridians [on maps]. HAARP may not 'cut' these strings in Gaia's magnetic mantle, but will pulse each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony high frequencies. These noisy impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending vibrations all through the geomagnetic web.

"The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands, and the web's vibrations alert the spider to possible prey. HAARP will be a man-made microwave finger poking at the web, sending out confusing signals, if not tearing holes in the threads.

"Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's geomagnetic harp are unknown and, I suspect, barely thought of. Even if thought of, the intent [of HAARP] is to learn to exploit any effects, not to play in tune to global symphonies."

Weather Control

Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit us hard. [The Stanford researchers'] work suggests that technicians could control global weather by sending relatively small "signals" into the Van Allen Belt (radiation belts around Earth). Thus Tesla's resonance effects can control enormous energies by tiny triggering signals.

The military has had about 20 years to work on weather warfare methods, which it euphemistically calls weather modification. For example, rain making technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The U.S. Department of Defense sampled lightning and hurricane manipulation studies in Project Skyfire and Project Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated technologies that would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP cites an expert who says the military studied both lasers and chemicals which they figured could damage the ozone layer over an enemy.

Looking at ways to cause earthquakes, as well as to detect them, was part of the project named Prime Argus, decades ago. The money for that came from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, now under the acronym ARPA).

In 1994 the U.S. Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan, which includes weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control since the 1940's, but Spacecast 2020 noted that "using environmental modification techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state [is] prohibited." Having said that, the Air Force claimed that technological advance "compels a reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic."

Forty Years of Zapping the Sky?

As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S. Department of Defense was studying "ways to manipulate the charges of the Earth and sky and so affect the weather" by using an electronic beam to ionize or deionize the atmosphere over a given area.

In 1966, Professor Gordon J.F. MacDonald was Associate Director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee, and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes. MacDonald made a revealing comment: "The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of energy."

World-recognized scientist MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at the time, the dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter "How to Wreck the Environment" for the book Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding around. In it he describes the use of weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice-cap melting or destabilization, ozone-depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean-wave control and brainwave manipulation using the planet's energy fields. He also said that these types of weapons would be developed and, when used, would be virtually undetectable by their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military's intention to do environmental engineering is well-documented.

Small Input, Big Effect

Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model is one way to look at the possible effect of multigigawatt pulsing of the ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain points, those parts of the ionosphere could react in surprising ways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its weather for **** sakes. They never know what a hurricane will do. They can only guess based on the observations of storms in the recent past. Thats why when a storm is approaching land they present one or two dozen possible tracks. As far as north east storms, their rare but they do happen. Long island express is a good example. Weird track so what, look at the track of Ivan in '04. What about the hurricane in about '93 that was on a direct path for New Orleans but a few hours before land fall it took a hard ninety and headed to texas. I 've been through at least 5 major hurricanes , 3 of which the eye passed directly overhead. And let me say being in the eye of a hurricane is not only an incredible thing , it's very humbling.

I don't know if you've ever experienced the real wrath of nature before but for those of us who have, the idea that man could not only create but control it seems, basically ridiculous to me. I try to be open minded and I respect your right to your own ideas, but if we were able to do what you claim we can, I would have to believe this world would be in a lot better condition. My advice to you is, next time it rains don't worry about "who" made it rain, just go a stroll and enjoy it.

Edited by praetorian-legio XIII
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an interesting theory and all... But I don't think Sandy was manufactured. The notion intrigued me enough that I spent a few minutes looking up the history of hurricanes in the NE. I think the history kind of makes Sandy seem normal. Super big and fast and damaging to be sure, but there have been a string of doozies through the centuries.

I second NIxon... What about other hurricanes? I realize you want to tackle Sandy first but I think you need to do some historical research into this theory.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So quick to judge! I applaud you for expressing an idea ad a taboo one at that. Nothing great ever became of people who just believe what they are told. This is an interesting thread and it would be nice to see an intelligent debate... but unfortunately I do not think you're going to get one. Just some people reading the title and responding lol

An intelligent debate would require showing proof that HAARP and or Cloud Seeding is able to produce a hurricane/typhoon. Which, since the induction of HAARP, has not been a proven fact and just speculation.

Cloud seeding cannot produce the temperature variance needed to start a hurricane.

HAARP does not produce the temperature variance needed to start a hurricane.

It is the mis-understanding, possibly due to the lack of research in these methods/technology that causes threads like these.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An intelligent debate would require showing proof that HAARP and or Cloud Seeding is able to produce a hurricane/typhoon. Which, since the induction of HAARP, has not been a proven fact and just speculation.

Cloud seeding cannot produce the temperature variance needed to start a hurricane.

HAARP does not produce the temperature variance needed to start a hurricane.

It is the mis-understanding, possibly due to the lack of research in these methods/technology that causes threads like these.

there we go.. now we are just saying more than NUH UHHH lol

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, lets use a link committed to conspiracy theories instead of some scientific studies.

That will help.

Actually, if you read the sourced material they used it will help. It's not just some guy running off his own thoughts throughout the thing. It links to factual information and also provides commentary from people with background on the subjects discussed.

My guess is you didn't read much of it though (if any at all), so you probably didn't catch any of that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, if you read the sourced material they used it will help. It's not just some guy running off his own thoughts throughout the thing. It links to factual information and also provides commentary from people with background on the subjects discussed.

My guess is you didn't read much of it though (if any at all), so you probably didn't catch any of that.

I have read enough of Conspiracy Archive to base a lot of their articles as being cherry picked information to form a simple conclusion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have read enough of Conspiracy Archive to base a lot of their articles as being cherry picked information to form a simple conclusion.

Right. So you didn't read a word of what the article said, it's sourced material, or the comments from professionals in the field discussing the matter because it doesn't fall in favor with what you believe.

Got it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the first sentence of your "article".

A review of Angels Don't Play This HAARP by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning. Reprinted from Nexus, December 1995 - January 1996

Technonet, the protest form of the 1990's: picketing on the information highways. For example, a fast-growing assortment of men and women around the world are using the Internet (started by the U.S. military for information transfer and exchange that would never be interfered with) to draw attention to a questionable military project in Alaska.

Like I stated earlier as well.

HAARP in Alaska has open tours of its facility. If the military was doing any kind of weapons project in HAARP it would be deemed in accessible to tours. The fact that the first paragraph of your article states "questionable military project" is a hilarious attempt at being scientifically serious.

As a matter of fact, if anyone wants to read that article, it is all presented in the book it happens to point to along critical points on the subject.

However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the military-industrial-academic-bureaucratic Goliath can be affected by the combined power of determined individuals and the alternative press. Becoming informed is the first step to empowerment.

The book Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is available from Earthpulse Press for $14.95 plus postage and handling ($1.50 U.S.; $4 international).

Marketing BS at its best.

Edited by RaptorBites
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*duplicate*

Edited by RaptorBites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HAARP in Alaska has open tours of its facility. If the military was doing any kind of weapons project in HAARP it would be deemed in accessible to tours.

So because parts of HAARP are allowed to be toured (which as far as I know isn't on any kind of daily basis unless they have changed things up in that regard recently) there is no possible way it is capable of doing any of the things discussed in the article I linked to?

That doesn't equate.

The fact that the first paragraph of your article states "questionable military project" is a hilarious attempt at being scientifically serious.

How so; and why?

As a matter of fact, if anyone wants to read that article, it is all presented in the book it happens to point to along critical points on the subject.

If you are referring to the article I linked to, then people can obviously read it at the link I provided.

Marketing BS at its best.

So because the book is for sale - like any book at a book store, etc tends to be - and because it addresses HAARP from a standpoint that doesn't fall in line with what is officially stated about it, it is "marketing BS at its best?"

That is ridiculous.

If you want to have a true understanding of marketing BS at its best you need look no further than everything the mainstream media, news outlets, and entertainment industry sell you on every day.

Edited by Left-Field

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weve been able to seed clouds to increase rainfall for sometime now yet had record droughts this year. Just saying

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some Real Actual Proof would be Good ! JUST SAYING !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If HARP is not a weatherization weapon and there is one out there we have bigger problems.

The flipside this worlds weather is going bonkers all on its own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If HARP is not a weatherization weapon and there is one out there we have bigger problems.

The flipside this worlds weather is going bonkers all on its own.

Thats the truth ! Its not a weapon,we would not know how to even use it !

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence has been gathering a lot since the original post. I am continuing to improve the website.

http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info

Hurricane Sandy was the deadliest and most destructive hurricane of the 2012 Atlantic hurricane season, as well as the second-costliest hurricane in United States history. Hurricane Sandy was also the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded (as measured by diameter with winds spanning 1,100 miles (1,800 km)). The severe and widespread damage the storm caused in the United States, as well as its unusual merge with a frontal system, resulted in the nicknaming of the hurricane by the media and several organizations of the U.S. government “Super-storm Sandy”. I believe that there are too many unusual occurrences and coincidences for me to accept that this storm was a natural creation.

http://en.wikipedia....Hurricane_Sandy

Sandy developed from a tropical wave in the western Caribbean Sea on October 22, quickly strengthened, and was upgraded to Tropical Storm Sandy six hours later. As the storm reached the North American coastline, the storm begins to curve with the coastline and stay the same distance away from the coastline of North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida, rather than following a direct path (Refer to images provided). The storm then changes direction and heads west towards New Jersey and Philadelphia. While curving west towards New Jersey, the storm accelerated to a forward motion of nearly 30mph (The hybridization of Sandy – Atmos News (by Bob Henson)). When the storm reached Philadelphia it made a ninety degree turn (rather than going inland), heading through the western parts of New York and then up the east coast through Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec and New Brunswick. The storm lasted for a period of five days, hitting the most populated area of the east coast. Coincidentally, it also seems to circle the business capital of the United States, New York City. Circling New York is the same as hitting it head on and if the United States was the subject of an attack, New York would be one of the primary targets (note September 11, 2001).

On October 25th The National Weather Service accurately predicted Hurricane Sandy would make landfall in southeastern New Jersey four days prior to actually making landfall. This is the same day that Hurricane Sandy was dubbed “Frankenstorm” by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). If you remember the story of “Frankenstein”, Frankenstein was put together with different body parts and struck by lightning to give him life. Frankenstein was manufactured. If Hurricane Sandy was labeled Frankenstorm, maybe it was manufactured too? Is this the correlation between Frankenstein and Frankenstorm? Conspiracy or coincidence? Interestingly enough, Hurricane Sandy sped up just before New Jersey (as sourced earlier in the post), just before the major catastrophe of the storm. It is very coincidental that Hurricane Sandy was dubbed Frankenstorm the same day the National Weather Service predicted the storm would make landfall in New Jersey. Apparently, the European weather models were very accurate in predicting what Hurricane Sandy would do ahead of time. How accurate were the models exactly? Did they predict that Sandy would speed up just before New Jersey?

Hurricane Sandy’s devastating storm track is a rare one among hurricanes; a new statistical analysis estimates that the track of the storm — which took an unusual left-hand turn in the Atlantic before slamming into the East Coast — has an average probability of happening only once every 700 years. “The particular shape of Sandy’s trajectory is very peculiar, and that’s very rare, on the order of once every 700 years,” said Timothy Hall, a senior scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies who co-authored the study. That means that in any particular year, the chance of such a storm track happening is 0.0014 percent (Refer to NASA Simulation – Media). Source – Hurricane Sandy Was 1- in-700-Year Event: http://news.yahoo.co...-182934012.html

An article by Dr. Jeff Masters states (Weather Underground): http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=2283

“We’re used to seeing hurricane-battered beaches and flooded cities in Florida, North Carolina, and the Gulf Coast. But to see these images from the Jersey Shore and New York City in the wake of Hurricane Sandy is a shocking experience. New Jersey only rarely gets hit by hurricanes because it lies in a portion of the coast that doesn’t stick out much, and is too far north. How did this happen? How was a hurricane able to move from southeast to northwest at landfall, so far north, and so late in hurricane season? We expect hurricanes to move from east to west in the tropics, where the prevailing trade winds blow that direction. But the prevailing wind direction reverses at mid-latitudes, flowing predominately west-to-east, due to the spin of the Earth. Hurricanes that penetrate to about Florida’s latitude usually get caught up in these westerly winds, and are whisked northeastwards, out to sea.”

Super-storm Sandy made landfall just when a full moon was brightening the sky. The moons gravity pulls on earths water, fractionally lifting the surface towards itself. Oceans bulge towards the moon to generate two oceanic tides per day. During a full moon, the moons gravity can align with that of the sun to produce particularly high tides. The full moon during the storm put an extra 6 feet onto the sea level. Also, sea level pressure hits peak just as Sandy makes landfall, 952hPa and surface wind speed hits peak just as Sandy makes landfall, 92mph. Very coincidental that so many aspects of the storm coincide with landfall. Even the track of Sandy coincides with landfall.

“Sandy’s track was the most perpendicular to the Atlantic Coast of any storm on record”. – http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/09/130902-hurricanes-climate-change-superstorm-sandy-global-warming- storms-science-weather/

In elementary geometry, the word perpendicular describes the relationship between two geometric objects that meet at a right angle.

An article by Amy Ellis Nutt and Stephen Stirling states: http://www.nj.com/ne...l_warmings.html

“It wasn’t supposed to happen. That’s what the weather experts kept saying immediately before, during and after Sandy smacked New Jersey in the face. Not this far north, they said, not in autumn, and certainly not this bad.”

I believe that there are too many unusual occurrences and coincidences for me to accept that this storm was a natural creation.

Stunning simulation of Hurricane Sandy:

Watch as Hurricane Sandy gathers wind speed along the East Coast and take note the transition of the storm until it makes landfall. Also note the change in the storm as it makes landfall. This video by NASA makes me feel like Sandy is a weapon that builds up wind speed and explodes on the New York State area. The storm seems to have a splash effect as it makes landfall. Via NASA: This simulation runs from Oct. 26 to Oct. 31, 2012, highlighting Hurricane Sandy’s near- surface (850 hPa) winds. More information: http://svs.gsfc.nasa...030000/a030019/

Diagram below shows Sea level pressure, wind speeds, and accumulated rainfall from a GEOS-5 7-km simulation. Note the diagram on Sea level pressure. Sea level pressure hits peak just as Sandy makes landfall, 952hPa. Note the diagram on surface wind speeds. Surface wind speed hits peak just as Sandy makes landfall, 92mph. More information: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a030000/a030000/a030019/

http://weatherwarfare.worldatwar.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/superstormsandy1-1024x575.jpg

List and Explanation of Hurricane Sandy Unusual Occurrences and Coincidences

#1 – Hurricane Sandy was the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded. (as measured by diameter with winds spanning 1,100 miles (1,800 km)).

#2 – If you look at the topography, when the storm reaches North America it continues to stay the around the same distance away from the coastline. (It is very rare that coastline effects the path of a storm. It seems that the coastline had a lot to do with the track of this storm. Note the distance of coastline that effected Super-storm Sandy).

#3 – The storm curves with with the coastline of North Carolina, South Carolina and Florida. (Once again, it is very rare that coastline effects the path of a storm, let alone curves with the coastline of a continent).

#4 – The storm speeds up just as it heads towards New Jersey. (From the start, the storm moved at a steady rate and then just before the major catastrophe of the storm, it speeds up, just before it circles New York City).

#5 – The storm moves in a circle around New York City (New York is the business capital of the United States. Circling New York is the same as hitting it head on and if the United States was the subject of an attack, New York would be one of the primary targets (note September 11, 2001)).

#6 – Hurricane Sandy is the largest Atlantic hurricane ever recorded and it hits late in the hurricane season. (You would think that the largest hurricane ever recorded would hit in peak period).

#7 – This hurricane is very far north in comparison to other Atlantic hurricanes. (Most Atlantic hurricanes hit Florida and very rarely go any further. If hurricanes do go any further, they usually head from west to east because the prevailing winds blow that direction. Hurricane Sandy headed from East to West towards the New York State Area).

#8 – Sandy had the biggest storm surge ever seen. (The storm surge of Sandy has created some of the worst flooding from a hurricane in a very long time).

#9 – Hurricane Sandy is very fast for a hurricane. (So, Hurricane Sandy is the largest in diameter, its very fast for a hurricane, its not at the right time, its very far north for a hurricane and had the worst flooding from a hurricane in a very long time. Too many unusual occurrences and coincidences for me to accept that this storm is a natural creation).

#10 – Forecasters labeled Hurricane Sandy “Frankenstorm“… If you remember “Frankenstein” was created, he was not born, he was manufactured.

#11 – Hurricane Sandy sped up just before New Jersey, just before the major catastrophe of the storm. It is very coincidental that Hurricane Sandy was dubbed Frankenstorm the same day the National Weather Service predicted the storm would make landfall in New Jersey. Did the weather models and predictions predict the storm speeding up before New Jersey?

#12 – Sandy had the most kinetic energy of all tropical cyclones on record at 222 trillion Joules (the equivalent of 3.5 Little Boy Hiroshima atomic bombs).

#13 – Sea level pressure hits peak just as Sandy makes landfall, 952hPa.

#14 – Surface wind speed hits peak just as Sandy makes landfall, 92mph.

#15 – Sandy’s track was the most perpendicular to the Atlantic Coast of any storm on record (In elementary geometry, the word perpendicular describes the relationship between two geometric objects that meet at a right angle).

#16 – Hurricane Sandy Was 1-in-700-Year Event – Hurricane Sandy’s devastating storm track is a rare one among hurricanes; a new statistical analysis estimates that the track of the storm — which took an unusual left-hand turn in the Atlantic before slamming into the East Coast — has an average probability of happening only once every 700 years. “The particular shape of Sandy’s trajectory is very peculiar, and that’s very rare, on the order of once every 700 years,” said Timothy Hall, a senior scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies who co-authored the study. That means that in any particular year, the chance of such a storm track happening is 0.0014 percent.

#17 – The moons gravity pulls on earths water, fractionally lifting the surface towards itself. Oceans bulge towards the moon to generate two oceanic tides per day. During a full moon, the moons gravity can align with that of the sun to produce particularly high tides. Super-storm Sandy made landfall just when a full moon was brightening the sky. The full moon during the storm gave an extra 6 feet onto the sea level, 20% higher than normal. (Source below Hurricane Sandy – What Really Happened (Documentary) – 37:40)

Edited by subhumn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's rare, therefore the US government did it. Did they also cause the last supervolcano? Maybe a long with their weather weapons they also have time machines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow.

Some people still cannot fathom the fact that mother nature is too unpredictable.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.