Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
evil_kenshin

Belgian twins choose euthenasia

182 posts in this topic

According to what you just said, as long as someone can bite their own tongue even the terminally ill should be denied euthanasia.

I like your point, but it's going to the extreme a bit, no? If they can use a razor, take an elevator, tie some rope, maybe even swallow some pills themselves, why should a doctor and, as joc stated, the government, be brought in? Especially considering that their pain would only be emotional. Another word for that type of 'pain' is mental. What next? Assisted suicide for manic depressives?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like your point, but it's going to the extreme a bit, no? If they can use a razor, take an elevator, tie some rope, maybe even swallow some pills themselves, why should a doctor and, as joc stated, the government, be brought in? Especially considering that their pain would only be emotional. Another word for that type of 'pain' is mental. What next? Assisted suicide for manic depressives?

The only real solution would just be to look at it case by case, can their depression or what have you be solved by other means?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like your point, but it's going to the extreme a bit, no? If they can use a razor, take an elevator, tie some rope, maybe even swallow some pills themselves, why should a doctor and, as joc stated, the government, be brought in? Especially considering that their pain would only be emotional. Another word for that type of 'pain' is mental. What next? Assisted suicide for manic depressives?

Why should someone in pain be forced to go to such measures? Should those who need operations also be forced to do it themselves?

BTW who else is going to regulate euthanasia? Some guy in a dark alley?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't they just do it the old fashioned...wait...the New Fashioned...American Way? One brother should shoot the other in the head, and then shoot himself in the head...murder/suicide...they could have flipped a coin to see who went first.

Because they probably weren't americans.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's people like you that makes this world a horrible place to be in. The doctors ended their hardship with dignity, and from that you wanted the two brothers to jump off a building? You are an animal. Go do some spirituality courses, then come back and join society

Dignity? That's a pretty strong word to use when referring to two people that were ended thier lives without being terminally ill. Hell they hadn't even gone blind yet. And there are people that are deaf and blind that don't kill themselves. Before you ask if they're happy living like that, I'm not even sure I'm so happy (despite my incredibly good looks)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only real solution would just be to look at it case by case, can their depression or what have you be solved by other means?

yes...it's called Xanax.

Why should someone in pain be forced to go to such measures? Should those who need operations also be forced to do it themselves?

BTW who else is going to regulate euthanasia? Some guy in a dark alley?

So the prescription for pain is now death? Maybe those who need operations and cannot afford them should choose Euthanasia if it is cheaper.

No one should be regulating euthanasia...no one. If you want to kill yourself well, that is one thing. If you are suffering in pain we have things like morphine for that.

Edited by joc
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes...it's called Xanax.

Anti-depressants don't always work~

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anti-depressants don't always work~

Good point~ Death ALWAYS works so, yeah, go with death.

How about: I can't bear the thought of never seeing again. Euthanize me please. Or... I just can't bear being alone for Christmas...euthanize me please. Or...What? Victoria Secret pulled out of the local Mall??? I can't bear not going to Victoria Secret...euthanize me please!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So the prescription for pain is now death?

I made it clear I was speaking of the terminally ill.
Maybe those who need operations and cannot afford them should choose Euthanasia if it is cheaper.

No one should be regulating euthanasia...no one. If you want to kill yourself well, that is one thing. If you are suffering in pain we have things like morphine for that.

If it is unregulated people would be abusing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's one thing to euthanize people who's only future prospect is pain and death, such as cancer patients with one month or three weeks to live, or someone with alzhiemers that can't remember who thier children are and have bodies no longer function. But two people who are depressed because they may soon be blind should not fit the definition. The doctor who did this should have his process reviewed and if found not to be stringent enough should be charged with some degree of murder IMO. This is leading down a very slippery slope. Again IMO.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can’t be the whole story.

The link in the OP doesn’t lead to that article anymore, by the way. Was it removed because it was written in too trolling way or it accidentally floated away?

I said “trolling” because being “unable to bear the thought of never seeing one another again” is not and probably will never be on the list of reasons even close to justify euthanasia. In Belgium or Botswana.

Maybe the brothers had other issues, that made them euthanasia candidates, but if the article exists and gave only their “can’t bear to never see him again” as the reason for their euthanasia, then it’s the most hilarious example of type of “journalism” that shouldn’t be legal.

Doctors are not killing people for being unsatisfied with their lives, it's up to each suicidal person themselves. Euthanasia is there for people who can't do that themselves and it's inhumane to leave them suffer the actual agony. Not something any "journalist" should toy with. *head explodes*

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should someone in pain be forced to go to such measures? Should those who need operations also be forced to do it themselves?

BTW who else is going to regulate euthanasia? Some guy in a dark alley?

Now you're just being silly. And just to state facts, those twins did not 'need' to die.

And I'm not sure what your second paragraph is all about. I am all for euthanasia given the right circumstances, as I have already stated in this thread. It is, however, my opinion that these were not the right circumstances, and I have made my reasoning quite clear already.

The only real solution would just be to look at it case by case, can their depression or what have you be solved by other means?

Depression can always be solved by other means. It is a mental illness, caused primarily by our environments. This is not to say that all are cured of it, but they can be. Are you actually suggesting that people who are seriously depressed (in other words, without the proper mental faculties) should be allowed to be euthanised (is that the verb for euthanasia?)? One of the deciding factors behind these decisions is that the patient must have control of his mental health; must be declared mentally fit. By definition depressives would be automatically excluded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can’t be the whole story.

The link in the OP doesn’t lead to that article anymore, by the way. Was it removed because it was written in too trolling way or it accidentally floated away?

I said “trolling” because being “unable to bear the thought of never seeing one another again” is not and probably will never be on the list of reasons even close to justify euthanasia. In Belgium or Botswana.

Maybe the brothers had other issues, that made them euthanasia candidates, but if the article exists and gave only their “can’t bear to never see him again” as the reason for their euthanasia, then it’s the most hilarious example of type of “journalism” that shouldn’t be legal.

Doctors are not killing people for being unsatisfied with their lives, it's up to each suicidal person themselves. Euthanasia is there for people who can't do that themselves and it's inhumane to leave them suffer the actual agony. Not something any "journalist" should toy with. *head explodes*

LINK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can’t be the whole story.

The link in the OP doesn’t lead to that article anymore, by the way. Was it removed because it was written in too trolling way or it accidentally floated away?

I said “trolling” because being “unable to bear the thought of never seeing one another again” is not and probably will never be on the list of reasons even close to justify euthanasia. In Belgium or Botswana.

Maybe the brothers had other issues, that made them euthanasia candidates, but if the article exists and gave only their “can’t bear to never see him again” as the reason for their euthanasia, then it’s the most hilarious example of type of “journalism” that shouldn’t be legal.

Doctors are not killing people for being unsatisfied with their lives, it's up to each suicidal person themselves. Euthanasia is there for people who can't do that themselves and it's inhumane to leave them suffer the actual agony. Not something any "journalist" should toy with. *head explodes*

Exactly. :tu:

Edited by ExpandMyMind

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made it clear I was speaking of the terminally ill.

If it is unregulated people would be abusing it.

So, the terminally ill are dying...so we should just go ahead and put them out of their misery like a horse with a broken pelvis? No, we shouldn't. We have pain medication and hospice set up to help them and their families and make their last moments comfortable and memorable for the family.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

So the article is real, the twins were photoshopped, badly, to fit into one photo, and they are – for starts – not identical.

If the article was wrong about that, I sure hope it was wrong about everything else that sounds alarming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

So the article is real, the twins were photoshopped, badly, to fit into one photo, and they are – for starts – not identical.

If the article was wrong about that, I sure hope it was wrong about everything else that sounds alarming.

Well, that's what we have to go by here you know...the article. But, if that is the case...wtf? They aren't even blind...just...going blind...and allowed to be killed because they can't bear the thought of that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the law and researchers' summary of what it requires:

To make a legitimate euthanasia request, the patient must be an adult, must be conscious and legally competent at the moment of making the request, and must be in a condition of constant and unbearable physical or psychological suffering resulting from a serious and incurable disorder caused by illness or accident, for which medical treatment is futile and there is no possibility of improvement.

The physician decides whether the disorder is incurable based on the actual state of medicine, and the patient alone determines whether suffering is constant and unbearable. The physician must have several conversations with the patient in which he ascertains whether the patient experiences his/her suffering as constant and unbearable.

The physician must inform the patient about their medical condition, prospects, and possible alternative treatments, including palliative care. He must consult another independent physician about the serious and incurable character of the condition. This physician does not need to be a palliative care specialist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now you're just being silly. And just to state facts, those twins did not 'need' to die.

And I'm not sure what your second paragraph is all about. I am all for euthanasia given the right circumstances, as I have already stated in this thread. It is, however, my opinion that these were not the right circumstances, and I have made my reasoning quite clear already.

Depression can always be solved by other means. It is a mental illness, caused primarily by our environments. This is not to say that all are cured of it, but they can be. Are you actually suggesting that people who are seriously depressed (in other words, without the proper mental faculties) should be allowed to be euthanised (is that the verb for euthanasia?)? One of the deciding factors behind these decisions is that the patient must have control of his mental health; must be declared mentally fit. By definition depressives would be automatically excluded.

How about this, since we're getting into the land of 'what if this'. Huntington's is very much like Alzheimer's, in time it robs you of your metal facility, but at the same time it cause chorea and many, many other nasty side effects. Since that person isn't in their right mind, should they be looked over? Or since they're experiencing 'real' physical pain, it should be allowable even if they can't say 'yay' or 'nay'? What if the disease progresses a different way? They're in pain but keep their mental facilities? Or a whole hodgepodge of different combination of physical, mental pain and what constitutes 'them' as they slowly slide into insanity.

Edited by Hasina
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about this, since we're getting into the land of 'what if this'. Huntington's is very much like Alzheimer's, in time it robs you of your metal facility, but at the same time it cause chorea and many, many other nasty side effects. Since that person isn't in their right mind, should they be looked over? Or since they're experiencing 'real' physical pain, it should be allowable even if they can't say 'yay' or 'nay'? What if the disease progresses a different way? They're in pain but keep their mental facilities? Or a whole hodgepodge of different combination of physical, mental pain and what constitutes 'them' as they slowly slide into insanity.

Well, see, the with the likes of degenerative brain disorders, as far as I'm aware, there is legal justification for euthanasia. The only problem being that they either have to set up their end before they lose control of their mental faculties, or they have to set it up during their good days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, see, the with the likes of degenerative brain disorders, as far as I'm aware, there is legal justification for euthanasia. The only problem being that they either have to set up their end before they lose control of their mental faculties, or they have to set it up during their good days.

Agreed. Let me add another, what if they (people with these disorders) want to be euthanized (not suicide, I'm going back to the 'too afraid to live, too afraid to die' concept) before their symptoms progress to a point where they themselves can't physically commit suicide?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Then they should kill themselves, not have a doctor do it. I doubt anywhere would do that for them. Well, except from Belgium, apparently...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I have no problem with it. Not sure how I would react in the same circumstances? I guess it's good to at least have the choice?

Art

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the terminally ill are dying...so we should just go ahead and put them out of their misery like a horse with a broken pelvis? No, we shouldn't. We have pain medication and hospice set up to help them and their families and make their last moments comfortable and memorable for the family.

Have you ever seen the pain someone goes through Lung Cancer and Emphysema, and wants nothing but to spend their last seconds with their loved ones other than to die in a hospital bed alone in the middle of the night? The fact that Morphine and other drugs no longer help their pain?

But no, let's make it more 'comfortable and memorable for the family'... Cause that is what is important right..?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are so many people who will be ready to chant - I am pro choice, let women have abortions.. It is their body, who is anyone to tell them what to do with THEIR OWN bodies ...right? Isn't that the pro choice argument?

Then why on earth would people complain about two fully grown middle aged men who made a choice with their OWN BODIES ?

It is too easy to sit back in your seats, calling them selfish and what not...But you were not in their shoes.. I feel sorry for them to have faced such a decision, but I am not going to sit yapping about what choices they made with their own lives..

Edited by Beckys_Mom
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.