Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Render

Do Scientists Fear the Paranormal?

50 posts in this topic

The question has been asked for decades: why haven’t psychic powers been proven yet? Psychics have been studied for decades, both in and out of the laboratory, yet the scientific community (and the public at large) remains unconvinced.

In a recent book, “Science & Psychic Phenomena: The Fall of the House of Skeptics,” author Chris Carter insists that the reason that psychic powers have not been proven is because scientists are unaware of the research or refuse to take it seriously because “Clearly many scientists find the claims of parapsychology disturbing.”

This is a common charge leveled against skeptics and scientists: that they refuse to acknowledge the existence of paranormal phenomenon (psychic abilities, ghosts, etc.) because it would somehow challenge or “disturb” their worldview.

Skeptics and scientists, they say, are deeply personally and professional invested in defending the scientific status quo and cannot psychologically tolerate the idea that they could be wrong. This results in a closed-minded refusal to accept, or even seriously examine, the evidence.

But is this really true? Do scientists ignore and dismiss claims and evidence that challenge dominant scientific ideas? Let’s examine some recent examples.

Scientific Blinders or Lack of Evidence?

The reason that psychic powers, Bigfoot, ghosts, and other phenomena are not accepted by the scientific community is simply because there is little or no good evidence for them — not because scientists haven’t looked at the evidence.

http://www.livescience.com/26268-do-scientists-fear-the-paranormal.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem is that so many people on both sides of the argument believe their word is law.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Proof of the existence of paranormal would be a goldmine for scientists just like Quantum Physics has been. It would open up a whole area of scientific study and inquiry.

But there is no proof. In the 70's there was an attempt to study ESP with some very fundamental experiments. Some scientists astounded the world by declaring positive results. Unfortunately no one else was able to reproduce them. Further investigation showed that the experiments had happened in surprisingly uncontrolled conditions. Anyone who could perform some magic tricks would have been declared to have ESP abilities by their standards.

Even worse the scientists, who had become quite the celebrities on the daytime talk show circuit, ignored all criticism and continued to perform their experiments in these casual settings. They reported ever more incredible results bringing themselves even more fame. If scientists "find the claims of parapsychology disturbing", it's because in the past the claims have come from people who can't properly perform science.

All scientists dream of shaking the world with some great discovery. That would be their ultimate goal of their careers. There is no "scientific status quo" to protect other than proper science.

BTW is this "Chris Carter" the guy who developed the TV show "The X-Files" or is that just a coincidence?

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Proof of the existence of paranormal would be a goldmine for scientists just like Quantum Physics has been. It would open up a whole area of scientific study and inquiry.

But there is no proof. In the 70's there was an attempt to study ESP with some very fundamental experiments. Some scientists astounded the world by declaring positive results. Unfortunately no one else was able to reproduce them. Further investigation showed that the experiments had happened in surprisingly uncontrolled conditions. Anyone who could perform some magic tricks would have been declared to have ESP abilities by their standards.

Even worse the scientists, who had become quite the celebrities on the daytime talk show circuit, ignored all criticism and continued to perform their experiments in these casual settings. They reported ever more incredible results bringing themselves even more fame. If scientists "find the claims of parapsychology disturbing", it's because in the past the claims have come from people who can't properly perform science.

All scientists dream of shaking the world with some great discovery. That would be their ultimate goal of their careers. There is no "scientific status quo" to protect other than proper science.

BTW is this "Chris Carter" the guy who developed the TV show "The X-Files" or is that just a coincidence?

nice post.

And Chris Carter :D didn't even think about it twice . Looked it up but according to certain book reviews it is not the same Carter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is repeatable and statistically significant experiments.

Sheldrakes experiments regarding the sense of being stared at are a good example.

There is a dogma in science

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an opinion, but I think there are increasing general scientific considerations of a "paranormal possibilty" than, say, in earlier years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is repeatable and statistically significant experiments.

Sheldrakes experiments regarding the sense of being stared at are a good example.

Sheldrakes has abandoned the world of science for the more profitable arena of writing popular books and making presentations to non-scientific audiences.

There is a dogma in science

[media=]

[/media]

Do people read books and magazines any more or do they learn everything from youtube?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid? You have scientist studying volcanos by getting into them, scientists being shot into space on rockets, going into jungles, messing with atomic particles themselves and you think the 'paranormal' would scare them just because it may debunk some of their theories? Pfffft.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an opinion, but I think there are increasing general scientific considerations of a "paranormal possibilty" than, say, in earlier years.

Science was very receptive to ESP as a possibility in the late 60's and early 70's, but the inexcusable behavior of scientists performing extremely uncontrolled experiments and parading the results in the popular media poisoned the field for decades. Studies have continued but like the paper cited in the article by Dr. Bem at Cornell, they've found that positive results have been caused by errors in the experiments or the results are just expected statistical anomalies. It hasn't been a profitable field of research.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sheldrakes has abandoned the world of science for the more profitable arena of writing popular books and making presentations to non-scientific audiences.

Do people read books and magazines any more or do they learn everything from youtube?

Since mainstream media is heavily controlled and censored concerning content, at least "youtube" offers one an alternative platform in which to communicate to the masses.

Edited by NiteMarcher

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cuban-born journalist and author Alex Abella ("Soldiers of Reason") was allowed exclusive access inside the RAND Corporation to view their archives. What he discovered was a plot driven by mad scientists, behaviorists, and generals who were intent on starting world war three and fleecing the American people in the process. Once he was a skeptic on the subject of conspiracy theories and the new world order, but after his work with the RAND Corporation he is now convinced that this top secret think tank has been pulling the strings of American government for at least 60 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cuban-born journalist and author Alex Abella ("Soldiers of Reason") was allowed exclusive access inside the RAND Corporation to view their archives. What he discovered was a plot driven by mad scientists, behaviorists, and generals who were intent on starting world war three and fleecing the American people in the process. Once he was a skeptic on the subject of conspiracy theories and the new world order, but after his work with the RAND Corporation he is now convinced that this top secret think tank has been pulling the strings of American government for at least 60 years.

[media=]

[/media]

In other words, 'wordswordswordswords' without solid evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Things get complicated when we throw James Randi's One Million Dollar Challenge into the discussion.

He says he'll pay it to anybody who can demonstrate psychic/paranormal/supernatural powers, yet even though its been up for many years, nobody has won it and there have been a number of failed attempts.

So why hasn't anybody won it?

http://skepdic.com/randi.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't think scientists are afraid of the paranormal. I think its one of those things that you have to experience it to believe it. Its hard to put a ghost under a magnifying glass and as far as being physic I think its one of those things for most people it happens at random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Science can never accept anything supernatural!! The proof it demands has to be so "consistent" in testing, thus making anything supernatural a

"Natural Occurrence" by the standards of science. The naturalistic viewpoint of science lends no room for anything supernatural to exist, they cannot exist together.

Yet!! We all know the supernatural is there!!! There is just too much evidence. Every reader out there has probably had some kind of experience at some time!! Police agencies enlist the use of diviners to find bodies and killers. (Police Science uses the supernatural "lol").... Scientists themselves flock to the local tabernacle's on Sunday to pray to the god they denied existed all week while at work. Many of them, anyway.

It all works out for the better, in that...To deny the existence of the supernatural, is our best defense AGAINST it. It's when we believe in it, we lend ourselves to spiritual attack. Loot at the

witch trials.... The spirits had a field day with the minds of the people of Salem.

Ps great article, kudos to the poster.

Sent from my iPhone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sheldrakes has abandoned the world of science for the more profitable arena of writing popular books and making presentations to non-scientific audiences.

It's easy to say that about Somone when you reject their work. Last time I checked Hawkins does research, gives presentations, and does research.

I have also personally sat Down in a workshop with Dr. Sheldrake, and I assure you the room was filled with PHDs some in physics and some in chemistry. One gentleman owns a set of notable labs.

It's funny what happens when you look at the truth about Somone and what they are doing instead of only getting information from magazines and critics ;)

Edited by Seeker79
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do people read books and magazines any more or do they learn everything from youtube?

Some people (mentioning no names) couldn't read if their life depended on it. Edited by Rlyeh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cuban-born journalist and author Alex Abella ("Soldiers of Reason") was allowed exclusive access inside the RAND Corporation to view their archives. What he discovered was a plot driven by mad scientists, behaviorists, and generals who were intent on starting world war three and fleecing the American people in the process. Once he was a skeptic on the subject of conspiracy theories and the new world order, but after his work with the RAND Corporation he is now convinced that this top secret think tank has been pulling the strings of American government for at least 60 years.

Does he have a history of schizophrenia?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since mainstream media is heavily controlled and censored concerning content, at least "youtube" offers one an alternative platform in which to communicate to the masses.

Who relies on mainstream media for science? Any idiot can post a video full of garbage on it. I read peer-reviewed science journals in the library and books written by practicing scientists and professors.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's easy to say that about Somone [sic] when you reject their work.

It's even easier to say that when it's true.

Last time I checked Hawkins does research, gives presentations, and does research.

We're talking about Sheldrake here.

I have also personally sat Down in a workshop with Dr. Sheldrake, and I assure you the room was filled with PHDs some in physics and some in chemistry. One gentleman owns a set of notable labs.

I can assure you that people with doctorates enjoy entertainment as much as regular people. You will also find them in movie theaters.

It's funny what happens when you look at the truth about Somone [sic again!] and what they are doing instead of only getting information from magazines and critics ;)

In science, what a scientist publishes in reputable peer-reviewed journals is what they're doing. Sheldrake has only been able to publish paranormal research in a British publication called the Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. This "society" which was once a very skeptical organization is now known for welcoming scientists who no longer wish to perform science and non-scientific members who are celebrities and fans of the paranormal. One was Sir Arthur Conan Doyle who declared my avatar to be "proof" of the existence of fairies. In fact it looks like Sheldrake been so busy raking in the cash writing popular books that I can't find any recent studies he's published.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scientists have a burning desire to EXPLAIN everything (it's in their DNA), that's why they trash Religion because they can't explain it and it makes them feel uncomfortable.

Dawkins is the prime example of this, he's become a kind of front man for the Atheist movement!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scientists better get ready for the day when Science finally unites with the Paranormal and begins scientifically explaining paranormal phenomena. Like they said in the anime movie Dead Space, Convergence is coming people. Soon it will be discovered that the Paranormal and the spiritual world is real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scientists better get ready for the day when Science finally unites with the Paranormal and begins scientifically explaining paranormal phenomena. Like they said in the anime movie Dead Space, Convergence is coming people. Soon it will be discovered that the Paranormal and the spiritual world is real.

What? They're already explaining paranormal phenomena, like since the dawn of science. THat is what science is about, thinking about something rationally and finding a logical explanation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering that every single instance of the so-called "paranormal" and "psychic" experiences has been easily explained by mundane things like imagination, lack of knowledge, hysteria, etc...I see no reason to give these topics any serious considerations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Considering that every single instance of the so-called "paranormal" and "psychic" experiences has been easily explained by mundane things like imagination, lack of knowledge, hysteria, etc...I see no reason to give these topics any serious considerations.

More like "explained away". With preposterous

Theories derided from "slothful induction", such

as Periodolia and "Mass Hysteria"....

It's all in our minds!!! And when it strikes in numbers,

"Mass Hysteria"!! How convenient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.