Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
Liquid Gardens

Atheism - any contradictions or 'problems'?

310 posts in this topic

Crikey asked- But what possible motive would anybody have for sitting down and "inventing" Jesus and Christianity?

If that's so, why did the early Christians write this?-

"..we do not peddle the word of God for profit"- 2 Cor 2:17

"Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care.. not lording it over those entrusted to you" -1 Peter 5:2-3

Early Christians were different from most of the Christians we have today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or it has been edited and it was a half baked job?

Jesus said "Oh God I don't want to die tomorrow, get me out of it if you can". That makes him look weak, so why didn't they edit it out?

And some disciples showed cowardice by abandoning him and running off in fear of the Romans, why wasn't that edited out too?

You see, if somebody allegedly edited the Bible to make it squeaky-clean they'd have made damn sure they edited out the most obvious bits like that first..;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Early Christians were different from most of the Christians we have today.

I made a disparaging remark in another thread about most of today's Christians but a mod deleted it in case it upset people, so I'd better not repeat it here..;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prove it.. :)

What about the popes and all the crusades? Vatican City has enough wealth to feed the entire world, learned that on the history channel. Now why don't you prove that what they said is the truth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus said "Oh God I don't want to die tomorrow, get me out of it if you can". That makes him look weak, so why didn't they edit it out?

And some disciples showed cowardice by abandoning him and running off in fear of the Romans, why wasn't that edited out too?

You see, if somebody allegedly edited the Bible to make it squeaky-clean they'd have made damn sure they edited out the most obvious bits like that first.. ;)

They edited what suits.. Hence why Christianity is split into so many groups.. They cannot agree with each other.

Edited by Beckys_Mom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jesus said "Oh God I don't want to die tomorrow, get me out of it if you can". That makes him look weak, so why didn't they edit it out?

Hmmm, or it makes him look human, just like they said he was (and yes, he's God too; don't ask me, I think it's nonsensical also). I've always thought this and the 'God why have you forsaken me' statement potentially causes problems because I'm not sure in what capacity it's really correct to say that Jesus is really God then, unless he likes talking to himself.

And some disciples showed cowardice by abandoning him and running off in fear of the Romans, why wasn't that edited out too?

This seems to also be consistent with the general biblical message that none are good enough, none are sinless, you're all a bunch of base, selfish, repulsive. dirty animals who deserve damnation and until you admit that fact to yourself and truly accept in your heart that Jesus/God came down and died so that you can be spared from, well..., Jesus's/God's wrath, you are ultimately doomed and cannot help but to continue to do your wanton evil.

You see, if somebody allegedly edited the Bible to make it squeaky-clean they'd have made damn sure they edited out the most obvious bits like that first.. ;)

Yea, I'd have started by removing the part concerning the Amalekites; God-commanded genocide is kind of a dealbreaker for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, or it makes him look human, just like they said he was (and yes, he's God too; don't ask me, I think it's nonsensical also). I've always thought this and the 'God why have you forsaken me' statement potentially causes problems because I'm not sure in what capacity it's really correct to say that Jesus is really God then, unless he likes talking to himself.

http://bible.cc/john/10-20.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand! One minute atheists are telling us that the Bible has been edited, censored and tidied up over the centuries to make it look good, then the next minute they're telling us it's still full of contradictions!

Wish they make up their minds and tell us once and for all whether it's been prettied up or hasn't it?.. ;)

Both statements are true. What is your problem with that?

The idea that the editing of the bible would necessarily lead to a contradiction-free book is entirely your own invention.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a misrepresentation of atheism. Atheists do not "realize" anything of that sort; they simply do not use phantastical mythical scripts to explain the unknown.

By the way the religionists` claim that their respective gods must exist because everything needs a creator begs to question: So who created their god? ........and back to square zero. Duh.

Some of us figured out that particular non-starter in first grade.

If you believe God doesn't exist and people claim that god created everything it goes against your nothing can create something belief because you believe that God is Nothing. (Since God to atheists do not exist)

If you believe God does exist and people claim that nothing creates something(case and point the whole creationist debate) it goes against the belief, that same belief of something creating something.

Therefore both sides basically agree that something has to create something. The people who can't come to grips with it usually get angry and upset because they don't know exactly what that unknown something actually is.

I shouldn't of said something created everything because people got confused, I should of said something creating something.

Edited by Jinxdom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you believe God doesn't exist and people claim that god created everything it goes against your nothing can create something belief because you believe that God is Nothing. (Since God to atheists do not exist)

If you believe God does exist and people claim that nothing creates something(case and point the whole creationist debate) it goes against the belief, that same belief of something creating something.

Therefore both sides basically agree that something has to create something. The people who can't come to grips with it usually get angry and upset because they don't know exactly what that unknown something actually is.

I shouldn't of said something created everything because people got confused, I should of said something creating something.

You just repeated your previous post, and added an insult. Here is a hint for you you: Insults are not arguments.

OK, I will phrase it simpler for you:

God is something. Theists believe that for everything there must be a creator. Hence, there must be a creator for god.

Since the religionists do not accept that, their simplistic argument about the creator does not work.

Again;: Some of us figured that one out in first grade. (And later most of us figure out too that repeating the same argument does not make it valid).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But what possible motive would anybody have for sitting down and "inventing" Jesus and Christianity?

Power, an insatiable lust for power, riches and glory.

Ultimately, "the psychopath must have what he wants, no matter what the cost to those in his way."

And what of the early believers who allegedly saw Jesus and ended up being persecuted and killed for that? Today, nearly 2000 years after the events we can see a powerful entity such as the Catholic Church. But in the years immediately after Jesus, there was no colossus of a church, there were no riches and glory. There was death and persecution. Tell me, if those original followers who allegedly saw Jesus were lying, and doing so to try and gain power and wealth, when they were persecuted and lined up to be executed, which do you feel would be the more likely event:

Scenario A - Just before execution, the person cries out "Look, this is all a mistake, Jesus wasn't really real, we just thought we could make a quick buck out of this. I recant my statement and from henceforward will follow the status quo.

Scenario B - I go to my death knowing that my Lord Jesus is with me and has prepared a place for me in heaven. I shall pray for you before I die.

It should be obvious to anyone reading that the more likely scenario to play out would be scenario A. IF they were lying. If they were NOT lying, then scenario B begins to look more realistic.

What about the popes and all the crusades? Vatican City has enough wealth to feed the entire world, learned that on the history channel. Now why don't you prove that what they said is the truth?

I touched on this briefly in my last comment, but while today it may be tempting to say the Catholic church is rich, the fact remains that in the 1st Century AD they were not rich, and did not get rich. Instead they got persecution and death. It is a fallacy to point to the wealth of the modern church and use that as evidence that the biblical writers were lying, they were not rich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the popes and all the crusades? Vatican City has enough wealth to feed the entire world, learned that on the history channel. Now why don't you prove that what they said is the truth?

I suppose if you count all the art and architecture. Not terribly liquid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Atheism and Theism is about the existence of deities. The debate is on if deities are real. I.E. They both have the same argument.

Passive-Aggressive insults are better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Christian martyrs were no different from martyrs of other faiths (such as Druids, whom the Romans really persecuted. Most of it (except for a short period under Diocletian) was made up by the Christians after they were in power.

A martyr is someone who dies for their beliefs. All that proves is that they believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Atheism and Theism is about the existence of deities. The debate is on if deities are real. I.E. They both have the same argument.

Passive-Aggressive insults are better?

You keep saying that, and I don't get it. One argues they are real, the other that they are not. This is opposite argument, not the same.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Opposite argument of the same idea.

Think about it like math. What is the opposite of 1 it's -1.

What happens when you put them both together it's 0.

That is what the difference really are. The differences start to show when you add more junk to the debate.

Hence the nothing from something vs something from something. That is what the real argument should be about but everybody is too scared to admit it

Edited by Jinxdom
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tis a puzzlement. I take it you are proposing some sort of paradox, but what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No paradox. The paradox/Argument only comes from not going through the equation completely.

Honestly you are served no better by being an atheist or being a theist.

Edited by Jinxdom
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh. Well I'm not interested in what serves me better. If I am persuaded something is true, then I can't help but believe it, regardless of whether it serves me or not.

Let me provide an example: one not-so-fine day my boss calls me into the office and tells me to clean out my desk and leave -- I'm fired. Now, this does not serve me at all, but do I just choose to not believe it? It doesn't work like that.

Most religion is based on wishful thinking; we would like for it to be true and so we manage to persuade ourselves that it is true. I suppose that is okay if it makes us happy, but for some people it just doesn't work. They have an intellectual honesty that forces them to try to see the world as it really is. In the end I think they are probably better off, as they avoid wasting a lot of time and money.

I find it impossible to believe in God, at least as generally presented, not because there is no evidence (although that is part of the case) but because of the irrationality. No matter how desirable such a belief might be, that has no effect on me.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the thing about the debate about God. Nobody really knows how to define it correctly. I default to agnostic or ignostic(If I'm feeling playful)

You being fired. That was clearly defined by your boss. instead of it being 1 and -1 comparison. That scenario is more of a true/false scenario.( 1 or 0) So there is something to actually compare.

Edited by Jinxdom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the undefinability is a good reason for non-belief. The theist constantly moves the goal post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really the problem isn't theism alone the problem is trying to compare all walks of theism to all walks of atheism(or just looking at the most insane groups) . That is when the contradictions tend to appear.

Edited by Jinxdom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't doubt beings exist "out there" with intelligence and will and so on besides ourselves -- the universe is too big for it to be otherwise. However, they are not divine, no matter how smart or powerful or advanced they may be.

Now I would see no difference between one of these and one of the deities of one of the standard polytheistic religions. Just because Jupiter can hurl thunderbolts doesn't make him divine.

So what would make a being divine -- a "God?" Certainly something more than just great power or great wisdom, and so on. I suppose being infinite is one way we could come to say a being is divine. Even here I have trouble with definition. An infinite stack of books goes on forever, but is still just a stack of books, and other similar stacks could also exist. A being with infinite knowledge knows an endless amount of stuff, but there could still be worlds outside his ken.

Various "omni-" proposals for God also exist -- omni present, omnipotent, omni-beneficent (that one really is meaningless), omniscient. These lead to the self-referential logical contradictions that even the Scholastics understood but never answered -- except to move the goal post (God is omnipotent except He can't do something against His nature), which goes back to saying He is just another Jupiter. (An omniscient God, too, leads logically to a world where free will and random events are impossible. Some Christians realize this and jump through all sorts of hoops about it, getting nowhere).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is where the nothing from something argument part comes in and why people generally don't like it.

Theism in general though doesn't have any contradictions nor does atheism. Depending on how far you go on either side of the fence is when it starts to get strange and confusing.

*edited because didn't need the quote :P

Edited by Jinxdom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hence the nothing from something vs something from something. That is what the real argument should be about but everybody is too scared to admit it

I expect that the answer is that the Universe exists in a Closed Timelike Curve. As such, it has no need for a prime cause, just as a circle has no need for a starting point.

The Universe is, has and always will be.

Amen.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.