Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6
william joseph

Interesting mineral formation on Mars

108 posts in this topic

mars-metal.jpg

Cheers for the photo, handy as usual :P

This is now very close to the idea of fulgurite after a lightning strike as rare as they are, they happen. Don't forget the universe is how old? There is no carbon dating on the item, not even sure if that is possible by us at this stage? sorry if I'm mistaken, so it could be in fact fulgurite and an old piece at that, one that has been through alot of wind and sand activity to wear it down to a smoother surface as it's still got a fair bit of dirt "gripping" to it. Just like in the desert and or a piece of glass in the ocean would smooth the objects down over time.

Hahaha think it's funny for people that bash nasa, Who is exactly putting their hand up to want to be the first person on mars at this time? Hence no manned mission, we are doing the same we did with the moon. Learn as much as possible with what we have then send someone. It's not they are controlling space and saying "NO... NO ONE ELSE CAN EXPLORE SPACE!", other countries are quite free to do the work and get to the same stage and ability to explore mars then they can send someone in cowboy gun-ho! if they want. Seems to me NASA care a fair bit about their staff. Would you send 5 randoms to mars just remember there could be nasty aliens :o OMG!!! so even by the crackpot theories you wouldn't be sending suicide sacrifices to any condition of unknown variables that could happen at this present time.

And on that note where is all the information coming from for the rebuttles? What space program do they run? Come on really? it's actions and comments like that, that make it soooo much harder for every other fringe theorist out there to follow theirs. What is the big deal if it's fake what could it do? There is apparently a majority of people out there just waiting to drop what they are doing and move to mars. DAMN YOU NASA!!! playing with peoples concious like that. Don't like the news don't follow the topic?

If there is such a threat about what they are doing, present an actual case for it plain and simple I do agree there is other things out there we don't know like the existance of ets and what not, but being in our back yard and posing a threat if it is a hoax mission to fool the world, maybe the cause is we just aren't ready to play neighbours yet? What would be so wrong with that, look at the reactions of the general public on the stupidest of news maybe it's us that are the problem and not mature enough to comunicate.

IF it was going to pose a threat there would be next to nothing bar commiting mass exodous globally... really think about it... if they have the ability to do everything everyone says from a stones through away like the moon or mars, they would obviously be far more superior in warfare and technology to get to where they are both would be needed in the theories against the hoax missions, to stop whatever would happen would be like throwing a global tamtrum. Enjoy what you have, if you think the oogie boogies are coming to get you, do so even more and don't waste time either that or document what there is.

Edited by chopmo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like an earring I used to have that its now GONE... what do you know about that, Mars Rover Curiosity...hmmm??? I wonder how it got all the way up there on mars... :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I often wonder about Mars. Millions of years ago if it were teaming with life maybe even intelligent in the oceans or on land. It may have been bombarded with meteors which helped it lose its magnetic field during a natural pole shifting. Terrible climate effects would happen both to the atmosphere and even underground. Extreme cold and heat, sand storms, dry ice snow spewing at the caps etc. If this were to happen to earth how much would be left for archeologists to discover millions of years later?

With the sand storms themselves it would cover any signs of surviving structures.

We wouldn't really know until they were uncovered just as the Sphinx laid buried so long under the sand on our own planet. I would imagine ever thing would be gone except under ground for some extremeaphiles maybe?

I'm not into conspiracy theories but there are such sand storms from the drying, if there were any real artifical structures on Mars, very small or large, couldn't they be masked by the sands at certain times and uncovered later by another sand storm later?

Just a thought.

That's potentially true I suppose.

Unfortunately in the absence of no evidence, all people can do is offer wild speculation. If a dead planet with no past civilisation or life looks the same as a dead planet had life, water, atmosphere, etc. millions of years ago that all evidence has been wiped away of, then you should apply Occam's Razor and assume it's what it appears to be without adding unnecessary and unevidenced extras to the theory. If evidence does come through that there was civilisation on Mars in the past, then so be it, it can be discussed and explained then. Until them it's just wishful thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the photo, handy as usual :P

This is now very close to the idea of fulgurite after a lightning strike as rare as they are, they happen. Don't forget the universe is how old? There is no carbon dating on the item, not even sure if that is possible by us at this stage? sorry if I'm mistaken, so it could be in fact fulgurite and an old piece at that, one that has been through alot of wind and sand activity to wear it down to a smoother surface as it's still got a fair bit of dirt "gripping" to it. Just like in the desert and or a piece of glass in the ocean would smooth the objects down over time.

Hahaha think it's funny for people that bash nasa, Who is exactly putting their hand up to want to be the first person on mars at this time? Hence no manned mission, we are doing the same we did with the moon. Learn as much as possible with what we have then send someone. It's not they are controlling space and saying "NO... NO ONE ELSE CAN EXPLORE SPACE!", other countries are quite free to do the work and get to the same stage and ability to explore mars then they can send someone in cowboy gun-ho! if they want. Seems to me NASA care a fair bit about their staff. Would you send 5 randoms to mars just remember there could be nasty aliens :o OMG!!! so even by the crackpot theories you wouldn't be sending suicide sacrifices to any condition of unknown variables that could happen at this present time.

And on that note where is all the information coming from for the rebuttles? What space program do they run? Come on really? it's actions and comments like that, that make it soooo much harder for every other fringe theorist out there to follow theirs. What is the big deal if it's fake what could it do? There is apparently a majority of people out there just waiting to drop what they are doing and move to mars. DAMN YOU NASA!!! playing with peoples concious like that. Don't like the news don't follow the topic?

If there is such a threat about what they are doing, present an actual case for it plain and simple I do agree there is other things out there we don't know like the existance of ets and what not, but being in our back yard and posing a threat if it is a hoax mission to fool the world, maybe the cause is we just aren't ready to play neighbours yet? What would be so wrong with that, look at the reactions of the general public on the stupidest of news maybe it's us that are the problem and not mature enough to comunicate.

IF it was going to pose a threat there would be next to nothing bar commiting mass exodous globally... really think about it... if they have the ability to do everything everyone says from a stones through away like the moon or mars, they would obviously be far more superior in warfare and technology to get to where they are both would be needed in the theories against the hoax missions, to stop whatever would happen would be like throwing a global tamtrum. Enjoy what you have, if you think the oogie boogies are coming to get you, do so even more and don't waste time either that or document what there is.

You make good points about NASA. Robotics are great but not prepared to explore ALL unexpected finds given any mission.

We all got some great pictures of space and must remember NASA gives them to us. You'd be crazy to want to be one of the first manned missions without the robots!

I am one of many members of Planetary Society. I always thought Mars had an atmosphere and water in the distant past and would be a great study and might hold evidence of ancient life forms. I helped fund the first Mars rover and I can't tell you how happy I was that NASA welcomed the support of a the private organizations in many ways. Original founding members were very honored that when they put up the Carl Sagan Memorial they also included our names too. If it weren't for NASA a little part of me wouldn't be on Mars!

Edited by White Unicorn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's potentially true I suppose.

Unfortunately in the absence of no evidence, all people can do is offer wild speculation. If a dead planet with no past civilisation or life looks the same as a dead planet had life, water, atmosphere, etc. millions of years ago that all evidence has been wiped away of, then you should apply Occam's Razor and assume it's what it appears to be without adding unnecessary and unevidenced extras to the theory. If evidence does come through that there was civilisation on Mars in the past, then so be it, it can be discussed and explained then. Until them it's just wishful thinking.

It was Dr. Albert Einstein who said: 'Imagination is more important than knowledge'. It was once considered 'wild speculation' that people could travel to the Moon and back on rockets. If we were to keep alive in our minds the merest *possibility* that there was once a civilization on Mars, it might make us attentive to evidence that would show this to be the case; evidence that we might otherwise overlook in our haste to find a 'natural' explanation for whatever we find.
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason people once thought there was a civilization on Mars was because they could see 'canals' on Mars. With better equipment these canals vanished, but the idea stuck..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like a featherless turkey with a model car for a head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason people once thought there was a civilization on Mars was because they could see 'canals' on Mars. With better equipment these canals vanished, but the idea stuck..

Percival Lowell, prime exponent of the Martian canals, thought that there was a *current* civilization on Mars. Today we know that conditions on Mars rendered it conceivably habitable by higher forms of life a very long time ago, but not now. Since Mars is substantially smaller than Earth, it could have cooled from its hot primordial state sooner than Earth did. This might have allowed it to get a head start on Earth life. This just might have progressed to the point of civilization, long before humans appeared on Earth.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 6

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.