Render Posted March 3, 2013 #1 Share Posted March 3, 2013 (Phys.org)—New research by Stanford aeronautics and astronautics Assistant Professor Sigrid Close suggests she's on track to solve a mystery that has long bedeviled space exploration: Why do satellites fail? In the popular imagination, satellites are imperiled by impacts from "space junk" – particles of man-made debris the size of a pea (or greater) that litter the Earth's upper atmosphere – or by large meteoroids like the one that recently exploded spectacularly over Chelyabinsk, Russia. Although such impacts are a serious concern, most satellites that have died in space haven't been knocked out by them. Something else has killed them. The likely culprit, it turns out, is material so tiny its nickname is "space dust." http://phys.org/news...xploration.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjadude Posted March 3, 2013 #2 Share Posted March 3, 2013 I would say that, and "whiskers". A very real phenomena. http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now