Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Dragon Skeleton found in China Sea


Simbi Laveau

Recommended Posts

Doesn't appear to be a sea going ostrich or marine kangaroo.

Curious!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hoax hoax hoax. There is absolutley no flesh left on the bones and yet enough cartlidge to hold the entire skeleton together? Right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like dragons with arms and legs better :) the ones with wings are the best. Great find I think. Even if it isnt a dragon its obscure enough not to be easily identified so that must mean something.. like they are rare, have little relatives, have good hiding places and take a long time to die... probably something like a lochness creature?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The skull greatly resembles an ox or an impala..

I would love if this thing had dna tests run and doesn't suddenly disappear, or get thrown back into the ocean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is definately a fish. The tail shows clearly that this is a upright "fish like" tail, not a fluke or flipper like a mammal would have.

post-26883-0-89996500-1365015440_thumb.j

And the vertebrae look like fish to me also. Sharks and other fish have those slots in the bones, while whale bones are solid. Shark vertebrae can even be made into beads for jewelry.

vertebrae.gif

il_fullxfull.51636313.jpg

Whale vertebrae...

WhaleInstall071Large.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently "sea creature" in English is also "sea creature" in Chinese. Heard it twice.

Back to the mystery...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of looks like the skeleton of a Great White shark. The tail matches up as does the nose of hte skull.

dragonskeleton.jpg

800px-Carcharodon_carcharias_skeleton.jpg

Source: Wikipedia - Great White Shark.

Take away the jaws and the rest of the fins and other bits and the skull is almost the same. And look at the spines on the Great Whites tail and compare to the tail section of the monster.

Could be another shark species, but clearly is an open ocean type of shark.

Edited by DieChecker
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you said it could be another shark. The tail and skull structure is pretty similiar in those sharks so I would like to know a more specific detail before I agree to a Great White,Its certainly not a frilled shark btw the cranium of Chlamydoselachus africana for example is obviously very different (http://www.mlml.calstate.edu/system/files/private/Ebert%2526Compagno%20C_africana%20sp%20n%202009.pdf) and probably the skull of C. anguineus is it too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:st ANYONE ELSE SEE HOLES FOR TUSKS???
Link to comment
Share on other sites

stock-photo-skull-of-an-african-wart-hog-on-a-black-background-115024657.jpg

African Wart Hog ....... are we getting closer? (Missing lower jaw, obviously).

Yes, the more I look at warthog skulls the more I'm convinced that's what it is ...... with the spine of something else attached and the lower jaw missing.

Edited by ouija ouija
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In china If it has a pulse, its lunch. This was just somebodies leftovers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you said it could be another shark. The tail and skull structure is pretty similiar in those sharks so I would like to know a more specific detail before I agree to a Great White,Its certainly not a frilled shark btw the cranium of Chlamydoselachus africana for example is obviously very different (http://www.mlml.cals...a sp n 2009.pdf) and probably the skull of C. anguineus is it too.

I was looking for a frilled shark skull online... Your Kung Fu must be better then mine. :nw:

The eye sockets of the frilled shark fit in with the "tusk holes", but the nose does not quite match. Could be a cousin species to the Frilled shark maybe?

Also from what I read, the Frilled Shark usually is less then 2 meters long, and this "dragon was almost 4 meters long.

Edited by DieChecker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah!!!

Found this....

chondro.gif

dragonskeleton.jpg

Looks very close in my opinion.

Anyway.... CLEARLY a shark.

Edited by DieChecker
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be a similar shaped shark.

Bull sharks... Great White sharks... Tiger sharks... Bronze whaler... Mako... Whitetip...

http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/fisheries/info/sharksmart/identifying-sharks

All reach 3.5 meters and have similar head anatomy, so it could be any large shark.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharks don't have skeletons... they have cartilage instead of bones, except for their jaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharks don't have skeletons... they have cartilage instead of bones, except for their jaws.

True, and yet the cartilage can last quite a while longer then the flesh, and can even be collected washed up on beaches and made into jewelry/beads. It is not jelly after all, but a hard non-calcified material.

Lots of fossilized shark vertebrae are found around the world in ocean fossil beds.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more photos that you guys put up, the more I think it is a shark's remains. Too bad, I was hoping for a Mosasaur, lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DragonLSmiley_zps0cf718d2.gif I'm starting to think Shark or Dolphin but that wouldn't be as cool as a dragon or get the media attention. DrangonRSmiley_zps4b71b75d.gif Edited by Hilander
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, not shark, this is something "different".

These are veteran fisherman who have seen a lot, they would know a shark carcass if it was so.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to think it was something else, but it represents the sharks pictures depicted almost completely, if you'd take the time to look, Talion.

I love to be corrected and find truth as well; I have the humility to accept greater evidence.

There is really no reason to find this as something other than a natural decaying creature.

I'm not going to say that it is truly a shark by what I find the further evidence, because my opinion is just one being swayed by logical portrayals.

Yeah, it's a shark.

Edited to add:

As for those "veteran" fisherman, I'm sure they're not really used to dragging up carcasses without the flesh still on them, that are so oddly composed.

They're used to catching fish.. and to be quite frank, most are rather dull. Most. They really don't recognize the skeletal structures of many beasts, let alone many of the beasts they capture in nets.

Edited by AliveInDeath7
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.