Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
pantodragon

The Fossil Merry-Go-Round

7 posts in this topic

Geological theories about the formation and age of rocks are riddled with assumptions. This has not stopped scientists using geological theory to create a theory of evolution, of which fossils are a part. What scientists have done is to feed these fossils, via fossil “evidence”, back into the geology to back up the theories which were originally used to create them.

Am I the only person who sees a problem with this geological merry-go-round?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geological theories about the formation and age of rocks are riddled with assumptions. This has not stopped scientists using geological theory to create a theory of evolution, of which fossils are a part. What scientists have done is to feed these fossils, via fossil “evidence”, back into the geology to back up the theories which were originally used to create them.

Am I the only person who sees a problem with this geological merry-go-round?

There are other ways to date rock, and without the use of fossils.

It's called "absolute dating".

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are other ways to date rock, and without the use of fossils.

It's called "absolute dating".

Not to mention geological theory was not used to create the theory of evolution. I love how misunderstanding science leads to this kind of ignornace.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to mention geological theory was not used to create the theory of evolution. I love how misunderstanding science leads to this kind of ignornace.

Darwin took Lyell's Principles of Geology with him on the Beagle. I believe he did actually read it, and may have picked up one or two pointers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are other ways to date rock, and without the use of fossils.

It's called "absolute dating".

That is not the point. It is a separate issue. In the first instance, there was bad science creating theories. Good science later (though the other methods of dating are, at least in some respects --- the use of "primordial" iron from meteorites?!? --- questionable) does not justify bad science. When one spots instances of bad practice, and especially in such an important fundamental theory, it throws all of science into doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geological theories about the formation and age of rocks are riddled with assumptions. This has not stopped scientists using geological theory to create a theory of evolution, of which fossils are a part. What scientists have done is to feed these fossils, via fossil “evidence”, back into the geology to back up the theories which were originally used to create them.

Am I the only person who sees a problem with this geological merry-go-round?

You seem to have this completely backwards. Fossils come FROM the Geology,not the other way around as you stated.

Fossils are found in certain strata, with the older fossils corresponding with the older strata... it is simple and elegant. A perfect example of Occam's razor at work. Older strata (and the fossils they carry) lie below newer strata complete with evolved forms of the older fossil types.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem to have this completely backwards. Fossils come FROM the Geology,not the other way around as you stated.

Fossils are found in certain strata, with the older fossils corresponding with the older strata... it is simple and elegant. A perfect example of Occam's razor at work. Older strata (and the fossils they carry) lie below newer strata complete with evolved forms of the older fossil types.

Occam's razor is too often used as an excuse for fantasy. There is so much bad practice in what you describe, but it hides behind jargon and a sort of "compelling" reasonableness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.