Keel M. Posted April 17, 2013 #1 Share Posted April 17, 2013 (edited) I thought this happened a while back, but apparently not. I've seen just as many white boys with saggy pants as any other race so the racial profiling issue is moot. But I suppose even if it was only one race wearing pants in this manner, it's racial profiling to point out the obvious? Pants on the ground? Better pull ’em up fast if you’re in Louisiana’s Terrebonne Parish, where a new law bans the low-slung, undies-exposing jeans look popularized by hip-hop culture.The ban, approved Wednesday and expected to be signed into law this week, targets the public wearing of pants—and, oddly, skirts—that hang “below the waist” and “expose the skin or undergarments.” Violators will be slapped with fines: $50 for the first offense, $100 for the second, and $100 plus 16 hours of public service for each subsequent offense. Full story Edited April 17, 2013 by Kasey2601 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted April 17, 2013 #2 Share Posted April 17, 2013 about time too .... body shapes were all bent out since the fad began ... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfknight Posted April 17, 2013 #3 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Thank God. That so tired of seeing young man with there drawers showing in public. Having to walk the way they do is dumb as hell. Walking and holding your pants up. Buy and damn belt and pants the fit you. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taun Posted April 17, 2013 #4 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I always thought it was strange that particular 'fad' caught on... Not only does it require the wearer to keep one hand free to keep their 'britches' from totally falling down, and also acts to restict their freedom of movement, (not to mention it looks really stupid)... but especially owing to the 'fads' origins... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted April 17, 2013 #5 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Yes lets control how people wear their cloths too... 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonKing Posted April 17, 2013 #6 Share Posted April 17, 2013 The funniest thing about this "style" of wearing ones pants is it started in the prison system and meant one was ready to be "taken" lmao.How anyone ever started thinking it was cool is beyond my comprehension 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockabyeBillie Posted April 17, 2013 #7 Share Posted April 17, 2013 HAHA good! I used to live in Terrebonne Parish and I can tell you pretty much all boys wore their pants around their knees where I lived, regardless of their race. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 17, 2013 #8 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I always thought it was strange that particular 'fad' caught on... Not only does it require the wearer to keep one hand free to keep their 'britches' from totally falling down, and also acts to restict their freedom of movement, (not to mention it looks really stupid)... but especially owing to the 'fads' origins... You and me both. Just goes to show you people will do whatever is popular or a "fad" and not even think about what it means... I get so tired of seeing boys running around with baggy pants that are so low you can see their underwear. Buy a BELT! Jeez. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notoverrated Posted April 17, 2013 #9 Share Posted April 17, 2013 if you want to sag thats up to you, i dont see the problem. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted April 17, 2013 #10 Share Posted April 17, 2013 (edited) I think people look stupid and moronic when they do it. BUT banning it is a bit much. It's another step in the wrong direction really. The funniest thing about this "style" of wearing ones pants is it started in the prison system and meant one was ready to be "taken" lmao.How anyone ever started thinking it was cool is beyond my comprehension That's actually true as well. lol There was a good picture going around about it. Edited April 17, 2013 by Coffey 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted April 17, 2013 #11 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Problem is ... they are not 'wearing' anything are they .... ? its not what they wearing its how they are not wearing ... sort of purposeful wardrobe malfunction .... it's not allowed that at beauty pageants or public events ... why should it be allowed on public streets ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bama13 Posted April 17, 2013 Popular Post #12 Share Posted April 17, 2013 For all the people on here complaining about losing their freedoms and rights I am suprised that most on this thread think this is a good idea. Yes I think they look silly, but I thought many of the clothes worn in the 80s looked silly as well. I have seen pictures of myself from the 60s with purple bell bottoms and a tie dye shirt. Can't believe my parents let me leave the house dressed like that. If the pants cause some part of the anatomy to show that would be considered indecent (you know what parts I'm talking about) then it is probably already illegal (indecent exposure). Otherwise let them look silly. Funny story: A few weeks ago I was walking to the store and I say a young man talking to someone in a car in his driveway. The car drove off. The man apparently had something he wanted the person in the car to have so he tried to run after the car but since the object required two hands to hold he did a faceplant after about four steps because his pants fell down around his knees. I laughed all the way to the store. But no bans, please. 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praetorian-legio XIII Posted April 17, 2013 #13 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Cops will have no trouble enforcing it because if an offender tries to run he'll end up flat on his face. Personally I don't like that look or even get it, but its just another example of government over reaching into our daily lives. Now they are telling us what we can and cannot wear or how we have to where it. Those involved with this law could better serve their community worrying about more pressing issues that seriously affect the citizens of their juristiction. And I know Louisiana well, and they definitly have important issues to deal with. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rashore Posted April 17, 2013 #14 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Walking around with one's underwear exposed is pretty indecent. I have to wonder, is there a similar law in place for bra exposure? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keel M. Posted April 17, 2013 Author #15 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Yes lets control how people wear their cloths too... You're right. We should also remove the ban on public nudity too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted April 17, 2013 #16 Share Posted April 17, 2013 (edited) You're right. We should also remove the ban on public nudity too. Because that is definitely an even comparision to saggy pants... Edited April 17, 2013 by spartan max2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taun Posted April 17, 2013 #17 Share Posted April 17, 2013 You're right. We should also remove the ban on public nudity too. I was once in the position to view a nude beach in Italy... I then decided that people that go to nude beaches - should mostly be forbidden by law from doing so... My goodness, I've never seen so much ugly, flabby, wrinkled, sunburned (or grossly over tanned) flesh in my life (well... at least without looking in a mirror)... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander CMG Posted April 17, 2013 #18 Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's a ridiculous look in my opinion, not sure they know how stupid they look dressed like that.. but a ban is a bit extreme. I wonder how they would feel about me in my edible tiger design thong.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euphorbia Posted April 17, 2013 #19 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I was once in the position to view a nude beach in Italy... I then decided that people that go to nude beaches - should mostly be forbidden by law from doing so... My goodness, I've never seen so much ugly, flabby, wrinkled, sunburned (or grossly over tanned) flesh in my life (well... at least without looking in a mirror)... At fifteen, I saw my first naked woman at a nudist beach on the central coast in California. Maybe California girls look better than Italian girls? She was in her early to mid twenties and was a perfect blonde with a perfect figure. (The shades matched the carpet.) She walked past me and she knew she had my attention. I watched her slowly walk by me and straight into the ocean for a swim. So my experience was much different than yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keel M. Posted April 17, 2013 Author #20 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Because that is definitely an even comparision to saggy pants... So making us wear clothes at all is different from making us wear them in a certain way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corp Posted April 17, 2013 #21 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Clothing is a form of expression and that should not be banned. Personal freedom and all that. Oh the other hand it is massively stupid looking and would love to see it finally die out... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted April 17, 2013 #22 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I think people look stupid and moronic when they do it. BUT banning it is a bit much. It's another step in the wrong direction really. That's actually true as well. lol There was a good picture going around about it. Agreed, I think it's ridiculous as a fashion statement (but I'm an old coot but banning is over the top. The only place I would invoke that serious a restriction is in a courtroom. Some judges will nail you for wearing trashy clothes - saying it's disrespectful. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supervike Posted April 17, 2013 #23 Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's a disgrace that this is even a law. Don't get me wrong, I laugh and point at anyone wearing their pants this way, it looks ridiculous. Especially the dude I saw the other day, he wears a belt, but tightens it below his butt cheeks....LOL Hilarious! However, as long as they are fully clothed, I don't see where any law can really apply to any sort of decency. This does smack of racial profiling. What's next, banning fat girls from wearing leggings? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euphorbia Posted April 17, 2013 #24 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Agreed, I think it's ridiculous as a fashion statement (but I'm an old coot but banning is over the top. The only place I would invoke that serious a restriction is in a courtroom. Some judges will nail you for wearing trashy clothes - saying it's disrespectful. Or at most places of employment...........or my house....my house, my rules.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffey Posted April 17, 2013 #25 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Agreed, I think it's ridiculous as a fashion statement (but I'm an old coot but banning is over the top. The only place I would invoke that serious a restriction is in a courtroom. Some judges will nail you for wearing trashy clothes - saying it's disrespectful. I don't blame judges for that, after all if you are in court for wrong doing and you don't even make an effort to look half good it's like saying you don't care. Just like turning up to a funeral in jeans and t shirt. Unless it's a theme funeral the deceased asked for of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now