Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

USAF Col - Primary Job was UFO Disinformation

wallarookiller

By wallarookiller
in Extraterrestrial Life and The UFO Phenomenon

 Share

Recommended Posts

bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #101 
Posted

For you every loon is "genius", starting with B.Cathie...

yes Bruce Cathie was a genius as well....

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bee

    28

  • psyche101

    23

  • badeskov

    20

  • bendigger0

    16

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

topsecretresearch
topsecretresearch

It goes to show some people are here for the sole purpose of debunking ET and not objectivly looking at the UFO subject matter. #1. In an effort to dismiss ET the article admits that there are crash

psyche101
psyche101

I watched as my Father deteriorated over a number of years and died from Alzheimer's and Dementia with Old Age. Had any of the believer people here been in my shoes, you would most certainly not find

bee
bee

I am sorry for your loss - I truly am. And my heart goes out to you.. I doubt that there are many families, nowadays, that are not affected by the scourge of Alzheimer's and dementia. My Nan had it

bmk1245 Sagacious

bmk1245

Posted
   #102 
Posted

yes Bruce Cathie was a genius as well....

.

Seriously? SERIOUSLY?!!! After all explanations you still consider him "genius"?!

rf_fp.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
badeskov Erudite

badeskov

Posted
   #103 
Posted

yes Bruce Cathie was a genius as well....

.

Bruce Cathie, eh?! Another character whose story has been shredded to pieces, yet here he is paraded again. Seriously Bee?

Cheers,

Badeskov

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #104 
Posted

Bee,Project Blue Book was a code name for the project,it wasn't a book as such.The book you show is just a compilation of stuff from the project,it isn't an official Blue Book data release.This is why French was wrong,he referred to a "book" he helped write-it never existed in such a form.

well I don't know...but I expect French knew more about it all than you or anyone else on the forum...

I expect this twisting the blue book thing around is just to try and discredit him...

semantics

lol....there's always something isn't there....something is always twisted around to try and discredit EVERY whistleblower...

it's so predictable and frankly a bit silly....

^_^

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #105 
Posted (edited)

Bruce Cathie, eh?! Another character whose story has been shredded to pieces, yet here he is paraded again. Seriously Bee?

Cheers,

Badeskov

tell bmk not me...he brought him up...

.

Edited by bee
Link to comment
Share on other sites
badeskov Erudite

badeskov

Posted
   #106 
Posted

tell bmk not me...he brought him up...

.

Fair enough, he indeed did. But you labeled him a genius as well. Which he is absolutely not. If you don't have anything nice to say about people, you should stay silent, so I will refrain from commenting on what I think about him.

Cheers,

Badeskov

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dr no Experienced

dr no

Posted
   #107 
Posted (edited)

well I don't know...but I expect French knew more about it all than you or anyone else on the forum...

I expect this twisting the blue book thing around is just to try and discredit him...

semantics

lol....there's always something isn't there....something is always twisted around to try and discredit EVERY whistleblower...

it's so predictable and frankly a bit silly....

^_^

That's the point French knew nothing about Blue Book or else he would've known what it was.The man has been caught repeatedly lying

Predictably,although the lies came from his own mouth,you are trying to say he's being discredited-that's ludicrous :yes:

Edited by dr no
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #110 
Posted

That's the point French knew nothing about Blue Book or else he would've known what it was.The man has been caught repeatedly lying

yeah yeah yeah......in your sceptic fantasy..... :D

.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
badeskov Erudite

badeskov

Posted
   #111 
Posted

Good Heavens.......

35506_bear_polar_bear_facepalm.jpg

Cheers,

Badeskov

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bendigger0 Intermediate

bendigger0

Posted
   #112 
Posted

For you every loon is "genius", starting with B.Cathie...

Funny how these "loons" get into such high positions of responsibility.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #113 
Posted (edited)

Funny how these "loons" get into such high positions of responsibility.

I think the medical term is Professional-loony-itis......

it usually strikes someone who is revealing....'stuff'...

.

Edited by bee
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bendigger0 Intermediate

bendigger0

Posted
   #114 
Posted

a brief list of loons: Gordon Cooper(astronaut), Edgar Mitchell(astronaut), Paul Hellyer(Defense Minister of Canada), Boyd Bushman(Lockheed Skunk Works), Ben Rich(Lockheed Skunk Works), Stanton Freidman(NASA physicist), the list goes on, and on, and on... In fact, anyone who believes anyone has seen a "flying saucer" is a loon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bmk1245 Sagacious

bmk1245

Posted
   #115 
Posted

Funny how these "loons" get into such high positions of responsibility.

What positions? General, mayor, etc? Bark loudly on subordinates and you'll get "general", pull the wool from your back entrance and you'll get "mayor". What makes "position" more reliable than not?
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bmk1245 Sagacious

bmk1245

Posted
   #116 
Posted (edited)

a brief list of loons: Gordon Cooper(astronaut), Edgar Mitchell(astronaut), Paul Hellyer(Defense Minister of Canada), Boyd Bushman(Lockheed Skunk Works), Ben Rich(Lockheed Skunk Works), Stanton Freidman(NASA physicist), the list goes on, and on, and on... In fact, anyone who believes anyone has seen a "flying saucer" is a loon.

E.Mitchell just retold stories he had heard, but that doesn't make those stories to be true.

And for umpteenth time - Conan Doyle was far from 'stupid', but was in the same paragraph with 'gullible'.

Edit: BTW B.Bushman with his "alien" technology (i.e. magnet in copper pipe) fits category 'loon' quite nicely.

Edited by bmk1245
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
badeskov Erudite

badeskov

Posted
   #117 
Posted (edited)

a brief list of loons: Gordon Cooper(astronaut)

Changed his story over the years, directly in contradiction with Edgar Mitchell

Edgar Mitchell(astronaut)

Has publicly stated that he knows absolutely nothing and has never seen a UFO, is only retelling what others have told him.

Paul Hellyer(Defense Minister of Canada)

Certifiable nut case, has no knowledge himself but reads from books by other UFO nut cases.

Boyd Bushman(Lockheed Skunk Works)

Rambling old man, demonstrably wrong in his assertions and imaginary physics (yes, we know this).

Ben Rich(Lockheed Skunk Works)

See above.

Stanton Freidman(NASA physicist)

Was never with NASA. Charlatan and snake oil sales man. Makes up and embellishes UFO stories, butchers official information to make them fit his opinion.

the list goes on, and on, and on... In fact, anyone who believes anyone has seen a "flying saucer" is a loon.

Yes, the list of morons polluting UFO research is endless, that much is obvious. Your point?

Cheers,

Badeskov

Edited for typo.

Edited by badeskov
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #118 
Posted

Yes, the list of morons polluting UFO research is endless, that much is obvious

only in your sceptic fantasy...

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
badeskov Erudite

badeskov

Posted
   #119 
Posted

only in your sceptic fantasy...

.

Sadly, no. It is demonstrably so. All of the above listed either has no knowledge (provably so) or are plain our wrong (provably so). Only those that simply do not want to know think otherwise.

Cheers,

Badeskov

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #120 
Posted

Sadly, no. It is demonstrably so. All of the above listed either has no knowledge (provably so) or are plain our wrong (provably so). Only those that simply do not want to know think otherwise.

Cheers,

Badeskov

Tut tut...you called all those good people morons.......including American hero Edgar Mitchell...

as you might have gathered I am a bit suspicious of Friedman and think he may be a plant...

but I wouldn't be so rude to even call him a moron...

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bendigger0 Intermediate

bendigger0

Posted
   #121 
Posted

only in your sceptic fantasy...

.

what "ufo research" does Badeskov regard as worthwhile?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
badeskov Erudite

badeskov

Posted
   #122 
Posted

Tut tut...you called all those good people morons.......including American hero Edgar Mitchell...

as you might have gathered I am a bit suspicious of Friedman and think he may be a plant...

but I wouldn't be so rude to even call him a moron...

.

OK, calling them morons is probably over the edge, my apologies and what my personal opinion about each of them is I will keep to myself. But that makes them no less wrong or clueless about what they speak, and provably so.

Cheers,

Badeskov

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bendigger0 Intermediate

bendigger0

Posted
   #123 
Posted

Tut tut...you called all those good people morons.......including American hero Edgar Mitchell...

as you might have gathered I am a bit suspicious of Friedman and think he may be a plant...

but I wouldn't be so rude to even call him a moron...

.

i've know Stanton Friedman personally for over 40 years, and can assure you, he is not a "plant", but a cornerstone of the UFO Disclosure Movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bee Immortal

bee

Posted
   #124 
Posted

what "ufo research" does Badeskov regard as worthwhile?

I have no idea as he is usually just against everything...?

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.