danielost Posted May 24, 2013 #51 Share Posted May 24, 2013 The pharao? Are you comparing the story of Moses to the founding of the USA? And what does that have to do with atheists having no rights? If you don't believe in god, how can you have god given rights? Since there is no god. @/ @/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ninjadude Posted May 25, 2013 #52 Share Posted May 25, 2013 No much further back, 2011 ??? If you don't believe in god, how can you have god given rights? I think that was the point you missed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metaltania Posted May 25, 2013 #53 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I agree with Flombie. Well said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arbenol Posted May 25, 2013 #54 Share Posted May 25, 2013 I agree with Flombie. Well said. I agree with Flombie's cat. Smart feline. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielost Posted May 25, 2013 #55 Share Posted May 25, 2013 ??? I think that was the point you missed But, you see I do believe in god thus I have god given rights. Where as you don't believe in god you have no rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLOMBIE Posted May 25, 2013 #56 Share Posted May 25, 2013 (edited) But, you see I do believe in god thus I have god given rights. Where as you don't believe in god you have no rights. There are no god given rights; man always had to struggle for its rights. Edited May 25, 2013 by FLOMBIE 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tata Rompe Pecho Posted May 25, 2013 Author #57 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Ok stop derailing the subject omg the post had nothing at all to do with god or atheists O_o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLOMBIE Posted May 25, 2013 #58 Share Posted May 25, 2013 But with rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielost Posted May 25, 2013 #59 Share Posted May 25, 2013 Universal registration. Universal background checks. Limits on gun types and ammo types. Limits on who can own a gun and where they can be used. Ecxept for the first two, we already have this. Civilians can't buy the new exploding ammo the army has. Restricting the mag. Would not have heled in newtown. The gent. Never emptied one, he kept changing them. Limiting the size of the mag. might have helped the shooter in colo. since his hundred round mag. jammed. If he had had to change mags it may not have jammed. In all cases the random shooting stop, as soon as another gun showed up. In most cases the shooter shot themselves when that happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetpumper Posted June 5, 2013 #60 Share Posted June 5, 2013 There have been 73,441,399 background checks for gun purchases since President Obama took office, according to data released by the FBI. http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/73441399-gun-purchase-background-checks-under-obama-nj-spikes-41-may 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielost Posted June 5, 2013 #61 Share Posted June 5, 2013 That stop and frisk in new york is unconstitutional. If you want to search someone you are supposed to get a warrent, unless said person is commeting a crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted June 5, 2013 #62 Share Posted June 5, 2013 probable couse is not limited to crime, however nypd could not care less of the laws they supposed to enforce, es[pecially with a mayor like that, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavenHawk Posted June 5, 2013 #63 Share Posted June 5, 2013 There have been 73,441,399 background checks for gun purchases since President Obama took office, according to data released by the FBI. http://cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/73441399-gun-purchase-background-checks-under-obama-nj-spikes-41-may Of those how many have been denied? Of those denied, how many went on to commit a crime? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tata Rompe Pecho Posted June 6, 2013 Author #64 Share Posted June 6, 2013 (edited) probable couse is not limited to crime, however nypd could not care less of the laws they supposed to enforce, es[pecially with a mayor like that, In the United States criminal court system, probable cause refers to facts or evidence that would make a reasonable person believe that a crime or wrong doing has been, is being, or will be committed. You are half right, half wrong.. It really isn't limited to crime it can be for wrong doing. However, a "wrong doing" can only be legally defined as breaking a law, therefore a crime.. But I do agree 10000000% with everything else you said Edited June 6, 2013 by xFelix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now