Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Avatar Samantha Ai

Syrian endgame playbook: options we have?

38 posts in this topic

I rather think it is US that tends to escalate things beyond all reason, Iraq come to mind. And of course their meddling in various places since 1945. Russia has not meddled anywhere, has invaded nobody except to defend against naked agression (Georgia), and has not engaged in any proxy war, and does not send drones to kill often innocent people. Your comment is designed as propaganda to make it seem, as always, that Russia under Putin is some unstable banana republic about to wage war any moment. Remove beam from your American eye before pointing out mote in mine. Tell me, were are Russian forces fighting outside RF? Tartus is the only Russian base outside RF, and there is no fighting. How many American bases outside US territory? How many countries do you meddle in? Should the world worry about unreasonable reactions from Russia? I think perhaps we should all be worried about US and your meddling and spying on everybody. Gradually you become hated as bullies with one aim, $$$$$$

Watch out!! You are surrounded.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Watch out!! You are surrounded.

video snipped

Worrying to see it laid out so clearly. Looks very much like an Evil Empire to me. I wonder who will be senator Palpatine, then President Palpatine, then........ :)

Edited by Tutankhaten-pasheri
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the Sunni are going to win, most likely.

So here are a new set of concerns once they do win with American, Israeli, Turkish, and European backing?

  • How to get rid of the foreign Al-Qaeda elements?
  • How to get rid of the sharia courts already set up because of them?
  • How to insure Christians, Shia, Druze, Kurds and Alawites are not slaughtered but instead that minority rights are respected?
  • How to allow a free media to operate?
  • How to set up democracy?
  • How to allow secularism?
  • How to respect Russian investment already in place or that was in place?
  • How to respect Iranian investment already in place or that was in place?
  • How to not allow sectarian violence to continue?
  • How to not let America, Israel, Turkey, and Europe not run the new Syria and have Syria be their puppets?
  • How to rebuild?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Option: Let their people decide.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Tiresome Russophobia from mickey mouse land. As each year passes I see that the words of Nikita Khrushchev will come true.

Tut, Nikki Khrushchev was an old soldier from the antiquated irredentist Soviet Union from which you wish to distinguish Prince Vlad and the contemporary Russian leadership. If Khrushchev is old school, why do you quote him in your defense of the "new?" It doesn't make sense to me. Can you explain?

"We will bury you?" Hardly the words of a peace-seeking internationalist with a human rights heart o' gold.

Edited by szentgyorgy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch out!! You are surrounded.

*video*

Whoa...no wonder the rest of the world can't stand them :gun:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course we cannot expect the moderate rebels themselves to tell off their extremists counterparts when they need all the help they can get so it seems to me intelligence gathering and accountability will be our only recourse after all is said and done. Hope the international war crime trials that will ensue are fair and grab all those responsible and not just those who we don't like now.

I love this pontificating about the "moderate rebels".

How about if these "moderate rebels" only exist in your imagination?

People seem to have forgotten that the sunni islamist rebellion against the secular Assad regime is not new. Assad Senior had been battling the Muslim Brotherhood islamists (basically, the Syrian version of the Taliban) for decades, and quite brutally.

And THAT are the rebels. And now, suddenly, the West has decided to support the Muslim Brotherhood, so we start pontificating about "moderate rebels". But everywhere where these "moderate rebels" aka the Muslim Brotherhood/Al Quaeda take power, the immediately introduce primitive Shariah law. And we still dream about sorting out the "moderate" Al Quaeda from the immoderate Al Quaeda.

Insanity!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just came across an article by George Friedman (the founder of Stratfor). His comment here addresses the Syrian situation spot on:

" Another issue troubles me -- what I call the "Arab Spring syndrome." There is an assumption by human rights advocates that the crowd opposing a repressive regime will create a less repressive government. I recall how in 1979, when demonstrations were going on against the Shah of Iran, the obvious fact that he ran a repressive regime was combined with a fantasy about what the demonstrators were like -- they were all seen as Western liberal democrats. They weren't, and it is difficult to argue from a human rights point of view that the success of the demonstrators enhanced human rights in Iran. "

.... Exactly. And yet, once again, our politicians fall into the same trap. Why oh why.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Tut, Nikki Khrushchev was an old soldier from the antiquated irredentist Soviet Union from which you wish to distinguish Prince Vlad and the contemporary Russian leadership. If Khrushchev is old school, why do you quote him in your defense of the "new?" It doesn't make sense to me. Can you explain?

"We will bury you?" Hardly the words of a peace-seeking internationalist with a human rights heart o' gold.

Easy explanation. Krushchev, at a meeting with Western ambassadors to Moscow, said this "Нравится вам или нет, но история на нашей стороне. Мы вас закопаем", which translates as "Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you". He was talking about the political systems. He was saying that capitalism was finished, it had run it's course, and as feudalism had given way to capitalism, so capitalism will give way to Marxism-Leninism. This main part of what he said is always missed out because the propagandists of the West rather like to quote the last sentence "We will bury you", by itself and out of context. I know people who even think the "We will bury you" part comes from he when he banged his shoe on table at UN building.......

However, he knew the West had deliberately misquoted him, and later made a qualification of his statement, where he emphasised that he did not mean to literally put you in a grave and shovel earth over you. He meant that the Western proletariat will be the undertaker of capitalism. So "We will bury you" simply means our political system will take over because your own working class will take power and destroy capitalism. So the entire wrong history of "We will bury you" is because of mischevious translation, or translators unable to understand Russian idioms, but by the time Krushchev made clear what he said, it was to late. Not too late for Western proletariat to rise up against repressive capitalist overlords though. Rise up! davai! :)

And you are second Hungarian (by your forum name) in twentyfour hours to talk to me about Krushchev. Such co-incidences....

Edited by Tutankhaten-pasheri

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Whoa...no wonder the rest of the world can't stand them :gun:

See you at Sochi on the ice next year. We will beat USA in semi final, then you :)

Edited by Tutankhaten-pasheri
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love this pontificating about the "moderate rebels".

How about if these "moderate rebels" only exist in your imagination?

People seem to have forgotten that the sunni islamist rebellion against the secular Assad regime is not new. Assad Senior had been battling the Muslim Brotherhood islamists (basically, the Syrian version of the Taliban) for decades, and quite brutally.

And THAT are the rebels. And now, suddenly, the West has decided to support the Muslim Brotherhood, so we start pontificating about "moderate rebels". But everywhere where these "moderate rebels" aka the Muslim Brotherhood/Al Quaeda take power, the immediately introduce primitive Shariah law. And we still dream about sorting out the "moderate" Al Quaeda from the immoderate Al Quaeda.

Insanity!

I caught the tail end of Sir Malcolm Rifkind talking about Syria on the radio yesterday...and (think I've remembered this right)...

he said there were around 100, 000 Syrian rebels....and only 5,000 of these were foreign terrorist, Jihad, Al Qaeda fighters...ONLY!!!

So I looked to get info about the Syrian population....

http://www.indexmund...cs_profile.html

there are around 7 million males between the ages of 15 and 64.....

Which puts the numbers of Syrian 'rebels' in perspective....presumably the other 6, 900, 000 males don't feel

strongly enough to fight?

What I'm getting round to saying is that the ones who ARE fighting are probably on the extreme side of things...

and like you I doubt they are 'moderate'...

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See you at Sochi on the ice next year. We will beat USA in semi final, then you :)

:w00t:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watch out!! You are surrounded.

Amazing vid.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.