Rafterman Posted June 23, 2013 #26 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Can we all just agree that proof of the paranormal isn't going to be found on YouTube? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesseCuster Posted June 23, 2013 #27 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Can we all just agree that proof of the paranormal isn't going to be found on YouTube? YouTube is like the tabloid newspapers in Men in Black. The real source of the truth about the paranormal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesseCuster Posted June 23, 2013 #28 Share Posted June 23, 2013 lol. No evidence to support your claim though.. Would it matter if it was fake? You'd still say it was real.Remember the video of the lizard-bird thing swooping in through the trees and capturing a fox (I think it was a fox). When it was pointed out that it was clearly digitally altered (and not very well edited), you still maintained the truth of the video but that it was a real video of a lizard bird made to look like a fake to hide the truth or something. When you can dismiss the obvious fakes as being real footage made to look fake, there's not a lot of debating to be done with you. Whether it's real or not, you'll say it's real even when you know it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatureBoff Posted June 23, 2013 Author #29 Share Posted June 23, 2013 I'm not sure if it has been mentioned yet, but the video in the OP is fake. The "UFO" disappears completely just before the truck blocks the view 39 seconds in. Does anyone else agree with this statement because I can't see any evidence of any obvious fakery of this particular clip.P.S. Yes of course I know most YouTube ufo clips are badly faked. This one doesn't seem so obvious though which suggests it could be genuine imv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andami Posted June 23, 2013 #30 Share Posted June 23, 2013 (edited) Does anyone else agree with this statement because I can't see any evidence of any obvious fakery of this particular clip. There is a slowed down video as a reply. [url=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpQ_vES128Y[/url] Just to be sure the reply video wasn't itself modified (other than frame slowing), I used a program to slow down the "original" and confirm myself that the object does indeed disappear temporarily around the 39 second mark. Edited June 23, 2013 by Andami Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted June 23, 2013 #31 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Does anyone else agree with this statement because I can't see any evidence of any obvious fakery of this particular clip. P.S. Yes of course I know most YouTube ufo clips are badly faked. This one doesn't seem so obvious though which suggests it could be genuine imv. why would people believe you, when you create fantasy creatures you even create little stories and drawings to go with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatureBoff Posted June 23, 2013 Author #32 Share Posted June 23, 2013 (edited) There is a slowed down video as a reply. Just to be sure the reply video wasn't itself modified (other than frame slowing), I used a program to slow down the "original" and confirm myself that the object does indeed disappear temporarily around the 39 second mark. That's just the ufo dodging back and forth into the cloud. There's about a billion credible reports of ufos flying extremely fast, even faster than the eye can see. This isn't evidence of fakery imv. Edited June 23, 2013 by RingFenceTheCity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbyssWalker Posted June 24, 2013 #33 Share Posted June 24, 2013 Classic Smugfish. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatureBoff Posted June 24, 2013 Author #34 Share Posted June 24, 2013 Classic Smugfish. Classic common sense imv. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bivy Posted June 24, 2013 #35 Share Posted June 24, 2013 (edited) Wasn't this on an episode of Fact or Faked? At the very least, I remember a similar video that was debunked the same way. Edited June 24, 2013 by mmhmm374 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbyssWalker Posted June 26, 2013 #36 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Classic common sense imv. Don't get me wrong, I have always enjoyed your threads. One thing I don't understand is how you start with the conclusion that it is a Glowing Lizard Bird or something and then move forwards trying to fit any video into that conclusion... It's like cramming a circular piece into a square hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyverna Posted June 26, 2013 #37 Share Posted June 26, 2013 So, I don't understand. Is this thread about UFOs or lizards or birds? Or all of them? How does a UFO tie in with a lizard and/or bird? Am I missing something? Whatever it is, I think the video is fake. Andami's video is a good indicator that it's probably not genuine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatureBoff Posted June 26, 2013 Author #38 Share Posted June 26, 2013 So, I don't understand. Is this thread about UFOs or lizards or birds? Or all of them? How does a UFO tie in with a lizard and/or bird? Am I missing something? Whatever it is, I think the video is fake. Andami's video is a good indicator that it's probably not genuine. It's because there's thousands of reported lizard-like entities and also billions of ufo entities seen. I've made the astounding leap that both are the same thing, just that one is seen flying at night at a distance and the other closer-up and in daylight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rashore Posted June 26, 2013 #39 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Crap, hyraxes can transform into UFO's too?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatureBoff Posted June 26, 2013 Author #40 Share Posted June 26, 2013 Crap, hyraxes can transform into UFO's too?!?!?! Err, the dogman-type cryptid is portrayed in the Dartmoor Beast photo, the four legged land-loving animal, which I've deduced to have an ancestor of the rock hyrax.The bright white ufos are lizard-birds which eat white fireflies. What's so difficult to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyverna Posted June 27, 2013 #41 Share Posted June 27, 2013 It's because there's thousands of reported lizard-like entities and also billions of ufo entities seen. I've made the astounding leap that both are the same thing, just that one is seen flying at night at a distance and the other closer-up and in daylight. Just thought this part of your post was really self-explanatory. Don't you think it might make a little more sense to make some not-so-astounding leaps? Maybe make some smaller leaps, collect some evidence, and then make the astounding leap? (Which at this point, provided the evidence is convincing and makes sense, would not be so astounding.) Making astounding leaps is something you try to avoid without proof. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NatureBoff Posted June 27, 2013 Author #42 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Just thought this part of your post was really self-explanatory. Don't you think it might make a little more sense to make some not-so-astounding leaps? Maybe make some smaller leaps, collect some evidence, and then make the astounding leap? (Which at this point, provided the evidence is convincing and makes sense, would not be so astounding.) Making astounding leaps is something you try to avoid without proof. Err...I was being sarcastic. Sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now