seeder Posted June 27, 2013 Author #51 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Without reviewing the video, there was a local resident spraying water on the fire with his garden hose? Nope it looks like a hydrant gushing water with no hose attached 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted June 27, 2013 #52 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Nope it looks like a hydrant gushing water with no hose attached Perhaps because Hastings' car sheared the hydrant off before hitting the tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetpumper Posted June 27, 2013 #53 Share Posted June 27, 2013 (edited) A friend of an award-winning reporter, who died last week in a car accident, says Michael Hastings was investigating the CIA at the time of his suspicious death. Sgt. Joe Biggs told Fox News on Tuesday that Hastings was working on a story about the CIA and that it was “going to be the biggest story yet.” He added that “something didn’t feel right” after Hastings sent a panicked email saying the authorities were on his tail. Biggs said that Hastings was a safe driver that drove “like a grandma,” making it extremely unlikely that he would speed in the morning that he crashed. Hastings, 33, died on June 18 in a one-car crash in Los Angeles which shocked his colleagues and the American public. “His friends and family that know him, everyone says he drives like a grandma, so that right there doesn’t seem like something he’d be doing, there’s no way that he’d be acting erratic like that and driving out of control,” said Biggs, adding that “things don’t add up, there’s a lot of questions that need to be answered.” On the same day of his death, Wikileaks tweeted, "Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him." More: http://www.presstv.i...ail/310902.html Edited June 27, 2013 by Sweetpumper 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted June 27, 2013 Author #54 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Perhaps because Hastings' car sheared the hydrant off before hitting the tree. Very possibly yeh, but its off the road, kind of setback from the car, so he 'may' have hit it , no other explanation really, but watch for yourself, its on the left of the car/picture at about the 45 secs mark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted June 27, 2013 Author #55 Share Posted June 27, 2013 A friend of an award-winning reporter, who died last week in a car accident, says Michael Hastings was investigating the CIA at the time of his suspicious death. Sgt. Joe Biggs told Fox News on Tuesday that Hastings was working on a story about the CIA and that it was “going to be the biggest story yet.” He added that “something didn’t feel right” after Hastings sent a panicked email saying the authorities were on his tail. Biggs said that Hastings was a safe driver that drove “like a grandma,” making it extremely unlikely that he would speed in the morning that he crashed. Hastings, 33, died on June 18 in a one-car crash in Los Angeles which shocked his colleagues and the American public. “His friends and family that know him, everyone says he drives like a grandma, so that right there doesn’t seem like something he’d be doing, there’s no way that he’d be acting erratic like that and driving out of control,” said Biggs, adding that “things don’t add up, there’s a lot of questions that need to be answered.” On the same day of his death, Wikileaks tweeted, "Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him." More: http://www.presstv.i...ail/310902.html The clincher will be if he shared his findings with anyone else, ie if someone else has copies of documents etc etc. Mind you, if they have they may be too scared to say.... we shall have to wait and see how it pans out 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted July 10, 2013 #56 Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) Interesting local news report in San Diego yesterday (see video): http://www.sandiego6...lusive-20130708 A fascinating tidbit of new information is that the engine from the car was found 150 to 200 feet BEHIND the point where the car came to rest against the tree. This means it was ejected from the car before hitting the tree, corroborating witness accounts of explosion(s) prior to a crash. And why is law enforcement so tight-lipped and guarded about the wreckage? Maybe the phosphorus is still too hot for close inspection. Edited July 10, 2013 by hacktorp 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 10, 2013 #57 Share Posted July 10, 2013 Law enforcement is so tight-lipped because they know what happened... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted July 11, 2013 #58 Share Posted July 11, 2013 OMG ! What webs you people weave ! It would be nice for once to See some actual Facts,Proof,Documentation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Buzzkill Posted July 11, 2013 #59 Share Posted July 11, 2013 sorry don. For some reason the police report on this explosion will not be released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted July 11, 2013 #60 Share Posted July 11, 2013 sorry don. For some reason the police report on this explosion will not be released Its because the pubic needs not know what powers that be run this World. Looks like a easy thing to put down As ."Its All over now " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted July 11, 2013 Author #61 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Interesting local news report in San Diego yesterday (see video): http://www.sandiego6...lusive-20130708 A fascinating tidbit of new information is that the engine from the car was found 150 to 200 feet BEHIND the point where the car came to rest against the tree. This means it was ejected from the car before hitting the tree, corroborating witness accounts of explosion(s) prior to a crash. And why is law enforcement so tight-lipped and guarded about the wreckage? Maybe the phosphorus is still too hot for close inspection. Interesting link, and I found this bit intriguing "Another significant detail pointed out by some members of law enforcement, is the intensity of the fire inside the car. It’s highly unusual since gasoline generally doesn’t burn that hot. Reviewing video footage from the scene, the intensity of the fire resembles a “thermite” burn. No matter how you slice this highly suspicious car accident, a Mercedes is not going to explode into flames without assistance. Car aficionados say fires in new cars happen for three main reasons, “running the engine out of oil, running the engine out of coolant, or a mammoth car mangling accident, that leaves the hot side of the battery to short out against the frame before it reaches the fuse panel.” 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted July 11, 2013 #62 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Interesting local news report in San Diego yesterday (see video): http://www.sandiego6...lusive-20130708 A fascinating tidbit of new information is that the engine from the car was found 150 to 200 feet BEHIND the point where the car came to rest against the tree. This means it was ejected from the car before hitting the tree, corroborating witness accounts of explosion(s) prior to a crash. And why is law enforcement so tight-lipped and guarded about the wreckage? Maybe the phosphorus is still too hot for close inspection. The reporter was wrong. Plain and simple. http://metabunk.org/threads/debunked-michael-hastings-crash-engine-found-north-of-crash-going-south.1964/#post-53268 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted July 11, 2013 Author #63 Share Posted July 11, 2013 The reporter was wrong. Plain and simple. http://metabunk.org/...964/#post-53268 Interesting link and photos ... I have also found another car crash that ejected the engine Heres the story: "Head-On Collision - Car Engine Ejected & Flies 100 Feet" Published on Jan 4, 2013 This afternoon just before 3:00 p.m. emergency crews were dispatched to Brighton Ave. in Modesto, California for reports of a head-on collision car crash. When crews arrived on the scene they found 2 cars that had significant damage with both drivers out of the vehicles. Both cars only had one occupant. The Police Accident Investigation is still in the early stages but, at this time it appears that a young male driver was driving at a high rate of speed northbound on Brighton Ave. when he lost control of his vehicle, crossed into oncoming traffic, and collided with a car traveling southbound. When the two cars collided the entire engine from the northbound vehicle was ejected from the car and flew about 100 feet into the middle of a park. Luckily their were no children present and no pedestrians were injured. The exact distance that the engine flew was not measured by police at the scene. The figure of 100 feet is an estimate. The driver of the southbound vehicle was transported to an area hospital with minor injuries. The driver of the northbound vehicle was checked out by an ambulance crew on the scene who determined he did not need emergency medical treatment. http://www.ModestoNews.org However, the heat of the fire is still a bit of a puzzle 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted July 11, 2013 #64 Share Posted July 11, 2013 The reporter was wrong. Plain and simple. http://metabunk.org/...964/#post-53268 I don't think these photographs are of the same spot...while appearing somewhat similar, the differences are notable: This looks to be a case where over-zealous debunkers are crafting 'evidence' to suit their purpose. Not saying the newscasters are infallible, but at least their names and reputations are on the line...unlike Metabunk-sters. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted July 11, 2013 Author #65 Share Posted July 11, 2013 I don't think these photographs are of the same spot...while appearing somewhat similar, the differences are notable: This looks to be a case where over-zealous debunkers are crafting 'evidence' to suit their purpose. Not saying the newscasters are infallible, but at least their names and reputations are on the line...unlike Metabunk-sters. well spotted, the inserted image top right of the big piccy, shows grass in front of the kerb/engine... the alleged spot however has no grass in front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 11, 2013 #66 Share Posted July 11, 2013 If the tranny and engine were indeed behind the car, not in front by direction of travel, then it's no wonder the cops are keeping it under wraps. For those humans able to read between the lines and connect the dots though, their silence speaks volumes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted July 12, 2013 #67 Share Posted July 12, 2013 (edited) I don't think these photographs are of the same spot...while appearing somewhat similar, the differences are notable: This looks to be a case where over-zealous debunkers are crafting 'evidence' to suit their purpose. Not saying the newscasters are infallible, but at least their names and reputations are on the line...unlike Metabunk-sters. Did you bring this up at the MB site? The guy that runs the site will most certainly engage with you if you bring this up in the thread. I just rechecked the MB thread and I think you are mistaken in your analysis. The photos are consistent. The inset photo is simply taken from a different angle and position than the larger photograph - note the position of the lamp pole. Edited July 12, 2013 by Rafterman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted July 12, 2013 #68 Share Posted July 12, 2013 well spotted, the inserted image top right of the big piccy, shows grass in front of the kerb/engine... the alleged spot however has no grass in front Look again. The photos are consistent. Note the red grate piping over the drain hole. In the larger photo it is readily visible. In the inset photo, you can only see the very top of the red pipe. The photos were simply taken from different angles of elevation. If the tranny and engine were indeed behind the car, not in front by direction of travel, then it's no wonder the cops are keeping it under wraps. For those humans able to read between the lines and connect the dots though, their silence speaks volumes. And if it wasn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 12, 2013 #69 Share Posted July 12, 2013 If it wasn't behind the direction of travel, then it would make more sense, and a likely explanation would be that it was thrown forward by the impact. But it still makes it an unusual accident, all things considered. If it were an old beat-up car such an event might not mean much, but a new M-B, not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiggs Posted July 19, 2013 #70 Share Posted July 19, 2013 Hasting's body "Cremated against Family's wishes". Rolling Stone journalist Michael Hastings’ body was cremated against his family’s wishes, destroying potential evidence that could have contradicted the explanation that he died as a result of an accident, according to San Diego 6 reporter Kimberly Dvorak. Source: Info Wars 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted July 27, 2013 Author #71 Share Posted July 27, 2013 OMG thats got to be totally illegal? When has that ever happened before? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babe Ruth Posted July 28, 2013 #72 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Don't be asking too many questions Seeder.... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiggs Posted July 28, 2013 #73 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Surveillance video footage of the crash has now emerged. [media=]http://vimeo.com/71132682[/media] Sources: Report including the video: http://laist.com/201...tings_crash.php Frame by Frame analysis: http://whowhatwhy.co...rs-a-few-clues/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted July 28, 2013 Author #74 Share Posted July 28, 2013 Surveillance video footage of the crash has now emerged. [media=]http://vimeo.com/71132682[/media] Sources: Report including the video: http://laist.com/201...tings_crash.php Frame by Frame analysis: http://whowhatwhy.co...rs-a-few-clues/ Bloody hell that was a big flash and ball of flame wasnt it? Ive been away a couple of weeks and while I was away I got chatting with some americans in spain one of them said/implied it could have been a drone strike! While I dont think thats the case, this is becoming more and more of a head scratcher. But, I dont see how anyone can investigate this now and turn up the real eveidence. Ok the articles say the family have employed a private dick, but they dont have access to all areas do they? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted July 28, 2013 #75 Share Posted July 28, 2013 I think they hijacked the computer in his car, making it crash..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now