Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Big Bad Voodoo

Thermodynamic paradox

8 posts in this topic

If universe isnt infinetly old it cant be infinite in extent.

Right or wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's not really a paradox L.

it's based on a false premise that the universe is infinitely old, but we know it isn't, and we also know it isn't infinite in extent.

a better thermodynamic paradox would be the one of solar energy contravening the law of entropy as it leaves the sun.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

that's not really a paradox L.

it's based on a false premise that the universe is infinitely old, but we know it isn't, and we also know it isn't infinite in extent.

a better thermodynamic paradox would be the one of solar energy contravening the law of entropy as it leaves the sun.....

What do you mean that universe is infinetly old?

It said "isnt infinetly old".

Edited by the L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what I meant is, the thermodynamic paradox you're talking about, ie- if the universe was infinitely old, then there would be a thermal equilibrium, no stars, no matter, just a universal temperature, a kind of heat death, that would only work if the universe was spatially & temporally infinite, but it doesn't work if the universe is spatially & temporally finite, which we know it is, therefore the paradox falls apart!

check out steinmetz's objection to the 2nd law of thermodynamics as a universal law, now THAT'S a paradox you might find interesting.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what I meant is, the thermodynamic paradox you're talking about, ie- if the universe was infinitely old, then there would be a thermal equilibrium, no stars, no matter, just a universal temperature, a kind of heat death, that would only work if the universe was spatially & temporally infinite, but it doesn't work if the universe is spatially & temporally finite, which we know it is, therefore the paradox falls apart!

check out steinmetz's objection to the 2nd law of thermodynamics as a universal law, now THAT'S a paradox you might find interesting.....

I said: If universe isnt infinetly old it cant be infinite in extent.

I will check Steinmetz objection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
72[/size]058283' post='4821464']

I said: If universe isnt infinetly old it cant be infinite in extent.

Sure it can.

Shrooma, can you elaborate on Steinmetz? (I assume you are talking about C. P. Steinmetz?) I can't seem to find any of his non-electric circuit work.

I can only find a few quotes from him on the subject of entropy, but it seems these were made prior to the publication of Noether's theorem and the development of the Schrodinger equation (which to my mind quite adequately refute his arguments, but as I said I haven't found a direct link to his entire work so I can't really assess his full argument).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure it can.

How?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How?

Just because the universe has existed for a finite quantity of time doesn't imply that it contains a finite quantity of space.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.