Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Still Waters

Photographer turns fireworks into flowers

5 posts in this topic

A quick glance at these pictures might have people believing they are the results of the latest set of wildlife close-ups - photographers using macro lenses to capture flowers in all their colourful glory.

But they are, in fact, the results of time-exposure photography and are not flowers at all - rather they are the violent and awe-inspiring bursts of colour from exploding fireworks.

http://www.dailymail...ke-flowers.html

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

beautiful......nuff said

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting shots, but I have some issues with the DailyFail's comments..

they are the violent and awe-inspiring bursts of colour from exploding fireworks.

That implies that this is real detail, but it isn't. It's bokeh.

Photographer Alan Sailer captures the moment a firework detonates in the air. His use of long-exposure shutter speeds creates the illusion that the light show is actually a red flower

To quote the cat - No-no-no-no-no. If he was capturing that 'moment', it would all be emanating from one point - clearly these are taken well after the initial bang.. And it is not the long exposure that creates the key effect. In general terms, any photographer will always use a long exposure to shoot fireworks. The difference here is that he is deliberately defocusing the lens during the exposure - so all that much expanded stuff is not real detail, it is bokeh - the nature of that 'fuzz' is dependent on the lens design, the aperture blade design, the aperture setting, the focal length and just how much out of focus it is, as the bright spot of the actual firework moves through the field of view..

Change any of those, and you change the 'detail'. So it is not a new way to analyse fireworks as the article seems to imply.

So...

offer a glimpse into the split-second beauty contained in fireworks

No, they do not.

But pretty - don't get me wrong.. I'm just a stickler for getting the explanation right...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very impressive...

I would have never guessed they were fire works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.