Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
Big Bad Voodoo

Russia warns of nuclear disaster if Syria is

37 posts in this topic

"If a warhead, by design or by chance, were to hit the Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) near Damascus, the consequences could be catastrophic," Aleksandr Lukashevich said in a Wednesday statement.

http://rt.com/news/syria-strike-nuclear-disaster-427/

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh yeah, that's all we needed!

Let's hope there won't be any attack in the first place

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a really scary thought.... :(

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very scary and well, I think The Bible mentions something about Damascus being destroyed. I hope it doesn't happen, but nobody wants to play nice. Too bad we've got a lot of crazies in power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's very scary and well, I think The Bible mentions something about Damascus being destroyed. I hope it doesn't happen, but nobody wants to play nice. Too bad we've got a lot of crazies in power.

Isaiah 17 - also called "the burden of damascus" Damascus is to be utterly left in a ruinous heap -OVERNIGHT - and will be left uninhabitable by humans. Of course it hasn't happened yet but if there ever was a time that seemed likely - this is it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt that there would be an intentional, or even "accidental", strike on that facility.

Too far removed from the strike targets in question, that's for sure. And no reason anyway.

I see it as Russian propaganda to scare people.

Even still, this whole dang thing is a mess.

Likely a strike will cause a VERY wide-spread regional war, eventually turning into international involvement, AKA WW3.

I don't know, I just hate this whole damn thing.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia created Israel. Everything were hearing is BS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isaiah 17 - also called "the burden of damascus" Damascus is to be utterly left in a ruinous heap -OVERNIGHT - and will be left uninhabitable by humans. Of course it hasn't happened yet but if there ever was a time that seemed likely - this is it.

You lil war mongorer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia created Israel. Everything were hearing is BS.

How come?

Big Bad Voodoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How come?

Big Bad Voodoo

Who won ww2... whatvwas the result of ww2?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who won ww2... whatvwas the result of ww2?

UK, USA, China, Russia, France, Brazil...

Big Bad Voodoo

Edited by Big Bad Voodoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two thibgs happened.. the UN was formed and Israel was created.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two thibgs happened.. the UN was formed and Israel was created.

Yes but to claim that Russia created Israel I thought you have some evidence that specificly Russia created it.

To me is obscure. Because during 6 day war and onwards we know Russia supported Egypt and Syria.

Big Bad Voodoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You lil war mongorer

To reject something without investigating it is the very definition of laziness or bias. Even if Damascus was destroyed by a nuke next week, you (and to be fair -MOST) would STILL refuse to acknowledge the prophetic aspect of it. But that refusal doesn't make God's word any less real OR inaccurate. If that makes me a war monger then I accept the title.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not prophetic if you go out of your way to make it happen.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not prophetic if you go out of your way to make it happen.

That's an interesting point but why exactly does it invalidate it? Are there rules of what constitutes prophetic fulfilment or is this just your opinion? And if this IS the case then why hasn't it happened before now? Up til now mankind has had to take it on faith. If it actually happens then I think it would be foolish and a bit insincere to reject it for such a reason - just my 2p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an interesting point but why exactly does it invalidate it? Are there rules of what constitutes prophetic fulfilment or is this just your opinion? And if this IS the case then why hasn't it happened before now? Up til now mankind has had to take it on faith. If it actually happens then I think it would be foolish and a bit insincere to reject it for such a reason - just my 2p

The rules of prophetic fulfillment consist of one rule - it's complete and total BS. When you start playing politics with it, and you always do, it becomes a multi-layered BS mixed with politics and religion that has no foundation in reality.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt that there would be an intentional, or even "accidental", strike on that facility.

Too far removed from the strike targets in question, that's for sure. And no reason anyway.

I see it as Russian propaganda to scare people.

Even still, this whole dang thing is a mess.

Likely a strike will cause a VERY wide-spread regional war, eventually turning into international involvement, AKA WW3.

I don't know, I just hate this whole damn thing.

Too far from what strike targets "for sure"? What do you know? Nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally if I wanted to make sure my **** didnt get bombed by the U.S then I would move it to somewhere that they Wouldent bomb.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rules of prophetic fulfillment consist of one rule - it's complete and total BS. When you start playing politics with it, and you always do, it becomes a multi-layered BS mixed with politics and religion that has no foundation in reality.

So the fact that Yam doesn't believe in prophecy is the last word on the subject, eh? What arrogance you display.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This too shall pass.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The POST heading says "Russia warns of Nuclear disaster etc", ok so why do people start bringing religeon and prophesies into the thread ?, The U.S. wont use Nukes if they do go ahead and hit Syria,the Ruskies wont use them either,so who are we debating is going to use Nukes ? From the pictures I've seen Damascus is allready a heap of rubble,due to Assads rag-tag army and guerillas running around blasting everything.The horrible thing is that Syrians are killing Syrians and should get around a PEACE table and sort things out in a civilised manner.At the moment both sides are losers,and its the wives and kids who are suffering.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I`m not one for prophesies of the Bible to be true, but if there are Jesus`s could be , since he appeared to see the future. When you see this abomination of desolation standing in a holy place run into the hills of Judea,or no flesh shall be saved. Could it be if the US hits Syria, Iran would hit Isreal.What about the redline on Iran`s nukes?

Edited by docyabut2
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I`m not one for prophesies of the Bible to be true, but if there are Jesus`s could be , since he appeared to see the future. When you see this abomination of desolation standing in a holy place run into the hills of Judea,or no flesh shall be saved. Could it be if the US hits Syria, Iran would hit Isreal.What about the redline on Iran`s nukes?

I think that 'redline' regarding Iran's nukes has faded to pink. I don't think anyone is gonna touch that one anytime soon.

( Normally I would put a disclaimer here stating that this is my opinion; however, it seems even that isn't safe from ridicule this days.)

Kind Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The POST heading says "Russia warns of Nuclear disaster etc", ok so why do people start bringing religeon and prophesies into the thread ?, The U.S. wont use Nukes if they do go ahead and hit Syria,the Ruskies wont use them either,so who are we debating is going to use Nukes ? From the pictures I've seen Damascus is allready a heap of rubble,due to Assads rag-tag army and guerillas running around blasting everything.The horrible thing is that Syrians are killing Syrians and should get around a PEACE table and sort things out in a civilised manner.At the moment both sides are losers,and its the wives and kids who are suffering.

No the thread is about a nuclear facility near Damascus

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.