Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
seeder

F16 Jet takes off... and no pilot..

23 posts in this topic

OMG, now jets are being made into drones... maybe one day there wont be pilots any more...

Empty F-16 jet tested by Boeing and US Air Force

Boeing has revealed that it has retrofitted retired fighter jets to turn them into drones. It said that one of the Lockheed Martin F-16 made a first flight with an empty cockpit last week.

Two US Air Force pilots controlled the plane from the ground as it flew from a Florida base to the Gulf of Mexico. Boeing suggested that the innovation could ultimately be used to help train pilots, providing an adversary they could practise firing on.

The jet - which had previously sat mothballed at an Arizona site for 15 years - flew at an altitude of 40,000ft (12.2km) and a speed of Mach 1.47 (1,119mph/1,800km/h).

The firm added that the flight attained 7Gs of acceleration but was capable of carrying out manoeuvres at 9Gs - something that might cause physical problems for a pilot.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...nology-24231077

.

Edited by seeder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Turn old jets into drones for target practice ? Shuuuuure. I can see Unca Sam needing thousand of these things with all the latest and greatest weaponry.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a bit expensive for a target no? I would rather have us do this then dumping money on developing and producing drones. Just a thought.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strikes me more as a "lets see if we can do it". I don't believe a fighter piloted by remote would do well in a combat situation, as in against another plane intending to destroy said fighter. For ground stricks, the question must be asked: why replace what what you have? With current drones, you don't have to design around a pilot, therefore removing the need to put a large amount of armor on said plane, increasing the operational range and allowing for more designs to reduce the radar signature.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this whole story terrifying. What kind of future are we headed towards here?? :unsure2:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this whole story terrifying. What kind of future are we headed towards here?? :unsure2:

A possibly bad one - or a bad one for the bad guys anyway! I can see the point of it, to an extent, without a pilot - the jets, and even new versions that may be developed, will have such speed as G-forces wont apply so much without a human pilot. If they are just to be used as target practice, then fine! But the article ends with this bit:

However, a spokesman for the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots warned of the temptation to use them in warfare.

"I'm very concerned these could be used to target people on the ground," said Prof Noel Sharkey. "I'm particularly worried about the high speed at which they can travel because they might not be able to distinguish their targets very clearly. There is every reason to believe that these so-called 'targets' could become a test bed for drone warfare, moving us closer and closer to automated killing."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The USAF has been flying drone aircraft since the late 40's.

Tyndall AFB has many of them, and the designation is Q, so this new one is QF-16. They have been flying against them, and shooting a few down here and there, for decades.

How hard would it be to have a QB-767? Not very. :gun:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this whole story terrifying. What kind of future are we headed towards here?? :unsure2:

Skynet is coming!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But these drones, they are still being "piloted", right? Just not from someone inside the craft. So no skynet.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But these drones, they are still being "piloted", right? Just not from someone inside the craft. So no skynet.

Yep, that was not "autonomous"

The pilot(s) and weapons officers are on the ground in a special trailer or building, doing what they do as if actually in the aircraft.

EDIT: Of course, as a training flight, the weapons are dummy loads, and likely the fighter jet was outfitted with a ground control self-destruct mechanism if it strayed beyond ground control abilities.

Plus, there was likely even more people to oversee and effect an abort if necessary.

Edited by pallidin
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We will Indeed See this Evolve ! Not too far from the Skynet commit !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, i thought this was going to be be a comedy vid of a plane charging off down the runway with the pilot running after it shaking his fist.

Actually it's not an entirely new concept; it's been tried various times before, even using B-17s during WWII.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strikes me more as a "lets see if we can do it". I don't believe a fighter piloted by remote would do well in a combat situation, as in against another plane intending to destroy said fighter. For ground stricks, the question must be asked: why replace what what you have? With current drones, you don't have to design around a pilot, therefore removing the need to put a large amount of armor on said plane, increasing the operational range and allowing for more designs to reduce the radar signature.

I did read that during the "No Fly Zone" over Iraq, a Predator or something similar did have a go at an Iraq MiG-29. It lost, but I suppose the pilot decided there was nothing to lose having a go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did read that during the "No Fly Zone" over Iraq, a Predator or something similar did have a go at an Iraq MiG-29. It lost, but I suppose the pilot decided there was nothing to lose having a go.

999,9999 times out of a million a MiG will win. In a piloted drone you can only see what the cameras let you. Not to mention a Predator has the maneuverability of a cardboard box.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What? They are worried an RC F16 could be used for warfare? Sounds more plausible than target practice. That's one hell of an expensive clay pigeon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What? They are worried an RC F16 could be used for warfare? Sounds more plausible than target practice. That's one hell of an expensive clay pigeon.

QF-16 is the proper designation. :tu:

Old airplanes must eventually be destroyed. Why not get the most bang for the buck in the process?

Radar injects can only do so much in the training scenario. Air combat maneuvering against a real airplane is far better for training than just a video game.

Edited by Babe Ruth
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's been done with many different types there at Tyndall, including the old Delta wing General Dynamics QF-102 and QF-106

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a waste. Couldn't they sell them to rich rappers and Arabs, De armed and ready to be an uber toy? Yes I'm being g flippant, but still seems a waste. Then again if it saves the lives of good guys then it's worth it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ps. Just jealous as I drive a 12 year old POS that definitely does not fly :-(

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I find this whole story terrifying. What kind of future are we headed towards here?? :unsure2:

"Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. This is your pilot speaking. You are now crossing the coast at a flight level of thirty thousand feet in good visibility. You may be surprised to learn that I am at the Ryanair drone control center in Islamabad and controlling the aircraft remotely. There is no need for apprehension as this system has been tested thoroughly and at great length. I can therefore, assure you that nothing can possibly go wrong (click) go wrong (click) go wrong (click) go wrong (click) go wrong (click) go wrong..................."

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup it's not new they where doing this with big planes after the war

B-17s.they even flew jet liners remote controlled

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is old news the government been flying unmaned craft.What is the government doing we know there doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.