Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
ambelamba

UFOlogy: Maybe it's just me but....

16 posts in this topic

Sorry for repeating the same thing twice.

Maybe it's just me, but something makes me think that we have to throw away pretty much all known UFO mythos, except that some UFOs are manufactured and they may not be of terrestrial origin. And maaaaaaaybe aliens are visiting Earth. Probably. Maybe. I am not sure. Beside these two assumptions maybe we will have to throw away everything else and start from scratch.

Yeah, this can be incredibly unpopular to most of UFOlogists, except for a few who are pulling the punch to avoid being called crazy. Forget about Friedman. And passionately Ignore....Boylan, Lazar, and whoever comes to your mind.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Add whitley strieber to that ignore list...Oh,and Billy billy meier too.Not to mention Youtubers by the dozens that post B.S. as well.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Add whitley strieber to that ignore list...Oh,and Billy billy meier too.Not to mention Youtubers by the dozens that post B.S. as well.

Pretty much everyone, eh? I guess we all should.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for repeating the same thing twice.

Maybe it's just me, but something makes me think that we have to throw away pretty much all known UFO mythos, except that some UFOs are manufactured and they may not be of terrestrial origin. And maaaaaaaybe aliens are visiting Earth. Probably. Maybe. I am not sure. Beside these two assumptions maybe we will have to throw away everything else and start from scratch.

Yeah, this can be incredibly unpopular to most of UFOlogists, except for a few who are pulling the punch to avoid being called crazy. Forget about Friedman. And passionately Ignore....Boylan, Lazar, and whoever comes to your mind.

:D

You are stepping into the light of a skeptical outlook. It's all good, some of your sentiments are reflected in my signature.

I think you are one step from turning that maaaaaybeeee into "where does it say that?"

The best thing you can do is ask questions, and demand answers. If they do not exist, so be it, we pursue every corner just to make sure, but once you stop imagining what might be, and start concentrating on what can be, the picture becomes far clearer. The only stupid question is one not asked.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This guy films planes,and out of focus stars calling them UFO's.He sometimes dubs over the audio saying these planes are silent.

Sad part is he has a small following of believers.

I have seen other Tubers faking Bigfoot vids with people believing it.

:-(

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What UFOlogy is in desperate need of is a true scientific approach. One where you do not draw any conclusions until the research/investigation is done. Any pre-conceived notion, by it's very nature, introduces bias to an investigation and as modern UFOlogy has proven, ends up producing absolute rubbish. UFO investigation must begin with "I don't know what that is, what do the facts tell us?". If the facts aren't good enough for a solid conclusion then that is where it ends.... 'unknown'. That is the only way UFOlogy will ever be taken seriously.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, most UFOologists begin with the presumption that what is being witnessed is in fact ET, there by skewing and removing any objectivity from their arguments. Starting from a conclusion and cherry picking information is the worst possible method to prove anything. I think that most people interested in this phenomenon should be skeptical, if you want to be taken seriously.

Edited by EnderOTD
3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that most people interested in this phenomenon should be skeptical, if you want to be taken seriously.

you could lay the obstacle even lower and say people interested in this subject should at least maintain their objectivity,

instead of taking every picture/YT vid of blurry, undefineable blob as "100% proof of ET!"....

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What UFOlogy is in desperate need of is a true scientific approach. One where you do not draw any conclusions until the research/investigation is done. Any pre-conceived notion, by it's very nature, introduces bias to an investigation and as modern UFOlogy has proven, ends up producing absolute rubbish. UFO investigation must begin with "I don't know what that is, what do the facts tell us?". If the facts aren't good enough for a solid conclusion then that is where it ends.... 'unknown'. That is the only way UFOlogy will ever be taken seriously.

The problem is when you go unbiased you end up pretty much rejecting the whole field as nonsense. So people who want to study it cannot be scientific.
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is when you go unbiased you end up pretty much rejecting the whole field as nonsense. So people who want to study it cannot be scientific.

that's a problem that "proper" science has to face as well. My wife is a medical statistician, she helps doctors in developing studies in order to prove their theories, and you'd be surprised of how many docs approach studies with a possible outcome already in mind. That's what i would call bias in this example.

But what qualifies one as "unbiased" in the field of UFO research? could you maybe specify that a bit?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly, most UFOologists begin with the presumption that what is being witnessed is in fact ET, there by skewing and removing any objectivity from their arguments. Starting from a conclusion and cherry picking information is the worst possible method to prove anything.

It would be OK if ET were being used as a hypothesis instead of a conclusion.

UFOlogists rely on decades and decades of exciting stories to support their field. Roswell, Barney Hill, all those famous abduction cases are what they continue to stand on since recent cases have been mostly frauds or explained without alien participation. The last thing they want to do is start from scratch, only considering cases from 2013 on. That would leave them with very little.

Oddly, UFOlogists want you to ignore the long list of contactees like Billy Meier since they make their field look ridiculous.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder where ufology would be without the moon landings and people like Von daniken and Roswell.

Maybe we'd all be fascinated/paranoid about something else instead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is, we have nothing to put our hands on to study. And, if the military actually does have a captured craft, they'll never let us know.

UFOlogy disappears if we do get one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The faker I posted about caught me debunking him on another channel,and now he is in a huff.Anyone in the U.K. want to challenge him?

Check out the comment section.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider myself unique in ufology. I started researching when I was 13. Have read EVERY UFO book in the city library. 100% convinced they where aliens for a few years.

Years later after learning som photos and stoies where fake, that got me curious and I wanted to find out how. I did, and then I found how fun it was to do my own hoaxes and make crop circles. I still believed in aliens and many stories, but over the years I slowly started to find out more where hoaxes.

The last few years, I started seeing all the viral UFO videos on youtube and how many of them have been debunked. I also met a lot of circlemakers and did even more research on crop circles, concluding they are man made opposed to what I used to believe. I learned about CGI and after effects and more hoaxing techniques. Professional photography leant further skills to identifity objects as natural/manmade or hoaxes.

Now I'm skeptical. I can say almost all UFO videos and photos are fake or explainable. Some are not, but that doesnt mean they are aliens. I'd truly like to believe, but it's hard with all the experience I've had. Now all I want is the truth and evidence for it. It's boring, but probably better.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LGMs and crop circles are kinda today's equivalent to the old spiritualist movements, not to say they are not gone in spite of repeated demonstrations of fraud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.