Big Bad Voodoo Posted September 26, 2013 #1 Share Posted September 26, 2013 MSG is a neurotoxin that is used as a food additive. It is toxic, inflammatory and causes or contributes to many diseases. It must be eliminated from your diet but avoiding it may not be as easy as you think. Here is what you need to know to avoid it and reverse its damaging effects. http://blogs.naturalnews.com/how-to-avoid-being-secretly-poisoned-by-msg/ 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 29, 2013 #2 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Another pointless thread by bbv based off an article written by a dimwit for dimwits. I had some acquaintances who swore that they had averse affects from MSG until they learned that their favorite organic soy was rich in MSG. Their symptoms magically vanished with education. No more doofus threads please. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted September 29, 2013 #3 Share Posted September 29, 2013 My wife once read about how bad MSG is supposed to be, and in a fit of foolishness tried to banish it from our kitchen. This is an Asian kitchen you are talking about. The cook threatened to quit saying she didn't know how to cook without it and wouldn't even try. I told her I would buy it on the sly and sneak it in. After about a month I found some stuff about how stupid the fear is in the newspaper and put it on my wife's bathroom door. She never said a word but stopped asking about it and we were able to put it back on the food list. One should be aware that it is mostly salt, so watch it just as you do salt if you are salt-intolerant. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted September 29, 2013 #4 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Less toxic than salt. But water is toxic too, please eliminate that from your diet. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted September 29, 2013 #5 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Yea -- in the States there is "Lite" salt (a mix of potassium chloride and sodium chloride) while in Asia there is MSG (Glutamic acid and sodium chloride). Both are used to get the saltiness of salt with about half the sodium -- although in my opinion neither is really as good as full salt -- they both have a slightly metallic aftertaste, but some people prefer that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaptorBites Posted September 29, 2013 #6 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Dr. Brent Hunter: I am a Chiropractic physician with a focus on delivering the principles of a wellness lifestyle to people of all ages. So you take nutritional care advice from a chiropractor? What next? Your nuclear physics from your local mailman/woman? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted September 29, 2013 #7 Share Posted September 29, 2013 (edited) There are different MSGs. The ones in soy foods are naturally occurring, and don't cause ill affects. Then there's pure chemical msg. They are the ones that cause issues, and the ones being noted here. Know your MSGs before you blather on. Just sayin Edited September 29, 2013 by Simbi Laveau 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted September 29, 2013 #8 Share Posted September 29, 2013 (edited) The Japanese tend to cook with natural msg. the Chinese use the chemical kind. The chemical kind is also in most processed foods. Duh http://www.rense.com/general52/msg.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umami http://glutamate.com/naturally-occurring-msg/ Edited September 29, 2013 by Simbi Laveau 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted September 29, 2013 #9 Share Posted September 29, 2013 (edited) http://www.truthinlabeling.org/HowIsItManufactured.html Oh look, it's made with GMOs. Dddduuuhhhhhhh again ~~~~~ Today, the glutamic acid component of the food additive "monosodium glutamate" is generally made by bacterial or microbial fermentation wherein bacteria used are often, if not always, genetically engineered. In this method, bacteria are grown aerobically in a liquid nutrient medium. The bacteria have the ability to excrete glutamic acid they synthesize outside of their cell membrane into the liquid nutrient medium in which they are grown. The glutamic acid is then separated from the fermentation broth by filtration, concentration, acidification, and crystallization, and, through the addition of sodium, converted to its monosodium salt. Edited September 29, 2013 by Simbi Laveau 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obviousman Posted September 29, 2013 #10 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I'd be cautious of any dealings with a chiropractor: Chiropractor breaks baby's neck http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/call-for-age-limit-after-chiropractor-breaks-babys-neck-20130928-2ul6e.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david icke is right Posted September 29, 2013 #11 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Another pointless thread by bbv based off an article written by a dimwit for dimwits. I had some acquaintances who swore that they had averse affects from MSG until they learned that their favorite organic soy was rich in MSG. Their symptoms magically vanished with education. No more doofus threads please. I say more doofus threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafterman Posted September 29, 2013 #12 Share Posted September 29, 2013 There are different MSGs. The ones in soy foods are naturally occurring, and don't cause ill affects. Then there's pure chemical msg. They are the ones that cause issues, and the ones being noted here. Know your MSGs before you blather on. Just sayin Can you post some sources on this because I think you're confusing MSG with naturally occurring glutamates. MSG doesn't naturally occur in anything. MSG is a food additive that is man-made through a various natural processes. The most common of which is through fermentation - much like yogurt. It has been used for more than a century and, like anything, is only harmful in doses many times higher than typical consumption levels. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 29, 2013 #13 Share Posted September 29, 2013 There are different MSGs. The ones in soy foods are naturally occurring, and don't cause ill affects. Then there's pure chemical msg. They are the ones that cause issues, and the ones being noted here. Know your MSGs before you blather on. Just sayin Are you trying to tell us that MSG is a set of chemicals? It's a single chemical, not a family. Please know this before you blather on. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 29, 2013 #14 Share Posted September 29, 2013 The Japanese tend to cook with natural msg. the Chinese use the chemical kind. The chemical kind is also in most processed foods. Duh http://www.rense.com/general52/msg.htm https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umami http://glutamate.com...-occurring-msg/ There are people that have the wacko idea that a chemical produced in nature is different than a chemical produced in the lab. That is the nonsense my acquaintances were under. A chemical is a chemical. You should know that, or maybe you need to learn that. What kiddy wrote that rense article? The wiki article points out the absurdity of the claims in the rense kiddy article. The third article was pointless. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 29, 2013 #15 Share Posted September 29, 2013 (edited) http://www.truthinla...nufactured.html Oh look, it's made with GMOs. Dddduuuhhhhhhh again ~~~~~ Today, the glutamic acid component of the food additive "monosodium glutamate" is generally made by bacterial or microbial fermentation wherein bacteria used are often, if not always, genetically engineered. In this method, bacteria are grown aerobically in a liquid nutrient medium. The bacteria have the ability to excrete glutamic acid they synthesize outside of their cell membrane into the liquid nutrient medium in which they are grown. The glutamic acid is then separated from the fermentation broth by filtration, concentration, acidification, and crystallization, and, through the addition of sodium, converted to its monosodium salt. Thanks for showing us that you are doing nothing but fear mongering and ascribing to the wacko notion that there is something different about chemicals made by nature and those made in the lab. A chemical is a chemical. About all you've showed is that if very high levels are given to rats at a very young age there are developmental problems for the rats. We also know that is salts are given in very high levels to avians at a young age it actually alters the physical structure of the intestine. There are biological responses to high levels of anything. Keep saying Dddduuuhhhhhhh. It suggests a low brow below average post. Edited September 29, 2013 by stereologist 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted September 29, 2013 #16 Share Posted September 29, 2013 The Japanese tend to cook with natural msg. the Chinese use the chemical kind. The chemical kind is also in most processed foods. Duh "Chemical kind"? As compared to what? You really don't know what a chemical is. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipsy_munchkin Posted September 29, 2013 #17 Share Posted September 29, 2013 There are people that have the wacko idea that a chemical produced in nature is different than a chemical produced in the lab. That is the nonsense my acquaintances were under. A chemical is a chemical. You should know that, or maybe you need to learn that. What kiddy wrote that rense article? The wiki article points out the absurdity of the claims in the rense kiddy article. The third article was pointless. I also never understood why some people equate naturally occurring with safer. Nature is full of stuff that is dangerous for us to consume. The idea that there is an older or more 'natural' way that is healthier is not in evidence when we look at modern health and life expectancy compared to those factors in history. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badeskov Posted September 29, 2013 #18 Share Posted September 29, 2013 I also never understood why some people equate naturally occurring with safer. Nature is full of stuff that is dangerous for us to consume. The idea that there is an older or more 'natural' way that is healthier is not in evidence when we look at modern health and life expectancy compared to those factors in history. Never understood this one either. But to quote stereologist in post #2: Another pointless thread by bbv based off an article written by a dimwit for dimwits. <snip> Pretty much spot on. Cheers, Badeskov 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DONTEATUS Posted September 29, 2013 #19 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Another pointless thread by bbv based off an article written by a dimwit for dimwits. I had some acquaintances who swore that they had averse affects from MSG until they learned that their favorite organic soy was rich in MSG. Their symptoms magically vanished with education. No more doofus threads please. Thats So true But one has to admit some of the caption quotes are Funny ! "dimwit ,doofus", Classic`s All Keep -em-coming ! MSG GMO`s ASAP`s sounds like an All American Meal ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 29, 2013 #20 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Thats So true But one has to admit some of the caption quotes are Funny !"dimwit ,doofus", Classic`s All Keep -em-coming ! MSG GMO`s ASAP`s sounds like an All American Meal ? This isn't the first thread of this low brow nature that has recently been posted. The only mystery here is why anyone would think that the original article was in any way logically sound or evidence based. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DecoNoir Posted September 29, 2013 #21 Share Posted September 29, 2013 This isn't the first thread of this low brow nature that has recently been posted. The only mystery here is why anyone would think that the original article was in any way logically sound or evidence based. An equally perplexing mystery is how long they shall continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted September 29, 2013 #22 Share Posted September 29, 2013 One of the things that people do believe is that there is something fundamentally different about a so-called nature chemical and that which is a manufactured chemical. It sounds appealing to some people that a chemical has a non-human origin. There can be differences in chemicals having the same chemical formula, but a different structure. They are isomers. But if two chemicals have the same structure they have the same properties. To those that think there must be a difference there is a simple test. Provide someone a number of samples and let them determine which has a natural source and which does not. Essentially that's what happened with the soy sauce. There was a realization that they could not determine if the soy was organic or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted September 29, 2013 #23 Share Posted September 29, 2013 Can you post some sources on this because I think you're confusing MSG with naturally occurring glutamates. MSG doesn't naturally occur in anything. MSG is a food additive that is man-made through a various natural processes. The most common of which is through fermentation - much like yogurt. It has been used for more than a century and, like anything, is only harmful in doses many times higher than typical consumption levels. I'm not confused at all. I lived in Japan, and when you cook with it, on the recipe it's called ajinmoto. It's natural msg. It can be extracted from various things, and it's sold this way, and called ajinmoto . The msg in the USA and China are pure chemical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted September 29, 2013 #24 Share Posted September 29, 2013 "Chemical kind"? As compared to what? You really don't know what a chemical is. And your comprehensive skills are rather below par if you cannot grasp the kind made in factories in the USA, are pure ARTIFICAL chemical compounds , and the kind found in food are naturally occurring. Similar to natural arsenic and fluoride. Not the **** the USDA and big pharm adds to our food 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Voodoo Posted September 29, 2013 Author #25 Share Posted September 29, 2013 And your comprehensive skills are rather below par if you cannot grasp the kind made in factories in the USA, are pure ARTIFICAL chemical compounds , and the kind found in food are naturally occurring. Similar to natural arsenic and fluoride. Not the **** the USDA and big pharm adds to our food 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now