Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Default Wouldn’t Be That Bad


questionmark

Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON — Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina, a reliable friend of business on Capitol Hill and no one’s idea of a bomb thrower, isn’t buying the apocalyptic warnings that a default on United States government debt would lead to a global economic cataclysm.

“We always have enough money to pay our debt service,” said Mr. Burr, who pointed to a stream of tax revenue flowing into the Treasury as he shrugged off fears of a cascading financial crisis. “You’ve had the federal government out of work for close to two weeks; that’s about $24 billion a month. Every month, you have enough saved in salaries alone that you’re covering three-fifths, four-fifths of the total debt service, about $35 billion a month. That’s manageable for some time.”

As President Obama steps up his declarations about the dire consequences of not raising the debt limit, increasing numbers of Congressional Republicans are disputing that forecast, as well as the timing of when the Treasury might run out of money and the implications of a default, further complicating the negotiating situation for both Mr. Obama and Speaker John A. Boehner, who must find a way out of the impasse.

Read more

Well guys, be careful what you wish for: you could get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Well guys, be careful what you wish for: you could get it.

They know which side the bread is buttered on. When the real crunch comes they will listen to their masters and make a deal. 'Til then I'm happy to see Obama be stiff armed for a change.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've often wondered that myself. So what if we default? We're still the strongest economy in the world with the largest military to back it up - not much anyone can do about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've often wondered that myself. So what if we default? We're still the strongest economy in the world with the largest military to back it up - not much anyone can do about it.

Wishful thinking. The military would have to be cut down by at least 50% (that is how much of it is paid by debts), the dollar would go straight to hell and gas will cost $20 at the pump.

I don't think that anybody would want to do anything to the US except what is done to all who default on their debt, don't give em anything unless they put money on the table. And what everybody will consider money is certainly not US dollars.

If we default we can kiss our way of life goodbye. Think 1920s and 30s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wishful thinking. The military would have to be cut down by at least 50% (that is how much of it is paid by debts), the dollar would go straight to hell and gas will cost $20 at the pump.

I don't think that anybody would want to do anything to the US except what is done to all who default on their debt, don't give em anything unless they put money on the table. And what everybody will consider money is certainly not US dollars.

If we default we can kiss our way of life goodbye. Think 1920s and 30s.

I'm not so sure about that given that those who hold are debt are as dependent upon us to pay it as we are dependent upon them to loan it.

Remember when the crash happened in 2008 and consumer spending plummeted? China practically went into panic mode because if we're not buying, they're not able to sustain their lopsided system.

Besides, even if there was default, it's not like it wouldn't get paid eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure about that given that those who hold are debt are as dependent upon us to pay it as we are dependent upon them to loan it.

Remember when the crash happened in 2008 and consumer spending plummeted? China practically went into panic mode because if we're not buying, they're not able to sustain their lopsided system.

Besides, even if there was default, it's not like it wouldn't get paid eventually.

Well, not this time, China's government has changed and they are now more interested in developing the country inwards than outwards ('cause if they don't do something soon they will have a new revolution on their hands). Don't expect them to lend more (in fact they are not already). Except for the Japanese and the Saudis every country has shortened its holdings in US bonds, mostly because at a yield of one point something you might as well keep the money under the pillow, safer and your loss of total risk is near 0.

So what remains is that the Fed revolving door system will have to increase: The Fed prints money, lends it for less than 1% and the banks buy debt bonds with 1.5%. They can live quite well from that half percent.

As long as the greenback is the reserve currency that will work for quite a while yet. It will not be as soon as the US defaults. Nobody will want to touch dollars with a ten foot pole. And then it will be evident that the emperor gots no clothes.

The rest, well have a look what happened to Argentina when they defaulted in 2005, same story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They know which side the bread is buttered on. When the real crunch comes they will listen to their masters and make a deal. 'Til then I'm happy to see Obama be stiff armed for a change.

It's not just China and Japan. The entire world economy is at stake.

China and Japan will do whatever it takes to push Obama to the compromise table with Speaker John Boehner.

The Boehner Compromise is reasonable. Obama will sign on the bottom line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the solution is to print more money, I'd rather see default.

Will end in the same, they will have to print faster with default because the dollar will loose value fast, and. as the whole economy is dependent on imports to even give a semblance of functioning, inflation will skyrocket.

They should have stopped printing money 12 years ago. But then it was more important to give supporter a tax break.

Edited by questionmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the solution is to print more money, I'd rather see default.

Positive Effect: China has stopped buying more T-Notes.

QE-Infinity has discouraged the Chinese from investing in more T-Notes that are losing value fast.

It's our own version of : Currency Manipulation :yes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positive Effect: China has stopped buying more T-Notes.

QE-Infinity has discouraged the Chinese from investing in more T-Notes that are losing value fast.

It's our own version of : Currency Manipulation :yes:

Which is another reason why the Chinese have no influence in the White House (or anywhere else except with the companies manufacturing there).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well guys, be careful what you wish for: you could get it.

he posts here as cyberken

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If the solution is to print more money, I'd rather see default.

Of course, because Mitt Romney isn't President and we're not spending a trillion dollars on Iran right now. I'd rather have seen default 10 years ago. We'd be well on our way to an actual recovery right now. Would I care that a bunch of greasy democrats playing politics stick the mud on the republicans for it? No, because politics doesn't determine right from wrong, and as a bonus, for once in my life I'd be able to say that the republicans did the right thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cutting the military in half would lower prices military pays for the stuff it needs. So instead of paying $600 for a Halliburton toilet seat lid, it might only cost $50. A hammer that costs $90 might only cost $10 when the military starts shopping at Walmart instead of trying to maximize the cost of everything with Cost-Plus accounting scams run by the Pentagon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The US defaulting will cause havoc - "do you have food for two weeks to a month" level havoc - around the globe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The US defaulting will cause havoc - "do you have food for two weeks to a month" level havoc - around the globe.

Most of the globe has been preparing for that eventuality since the Lehman collapse. It will be disruptive but will hardly cause havoc except in those countries nearly 100% dependent on trade with the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.