Big Bad Voodoo Posted October 12, 2013 #1 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) "I am aware that this is against the girls' wishes but that that it is not the only factor," the judge said. http://www.theguardi...ne-against-will Edited October 12, 2013 by Big Bad Voodoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simbi Laveau Posted October 12, 2013 #2 Share Posted October 12, 2013 That's like not letting a rape victim have an abortion. It's not his body 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Bad Voodoo Posted October 12, 2013 Author #3 Share Posted October 12, 2013 That's like not letting a rape victim have an abortion. It's not his body Its state property. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setton Posted October 13, 2013 #4 Share Posted October 13, 2013 That's like not letting a rape victim have an abortion. It's not his body No. It isn't. It's preventing parents from putting children at unnecessary risk. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now