Waspie_Dwarf Posted January 14, 2014 #1 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Few asteroids are worth mining, suggests Harvard study A new study might contain some bad news for companies hoping to mine asteroids for their valuable ores.In the last couple of years, start-ups - including one backed by Sir Richard Branson - have announced plans to extract resources from space rocks. But calculations by Dr Martin Elvis suggest our cosmic neighbourhood might not be such a treasure trove after all. The Harvard astrophysicist argues just 10 near-Earth asteroids might be suitable for commercial-scale mining. Read more... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DieChecker Posted January 14, 2014 #2 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Crud. That was a major point in actually sending people and robot-ships out to explore. That they would be pioneering the way for resource gathering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grandpa Greenman Posted January 14, 2014 #3 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I sent the eleven your old across the street their job application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sundew Posted January 14, 2014 #4 Share Posted January 14, 2014 As my late father might have said: "Too much sugar for a dime." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted January 14, 2014 #5 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Outer solar system asteroids are another matter and centuries if not further in the future, and they will be mined for water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paperdyer Posted January 15, 2014 #6 Share Posted January 15, 2014 We can't let spacecraft re-enter the atmosphere with fuel still in them and we are going to be able to bring fuel chemicals through re-entry????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Merton Posted January 15, 2014 #7 Share Posted January 15, 2014 We can't let spacecraft re-enter the atmosphere with fuel still in them and we are going to be able to bring fuel chemicals through re-entry????? Slight difference between uncontrolled crash and controlled landing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassai26 Posted January 17, 2014 #8 Share Posted January 17, 2014 If they can why not?better find alternatives to lessen our consumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socio Posted January 17, 2014 #9 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Crud. That was a major point in actually sending people and robot-ships out to explore. That they would be pioneering the way for resource gathering. I was thinking the Moon would be the best place to start extraterrestrial resource gathering but as luck would have it some environmental groups are already against it, saying due to the moons gravity any mining would cause vast amounts of dust to float up and not settle back down to the ground polluting the moon and rendering it visually unpleasing from the Earth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now