Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

450,000-year-old cemetery


Harambasha

Recommended Posts

 

450,000? Methinks someone added a couple extra zero's...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

450, 000 years old? That'll be interesting as it pre-dates modern man by about 250,000 years! :lol:

I had a quick google on this story, it seems there is one main source but many other links all state the same 450,000 date so its a mass produced error. One sentence from the OP says

“The antiques found in the area also included a jar dating back 5,000 years"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Wikipedia:

Homo heidelbergensis — sometimes called Homo rhodesiensis — is an extinct species of the genus Homo which lived in Africa, Europe and western Asia from at least 600,000 years ago, and may date back 1,300,000 years. It survived until about 200,000 to 250,000 years ago. Its brain was nearly as large as that of a modern Homo sapiens. It is very likely the direct ancestor of Homo sapiens (in Africa) and the Neanderthals (in Europe), and perhaps also the Denisovans (in Central Asia). First discovered near Heidelberg in Germany in 1907, it was described and named by Otto Schoetensack.

So, not impossible. But a misprint seems more likely.

Edited by PersonFromPorlock
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Wikipedia:

Homo heidelbergensis — sometimes called Homo rhodesiensis — is an extinct species of the genus Homo which lived in Africa, Europe and western Asia from at least 600,000 years ago, and may date back 1,300,000 years. It survived until about 200,000 to 250,000 years ago. Its brain was nearly as large as that of a modern Homo sapiens. It is very likely the direct ancestor of Homo sapiens (in Africa) and the Neanderthals (in Europe), and perhaps also the Denisovans (in Central Asia). First discovered near Heidelberg in Germany in 1907, it was described and named by Otto Schoetensack.

So, not impossible. But a misprint seems more likely.

It's not possible and it's clearly a misprint, as pointed out by seeder the article mentions a jar dating back 5,000 years. I hope you don't believe Homo heidelbergensis was still around 5,000 years ago... ^_^

Edited by Pax Unum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4,500-5000 seems more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.