Collecting information.

[qxcontinuum]

Or some energetic beings.

[JesseCuster]

Or some energetic beings.

That's a non-sequitur.

What do "energetic beings" have to do with cattle mutilations, infected cow hearts, raised or lowered minerals in the cows, etc.? You know, the stuff you posted above that people are asking you to explain the relevance of and what it has to do with aliens?

[Space Commander Travis]

Or some energetic beings.

Do you mean energetic as in composed of energy, or energetic as in lively?

[scowl]

so?

Exactly! This is just random data that has no pattern therefore it has no meaning. What does the absence of copper in a cow's heart really mean? They don't tell you that it doesn't mean anything, but you don't know that so you assume they're saying an alien somehow yanked out all of the copper molecules that may or may not exist in a normal cow's heart.

This is standard practice for UFOlogy these days: give a series of data points without any point of reference to understand them, then let the believers assume they're something extraordinary.

[qxcontinuum]

Do you mean energetic as in composed of energy, or energetic as in lively?

some of the ideas exposed in the following book were mine;

http://translate.goo...w=1916&bih=1251

yes there are energetic beings mastering universal physics highly evolved capable of converting energy into matter including capable of transferring their intellectual capacity into ether and reversal.

Edited February 14, 2014 by qxcontinuum

[scowl]

yes there are energetic beings mastering universal physics highly evolved capable of converting energy into matter including capable of transferring their intellectual capacity into ether and reversal.

I just was about to ask you if there are beings who have mastered universal physics and evolved so highly that they could convert energy into matter but then I realized how silly that question is.

[qxcontinuum]

[JesseCuster]

some of the ideas exposed in the following book were mine;

Cool. Are you properly cited as being the author of some of the ideas there? Were you interviewed for this book or was other material of yours used as source material?

Which ideas were yours?

The idea that 9/11 is the start of a New World War?

That the events of Revelations will happen between 2055 and 2113?

That for a period of 110 years during these events underground cities will be built in the USA and there will be genetic experiments done there?

Seriously, that's a book? It's like 30 pages of material. Was it ever actually published in a printer form or as an ebook or is it just a long blog post as it appears to be? There isn't (as far as I can tell) a single citation or reference given in the text and no appendix of sources. Other than vague references in text to religious scripture not anything is backed up by outside sources. Calling it a book is elevating it to a level it clearly doesn't deserve. But if you think Bob Lazar is a senior research scientist with awesome credentials, then this probably qualifies as scientific literature to you.

What does it have to do with what you are being asked about? Animal mutilations are mentioned casually once. No reference to infected cow hearts, lowered mineral levels in mutilated cattle, blood loss, etc. So could you please explain why you posted that information and what people were supposed to conclude from it?

This seems to be modus operandi for you. Make wild claims and when asked on them or asked to prove them or being shown them proven wrong, you just launch the thread into a derail and hope nobody notices you've been caught out.

yes there are energetic beings mastering universal physics highly evolved capable of converting energy into matter including capable of transferring their intellectual capacity into ether and reversal.

The problem with this idea is that you made it up. Your posts seem to com in 2 forms:

1. Posts based upon a photo or other piece of evidence that you naively misinterpret and lecture others as to the science behind them and declare your own interpretation of it (that isn't a meteorite because meteorites aren't sharped edged as they are rounded out by the atmosphere (despite you being shown hard evidence that your claim is patently false), that's a bunch of rounded domed objects and not a crater cluster on Mars, that's worm shaped bits of minerals sticking out of a Martian rock and not bits of rock highlighted by the sun as obviously to anyone else, etc.)

2. Fantastic stuff like the above that you just declare true without even the vaguest attempt at justifying.