Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Still Waters

4.4 Billion Year Old Piece of Earth's Crust

13 posts in this topic

Ever heard this life advice? When solving a big problem seems impossible, break it into smaller steps.

Well, scientists just took one of geology's biggest controversies and shrunk it down to atomic size. By zapping single atoms of lead in a tiny zircon crystal from Australia, researchers have confirmed the crystal is the oldest rock fragment ever found on Earth 4.375 billion years old, plus or minus 6 million years.

http://www.foxnews.c...lion-years-old/

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that pretty much proves there was liquid water 4.3 billion years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but unless you were there to see the rocks form, you can't know how old they are.

- Ken Ham

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is.

They're actually not inaccurate. That's why we use them.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless, if that image is the same type of rock, it's beautiful. Just goes to show that with age, there's beauty.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is.

Please explain?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This article says a collision. A while ago an article here theorized the Earth stole the Moon from Venus. I feel like Vinnie Barbarino "I'm so confused!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are not alone.Ever Tom Dick and Harry that says they know what happen a billion years ago are confused too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, but unless you were there to see the rocks form, you can't know how old they are.

- Ken Ham

Ken Ham is an embarrassment to Australia

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is.

if every geologist in the world slammed their head into a desk upon seeing this post, it would cause a minor seismic event. fact.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ken Ham is an embarrassment to Australia

And that is being very kind.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen the instruments used for this, in the basement at Geoscience Australia in Canberra. There are several around the world.

http://www.ga.gov.au/about-us/our-facilities/laboratories/geochronology-facilities.html

Zircons dated in 2000 or 2001.

http://www.geology.wisc.edu/zircon/Wilde2001Nature.pdf

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.